In a FEW WORDS? ;))
its a bit more complex and difficult to explain in just a few words since the CONTEXT of this entire anomaly is important to fully integrate if you truly want to understand it.
I suspect you haven't seen my videos which give the best explanation and deeper understanding of this entire issue
ah yes, the MATRIX
one of the key concepts involved in my writings, videos and EVERYTHING for that matter
;)
Quoting: MatrixLNIN11 I have watched the first video.
There are some errors in it, but still you may be on to something interesting, most notably the line drawing.
A sceptic will call BS, and from a scientific viewpoint it is. But there is more than science can explain.
On the errors:
- the first period is 189 days (2/27/10 - 4/9/10).
- the probability calculus (the odds) is not very convincing.
I have found many interesting things that confirm that we live in a virtual reality, but my research is focused on things that are more easy to explain. My research shows that history is a script.
a) YES, most skeptics will call bs, but those calling bs, ignore evidence I've presented against their objections that shows why its not the bs they claim or would like people to believe. The cycle and evidence shows this anomaly if you want to call it that, goes far beyond mere coincidence.
b) 188 is the KEY number sequence connected to the cycle, ley lines and sacred geometry as I'll be explaining in my 4th video (which I'm tying to and almost finished as we speak) and varies within about
+/- 1 day no more than 3 days as the CENTRAL HUB figure or FRAME OF REFERENCE which has a margin of variation due to Timezone and Leap Years etc.
So 188.4 is closer to the REAL number if you want to get technical. I and most only use 188 as the primary frame of reference to avoid all the mathematical technicalities/logistics that in the bigger picture for all intents and purposes, is irrelevant to its significance imo.
c) the probability calculation as I've said before, wasn't MINE... which is why I said that NUMBER has been calculated... BY OTHERS... and there are several that put forth their calculations that came up with a similar number... so if their calculations are wrong, I've invited others to show why and how. So far I've seen no argument against what they've reached, so until there is I've left it up.
d) Yes, you could say history is a script if our reality is an ILLUSION ;))
