OSAMA BIN LADEN did NOT do 9/11. Here's his denial right after 9/11... | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/29/2012 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/29/2012 10:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22698252 United States 08/29/2012 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/29/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14110447 United States 08/29/2012 10:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/29/2012 10:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Marmaduke User ID: 4093180 United Kingdom 08/29/2012 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19766215 United States 08/29/2012 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/29/2012 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Absolutely correct. He was only wanted by the FBI for the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. When asked why Bin Laden wasn't wanted for 9/11, the FBI spokesperson said it was because there was no evidence linking him to 9/11. Fancy that. Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders. |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/30/2012 01:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 08/30/2012 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 09/03/2012 09:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17713280 Canada 09/03/2012 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 09/03/2012 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess so, because I linked to the article from the newspaper that quotes bin Laden adamantly saying he had nothing to do with 9/11, and further suggests that it was orchestrated from within the U.S., and my post hasn't been pinned. This should be THE NEWS of the DECADE!!!!!!! This article should be shouted from the rooftops! Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8520253 New Zealand 09/03/2012 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vandetta7 User ID: 23144118 Germany 09/03/2012 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 09/03/2012 11:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 09/04/2012 12:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Prickbuster User ID: 21388810 United States 09/04/2012 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Absolutely correct. He was only wanted by the FBI for the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. When asked why Bin Laden wasn't wanted for 9/11, the FBI spokesperson said it was because there was no evidence linking him to 9/11. Fancy that. The Muckraker Report contacted FBI Headquarters on June 5, 2006 to learn why Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection to 9/11. They spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." You see the difference? Like all truthers, you omit a key piece of the truth in you answer above. There is a difference between evidence and hard evidence. Even with the tyranny of international terrorists, this country is still a nation of laws. Now wipe the milk off of your mouth and try again, prick. |
Thor's Hamster (OP) User ID: 1248699 United States 09/04/2012 12:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Absolutely correct. He was only wanted by the FBI for the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. When asked why Bin Laden wasn't wanted for 9/11, the FBI spokesperson said it was because there was no evidence linking him to 9/11. Fancy that. The Muckraker Report contacted FBI Headquarters on June 5, 2006 to learn why Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection to 9/11. They spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." You see the difference? Like all truthers, you omit a key piece of the truth in you answer above. There is a difference between evidence and hard evidence. Even with the tyranny of international terrorists, this country is still a nation of laws. Now wipe the milk off of your mouth and try again, prick. You make my point, fool. Our Government and media tell us, "Osama bin Laden did it!" No ifs, ands, or buts about it. We wage wars around the world, we curtail liberties in America, we expand the federal government to unsustainable levels, we spend up the wazoo sinking us further into insurmountable debt. You see, that's the dangerous thing about lying to the American people. The Government uses our blood, money, and resources to go after someone that there is NO HARD EVIDENCE FOR!!!!!! The FBI is honest and says there's no hard evidence. And actually, you absolute tool, evidence is like being pregnant. Either there IS evidence, or there ISN'T. You absolute jackass. Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders. |
Prickbuster User ID: 23151420 United States 09/04/2012 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22985647 Australia 09/04/2012 01:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Absolutely correct. He was only wanted by the FBI for the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. When asked why Bin Laden wasn't wanted for 9/11, the FBI spokesperson said it was because there was no evidence linking him to 9/11. Fancy that. The Muckraker Report contacted FBI Headquarters on June 5, 2006 to learn why Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection to 9/11. They spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." You see the difference? Like all truthers, you omit a key piece of the truth in you answer above. There is a difference between evidence and hard evidence. Even with the tyranny of international terrorists, this country is still a nation of laws. Now wipe the milk off of your mouth and try again, prick. So refresh us on any evidence that the FBI has |
Prickbuster User ID: 21529402 United States 09/04/2012 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Absolutely correct. He was only wanted by the FBI for the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. When asked why Bin Laden wasn't wanted for 9/11, the FBI spokesperson said it was because there was no evidence linking him to 9/11. Fancy that. The Muckraker Report contacted FBI Headquarters on June 5, 2006 to learn why Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection to 9/11. They spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." You see the difference? Like all truthers, you omit a key piece of the truth in you answer above. There is a difference between evidence and hard evidence. Even with the tyranny of international terrorists, this country is still a nation of laws. Now wipe the milk off of your mouth and try again, prick. So refresh us on any evidence that the FBI has You guys are obviously new at this. [link to www.pbs.org] Now perhaps Thor's peen can explain why he chose to omit the word "hard" from his statement. |
Vandetta7 User ID: 23144118 Germany 09/04/2012 07:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23157396 United Kingdom 09/04/2012 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | also, why did they attack iraq as a response to the 9/11 incident?? did you get duped (again)?? how does it feel to be the fool? |