Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,730 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 528,296
Pageviews Today: 741,421Threads Today: 181Posts Today: 3,850
08:21 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22874240
India
08/30/2012 09:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
WTF????

Two photos of Apollo show the Lander in different angles, one front and one almost from back, but the hills in the background remain unchanged. WTF???

Okay for all those 'Mountains look the same from different distances' shills, I can understand that, but not if you rotate the camera angle.
Once the lander lands, nobody rotates it anymore do they?
So how did the lander get rotated?
Check it out!
>>
First photo in the link:
[link to www.aulis.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 22874240
India
08/30/2012 09:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Here's an index of other photographic studies from this awesome site:
[link to www.aulis.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22873106
United Kingdom
08/30/2012 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Dont you ever tire of reading this sort of bullshit??
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 22874240
India
08/30/2012 09:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
The amazing CROSSHAIRS WITH A SHADOW!!!

Crosshairs have shadows? According to NASA , they do ! Lol.

Zoom in close to the top-left of this NASA official image.
One crosshair with shadow is at 2-o-clock position to the small dish , and travel west horizontally to locate the other cross hair to left of dish:
>>
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

WTFF??*

Note: That translates as "what the fuck fuck??"
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 22874240
India
08/30/2012 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Dont you ever tire of reading this sort of bullshit??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22873106


Dude!! They is fecking with our tiny brains, and you don't care? WTFF?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22263509
08/30/2012 10:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Dont you ever tire of reading this sort of bullshit??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22873106


Do you ever get tired of reading the official 9/11 Commission Report? How about the Warren Report??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 10:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
WTF????

Two photos of Apollo show the Lander in different angles, one front and one almost from back, but the hills in the background remain unchanged. WTF???

Okay for all those 'Mountains look the same from different distances' shills, I can understand that, but not if you rotate the camera angle.
Once the lander lands, nobody rotates it anymore do they?
So how did the lander get rotated?
Check it out!
>>
First photo in the link:
[link to www.aulis.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22874240


Jack White who made those "studies" on Aulis didn't understand perspective or even which side of the LM was the front. That doesn't mean you have to be just like him. The mountains are distant. They don't move much even whn objects in the foreground appear to move quite a bit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
The amazing CROSSHAIRS WITH A SHADOW!!!

Crosshairs have shadows? According to NASA , they do ! Lol.

Zoom in close to the top-left of this NASA official image.
One crosshair with shadow is at 2-o-clock position to the small dish , and travel west horizontally to locate the other cross hair to left of dish:
>>
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

WTFF??*

Note: That translates as "what the fuck fuck??"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22874240


internal lens relfection. notice how it only happens right around the bright light of the Sun?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22682349
United Kingdom
08/30/2012 10:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Dont you ever tire of reading this sort of bullshit??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22873106


Never: strangely enough it's not "bullshit".
stoner
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22879841
08/30/2012 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Lol. Jack White does not understand perspectove?
You got to be kidding me.
Jack White does not know the front end of a lander?
ROFL!

Oh those are lens shadows below the crosshairs?
Right.

Wait!! Why is that perfect shot of the lander facing the sun directly
not showing the lander in daek silhouette?

We are stupid?
UndercoverAlien

User ID: 22490618
Brazil
08/30/2012 11:10 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
WTF????

Two photos of Apollo show the Lander in different angles, one front and one almost from back, but the hills in the background remain unchanged. WTF???

Okay for all those 'Mountains look the same from different distances' shills, I can understand that, but not if you rotate the camera angle.
Once the lander lands, nobody rotates it anymore do they?
So how did the lander get rotated?
Check it out!
>>
First photo in the link:
[link to www.aulis.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22874240


bumpbumpbumpbumpbumpbump

That's a bummer!!! If Stanley Kubrick had quadcore computers running 3D CGI programs in the '60s, this wouldn't have happened!

cruise
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22880729
India
08/30/2012 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
The amazing CROSSHAIRS WITH A SHADOW!!!

Crosshairs have shadows? According to NASA , they do ! Lol.

Zoom in close to the top-left of this NASA official image.
One crosshair with shadow is at 2-o-clock position to the small dish , and travel west horizontally to locate the other cross hair to left of dish:
>>
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

WTFF??*

Note: That translates as "what the fuck fuck??"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22874240


internal lens relfection. notice how it only happens right around the bright light of the Sun?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14143765


Pretty amazing how the "internal reflections" dont show up on many other photographs?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22882391
India
08/30/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Lots of other photos taken into the "sun" that do not show internal reflections.
Too Lazy To Log In.
User ID: 4928432
United States
08/30/2012 11:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
I am starting to not give a fuck about the moon landings.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 01:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Lol. Jack White does not understand perspectove?
You got to be kidding me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22879841

No he didn't(he's not with us anymore). Many of his "studies" make that quite clear.


Jack White does not know the front end of a lander?
ROFL!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22879841

No he didn't. He has other "studies" where he continually misidnetified parts of the LM and confused left with right, front with back. He seemed proud of his ignorance and unwilling to learn. You're a lot like he was in that respect.

Oh those are lens shadows below the crosshairs?
Right.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22879841

Not lens shadows. Internal lens reflections of the crosshairs themselves. Again, notice how they show up around the bright light source and curl away from it. Perfectly consistent with an internal lens reflection. What other theory do you have?

Wait!! Why is that perfect shot of the lander facing the sun directly
not showing the lander in daek silhouette?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22879841

Why should it be? There is plenty of reflected light from the surface.

We are stupid?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22879841

Apparently.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 01:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
The amazing CROSSHAIRS WITH A SHADOW!!!

Crosshairs have shadows? According to NASA , they do ! Lol.

Zoom in close to the top-left of this NASA official image.
One crosshair with shadow is at 2-o-clock position to the small dish , and travel west horizontally to locate the other cross hair to left of dish:
>>
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

WTFF??*

Note: That translates as "what the fuck fuck??"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22874240


internal lens relfection. notice how it only happens right around the bright light of the Sun?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14143765


Pretty amazing how the "internal reflections" dont show up on many other photographs?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22880729


They show up on a few but there are only so many where they have the camera aimed just so at the sun.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 01:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Lots of other photos taken into the "sun" that do not show internal reflections.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22882391


Some do, some don't. The specific angle and brightness makes a difference. In this case the sun is mostly obscured behind the LM. In others you get lens flares first. Ask a photographer because you're obviously not one.

What is YOUR explanation for it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16712898
Netherlands
08/30/2012 01:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Check out Jay Weidners stuff on Kubrick and the moonlandings....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22886246
India
08/30/2012 01:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
AC65, I dont think you understand the physics of reflected light.
Most of the reflected light shown in the nasa pics are fake as hell. Will take me pages to explain it, but that is not the moon.
Those are not the lighting environment you will find on the moon.
Look at all the moon photos and you will see that it is studio loghting.
No matter how hard nasa tries to erase and doctor those archive fake pictures they still stand out as fake shit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22886246
India
08/30/2012 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Apparently nasa pays shills pretty well.
Do you work bythe hour or week?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 01:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
AC65, I dont think you understand the physics of reflected light.
Most of the reflected light shown in the nasa pics are fake as hell. Will take me pages to explain it, but that is not the moon.
Those are not the lighting environment you will find on the moon.
Look at all the moon photos and you will see that it is studio loghting.
No matter how hard nasa tries to erase and doctor those archive fake pictures they still stand out as fake shit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


Studio lighting with a single bright point source with a vanishing point far enough to be the Sun? What studio has 1/6 gravity, a vacuum, and is kilometers wide?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 01:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Apparently nasa pays shills pretty well.
Do you work bythe hour or week?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


Is it impossible in your world for someone to analyse the facts and come to a different conclusion than you? They all must be paid to oppose you? What a sad, paranoid life you must lead. I happen to currently be unemployed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22869236
Bulgaria
08/30/2012 01:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Busted!!!Oh Shit
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1600864
Canada
08/30/2012 01:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
The moon is not real. Don't fall for jewish trickery. I'm telling you. You will be kicking yourself later.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22886246
India
08/30/2012 01:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
AC65, I dont think you understand the physics of reflected light.
Most of the reflected light shown in the nasa pics are fake as hell. Will take me pages to explain it, but that is not the moon.
Those are not the lighting environment you will find on the moon.
Look at all the moon photos and you will see that it is studio loghting.
No matter how hard nasa tries to erase and doctor those archive fake pictures they still stand out as fake shit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


Studio lighting with a single bright point source with a vanishing point far enough to be the Sun? What studio has 1/6 gravity, a vacuum, and is kilometers wide?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14143765


Wow, dont tell me you dont understand perspective now?
Tell me this: on atwo dimensional canvas like a photograph, what difference does it make how far away the light source Is? Lol so nasa employs stupid shills?

You think 60's cinematography couldnt replicate one 6th gravity?
Have you seen any of Kubricks movies?
The location is most likely a hangar or some kind of a huge studio. Really not difficult to film.

And since when can you recognize a vaccum in space?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22886246
India
08/30/2012 01:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Believe me Zionists are greedy but very stupid too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22886246
India
08/30/2012 02:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
I meant when can you recognize a vaccum in photographs.

Typing on an android sucks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
AC65, I dont think you understand the physics of reflected light.
Most of the reflected light shown in the nasa pics are fake as hell. Will take me pages to explain it, but that is not the moon.
Those are not the lighting environment you will find on the moon.
Look at all the moon photos and you will see that it is studio loghting.
No matter how hard nasa tries to erase and doctor those archive fake pictures they still stand out as fake shit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


Studio lighting with a single bright point source with a vanishing point far enough to be the Sun? What studio has 1/6 gravity, a vacuum, and is kilometers wide?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14143765


Wow, dont tell me you dont understand perspective now?
Tell me this: on atwo dimensional canvas like a photograph, what difference does it make how far away the light source Is?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


Apparently you don't understand it. Whether the scene is 2d or 3d you can analyse for a vanishing point on the shadows and determine the distance to the light source.

Lol so nasa employs stupid shills?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246

Why is it when hoaxers are losing an argument they bring out the "shill" accusation? Lack of creativity?

You think 60's cinematography couldnt replicate one 6th gravity?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246

Not convincingly. And definitely NOT on every item including tools and dust.

Have you seen any of Kubricks movies?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246

Yes, especially where he couldn't get a single scene filmed without some kind of mistake (like any other director in the world), where his shadows in his lunar scenes show evidence of multiple lights, where he didn't accurately simulate 1/6 gravity, where the dust when kicked up was obviously NOT in a vacuum (it clouded and suspended in the air)

The location is most likely a hangar or some kind of a huge studio. Really not difficult to film.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246

A hanger covering multiple square kilometers? With distant mountains that change ever so slightly based on perspective exactly as they should for being multiple miles away?

And since when can you recognize a vaccum in space?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


You can recognize it by its effects on the dust that is kicked up. In a vacuum it doesn't cloud and get suspended in the air. It falls at the same rate as everything else.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/30/2012 02:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
I meant when can you recognize a vaccum in photographs.

Typing on an android sucks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22886246


You think the only record is in photographs? The hours of unbroken video footage (during which you can match many of the pictures they took to specific times) don't count?
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
08/30/2012 02:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
Dont you ever tire of reading this sort of bullshit??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22873106


Dude!! They is fecking with our tiny brains, and you don't care? WTFF?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22874240


Yes, someone is.

If you can't understand Aulis, there is no use in attempting to educate you.

I mean...Aulis? You should be able to get through at least half of Jack's "Studies" with nothing but high school geometry.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15740069
United States
08/30/2012 02:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Moon Landing Anomalies: The Moving Hills on the Moon: Apollo 15 photos show rotating hills!!!
They are hiding something, but its not what you guys all think.


Look at apollo 20 to find the truth.

News