Outrage In Britan As Channel 4 Airs 'Untold' History Of Islam

By the common law the age at which minors were capable of marrying, known as the age of consent, was fixed at fourteen years for males and twelve years for females. Marriages under the age of seven years for both were void, but between seven and the age of consent the parties could contract an imperfect marriage, which was voidable but not necessarily void. The marriage of parties who had attained the age of consent was valid even though they lacked parental consent, until in England the marriage act of 1753 declared such marriages void. This act, however, has never been the law in the United States. In England under the statute of 32 Henry VIII, c.38, all marriages were made lawful between parties not within the Levitical degrees of relationship; this was interpreted to mean all marriages excepting those between relatives in the direct line and in the collateral line to the third degree, according to the rules of the Civil Law, including both the whole and the half blood. In the United States, in the absence of statutes to the contrary, marriages are unlawful only in the direct ascending and descending line of consanguinity and between brothers and sisters. In most, if not all, of the States, however, there are statutes covering this subject, and in a number of them marriages between first cousins are forbidden. Marriages that are made without formalities, but by the mere consent of the parties, are known as common law marriages. In order to make such marriages effective, there must be a present intention to make the contract and it must be expressed accordingly,(in other words, "per verba de praesenti". Words expressing a future intention do not give the necessary consent, but when words are used with the future intention apparently, followed by consummation, or, as it is said, "per verba de futuro cum copula', a marriage is constituted, the future promise having been converted by action into an actual marriage. Marriages contracted without conforming to a statutory regulations are valid in a number of states and not in others. Formal solemnization is unnecessary. Where no penalty for disobedience of statutory formalities is provided, their omission does not invalidate the marriage.

Prophet Mohammad was a filthy cock eating faggot!

By the common law the age at which minors were capable of marrying, known as the age of consent, was fixed at fourteen years for males and twelve years for females. Marriages under the age of seven years for both were void, but between seven and the age of consent the parties could contract an imperfect marriage, which was voidable but not necessarily void. The marriage of parties who had attained the age of consent was valid even though they lacked parental consent, until in England the marriage act of 1753 declared such marriages void. This act, however, has never been the law in the United States. In England under the statute of 32 Henry VIII, c.38, all marriages were made lawful between parties not within the Levitical degrees of relationship; this was interpreted to mean all marriages excepting those between relatives in the direct line and in the collateral line to the third degree, according to the rules of the Civil Law, including both the whole and the half blood. In the United States, in the absence of statutes to the contrary, marriages are unlawful only in the direct ascending and descending line of consanguinity and between brothers and sisters. In most, if not all, of the States, however, there are statutes covering this subject, and in a number of them marriages between first cousins are forbidden. Marriages that are made without formalities, but by the mere consent of the parties, are known as common law marriages. In order to make such marriages effective, there must be a present intention to make the contract and it must be expressed accordingly,(in other words, "per verba de praesenti". Words expressing a future intention do not give the necessary consent, but when words are used with the future intention apparently, followed by consummation, or, as it is said, "per verba de futuro cum copula', a marriage is constituted, the future promise having been converted by action into an actual marriage. Marriages contracted without conforming to a statutory regulations are valid in a number of states and not in others. Formal solemnization is unnecessary. Where no penalty for disobedience of statutory formalities is provided, their omission does not invalidate the marriage.

don't for get bath sheba was married before king solomon was born
First: Uriah the Hittite (a 'mighty man of valor.')(2 Samuel 11:3) and then King David (2 Samuel 11:27) it was costem then for girls to be married at three years and one day old

Christianity - 2 billion

Islam - 1.5 billion

Hinduism - 1 billion

Buddhism - 900 million

What is relevant is that he pretended to be a "prophet" and manipulated the ignorance and superstition of a lot of people.

seriously whats the difference between outrage and rage?

is it just another one of those meaningless words?

Muslims are just like Christians.
Both of them just take for granted
what their pastors or Imams say
as the truth, not checking to see
if the info they get is a lie.
They both are religious mind slaves.

Such a small mind.

To a large extent the pedophilia and other vile behavior of this Mohammed guy is not really relevant and should neither be the subject of attack or defense. What is relevant is that he pretended to be a "prophet" and manipulated the ignorance and superstition of a lot of people. The fact is that he is held up as some sort of ideal by ignorant people. The ignorance that leads to this kind of superstition molding peoples minds and the intractable stupidity it inculcates is much more of an issue. What we have is an illiterate guy who misunderstood some tracts of the bible and may have been in possession of knowledge derived writings that did not make it into the bible who went round portraying himself as a semi godlike figure for his own enrichment. I think that stands alone as condemnation of him, without reference to any peccadilloes he may have had.

Muslims are just like Christians.
Both of them just take for granted
what their pastors or Imams say
as the truth, not checking to see
if the info they get is a lie.
They both are religious mind slaves.