POLE SHIFT IS HERE. More Quake Activity Near The Poles! Magnitude 4.9 - Pacific-Antarctic Ridge | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23022014 09/03/2012 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have never heard anything so ridiculous in my life. Pacific Antarctic RIDGE, the RIDGE part should give it away, they are very common there. [link to neic.usgs.gov] Top part of that map shows earthquakes there since 1990. 1 star and suggested unpin. Just look at all the recent GLP threads for earthquakes in the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge within the last few years- seems common Also look at related threads down below |
| Six Six Six (OP) User ID: 3753361 09/03/2012 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have never heard anything so ridiculous in my life. Pacific Antarctic RIDGE, the RIDGE part should give it away, they are very common there. [link to neic.usgs.gov] Top part of that map shows earthquakes there since 1990. 1 star and suggested unpin. Just look at all the recent GLP threads for earthquakes in the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge within the last few years- seems common Also look at related threads down below Common?!?! Two of the threads are from 2005 ! 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How common is it when "related" threads are 7 years old? ![]() Biko |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4227554 09/03/2012 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When: Monday September 3 2012, 01:31:56 UTC Quoting: Six Six Six Where: Pacific-Antarctic Ridge (South Pole Area) Mag. = 4.9 Dep. = 10.1 km Source: USGS Feed [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] if my toilet tilt, is that considered a 6.4 magnitude earthquake? I guess so... everybody .... polar shift!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21053011 09/03/2012 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22821496 I have never heard anything so ridiculous in my life. Pacific Antarctic RIDGE, the RIDGE part should give it away, they are very common there. [link to neic.usgs.gov] Top part of that map shows earthquakes there since 1990. 1 star and suggested unpin. Just look at all the recent GLP threads for earthquakes in the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge within the last few years- seems common Also look at related threads down below Common?!?! Two of the threads are from 2005 ! 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How common is it when "related" threads are 7 years old? ![]() Did you look at the map? Did you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ? Here it is again for you, take a look, look at how common they are [link to neic.usgs.gov] |
| Six Six Six (OP) User ID: 3753361 09/03/2012 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When: Monday September 3 2012, 01:31:56 UTC Quoting: Six Six Six Where: Pacific-Antarctic Ridge (South Pole Area) Mag. = 4.9 Dep. = 10.1 km Source: USGS Feed [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] if my toilet tilt, is that considered a 6.4 magnitude earthquake? I guess so... everybody .... polar shift!! Welcome to the successful brainwashing program of the ruling elite. The more the people become desensitized to everything that is happening, the less they question anything being wrong. Which is by design. Have we actually reached a point where 5.0 range earthquakes are NOT a big deal. Do you have any idea the power behind something like that? Now people make jokes about POWER that shakes buildings. Can you shake buildings? NO. But, it's nothing, right? A Power beyond humans... is looked at as a joke? I see a pattern here. Humans are idiots. ![]() Biko |
| Six Six Six (OP) User ID: 3753361 09/03/2012 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23022014 Just look at all the recent GLP threads for earthquakes in the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge within the last few years- seems common Also look at related threads down below Common?!?! Two of the threads are from 2005 ! 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How common is it when "related" threads are 7 years old? ![]() Did you look at the map? Did you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ? Here it is again for you, take a look, look at how common they are [link to neic.usgs.gov] Your link and chart PROVES my point. It's a graph of quakes in that region since 1990. Those quakes shown are over a span of 20+ years! There were more quakes in the San Diego, CA area last week alone then in the Pacific Ridge in 20 years combined! I believe there have been more quakes in the Phillipines region in the last few days then the Pacific Ridge in 22 years. That is hardly a frequently hit zone, in comparison to Japan, New Zealand, California, Indonesia, etc. Come on now. Define "common"... and if that's a common zone... what do you call the Pacific Ring? Last Edited by Six Six Six on 09/03/2012 10:04 PM Biko |
| mikebo2 User ID: 18012248 09/03/2012 10:09 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The poles shift every now and then. The process takes 10's if not 100's to 1000's of years to actually flip. It's a slow process. Please let us know when we should expect this catastrophic doom to happen??????????????? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23022014 09/03/2012 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22821496 I have never heard anything so ridiculous in my life. Pacific Antarctic RIDGE, the RIDGE part should give it away, they are very common there. [link to neic.usgs.gov] Top part of that map shows earthquakes there since 1990. 1 star and suggested unpin. Just look at all the recent GLP threads for earthquakes in the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge within the last few years- seems common Also look at related threads down below Common?!?! Two of the threads are from 2005 ! 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How common is it when "related" threads are 7 years old? ![]() Yeah the OLDEST ones! What about 2010, 2011 and May of this year!? |
| Six Six Six (OP) User ID: 3753361 09/03/2012 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The poles shift every now and then. Quoting: mikebo2 The process takes 10's if not 100's to 1000's of years to actually flip. It's a slow process. Please let us know when we should expect this catastrophic doom to happen??????????????? If you listen to the video posted at the begining of this thread... It's explained how SCIENCE has proven for a fact... that pole shift and climate change is not only a real and factual thing but happens much more quickly then most people believe. They have found mammals and plants in artic evviornments FLASH FROZEN. That's not a gradule process. Ice core samples also confirm this. When these extreme plate movements happen, it changes the enviornment for the entire world instantly. Something that everyone will soon experience, so why bother explaining... when you can FEEL it yourself, soon enough. Biko |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20860814 09/03/2012 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Common?!?! Two of the threads are from 2005 ! 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How common is it when "related" threads are 7 years old? ![]() Did you look at the map? Did you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ? Here it is again for you, take a look, look at how common they are [link to neic.usgs.gov] Your link and chart PROVES my point. It's a graph of quakes in that region since 1990. Those quakes shown are over a span of 20+ years! There were more quakes in the San Diego, CA area last week alone then in the Pacific Ridge in 20 years combined! I believe there have been more quakes in the Phillipines region in the last few days then the Pacific Ridge in 22 years. That is hardly a frequently hit zone, in comparison to Japan, New Zealand, California, Indonesia, etc. Come on now. Define "common"... and if that's a common zone... what do you call the Pacific Ring? Are you being serious? there are over 200 quakes on that map, divide that into 20 years, the maths isn't hard. Look at the seismicity for this year alone, so far, I count 9, that would average what, 1 a month so far! Now you are comparing them to areas on The Ring Of Fire? you said they were extremely rare in that area. They are not. You are delusional. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23144869 09/03/2012 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The poles shift every now and then. Quoting: mikebo2 The process takes 10's if not 100's to 1000's of years to actually flip. It's a slow process. Please let us know when we should expect this catastrophic doom to happen??????????????? If you listen to the video posted at the begining of this thread... It's explained how SCIENCE has proven for a fact... that pole shift and climate change is not only a real and factual thing but happens much more quickly then most people believe. They have found mammals and plants in artic evviornments FLASH FROZEN. That's not a gradule process. Ice core samples also confirm this. When these extreme plate movements happen, it changes the enviornment for the entire world instantly. Something that everyone will soon experience, so why bother explaining... when you can FEEL it yourself, soon enough. How do you know this is going to happen soon? |
| mikebo2 User ID: 18012248 09/03/2012 10:47 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The poles shift every now and then. Quoting: mikebo2 The process takes 10's if not 100's to 1000's of years to actually flip. It's a slow process. Please let us know when we should expect this catastrophic doom to happen??????????????? If you listen to the video posted at the begining of this thread... It's explained how SCIENCE has proven for a fact... that pole shift and climate change is not only a real and factual thing but happens much more quickly then most people believe. They have found mammals and plants in artic evviornments FLASH FROZEN. That's not a gradule process. Ice core samples also confirm this. When these extreme plate movements happen, it changes the enviornment for the entire world instantly. Something that everyone will soon experience, so why bother explaining... when you can FEEL it yourself, soon enough. Good point "OP". I'll wait until it happens. Of course if that is the case then there is no point in telling anyone about it is there? |
| MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 21310346 09/04/2012 03:12 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | is there any reason to believe this pole shift will affect magnetic data stored on hard drives? Quoting: SteamrolledGobias I would like to protect all my data and backups so that if SHTF and mad people die, I can help rebuild society after the damage is done. Data will be scarce and torrent trackers will not be up & running if serious earth changes do come. My concern is not EQs but solar bursts. I dont honestly believe photons from the sun could scramble magnetic HDD data - but I'm no scientist either so I would love to hear other's opinions. in a geological pole shift, both are going to be a problem and a tectonic rearrangement with a crustal shift of 90º should be your first concern since it won't matter if you protected your data if you don't survive the latter event. lol |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22994400 09/04/2012 08:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| pstrusi User ID: 23365661 09/21/2012 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When: Monday September 3 2012, 01:31:56 UTC Quoting: Six Six Six Where: Pacific-Antarctic Ridge (South Pole Area) Mag. = 4.9 Dep. = 10.1 km Source: USGS Feed [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] Brett Miller has an interesting hypotheses, my only doubt, which is the core of his hypotheses is: how can be he sure that we're in the galactic plane, doing our 25.000 cycle? when there are a lot of scientists saying that we've in fact left the galactic plane millions of years...which is the right cycle? pstrusi |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24355840 09/24/2012 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |