Rob Schneider Speaks Out Against Vaccines And Tells It Like It Is!

You missed my point.
To put it simpler terms; think about when these kids get older and then get it. If they're post-pubescent boys there's a chance they could become sterile. It's a slim chance but not really being a gambling man, it's not one one I'd care to take. Not with someone else's body anyway...

Will he dare speak out Against the Jewish owned pharmaceutical companies pushing these Vaccines?

I'm betting no.

Yes! Nobody's business.

It seems mopar28m, having found herself in a thread where she cannot delete/ban and silence people who oppose, with facts, her anti-life kOOkery has done as all antivax liars do ... she's run away.

Still waiting genius.

Show that you actually know how to think scientifically. Show that you aren't the Zakk Tull of the antivax contingent.

What is the answer, oh great one?

Let the drooling commence...


R.

Merck vaccine scientist admits presence of SV40 and AIDS in vaccines - Dr. Maurice Hilleman

Watch the 10 min. video here:

[link to tv.naturalnews.com]

BTW - Now that I've got my medical advice from a 3rd rate comedian I've decided to get my astrophysics advice, concerning the Big Bang Theory, from that world reknown scientist Paris Hilton.

She may be as dumb as Schneider, but she is much easier on the eyes, so I prefer her.

Next up - Rosie O'Donnell and Oprah on the question, "Mass Quantities of Food: Good or Bad". I'm betting they vote "Good".

Do not ever accept anything you see on that site. It is twisted with disinfo.

You are making a completely invalid comparison. And anyone who reads the links can see why.

The 77% figure apparently applies only to one county in New Jersey, while the disease outbreak occurred in both New York and New Jersey. Further, the 96% vaccination figure applies only to New Jersey kindergarteners, and most of those infected weren't NJ kindergarteners. Many were adults.

You can't calculate probabilities like that! Trick question!

And on what authority do you have to direct me which sites I deem credible and valid. Are you suggesting that Mike Adams and his staff run a disinformation-filled website? Please state your evidence, because cited in all of his articles are his sources. Please identify a more comprehensive, credible, all-inclusive health-related website that I may be directed to, because I haven't found a better one yet?

And after all that truth he gets "RUBBED UP" at the end by a BLATANT shill... fml

“Natural News” – Truth or Spin? [link to www.herbs.org]

Is NaturalNews a reliable source?
Thread: Is NaturalNews a reliable source?

Mike (The Health Danger) Adams, is that you?
It sounds dumb enough to be you.

Yes, the 77% applies to New Jersey.
And as you noted the outbreak occurred in NY & NJ, but the 77% applies to NJ.

And the 96% vaccination rate also applies only to NJ.

You see Mikey, that's how we do it... we compare NJ morbidity data with NJ vaccination rate data.
That may make it a "trick question" to a moron such as you, but it is the only logical and valid way to make a comparison of data from NJ.

What would you like to compare?
Infection rates from NJ and vaccination rates from the black helicopter crowd in Idaho?

As to the "kindergarten" objection, etc. here:

[link to www2.cdc.gov]
Kindergarten
Mumps - 2007-2008
New Jersey 120,906 110,693 106,428 96.1%

[link to www2.cdc.gov]
Kindergarten
Mumps - 2006-2007
New Jersey 119,956 119,956 117,204 97.7%

[link to www2.cdc.gov]
Kindergarten
Mumps - 2005-2006
New Jersey 110,722 110,722 107,538 97.1%

[link to www2.cdc.gov]
Kindergarten
Mumps - 2004-2005
New Jersey 104,807 104,807 98,050 93.6%

That's 93, 98, 97, and 94% vaccination rate for mumps for NJ at the time of entry into Kindergarten.

Look at this:
[link to www2.cdc.gov]
note that nationally the vaccination rate stays pretty much the same between Kindergarten and 1st grade. It's NJ law.

So, genius, why don't you or one of the other nitwits with "science degrees" do the calculation for us?
You can pick any vaccination rate you'd like as long as it's reasonable: 93 - 98%.

It's a 9th grade algebra calculation so surely some of you geniuses can tell us if Mike, The Death Ranger, Adams is a genius or a complete ignoramus who more than likely failed every science and math class in high school but is now telling you how to manage your medical care.

You know, like all the twits here... busy-body morons in high school and now acting the same on the internet.

Give me the number, twit.

(I'll be out of town, probably, for the next few days; but I'll look in if available or if I get home for a few minutes.)


R.

Government says cervical cancer jab is harmless

Thursday, September 6 2012 at 01:00

Government yesterday defended its plan to use HPV vaccine Gardasil, to vaccinate young girls against cervical cancer despite a strong campaign against its use in countries like the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Campaigners against the vaccine say it can kill, and in many cases it can also cause adverse reactions like infertility, bleeding, seizures, fatigue, stomach pain, auto-immune problems, and muscle pain and heart problems.


But ministry of health commissioner Dr Anthony Mbonye told Daily Monitor yesterday that the vaccine was safe and had been certified by the World Health Organisation.


Government will today launch the drive to vaccinate up to 140,000 young girls against cervical cancer using the Gardasil vaccine as part of a two-year pilot project.


“A country can’t procure a vaccine that is dangerous to its people. When a vaccine is being put on the market it has to be certified by WHO and WHO has certified Gardasil. It’s
.. [link to www.monitor.co.ug]

Since the relatively stable mercury in vaccines and teeth can be converted into the dangerous methyl mercury form by certain bacteria and yeast in the body, mothers should be concerned about the yeast and bacteria they are passing on to their child. If the mother has mercury fillings, and then has her child vaccinated with thimerosal containing vaccines, and she has some dysbiosis or yeast issues of which she is unaware, I would think that child is at high risk for autism. The mother passes on the elemental mercury along with yeast and bacteria to the child. The "relatively benign" form of mercury converts in the child's body into the vicious methyl mercury and the child develops autism as a result. I believe this is why they don't have concrete studies in pubmed showing correlations between vaccines and autism. That and the obvious fact that the vaccine and amalgam manufacturers can't afford the lawsuits that would surely follow. Just think how many people have mercury fillings and how many vaccines have been administered that have had thimerosal in them.

I say relatively benign because methyl mercury is about a hundred times more toxic to the body than the elemental form and it is much more difficult for the body to remove. This is also why some people with mercury fillings get sick while some don't - because some people have yeast issues or dysbiosis which promotes the conversion.

I don't have kids so I haven't researched the vaccine thing enough, but I do have mercury issues and I would never knowingly put any more mercury in my body. Let me tell you, IV chelation is a very long, drawn out pain in the ass. At least it works. And if I had kids I certainly wouldn't knowingly put mercury in their bodies, either.

I wonder how many autism births could be avoided by avoiding this conversion? I would suggest to any mother who is planning on getting pregnant to have a CDSA (comprehensive digestive stool analysis) test done to make sure she does not have yeast or bacteria issues, that her gut flora is in proper balance. If it's out of balance, then fix it before becoming pregnant. Then she won't be passing on the "mercury converters" to her baby. It would be nice if she could get any mercury fillings removed, too. And removed properly by a dentist who understands their potential danger, not the same idiot who put them in.