Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,110 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 301,035
Pageviews Today: 437,102Threads Today: 139Posts Today: 2,291
04:56 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject A virus that eats cancer, Cheap to produce, the virus is exquisitely precise, with only mild, flu-like side- effects in humans is just sitting in
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
I don't see any reason why this can't be investigated further.
 Quoting: Cahill


Well here's a reason for you. It's not going to make Big Pharma millions of dollars.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22901085


And you really believe that don't you?

It takes on average $900 million to develop a single drug. Think about it. $900 million. That’s an amount of money that even Bill Gates would have trouble finding down the back of the sofa on a regular basis. Of the drugs that get out of pre-clinical testing, 70% will fail at Phase 1 trial stage. One of the reasons that drug discovery is so expensive is that (apart from the fact that it’s difficult), the pharmaceutical industry is so heavily regulated.

Now I’m not defending Big Pharma. Far from it. I can't stand them. Their price fixing and handling of off-patent drugs in the 3rd world is criminal, they aren’t always transparent with their methods and data and when they mess up, people die. But they exist to make money and if, for example, 1 in 3 people in the Western world will get cancer in their lifetime do you not think that they would exploit a cure, any cure and have us over a barrel to make money from it? Not to mention the kudos, the plaudits, the Nobel Prizes that any scientist would receive if they managed to cure the potentially incurable? The idea that they would regularly throw away close to a billion dollars while sitting on possibly one of the most lucrative ideas of all time is laughable.
 Quoting: Cahill


You are forgetting something, there are people out there that want to reduce the population of the world. They treat the disease, they don't cure the disease.

They injected cancer into ww2 veterans. One of the Rockefeller, during that time said it was as good of away to die as any.

Pharma co. were very much into some very bad things.

The cancer charities make a lot of money, you might need to research them and who are the ones running it.

If you put your trust in people, without knowing their back ground, you just might have a treatment that is worse than the disease.

Who do you think was involved in eugenics? Who are they now? Genome study, genetics in all forms, they study people
like lab animals.

The good one have accidents.
 Quoting: Daughter


Look at this way...
Medicine, advances in hygiene and better nutritional advice are mainly responsible for the growth in population. Agreed?

Therefore one can argue that the ones promoting these quack cures are responsible for any depopulation...
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting: