Possible Mouse Like Skull appears in Mars Rover Picture, anyone seen this one before? | |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 798430 United States 09/04/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes little sheeple edujmocation is just what they and you beleave in. NO man has landed on the moon, lets give you a bit of schooling in distance and rf controls. Mars is 34.8 million miles away from earth at it's closest point or 218 million miles at it's longest, it would take some 8 months or so to send a rocket there at a given speed of 24500 mph at it's closest point to earth. Now IF it made it there there would be little to no way to slow the rocket down to deploy the said rover as there is NO AIR MASS in space. We have little to no way of understanding the gravity of mars so no way of understanding how to land the rover. Now lets understand sending a signal 34.8 million miles away. That signal can only travel 186,000 miles per second, given that info the lag would be 3.5 min up to 22 min. Think about trying to operate something that far away and waiting that long for it to move if at all. Nothing they or NASA says is logical. Is this the edujmocation your understanding or were you pulling it out of your rear end Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1436120 You actually seem proud to be an uneducated moran... Last Edited by SnakeAirlines on 09/04/2012 09:27 PM "Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail" deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM |
Just Some Guy User ID: 1235825 United States 09/04/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SnakeAirlines User ID: 798430 United States 09/04/2012 09:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States 09/04/2012 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro There are complete idiots around here who think the mars rovers are a hoax. They fit in well with the idiots who think the earth is flat. They are a hoax, we cannot put a man on the moon so your thinking we can put a rover on MARS and control it from EARTH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA. Actually we did all that and more. You'd be amazed at what you can do with a little education... Yes little sheeple edujmocation is just what they and you beleave in. NO man has landed on the moon, lets give you a bit of schooling in distance and rf controls. Mars is 34.8 million miles away from earth at it's closest point or 218 million miles at it's longest, it would take some 8 months or so to send a rocket there at a given speed of 24500 mph at it's closest point to earth. Now IF it made it there there would be little to no way to slow the rocket down to deploy the said rover as there is NO AIR MASS in space. We have little to no way of understanding the gravity of mars so no way of understanding how to land the rover. Now lets understand sending a signal 34.8 million miles away. That signal can only travel 186,000 miles per second, given that info the lag would be 3.5 min up to 22 min. Think about trying to operate something that far away and waiting that long for it to move if at all. Nothing they or NASA says is logical. Is this the edujmocation your understanding or were you pulling it out of your rear end Mars has a thin atmosphere, and we do have an easy way of understanding its gravity; its two moons provide easy verification of its mass and gravity. They don't operate the rover in realtime, they send it a series of commands which is then executed by the rover. Once the rover reaches its waypoint, or if it detects something it doesn't like, it stops and waits for further instruction. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States 09/04/2012 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes little sheeple edujmocation is just what they and you beleave in. NO man has landed on the moon, lets give you a bit of schooling in distance and rf controls. Mars is 34.8 million miles away from earth at it's closest point or 218 million miles at it's longest, it would take some 8 months or so to send a rocket there at a given speed of 24500 mph at it's closest point to earth. Now IF it made it there there would be little to no way to slow the rocket down to deploy the said rover as there is NO AIR MASS in space. We have little to no way of understanding the gravity of mars so no way of understanding how to land the rover. Now lets understand sending a signal 34.8 million miles away. That signal can only travel 186,000 miles per second, given that info the lag would be 3.5 min up to 22 min. Think about trying to operate something that far away and waiting that long for it to move if at all. Nothing they or NASA says is logical. Is this the edujmocation your understanding or were you pulling it out of your rear end Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1436120 You actually seem proud to be an uneducated moran... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22717690 Canada 09/04/2012 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22787868 Canada 09/04/2012 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22717690 Canada 09/04/2012 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States 09/04/2012 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23197325 United States 09/04/2012 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
shadasonic User ID: 15732022 United States 09/04/2012 09:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its a sleestack mouse “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” – Carl Sagan |
weasel keeper User ID: 15395274 United States 09/04/2012 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1550290 United States 09/04/2012 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | doesn't look like a skull at all, the picture of the actual mouse skull in the bottom right corner is likely to throw off the dummies. what kinda skull has a gaping big hole in the middle of their nose? sorry not buying it.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4623159 United States 09/04/2012 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1436120 United States 09/04/2012 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes little sheeple edujmocation is just what they and you beleave in. NO man has landed on the moon, lets give you a bit of schooling in distance and rf controls. Mars is 34.8 million miles away from earth at it's closest point or 218 million miles at it's longest, it would take some 8 months or so to send a rocket there at a given speed of 24500 mph at it's closest point to earth. Now IF it made it there there would be little to no way to slow the rocket down to deploy the said rover as there is NO AIR MASS in space. We have little to no way of understanding the gravity of mars so no way of understanding how to land the rover. Now lets understand sending a signal 34.8 million miles away. That signal can only travel 186,000 miles per second, given that info the lag would be 3.5 min up to 22 min. Think about trying to operate something that far away and waiting that long for it to move if at all. Nothing they or NASA says is logical. Is this the edujmocation your understanding or were you pulling it out of your rear end Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1436120 You actually seem proud to be an uneducated moran... Im sorry was that too much for that pee brain in your snake head to understand, or are you a smart ass that most people hate to even talk to due to the constant BS you think you know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1436120 United States 09/04/2012 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1436120 They are a hoax, we cannot put a man on the moon so your thinking we can put a rover on MARS and control it from EARTH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA. Actually we did all that and more. You'd be amazed at what you can do with a little education... Yes little sheeple edujmocation is just what they and you beleave in. NO man has landed on the moon, lets give you a bit of schooling in distance and rf controls. Mars is 34.8 million miles away from earth at it's closest point or 218 million miles at it's longest, it would take some 8 months or so to send a rocket there at a given speed of 24500 mph at it's closest point to earth. Now IF it made it there there would be little to no way to slow the rocket down to deploy the said rover as there is NO AIR MASS in space. We have little to no way of understanding the gravity of mars so no way of understanding how to land the rover. Now lets understand sending a signal 34.8 million miles away. That signal can only travel 186,000 miles per second, given that info the lag would be 3.5 min up to 22 min. Think about trying to operate something that far away and waiting that long for it to move if at all. Nothing they or NASA says is logical. Is this the edujmocation your understanding or were you pulling it out of your rear end Mars has a thin atmosphere, and we do have an easy way of understanding its gravity; its two moons provide easy verification of its mass and gravity. They don't operate the rover in realtime, they send it a series of commands which is then executed by the rover. Once the rover reaches its waypoint, or if it detects something it doesn't like, it stops and waits for further instruction. Basic finding and theory of that planet having two moons and a thin atmosphere still would not give you a firm understanding of the gravity that planet has. Nasa would have had to probe the hell out of it to get a firm understanding. I understand the sending of commands to the rover, but think about how long it would take just to move the rover a few feet ! |
Mister Pink User ID: 1708446 United States 09/04/2012 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16277870 Netherlands 09/04/2012 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I just had to post a new thread as this is really bugging me. Quoting: Red Hot Chilean Pepe IMHO this is one of the more neat skull images in a Mars Rover picture, but I have seen posted it only once in a Facebook comment, so I don't know where is the original picture to analyze it further. Anyone seen it before? [link to imageshack.us] That is not from Curiosity rover. That is not from the one that is broken, either. That must be from the one that is still working but is solar powered. I think it is this picture: [link to marsrover.nasa.gov] And, if so, then the image showing the skull is a fake. OP must provide refutation by providing NASA link to skull image. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States 09/04/2012 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Basic finding and theory of that planet having two moons and a thin atmosphere still would not give you a firm understanding of the gravity that planet has. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1436120 Yes, it does. M = (r*v^2)/G Congrats, you just failed basic physics. I guess you really do hate education. Last Edited by Astromut on 09/04/2012 10:03 PM |
Anonymous coward User ID: 23186191 United States 09/04/2012 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mister Pink User ID: 1708446 United States 09/04/2012 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16277870 Netherlands 09/04/2012 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sigh, this thread is being hijacked by "just a rock" tards and "mars rovers are fake" tards. Quoting: Red Hot Chilean Pepe Just found the page with all the panoramic images of the sol 820 of Spirit Mars Rover. The "skull looking rock" is on several of the still images. [link to marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov] It's a rock... give it a rest... |
Mister Pink User ID: 1708446 United States 09/04/2012 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | what kinda skull has a gaping big hole in the middle of their nose? An alien mouse skull has a gapping hole in the middle of it, that what. Its fucking Mars! Who says it has to match only what we know. Now im not saying its an alien mouse skull but its an alien mouse skull. So there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10509274 United States 09/04/2012 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22573986 United States 09/04/2012 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Basic finding and theory of that planet having two moons and a thin atmosphere still would not give you a firm understanding of the gravity that planet has. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1436120 Yes, it does. M = (r*v^2)/G Congrats, you just failed basic physics. I guess you really do hate education. Thanks Astromut. And thanks for the "We stopped dreaming" vid, loved it! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23202396 Mexico 09/04/2012 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Furthermore the landing vid was as phony as a stupid UFO on a string vid, the thing swung back and forth once a second and if on the end of a long parachute tether as stated it would have taken at least 5 seconds to complete a swing, The schools are destroyed and the poor quality fakery shows, these kids cannot calculate REAL. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23202396 Mexico 09/04/2012 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
weasel keeper User ID: 15395274 United States 09/04/2012 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is a lizard skull. I have no doubts. This goes hand in glove with the hard hat and quarter clearly visible in the rover pics directly downloaded from Nasa. The rover is a hoax, no if's or buts. When quarters, hard hats and lizard skulls, along with paint bucket zero bit depth sky that should be black and not white (because Mars atmosphere is less than one percent of earth's) and there was no dust storm when the rover was coming in, this is such an obvious hoax that you would have to be some sort of born stupid in the first place junk food raised imbecile to overlook these obvious errors and then turn around and ridicule people who can point them out. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23202396 Furthermore the landing vid was as phony as a stupid UFO on a string vid, the thing swung back and forth once a second and if on the end of a long parachute tether as stated it would have taken at least 5 seconds to complete a swing, The schools are destroyed and the poor quality fakery shows, these kids cannot calculate REAL. I've been saying that since it started, that video was a piss-poor fake and I knew the mars-tards would swallow this one hook, line, and sinker, and they did! Just reading the posts on here tells me that around 2/3rds the population actually believes this shit, we're so screwed, drunken retards are driving the world off a cliff and we're the screaming passengers. Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16701148 United States 09/04/2012 11:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is the mouse head you need to be noticing... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16701148 [link to upload.wikimedia.org] [link to i.pbase.com] |
weasel keeper User ID: 15395274 United States 09/05/2012 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is the mouse head you need to be noticing... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16701148 [link to upload.wikimedia.org] [link to i.pbase.com] STOOPID.... Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me! |
1 | Rover Video - Carpet Mouse Rover. | 10/28/13 |
Related Topics: Space (Science) - Astronomy (Science) - Mars Rover Hoax (Conspiracy) |