Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,931 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,823,651
Pageviews Today: 2,488,358Threads Today: 468Posts Today: 10,403
05:51 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47480
United States
01/07/2006 12:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Dave Letterman:
'Why,' you ask?


By Pat Boone

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

I love Dave Letterman. He's my idea of the funniest man in America. I appreciate his intellect, his quirky, irritated ideas about what's funny, and certainly respect his right to whatever opinions he has about anything.

I confess he irks me with his nightly ridicule and denigration of our president. He's really got it in for George Bush, and he and the staff select little snippets of speeches, or a stumble, or a door that doesn't open, or even just a little aside and shoulder-shaking chuckle – anything that makes the president appear foolish – and revel in derisive laughter.

Unfortunately, the president provides way too much fodder for them since he isn't the gifted communicator Reagan was, or the charmer Bill Clinton is.


And I understand and even sympathize with the unhappiness Dave and so many others in the media and entertainment business feel about George Bush and his administration and their policy decisions. I do think Karl Rove and those around the president could do a much, much better job of explaining to the American people (and at the same time, our allies) how we're doing and what we're doing – and why.

But still, I bristled a couple of nights ago when Dave had Bill O'Reilly on as a guest and treated Bill in a way no "guest" should ever be treated, certainly not on a comedy/talk show, by a host who is not seen as a political commentator or even especially qualified to opine on complex geopolitical matters. Dave is supposed to be – and usually is – funny. That's why he gets the big bucks, and I guess he earns 'em.

But from the moment Bill sat down, you could tell Dave was uptight and spoiling for confrontation. Not the good natured, spiky and funny sparring with a Dr. Phil – no, Dave obviously wanted to take Bill on, and down.

He asked Bill rough questions, and Bill had the answers and a lot of examples. He rattled off recent incidents across the heartland where Christian civil liberties were being scuttled by liberal jurists, and Dave cut him off. "Do those things really matter? Can't you just ignore things like that and go on to more important things? When Bill tried to answer, Dave cut him off, changing the subject. "Why are you so critical of Cindy Sheehan (the mother of the slain solder in Iraq who is crusading against the war)? Can't you just leave her alone?

Again, Bill began to explain he sympathized greatly with the mom, but saw her being used as a pawn by longtime antiwar – any war – interests, and Dave cut in again: "Instead of asking why she's doing what she's doing, why don't you ask why were in Iraq in the first place?"

Of course, since it was Dave's audience, disposed to agree with whatever he says, and also reacting to the angry way Dave asked, it applauded wildly. Bill tried to calmly answer, but Dave had had enough. He acidly, with his superb comic attitude and timing, said "Bill, I'm not a journalist like you, and I may not have access to all the information you do – but my gut tells me about 60% of what you say is crap!"

Well, the audience of course erupted in glee at that. And before Bill really had a chance to get a conversation going again, Dave thanked him for coming and went to commercial. He'd obviously gotten what he wanted – a chance to publicly disdain and embarrass Bill O'Reilly.

Well, Bill is a big boy and can take care of himself. The next night on his own show, he was gracious and simply pointed out that Dave's business is being funny while Bill's is reporting news and sharing valid information – to a far larger audience than Dave's.

But host Dave's mistreatment of guest Bill still provokes me, especially in view of his audience's warmth to Dave's echoing question "Why are we in Iraq anyway?" It's become an acceptable social choice by now to forget the answer to that question. It's sad there's any need, but it seems there can't be too much reminding.

Okay: 9-11. Airliners taken over by terrorists who destroy them and hundreds of innocent passengers. World Trade Center destroyed. Over 3,000 Americans killed. Evidence being reported of many plots to do more of the same.

The question of why to be in Iraq is preceded by the question "What are we doing about this? How can we prevent this happening again?"

Well, leaders of many important allied nations agree with our best intelligence that Saddam Hussein is developing WMDs. We know, the world knows, that he has developed and used poison gas and other WMDs against his own people. He hates America and Israel, and says so. He not only commissioned militant Muslims to seek out and kill Americans and Jews anywhere in the world, in the aftermath of Bush, Sr.'s retaliation against Iraq for taking over Kuwait, but Saddam also is known to have supplied money (lots of it) and arms and weapons to terrorist groups who could do his bidding.

Additionally – and I've been absolutely astonished that the administration hasn't made this widely known – there are documented specific eyewitness reports about the exchanges of money, weapons, and information, as well as the training of terrorist operatives in Iraq, between Saddam's top lieutenants and those of Osama bin Laden.

I can only suppose that, in today's contrary and suspicious and hyper-critical atmosphere, government officials have hesitated to speak about things they may not have courtroom-type incontrovertible evidence for.

But any rational, unbiased adult could assume that, if a dictator had the desire, the means, and the expressed intention – to say nothing of the track record of actually using WMDs – to develop and deploy them, he could play the "shell game" he did with the U.N. inspectors and then, when allied forces were forging toward Baghdad, he could simply slip all the actual WMDs across the border into Syria. And this is exactly what I believe we'll learn, in time, actually did happen. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

Why our government spokesmen, and even Senator McCain, keep repeating "we found no evidence of WMD" or worse, "there were no WMDs," I can't understand. There were, at least until we got there, and any playground kid who ever played "hide and seek" can fill in the gaps.


But, to answer Dave's question, which Bill wasn't given the chance to do: WE'RE IN IRAQ BECAUSE WE'RE AMERICANS, DAVE! That's what Americans do – we not only take whatever action we need to take to protect our own citizens, we also come to the aid of the oppressed, the victims, the desolate and devastated.

We rush in when tsunamis and earthquakes strike, we help flood and famine victims, we come to the aid of minorities in Bosnia, Rwanda and little countries like Kuwait when they're criminally overtaken by a neighboring dictator. When people are hurting and victimized, we care, and we do something about it.

Anti-war activists seem to think that we can wave a peace sign at an armed, masked terrorist and he'll just nod, "Okay, sorry to have bothered you" and go away. When will the liberals among us, the knee-jerk civil libertarians who yell bloody murder at the very thought the government may be quietly wire tapping where and when they feel the need to – for our protection – wake up to the fact that criminals and sworn enemies use our liberties, our democratic structure and strictures against us?

In time of war, citizens in a democracy voluntarily suspend some of their privileges and unite against the enemy, sacrificing, for a while, so that we can protect the structure and hopefully get back to our full freedoms again.

I see a picture of a neighborhood, on a nice cul de sac, happy and contented. One day a nest of rattlesnakes is discovered in one neighbor's backyard. Several neighbors insist on going in together and wiping out the nest, before the snakes inevitably slither into the other yards. In this instance, which is most important? Is it privacy or wiping out the snakes, before every home is afflicted and people unnecessarily die?

Why are we in Iraq, Dave?

BECAUSE WE'RE AMERICANS – AND AMERICANS KILL SNAKES BEFORE THEY KILL US!

You're a daddy now, Dave, with a backyard. Think about it.



-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------

Pat Boone, descendent of the legendary pioneer Daniel Boone, has been a top-selling recording artist, the star of his own hit TV series, a movie star, a Broadway headliner, and a best-selling author in a career that has spanned half a century. During the classic rock & roll era of the 1950s, he sold more records than any artist except Elvis Presley.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53584
United States
01/07/2006 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Wonder what Madonna has to say about it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60195
United States
01/07/2006 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Pat Boone, descendent of the legendary pioneer Daniel Boone, has been a top-selling recording artist, the star of his own hit TV series, a movie star, a Broadway headliner, and a best-selling author in a career that has spanned half a century. During the classic rock & roll era of the 1950s, he sold more records than any artist except Elvis Presley....
-----------------
singing is what he does well....maybe he would be best by sticking to it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60752
United States
01/07/2006 01:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
"He's really got it in for George Bush, and he and the staff select little snippets of speeches, or a stumble, or a door that doesn't open, or even just a little aside and shoulder-shaking chuckle – anything that makes the president appear foolish – and revel in derisive laughter.

Unfortunately, the president provides way too much fodder for them since he isn't the gifted communicator Reagan was, or the charmer Bill Clinton is."

C'mon. Bill Clinton is the funniest President ever. Letterman still tells jokes about Clinton on a regular basis. I can remember back to the Democrat Jimmy Carter, he didn't get much mercy from the comedians. Dubya doesn't have it any worse than any other Presidents.
Shady
User ID: 51815
United States
01/07/2006 01:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Well after reading Pat's recap, it sounds to me ONLY like Dave was giving Bill a taste of his own medicine, so to speak!
BOONDOGGLE
User ID: 4782
United States
01/07/2006 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
PATS WHOLE PREMISE IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT HIJACKERS DID IT..PROVE THIS 'ASSUMPTION'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60195
United States
01/07/2006 01:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
PATS WHOLE PREMISE IS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT HIJACKERS DID IT..PROVE THIS 'ASSUMPTION'


exactly
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60780
United Kingdom
01/07/2006 01:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
"....he was gracious and simply pointed out that Dave's business is being funny while Bill's is reporting news...."
rofl

And he says Letterman is the funny one? lmao

Stick with the singing Mr.Boone!
Bob the Monkey

User ID: 354
United States
01/07/2006 01:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
If Bill's job is reporting news and sharing valid information, he needs his contract canceled.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8527
United States
01/07/2006 01:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Tough shit if he don't like it. OReilly belittles people for a living, and Letterman was 1000% right to put the bitch in his place.

Bush isn't a fucking king and this ain't China.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33458
United States
01/08/2006 12:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
"When Bill tried to answer, Dave cut him off, changing the subject. "

Dave was just giving back to O'Reilly what he does to his geusts every day.

"But, to answer Dave's question, which Bill wasn't given the chance to do: WE'RE IN IRAQ BECAUSE WE'RE AMERICANS, DAVE! That's what Americans do – we not only take whatever action we need to take to protect our own citizens, we also come to the aid of the oppressed, the victims, the desolate and devastated."

So Mr. Boone how did we protect our citizens? We have created more trained terrorists (or rattlesnacks as you put it) in the last two years than we had before 9-11. Instead of using every means at our disposal to track and prosecute the criminal terrorists we have blown this war into a grab for oil to preserve our teetering economy. We are not in Iraq because we are Americans, we are in Iraq because the Bush cabal and all the corporate cronnies wanted us to be there.

Stick to singing Pat and endorsing whatever pathetic product that will take you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 59622
United States
01/08/2006 12:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Bush appeared on a Letterman show during the pres campaign. He was very nasty to Letterman regarding his upcoming heart surgery. Bush is a psychopath, and Letterman knows it. O'Reilly is a psychopath, and Letterman knows it.
ashesand sackcloth

User ID: 182
United States
01/08/2006 12:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
See how f**d up my family is?
In-Dn

User ID: 260
United States
01/08/2006 01:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Isn't Pat Boone talking about the Executive Branch of Gubmint ?

wake up to the fact that criminals and sworn enemies use our liberties, our democratic structure and strictures against us?
ashesand sackcloth

User ID: 182
United States
01/08/2006 01:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
Why is it they get to use them but they do me no good at all.
American people are the enemy of the USA inc.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57706
United States
01/08/2006 01:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Pat Boone column on Letterman vs. O'Reilly
well politics are like the media when your popularity drops you gotta do what you gotta do to get yours up. not lettermans fault he has an easy target.

News