a plane did not hit the pentagon period!!!!

Don't forget that there are about 500 airline pilots with decades of commercial experience and tens of thousands of flight hours who all said it is and was impossible for an airliner to hit the Pentagon at that altitude and angle of approach. IMPOSSIBLE. That means the alleged manuever was beyond the arodynamic capabilities of the jet AND the supposed pilot. It did not happen.

Anyway none of that matters. The only thing that matters is the COLLAPSE OF BUILDING NUMBER 7. All you need is THE COLLAPSE OF
BUILDING NUMBER 7 to blow the fricking doors off the entire bullshit "investigation".

911 is NOT a conspiracy. It is OBVIOUS TO SEE for anyone with even a single IQ point to their name and the slightest bit of bravery to face the facts.

Please tell me, who among you can deny building number 7? Who? Nobody is seriously that stupid.

Odd how I just watched people who were at the scene and clearly observed an American Airlines jet strike the building being interviewed. But you conspiracy tards have to have your conspiracy no matter how many witnesses come forward right?

Not saying yes or no to this whole idea, but think this statement is bs. The pentagon is at ground level, so it would just be like coming in at a extremely fast speed.

You sir, are a complete idiot.

One star.

Just because politicians or their appointees have been charged and jailed for conspiracies doesn't mean that they are real or ever have or will happen.

You HAVE to pass the bong bro, don't be greedy now, share.

Sorry,can't do it. I am smoking the pure thoughtless drug of patriotism. You can only indulge once you throw away common sense. You are either with us or against us. There is no middle ground or room for thought. It is our way or the highway. Just because America has over thrown righteously elected Governments that wont play ball with the Corporations that bought American politicians doesn't mean we have a bad system.

Wow, I must have caught a contact buzz, 'cause some of that actually made some sense. You mean the military industrial complex that sends our young men and women around the globe to fight and die for corporate profits, you are against that? I have always been a Teddy Roosevelt isolationist myself. But frankly I do not see our current government being patriotic but socialist or communist, something like that perhaps, but certainly not patriotic. Please, talk to me.

What America does internally and externally are and have been two separate things. After the Spanish American war the Philippians actually THOUGHT they would have a free country because America is all about freedom. WRONG. Americas military is the fighting force of the elite that run the world. The best slave is one that thinks he or she is free.

Well I am pretty sure if there were a couple of Hijackers with nothing but damn 'box cutters' that there would be a couple of big boys or martial artist on board that would over take the 'terrorist'followed by a few dozed followers.

I guess we Americans are a bunch of cowards to let a couple radicals and box cutters take down three buildings.

The official story is bullshit and you know it. As far as the details of the tactics that were used, guess common sense will give you the clues.


Who did it? doubt it was box cutters.

Where's the plane wreckage? Hell, even the Lockerbie plane, which fell 38,000 feet, had wreckage... To many douche nipples on this board...

Either a tomahawk or harpoon hit the building... There also was no wreckage in Pennsylvania. Why are people so fucking stupid?

Good god what bunch of jack leg idiots. Lockerbie was brought down by a bomb....the reason there was a huge debrie field. All the planes on 911were intact and traveling at high speed on impact.....not much left.

...if you start from a false premise, you generally reach a wrong conclusion..for example, building 7 suffered NO damage..well it suffered massive damage and was in flames..well according to FDNY ...I know, all liars, CIA...
Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.
[link to www.firehouse.com]

Good god what bunch of jack leg idiots. Lockerbie was brought down by a bomb....the reason there was a huge debrie field. All the planes on 911were intact and traveling at high speed on impact.....not much left.

The Pentagon is most likely one of the most security laidened building on the planet.
There would be more cameras pointing at that building than anyone would imagine. The only video footage we have seen is a bull shit view from some auto camera on a parking lot gate.
Bull Shit, Bull Shit.
The reason we do not see any other footage is because it was not an air plane.
Big load of BS. It was not a Plane.
If it was a plane we would have seen multiple videos from hundreds of cameras.

SWEET. I just got my license to fly a single engine small aircraft. I can now fly any airliner better than a pilot that has flown one for years.

Without taking a stance on whether a commercial airliner or a missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11, I have just one question...


[link to 911research.wtc7.net]

The graphic design demonstration (22:45 to 24:18) within the larger video below is from the American Society of Civil Engineers in their January 2003 report, "The Pentagon Building Performance Report. Notice what they, the American Society of Civiil Engineers, show what would happen to the airplane as it smashed into the Pentagon and its many support columns.

[link to www.youtube.com]

Keeping this in mind, again I ask: How could a commercial airliner's nose cone retain its structural integrity to crash through 3 rings of the Pentagon, including the recently reinforced outer wall of the outer ring (E ring) and the support columns within the Pentagon's infrastructure and leave a nearly perfectly circular "punchout" hole in the Pentagon's 3 ring (3rd ring in)?

This question is for anyone and everyone, including Ryan Dawson.

What would be able to accomplish the above feat is a missile, which is specifically designed to achieve maximum penetration of its intended target.

Perhaps we listened to fire fighters who said it live. Multiple explosions boom boom boom boom. I just wonder if it was because the damage on 1 side of the building, why didn't it collapse like the pentagon, falling sideways then straight down?

...well if another pilot took off and you took the controls, with some training in autopilot and radios...you should not have any real problems..you can't land but landing was never part of the plan, so you can turn the yoke and step on the rudder pedals and keep it level and either enter a way point OR follow a heading...yea you could do it..every 747 pilot I ever spoke with said it handled like a heavy Cessna 172...all the harder parts of flight, rotation speeds for weight/balance air temp, flap speeds, gear up/down never had to be mastered...I'm sure you could point your Piper to hit a 110 story building or the Pentagon...the exact same skill would be needed on a 757, left-right.nose up/down...rudder pedals...and throttle...speeds and systems change, not basic flight...

..the man said..."Building seven was a 30 story sky scraper. It was undamaged. There was no structural damage to it."
..I pointed out that that is NOT true and supplied the statements of a FDNY Captain who was at the scene and detailed the massive damage #7 suffered as well as a fire burning on multiple floors and NO attempt was made to fight that fire as FD folks were "pulled" out due to the lack of water and the building was deemed to unsafe to enter...in addition there are photos of the damage as well as the fire ..but if you think the building was just fine and the photos are phony and the Captain is lying..cool...BTW.if you care, [link to conspiracydebunked.com]

I don't think so genius. John Lear feels differently or maybe he's just lying?