BRKnews PROOF ABSOLTUTE SHINY DAMN PROOF THE FBI PLANTED THE GAS

FGDF

Rare Unheard 2nd Aurora Police Radio Transmissions From July 20th

[link to www.youtube.com]

Terrifying Masked man
kills 14 during Batman premiere
[link to www.youtube.com]


Terrifying Masked man

Terrifying Masked man
Terrifying Masked man
Terrifying Masked man
Terrifying Masked man
Terrifying Masked man
Terrifying Masked man

take your CAPS OFF asshole

CORBIN DATES THEATER 9
MOVIE AND LIGHTS WENT OFF


STEPHANIE DAVIES THEATER 9
MOVIE WENT OFF AND LIGHTS CAME ON
[link to www.youtube.com]


POLICE DISPATCH THEATER 9
AFTERWARDS
POLICE ON RADIO
says get someone to TURN THE MOVIE OFF IN THEATER 9

Swerdlow

16th september 2012

obama's
head ?

PROOF ABSOLTUTE SHINY DAMN PROOF THE FBI PLANTED THE GAS MASK!!!!!! [link to www.youtube.com]




enhanced brighter footage braoder sweep very clear line on corner
no mask


New Cell Phone Video from Aurora, CO Shooting - Enhanced

[link to www.youtube.com]

2F8388848E&index=9&feature=plpp_video

clearer view and wider shots no mask on line on corner

New Cell Phone Video from Aurora, CO Shooting - Enhanced



clearer view and wider shots no mask on line on corner


[link to www.youtube.com]

THEATER 8

WE ONLY THOGHT IS WAS OUR THEATER HAD IT GOING ON

WE DIDNT KNOW ABOUT THEATER 9

Rachel Fedeli Aurora Shooting Witness (Theater 8) on BBC
DEDUCTION

Ok this is an amazing interview. This witness was in theater 8. Did you hear what she said?
She says in her theater not the one where the shooting took place,
BUT IN THEATER 8
2 smoke/gas cans are lit at the same time 2 POPS THE SMOKE

and then one more POP AND MORE SMOKE.

SO There are 2 more suspects in this theater at least.

[link to www.youtube.com]

POLICE TOOK WITNESS STATMENTS AFTWERWARDS

OF A SHOOTER SEATED IN THEATER 8



DRESSED AS BATMAN
THE SHOOTER WAS IN THEATER 8 SEATED!!!!!
SEATED IN AUDIENCE!!!!

BATMAN IS FINGERED AS A SHOOTER~!!!!!!

POLICE RADIO
WITNESS STATEMENT
45 MINUTES AFTER HOLMES DETAINED


POLICE RADIO TRANSCRITIONS

Even after 45 more minutes pass – making it more than an hour after Holmes was detained – the officers still mention other potential shooters:

1:16:16: Officer: "Talking to people making statements, sounds like we have possibly 2 shooters, one that was in Theater 8 seated, another one that came in from the outside into Theater 9. Sounds like it was a coordinated attack."


AND WE HAVE CONFIRMATION BY ANOTHER WITNESS OF A PERSON DRESSED AS BATMAN

Aurora Eyewitness

SHE DESCRIBES THE PERSON DRESSED AS BATMAN SEATED IN T 8
BEHIND HER!!!!!

[link to www.youtube.com]
Rebecca Fedeli TV INTERVIEW - No one in 8 went out Emergency Exit

LIVE ON SCENE POLICE TRANSCRIPT 45 MINS AFTER HOLMES DETAINED
"Talking to people making statements, sounds like we have possibly 2 shooters, one that was in Theater 8 seated,



[link to www.businessinsider.com]


Even after 45 more minutes pass – making it more than an hour after Holmes was detained – the officers still mention other potential shooters:

1:16:16: Officer: "Talking to people making statements, sounds like we have possibly 2 shooters, one that was in Theater 8 seated, another one that came in from the outside into Theater 9. Sounds like it was a coordinated attack."
1:16:55: Dispatch: "Every unit, possible 2nd shooter still at large... Keep the media away from them."
1:31:27: Dispatch: Again, no witnesses are to be released, even if they've been spoken to."

[link to www.businessinsider.com]

THIS HAS TO BE THE SAME ONE LED OUT BY THE POLICEMAN WHO WAS CARRYING THE GUN THAT WAS PLACED NEAR THE EXIT

[link to www.youtube.com]

the idiots (the cop and the shooter) decided to step outside and act as if the cop was checking him for weapons in front of everyone so as to give everyone the impression that this was a patron because everyone was backing away from the guy in total black riot gear body armor.

Thomas Brinkley 1 day ago

Something isn't quite right about this footage. Something feels a little off, and it always did since we first saw this footage.

I don't think this idea of taking the shooter out the front was the best idea for them to use. Really idiotic. It did keep the shooters face off camera, with the batman mask, but wtf






THE POLICE MAN ESCORTING THE KID BATMAN ASSASSIN OUT OF THE THEATER IS HOLDING THE WEAPON HE THE KID HAD USED

[link to www.youtube.com]

THAT WEAPON WAS LATER PLACED AT THE EXIT DOOR NEAR JAMES CAR
TO FRAME HIM.

IT IS THE SAME WEAPON.





8 AND 9 ARE EASILY TRVELLED TO AND FROM


WITNESS IN THEATER 9
[link to www.youtube.com]

Channel 9 Interview Aurora Witness Two Gunmen
WUTNESS SAYS TWO
AND THAT
'HE HAD SOMETHING COVERING HIS FACE ' (WHY DOESNT HE SAY GAS MASK?)
INSTEAD HE SAYS,
'HE HAD SOMETHING COVERING HIS FACE'

(JUST LIKE BATMAN DID IN THAT VIDEO)

'HE WAS ALL IN BLACK
I THINK HE WOULD STAND OUT IN A CROWD'


DIGEST ALL THE ABOVE THIS IS THE KEY EVIDENCE
COVERING THEATER 8 AND 9

MORE V IMPORTANT

WHO WAS THROWING FIRE CRACKING LIKE TEAR GAS BOMBS

IN THEATER 8???
Vick van der Woodsen
My Experience in the Theater 8
Shooting in Aurora, Colorado

[link to www.youtube.com]

THERE HAD TO BE
A KILLER IN THEATER 8

JUST LIKE THE WITNESSS STATEMENT TAKEN BY THE POLICE

OF A SEATED SHOOTER IN THEATER 8

SEATED JUST LIKE BATMAN WAS SEATED BEHIND THAT GIRL

HIS FACE WAS COVERED BY SOMETHING
A TOTALY SEALED BATMASK


THERE HAD TO BE
A KILLER IN THEATER 8

WE HAVE NUMEROUS EYE WITNESSES OF FIRE CRACKERS EXPLSOING NEXT TO THEM

FIRE CRACKERS CANT COME THROUGH WALLS

THEY WERE DISCHARGED AND THROWN FROM WITHIN THEATER 8

BUMP

DELETED AND HIS ACTIVITY DOES NOT MATCH
George (uploader of Aurora cellphone aftermath video discussed below) aka Geosync 2323 on YouTube, aka Larrabie (or Larraby) ;

VIDEO 7-19-12 Aurora Colorado shooting


7-19-12 Aurora Colorado shooting


... Geosync 2323 ... Aurora Colorado shooting ...
[link to www.youtube.com]
hd

1 month ago | 2,934 views

by Geosync2323



by Geosync2323
Latest Activity
Feb 29, 2012

Date Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Country

NO VIDEOS

[link to www.youtube.com]



An immediate APB should be put out for the following accomplices in the Aurora Theater Massacre.

SUSPECTS

Bonnie Kate Pourciau, aka Bonnie Kate, aka Bonnie Pourciau, aka Bonnie Pourciau Kate;

Chris Lakota, aka Brent Christopher Pankievich, aka Brent D. Pankievich, aka Brent C Lakota, aka Brent Christopher Lakota, aka Brent Christopher Thunderbird Lakota, aka Spawntanious (gangster rap pseudonym; see [link to myspace.com] )

Elizabeth Sumralll;

Jane Doe #1 (girl in blue and white plaid shirt holding Bonnie Kate in front of theater from start of Bonnie Kate video)

George (uploader of Aurora cellphone aftermath video discussed below) aka Geosync 2323 on YouTube, aka Larrabie (or Larraby) ;

John Doe #1 (man in all black lying on Sable side back corner lying next to gas mask).

John Doe #2 (thin man in gray hoodie featuring dark triangle emblem stamped on chest, wearing baseball cap, holding a soda cup with straw and cell phone in first few frames of Bonnie Kate video).

John Doe #3 (man in Green camouflage)

…and many more to be identified.

I pray for the souls of those responsible for this tragedy to be convicted by truth. I pray for the victims of this tragedy, their families, and the nation. I pray for all who have suffered by the depravity of mortal sin. I have love for even the worst sinner, for everyone of us has contributed to the cycle of sin in some way. I pray that the truth will cleanse us, enlighten us, strengthen us, and lead us to one family under Love.

Full report pending.

D K O aka Dark Knight Oracle

[link to darkknighttruth.wordpress.com]

[link to elizabethmcclung.blogspot.com]


Saturday, July 21, 2012
Batman Aurora theater shooting: Why did Cinemark’s cinema safety system fail?
Why did a cinema's multiplex fire door allow access the wrong way? Why didn’t the (silent) alarm go off when they were opened? How did four guns, and body armor end up accessible through that door? What happened to the manager who should be checking the fire door when James Holmes left the screen in order to secure it? And why was the Cinemax not put into ‘emergency evacuation’ mode automatically with gas/smoke hitting detectors, the fire door triggering the silent alarm, and a manager hitting the evacuation button?

I don’t know.

As one of the thousands of people who have worked large Cineplex movie houses, I cannot understand how so many things went wrong with the Cinema system to allow this event to occur. Even so far as to have someone in an adjoining theater to end up shot through the wall because the cinema was not evacuated.

Linda and I were both shocked and saddened to hear of the shooting. I was looking forward to the final Batman film by Nolan, like those attending the midnight Premier showing in Aurora, CO. According to the BBC, James Holmes exited the emergency exit, returned in bulletproof vest, body armor and gloves, a gas mask, with four guns and threw two tear gas grenades before he started shooting. 70 people were injured or killed, 12 died, 11 in critical condition. James Holmes was a Ph.D. candidate who, like many of the film goers to the Premier was dressed up, and told the police when arrested he was ‘The Joker.’ The shooting took place only 20 miles from the Famous Columbine School shooting.

I worked four to five years at a Multiplex of 12 screens during many big openings, including some of the Lord of the Rings and Star Wars. So having hundreds line up in costumes in advance is part of movie experience. My job, or specialization was in crowd control and movement during large events.

The Batman screening at the Aurora was in a 16 screen multiplex owned by Cinemark, the second largest cinema chain in the US (probably after ones owned by VIACOM who is part of the group which owns BlockBuster and Coka). My visit last week the Cineplex, and talking to staff showed me that the system from seven years ago is still in place, including the ‘blue shirts’ (managers). Part of staff training from day one is for an event just like the one which happened was, for everyone who worked at the multiplex where I was, a mandatory monthly requirement. And every six months full ‘live’ tests with schools of children bussed in to replicate a potential life threat to the 2,000+ people in the screen was conducted. If what the BBC reported happened, it could not have done so and wouldn’t have done so at the Multiplex/Cineplex where I worked: so what happened here?

The reason there is a higher standard around the world for a Cinema/Theatre is because Cinema’s have regular lethal fires/incidents starting with the death of over 600 at the Iroquois Theatre in 1903; then Laurier Theatre Fire in Montreal (77 dead), but occurring regularly around the world in 1955, 1960, 1977 (694 dead), 1978 (438 dead), 1983, 1997 and 1999 (75 dead). The danger of Cinema’s was due to the extreme flammable nature of old film stock (now replaced with less flammable or digital). Then there is the use of large and complex projectors for 14 hours or more straight, which use oil and can get very hot, as well the number of people in a fixed location, like a concert or club where injury by trampling occurs. All these require high safety standards met by building design, door, alarm, dectors, and other inert safety measures and high levels of staff training.

Staff who work at a cinema, particularly a multiplex, should be aware, like those who work on a ship, that due to the history of disasters, they are the trained people who will ensure no one dies. After 9/11 we all knew that, like a Stadium, a cinema multiplex, with 2,000-4,000 people at capacity, is a target.

Addition: One news report now states that after the smoke grenades, and 20 shots, a manager turned on the alarm for the building, made an announcement and starting an evacuation. By the time the evacuation started, the police were already present and in the fire exit path in gas masks and body armour. The cinema sceens seemed full and the screens did not go into auto-lock (the film turning off and the house emergency lights coming on). Here is a report from someone in another screen, who was there that night. If you look at the picture at the bottom, you can see that no staff usher ripped the tickets, meaning they entered Screen 1 without having passed a control point and had the ticket stub taken. This indicates the cinema was likely understaffed that night.

So: How did James Holmes leave the fire exit and return without the alarm going off?

Fire Exits are meant to do just that, help people exit in case of fire. At the start of every shift in a cinema, I or someone would have to radio to the central office that I was doing a ‘fire exit’ check. The alarm which would send the fire department was turned off, and I would check every single door at the start of the day, and again at the end of the day to make sure they were not blocked, and the walkway out was not blocked in any way. Then the alarm is turned back on. Where I worked there was a delay, to allow for a visual check before the signal went to the fire department.

Why?

Because with 12, or with Century Aurora, CO Cinemark 16 screens, there is no way to be able to tell if there is a fire, or other emergency simply by the working staff seeing it in time (staff are taking tickets, seating, cleaning screens, selling popcorn, selling tickets, cleaning toilets, etc). The opening of a fire door during a film is a signal to check out why, and quickly. So with Associated Press saying that a Federal Law Enforcement Person told them James Holmes propped open a emergency exit side door during the movie, donned his protective gear and returned to the cinema screen to open fire with guns on the crowd. Again, why when the alarm went off in the office was no one sent to check on this fire door.

Yes, during the five years I worked at the multiplex/cineplex there were maybe hundreds of false alarms to check, over a dozen full evacuations and not one emergency involving loss of life. But that is the job. You check because without checking, and ensuring the door is tight, and that it can swing open for exit easily but cannot be opened the other direction, you are not ready for when trouble comes.

Why does the door only open one way? And why are they inaccessible from the other side?

You may think that the reason is to stop people sneaking in, but no, it is to prevent the spread of fire and loss of life. The reason doors only open one way is that if most movie customers can’t find the bathroom sign when they are looking for it, imagine how hard it is to figure out where to go during an emergency. The last thing needed is to have even ONE person re-entering a cinema that is on fire (and you know they would...because they forgot their cell phone). That is also why each staff person is assigned a screen to evacuate, or when short staffed, two small screens (yes, and bathrooms). And yes, I did evacuate screens because the alarm had gone off. Once a smoker illegally smoked and set off the alarm for the largest screen during Lord of the Rings. And it was raining outside. So having 500+ people want to lynch you for ruining their night out watching Lord of the Rings is part of the job. And no one goes back in, no one goes past you, and no one goes out the front, to make sure people aren’t trampled (enough people will exit the bathrooms or lines for films to end up with a group of people coming out the front anyway).

The building is emptied during an evacuation, all screens, not just the one where the alarm went off. The Fire Department has already been automatically notified and will check the building. They and the managers will have the keys to the evacuation doors. Once cleared, people reenter, after a short delay the movies resume. If it is not cleared, emergency officials take over.

So, the days of sneaking into a cinema, then opening the fire door and sneaking in your friends SHOULD have disappeared decades ago. Because a fire door which can be opened, or accessed or tampered with from the other side is not a safe exit. And creates an unsafe building.

So when news reports say that James put on armour and guns and prepared to shoot people with the fire door propped open for up to 30 minutes, something is VERY WRONG. What happened Cinemark?

Cinemark is saying that they have new ‘safety protocols’ like not allowing fake guns into the cinema during a screening. Uh…..right. But what about basic fire protocols?

As for leaving four guns and full body armor out in a exit causeway? How is that possible? Unless you are working that shift, and checking those doors with the alarm turned off, you should not even have access to the 'exit flow' out to the parking lot. Basic safety protocol BEFORE 9/11 stopped that from happening. And AFTER 9/11, the security increased, because a multiplex has 2,000-4,000 who have handed over their safety for two hours by buying a ticket. So whether the gunman he went to his car and got the guns there or they were in the fire exit path, that was a major safety breach.

Why didn't the grenades going off trigger the detectors, evacuate the building and notify authorities?

If one person smoking can cause an evacuation, then how can the EXPLOSION of two grenades, and the charges in them not set off a detector? This SHOULD have triggered a full evacuation of the building and immediate notification of the fire department for two reasons. The First is that due to the history of lethal disasters and the risk of electrical, oxygen and other types of combustion, there are not only two types of emergency fire extinguishers available for trained staff (I know, as I used one during a fire that occurred beside the cinema). Staff are supposed to pass both written tests but also have hands on training. Yet often that is determined by the corporation in charge. Because of history of fires the detectors in cinemas are much more sensitive for anything which could be considered a threat(remember it was the tear gas grenades that started the fire at Waco, TX). I would think that post 9/11, gas would be included in what would set them off. Even if that wasn't triggering the detector, the powder shock charges blowing open a grenade inside a cinema screen should qualify. Second, Batman was filmed using IMAX and 70mm film, which means a projectionist should have been up in the booth, and the projectionist has their own fire alarm system which they can trigger in case of any problems. The reason is because historically the projector has been the trigger of many fires, often the projection booth is isolated for fire safety, and a small window gives the projectionist a view of the screen and audience.

In the same way, if there is a raging fire in screen 5, you don’t want screen 4 and 6 to keep watching their film as the fire grows, that is why the automatic evacuation alarm sends out an automated message. Once the alarm is triggered, the entire multiplex evacuates, and yes it may cost a few bucks but it is better than loss of life. When the alarm occurs, the message comes over the speakers, the film projection is cut, the exit is lit and the audience is informed to proceed to the evacuation point – which is where the staff should be leading them. A few staff then check each screen, each toilet, and under the front ‘masking’ of the screen to ensure the building is evacuated.

So when “Eyewitnesses say bullets from the shooting in theatre nine passed through the theatre walls into adjacent screens, injuring people there also.” (source) It is the exact opposite of what is supposed to happen.

Why did it? Only Cinemark can answer why the fire exit either had no alarm, or the alarm was not checked. I am guessing, from talks with managers and staff in recent trips to the cinema that the building was extremely understaffed.

Premier Showings and Midnight Showings often call for extra staff, but as most multinational business’ know, it is the staff hours that where profit or loss is often made. One summer the multiplex owned by VIACOM guessed wrong and used up the extra hours on a dud opening. So for the rest of that summer, 12 screens were watched, cleaned and checked by TWO people. It simply isn’t enough. Yet the 10 screen I went to last week had only 1 usher on duty. And at a six screen cinema I attended a few weeks ago, the Manager told me that ALL of the projectors were merely on timers and that the projection booths were locked and that only ONE person had the key to get in. So if a fire started in the projection booth, good luck dealing with it in time.

The staffing levels should be enough on the Screen Usher Level to: check to ensure each customer has a valid ticket and is not sneaking in with a cast off ticket or ‘I forgot it back in my seat’, a manager should be on floor to deal with any issues or complaints, there should be enough working walkie talkies to be sent to check out any problems, and each screen should be checked during trailers and the start of the film to ensure that the masking and focus is correct, and that the surround sound is working (and that the Bass hasn’t tripped the switch to leave the audience with only the forward sound). There would also be enough staff to check each screen a couple times during the film to ensure that there are no problems (from fights, to getting drunk, to vomit, to people throwing popcorn to hauling pedophiles with their pants down out to give to the police – it all happens, including people sometimes having heart attacks during the film).

For a Premier Showing, which would almost always be a full house, a staff member is almost always left in the screen to make sure nothing has or will go wrong. If there is no special advance showing for reviewers then these are the people reviewing the film, or referring it to friends. How this 'Premier' goes is what makes a profit or a loss. But no one has talked about the Cinema staff on the news. I think that is because perhaps they were understaffed and undertrained. Training costs money. Doing fire and emergency drills costs money and while it may save money in the short term – eventually somewhere there is a tragedy.

I don’t know if a manager turned off the silent alarm fire door system, or if it was ‘unwritten policy’ to turn it off in order to save on staffing. But there is no way this could have occurred with a functioning fire detection and door system alarm. People don’t walk INTO multiplex’s through the fire doors unless something is very wrong with the management and training.

Instead of press releases and talking about costumes, guards and fake guns, I hope Cinemark’s Century cinema’s will instead activate the alarm systems they should already have in place. That is on the doors, with the switchboard in the central office, the manager on the floor, and the detector for the changes within the cinema (two grenades go off and no automatic alarm for evacuation?), on the emergency egress, and the training for the staff to prepare them for emergencies.

Our Cinema had a ‘safe room’ for those who were disabled and unable to evacuate in time, which was self contained and had 24 hours of oxygen. ‘So once we bring the person in the wheelchair here, we can leave right?’ one recent hire asked me.

‘No, you represent the safety of this cinema, and where the people who trust you go, you will stay. If you have a problem with that, then you shouldn’t do this job.’ Four of them stayed, one quit. If someone making a low end wage is the foot on the floor, hand on the door of safety, it is the company which buys the equipment then creates and enforces the regulations to ensure safety.

I hope Cinemark realizes that for two hours I haven’t just paid for a film, but for the safety and security they provide.
Posted by Elizabeth McClung at 5:54 AM

[link to elizabethmcclung.blogspot.com]

IN TH INTREREST OF PUBLIC SAFETY
THE CINEMA SHOULD BE SUED

AS SHOULD THE COUNTY EMRGENCY SERVICES DEPT

AND THE COUNTY INSPECTORS OF BUUSNESS SAFETY BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT CINEMA HAD NOT BEEN INSPECTED FOR FOLLWING SAFETY PROCEDUES

AND ITS AUTOMATED SAFETY DOORS FAILED AS DID IT SMOKE ALRM SYSTEMS AND IT FIRE ALRMS SYSTEMS

AND ALSO THE COUNTIES AMBUKLANCE SERVIES FAILED SO THEY SHOULD BE SURED ALSO

NOT FOR THE MONEY BUT TO INSURE AND EXAMPLE IS SET
FOR THE SAKE OF PUBLIC SAFETY

THE POLICE OBVIOUSLY ALL THREE HUNDRED OF THEM IN CARS

WERE NOT REALLY NEEDED TO PRTECT AND DIDNT PROTECT
BUT AT LEAST THEY MOVED THE VICTIMS AROUND AND AROUND AND THEN TOOK THEM IN CARS
TO THE HOSPITAL

In the same way, if there is a raging fire in screen 5, you don’t want screen 4 and 6 to keep watching their film as the fire grows, that is why the automatic evacuation alarm sends out an automated message. Once the alarm is triggered, the entire multiplex evacuates, and yes it may cost a few bucks but it is better than loss of life. When the alarm occurs, the message comes over the speakers, the film projection is cut, the exit is lit and the audience is informed to proceed to the evacuation point – which is where the staff should be leading them. A few staff then check each screen, each toilet, and under the front ‘masking’ of the screen to ensure the building is evacuated.

So when “Eyewitnesses say bullets from the shooting in theatre nine passed through the theatre walls into adjacent screens, injuring people there also.” (source) It is the exact opposite of what is supposed to happen.

Why did it? Only Cinemark can answer why the fire exit either had no alarm, or the alarm was not checked. I am guessing, from talks with managers and staff in recent trips to the cinema that the building was extremely understaffed.

So when news reports say that James put on armour and guns and prepared to shoot people with the fire door propped open for up to 30 minutes, something is VERY WRONG. What happened Cinemark?

Cinemark is saying that they have new ‘safety protocols’ like not allowing fake guns into the cinema during a screening. Uh…..right. But what about basic fire protocols?

As for leaving four guns and full body armor out in a exit causeway? How is that possible? Unless you are working that shift, and checking those doors with the alarm turned off, you should not even have access to the 'exit flow' out to the parking lot. Basic safety protocol BEFORE 9/11 stopped that from happening. And AFTER 9/11, the security increased, because a multiplex has 2,000-4,000 who have handed over their safety for two hours by buying a ticket. So whether the gunman he went to his car and got the guns there or they were in the fire exit path, that was a major safety breach.

Why didn't the grenades going off trigger the detectors, evacuate the building and notify authorities?

If one person smoking can cause an evacuation, then how can the EXPLOSION of two grenades, and the charges in them not set off a detector? This SHOULD have triggered a full evacuation of the building and immediate notification of the fire department for two reasons. The First is that due to the history of lethal disasters and the risk of electrical, oxygen and other types of combustion, there are not only two types of emergency fire extinguishers available for trained staff (I know, as I used one during a fire that occurred beside the cinema). Staff are supposed to pass both written tests but also have hands on training. Yet often that is determined by the corporation in charge. Because of history of fires the detectors in cinemas are much more sensitive for anything which could be considered a threat(remember it was the tear gas grenades that started the fire at Waco, TX). I would think that post 9/11, gas would be included in what would set them off. Even if that wasn't triggering the detector, the powder shock charges blowing open a grenade inside a cinema screen should qualify. Second, Batman was filmed using IMAX and 70mm film, which means a projectionist should have been up in the booth, and the projectionist has their own fire alarm system which they can trigger in case of any problems. The reason is because historically the projector has been the trigger of many fires, often the projection booth is isolated for fire safety, and a small window gives the projectionist a view of the screen and audience.

As for leaving four guns and full body armor out in a exit causeway? How is that possible? Unless you are working that shift, and checking those doors with the alarm turned off, you should not even have access to the 'exit flow' out to the parking lot.

NO GAS MASK

SO WAHT ARE THEY GOING TO DO ABOUT THAT?

WHO PUT IT THERE?
AND WHY?
IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE
NO MATTER WHO OR WHY

nice video !

[link to sleepbutawhile.com]

THE REASON THEY PLANTED THE GAS MASK

TO MAKE THE SECOND SHOOTER LOOK LIKE HE WAS WEARING ONE

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




“[Canada Free Press]…

“[Canada Free Press]…Clearly, radio communications from officers at the scene strongly indicate that the responding police officers believed that more than one suspect was involved based on their observations at the scene and in spite of the utterances of the suspect.
The possibility that more than one person was involved is later supported by the presence of other, duplicate equipment, including an second gas mask found at the NE corner of the theater complex—approximately 25 parking slots away from the alleged shooter’s vehicle….”



Since the Aurora Police radio transmissions state that they had the suspect in custody within 90 seconds of arriving, and he was in full combat gear, including the gas mask, how come a SECOND GAS MASK with blood stains is found down at the end of the building hundreds of feet away?

From Washington Post (Click image to enlarge)

[link to sleepbutawhile.com]

YET WE HAVE WITNESS REPORTS TAKEN BY POLICE OF A SECOND SHOOTER
SAT IN THEATER 8
ALL IN BLACK

AND WE KNOW BATMAN KID WAS ALL IN BLACK INCLUDING HIS FACE AND HEAD IN SEALED BLACK SUIT

SO THIS IS WHY THEY PLANTED A SECOND GAS MASK

TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE IF THERE WAS ANY SECOND SHOOTER HE HAD A GAS MASK

BUT WE KNOW THAT GAS MASK
IS PLANTED!!!!!!!!

THE REASON FBI PLANTED THE SECOND GAS MASK solved FOR REAL

TO MAKE THE SECOND SHOOTER LOOK LIKE HE WAS WEARING ONE

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AND TO DISTRACT FROM THE BATMAN SEATED IN THEATER 8
Aurora Eyewitness

SHE DESCRIBES THE PERSON DRESSED AS BATMAN SEATED IN T 8
BEHIND HER!!!!!

[link to www.youtube.com]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE0XvKhLRDc
Rebecca Fedeli TV INTERVIEW - No one in 8 went out Emergency Exit


POLICE RADIO TRANSCRITIONS

Even after 45 more minutes pass – making it more than an hour after Holmes was detained – the officers still mention other potential shooters:

1:16:16: Officer: "Talking to people making statements, sounds like we have possibly 2 shooters, one that was in Theater 8 seated
[link to www.businessinsider.com]





“[Canada Free Press]…Clearly, radio communications from officers at the scene strongly indicate that the responding police officers believed that more than one suspect was involved based on their observations at the scene and in spite of the utterances of the suspect.
The possibility that more than one person was involved is later supported by the presence of other, duplicate equipment, including an second gas mask found at the NE corner of the theater complex—approximately 25 parking slots away from the alleged shooter’s vehicle….”



Since the Aurora Police radio transmissions state that they had the suspect in custody within 90 seconds of arriving, and he was in full combat gear, including the gas mask, how come a SECOND GAS MASK with blood stains is found down at the end of the building hundreds of feet away?

From Washington Post (Click image to enlarge)

[link to sleepbutawhile.com]

YET WE HAVE WITNESS REPORTS TAKEN BY POLICE OF A SECOND SHOOTER
SAT IN THEATER 8
ALL IN BLACK

AND WE KNOW BATMAN KID WAS ALL IN BLACK INCLUDING HIS FACE AND HEAD IN SEALED BLACK SUIT

SO THIS IS WHY THEY PLANTED A SECOND GAS MASK

TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE IF THERE WAS ANY SECOND SHOOTER HE HAD A GAS MASK

BUT WE KNOW THAT GAS MASK
IS PLANTED!!!!!!!!
BECAUSE IT WAS NOT THERE ON THE DARK NIGHT!

HERE IS THE VIDEO ON TOP OF PAGE
BUT SCROLL THROUGH PAGES FOR LATEST ENHANCED VERSION
Thread: BRKnews PROOF ABSOLTUTE SHINY DAMN PROOF THE FBI PLANTED THE GAS

PUT IT THIS WAY

if kid batman was the shooter in the lobby

seated in theater 8
but left to take his position shooting everyone who came out
leading to the warning for everyone to go back in their respective theaters
as there is a sahooter in the LOBBY

although he has sealed bataman suit with face prtected

he didnt really need a gas mask
as he was doing the LOBBY SHOOTING

AND EVEN MAINSTREAM STORY BACKS UP TIHS

AS THEY CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR THE SHOOTER IN THE LOBBY

but the court will try obviously because its fake

because they claim holmes
came in then left vie side exit door leading to his car


NO MENTION OF HIM GOING INTO THE LOBBY
AND POOPING OFF PEOPLE WHO CAME OUT TO MAIN EXIT

But there are numerous reports from both theater 8 and 9
of having to retreat back because of the SHOOTER in the lobby

GREAT THINKING BATMAN!

THAT WAS NO ORDINARY BAT SUIT

CLOAK WAS OBVIOUSLY DETACHABLE

BUT HEAD WAS A SEALED UNIT

CUSTOM MADE I RECKON

HOW DID HE BREATHE TALK SEE EVEN?

I GUESS TOTALLY SEALED EVEN EYES
PLASTIC EYE SHUEILDS LIKE A GAS MASK
ETC

EVEN A FILTER OVER MOUTH AREA

ALSO SEALED CHEST AREA
MOST LIKELY BULLET PROOF ARMOURED ALSO.

blue inner to cloak or blue something

were there not early reports of shooter wearing all blue under his clothes?

The following police radio transmissions were three minutes after Holmes was supposedly detained in/by his car:

9:58 “One of the shooters might be wearing a white and blue plaid shirt” and the dispatcher responds “Copy, outstanding shooter possibly wearing a white and blue plaid shirt.”
At 11:43 “The suspect is saying that he’s the only one but I’m getting conflicting suspect descriptions from the witnesses out here.”

Even after 45 more minutes pass – making it more than an hour after Holmes was detained – the officers still mention other potential shooters:

At 1:16:16: Officer: ”Talking to people making statements, sounds like we have possibly 2 shooters, one that was in Theater 8 seated, another one that came in from the outside into Theater 9. Sounds like it was a coordinated attack.”