I know your right.. yet for some reason, its difficult to remember to attach "radical" before Islam and Muslim when reacting to their actions.

Now, what you said is right on I think. But who really is running this show? Could it be a flock of religious democrats flipped over to repubs (Neocons)? Or the Muslim Brother (with their new found partner Iran) and the crazed clerics that believe firmly that the world must be set ablaze in order to rush in their precious Imam? Or even Israel, trying to gain support for a strike against Iran? Perhaps a Soros operation unfolding for the middle east (if not for the US and its allies)?

A cluster f**** is all I see at the moment. Its not entirely clear. I do know that the Muslim Brotherhood was calling for more protests (they said "peaceful") yet in english, condemning the attacks on embassies. This may be to appease their own population more than an indictment though... much the same way Arafat did with his Palestinian state idea.

Or perhaps, it is enough to be raised in a third world (or developing nation) to end up radicalized in general with nearly any catalyst and finger pointing blame to incite violence.

Again, Its a cluster f****!