| Users Online Now: 2,210 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,399,574 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,016,787 | Threads Today: 566 | Posts Today: 10,870 |
| 04:27 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,210 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,399,574 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,016,787 | Threads Today: 566 | Posts Today: 10,870 |
| 04:27 PM | ||
US Ambassador Chris Stevens Was SODOMIZED in the name of Allah Before Being Killed | |
| Archon User ID: 1003003  United States09/15/2012 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Bostons paying the excise-man or tarring & feathering [link to www.loc.gov] Tar and Feathers in Revolutionary America Benjamin H. Irvin Brandeis University [link to revolution.h-net.msu.edu] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [link to threerivershms.com] The nucleus of such radical mob action was the Sons of Liberty, groups first making their appearance in New England and New York, but soon springing up in virtually every colonial town. These organizations functioned as independent entities and in fact no one has demonstrated a clear and undisputed lineage between them and the...Committees of Correspondence....At the heart of radical demonstrations was the "mechanic," a catchall term covering both master employees and journeymen wage workers. The "mechanics" were the "radicals" and as such were indispensable ingredients in fueling the flame of political protests.(5) One of the favourite pastimes of the mob was to tar and feather "obnoxious Tories." The tar was usually heated before the victim was stripped naked. The hissing tar was poured over the victim's head, shoulder, chest and back and feathers were placed over the pine tar. The victim was then paraded about the streets in a cart for all the townspeople to see what happens to supporters of the British government. Another form of torture inflicted on some of the Tories was to force them to ride the rail. This involved placing the "unhappy victim" upon sharp rails with one leg on each side; each rail was carried upon the shoulders of two tall men, with a man on each side to keep the poor wretch straight and fixed in his seat. Seth Seeley, a Connecticut farmer, who later fled to New Brunswick was brought before a local committee in 1776 and, as punishment for signing a declaration to support the king's laws was put on a rail carried on men's shoulders through the streets, put into stocks and besmeared with eggs and was robbed of money for the entertainment of the Company.(6) Some of the other acts of extreme cruelty used on the Tories by the Patriots were hoisting enemies of liberty up a liberty pole with a dead animal on the pole; forcing a Tory to ride an unsaddled horse with his face to the tail of the horse and his coat turned inside out; sitting Tories on lumps of coal; whipping, cropping ears, placing the enemy in the pillory or stockade. The mob could at times be moved by extremely reactionary impulses and cruel acts. Some of the revolutionary leaders encouraged the sadistics acts of the mobs. In December 1776 the Provincial Congress of New York went so far as to order the Committee of Public Safety to purchase all the pitch and tar necessary for the public's use and safety. General George Washington seems to have approved mob persecution of the Tories. In 1776 General Israel Putnam, one of Washington's generals, met a procession of the Sons of Liberty parading a number of Tories on rails up and down the streets of New York and he attempted to halt this inhuman proceeding. On hearing this, Washington reprimanded General Putnam, stating that "to discourage such proceedings was to injure the cause of liberty in which they were engaged, and that nobody would attempt it but an enemy of his country." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the spring of 1766, John Gilchrist, a Norfolk merchant and ship-owner, came to believe that Captain William Smith had reported his smuggling activities to British authorities. In retribution, Gilchrist and several accomplices captured Smith and, as he reported, "dawbed my body and face all over with tar and afterwards threw feathers on me." Smith's assailants, which included the mayor of Norfolk, then carted him "through every street in town," and threw him into the sea. Fortunately, Smith was rescued by a passing boat just as he was "sinking, being able to swim no longer."(1) Tar and feathers was a very old form of punishment, but it does not appear to have ever been widely applied in England or in Europe.(2) Why Gilchrist and his allies chose to resurrect tar and feathers on this particular occasion historians can only surmise. Whatever their reasons, these Virginians inaugurated a new trend in colonial resistance, a trend that their New England neighbors would eagerly follow. Throughout New England, tar and feathers soon became the "popular Punishment for modern delinquents." By March, 1770, at least thirteen individuals had been feathered in the American colonies: eight in Massachusetts, two in New York, one in Virginia, one in Pennsylvania, and one in Connecticut. In all of these instances, the tar brush was reserved exclusively for customs inspectors and informers, those persons responsible for enforcing the Townshend duties on certain imported goods. Indeed, American patriots used tar and feathers to wage a war of intimidation against British tax collectors. During this period of economic resistance, the practice of tarring and feathering began to take shape as a kind of folk ritual. The participants in this ritual usually consisted of sailors, apprentices, and young boys---those members of society who could be readily mobilized by protesting merchants. In these early days the victim was sometimes fortunate enough to be "genteely" tarred and feathered, that is, over the outer garments. Within Whig ideology, these personal assaults were warranted only because the colonists had been denied all legal avenues of redress, and they were justified only to the extent necessary to deter enforcement of customs duties. This first tar and feathers campaign proved very successful. In conjunction with the nonimportation movement, tar and feather terrorism reduced Townshend duties' revenues below the costs of enforcement. In 1770, the British government recognized that the program was an abysmal failure, and it repealed the taxes on all imports but tea. As a result, the tarring and feathering of these loathed individuals came to a virtual halt. This is not to suggest, however, that the practice of tarring and feathering ceased entirely. To the contrary, tar and feathers had proven an effective deterrent, and patriot leaders quickly devised a new use for it. Before the repeal of the Townshend duties, when the colonists began to galvanize in their opposition to British taxes, Whig merchants coordinated a series of nonimportation agreements. To enforce these agreements, they then invoked the threat of tar and feathers. During this second phase of tarring and feathering, the practice changed significantly. Most notably, Boston mobs began to tar and feather an individual's property and effects rather than his body. Several persons' homes were tarred and feathered, as was at least one merchant's store. In Marlborough, a crowd went so far as to tar and feather the horse of merchant Henry Barnes. As the possibility of war grew imminent, however, Boston leaders began to feel that they could no longer control the violent impulses of the mob. In the wake of the incendiary Tea Party, tarring and feathering mobs nearly killed a crotchety old British official named John Malcom, and they also assaulted four men who had stolen hospital blankets. Meanwhile, back in England, King George III watched indignantly as impertinent colonists abused his agents and officials. In Parliament, where debates raged over how best to punish the Bostonians, one member argued that "Americans were a strange sett of people, and that it was in vain to expect any degree of reasoning from them; that instead of making their claim by argument, they always chose to decide the matter by tarring and feathering."(3) Recognizing that unrestrained violence could only bring the American cause into ill repute, Boston leaders called a halt to the practice of tarring and feathering. The town that contemporaries called a "seminar[y] in the art," and the "Focus of tarring & feathering," now laid the practice to rest.(4) In this resolve, however, Bostonians were alone. After 1773, mobs throughout the colonies continued to treat offenders to the "new-fashioned discipline." And, within this period, the meaning of tar and feathers continued to evolve. The punishment that had once been reserved for trade war culprits was increasingly applied to Tories and their sympathizers. In Georgia, New Jersey, and Connecticut, villagers were quick to feather any perceived "enemy to the rights of America." Tar and feathers were also put to use by the various local committees that formed throughout the colonies. In Charleston, the Secret Committee ordered the first South Carolina tarring and featherings for two men charged with disrespect towards the General Committee. Women also took part in this patriotic ritual. In the fall of 1777, for instance, the participants in a quilting bee seized a youth who dared to speak against the Continental Congress. For want of tar and feathers, these women applied molasses and "the downy tops of the flags that grew in the meadow."(5) As the focus of tar and feathers shifted from informers to loyalists, the practice became more violent. In 1775, a physician named Abner Beebe was blistered by the hot tar poured upon him. The mob then "carried [him] to an Hog Sty & rubbed [him] over with Hogs [sic] Dung. They threw the Hog's Dung in his Face, & rammed some of it down his Throat."(6) In 1776, a Charleston mob committed a even grizzlier execution. According to the local paper: John Roberts, a dissenting minister, was seized on suspicion of being an enemy to the rights of America, when he was tarred and feathered; after which, the populace, whose fury could not be appeased, erected a gibbet on which they hanged him, and afterwards made a bonfire, in which Roberts, together with the gibbet, was consumed to ashes.(7) Over time, the increasing violence of the colonial crowds gave rise to a great deal of ambivalence towards tarring and feathering among patriot organizers. Colonial leaders recognized the injustice of persecuting individuals who had committed no crime against the colonies. For this reason, many leaders began urging the American people to put aside the practice of tarring and feathering. Even Thomas Paine argued that tarring and feathering ought to be abandoned.(8) Yet others resisted Paine's proposal. As late as 1779, a Providence correspondent asked the American people to "[d]etermine whether the application of tar and feathers be not more absolutely necessary at this day, than at any time heretofore!"(9) Notwithstanding this debate, tarring and feathering continued throughout the war and even after it ended. "In the Jersies," wrote Peter Oliver, "they naturalize [returning loyalists] by tarring and feathering; and it costs them more in scrubbing and cleaning than an admission is worth, so that you know the fate of trading your natale solum."(10) Though the Revolution ended with the Treaty of Paris, Americans still felt the need to confirm themselves in their own patriotism and to subject those who had opposed them to a painful rite of reintegration. =============================================================================== Ahhh, the ‘Salad Days’, good times, good times… |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 288414 United States09/15/2012 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16800654 United States09/15/2012 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Golly Gee Willikers!! Those crazy radical Islamists…we’d never do anything so reprehensible [insert facetious Judy Tenuta tone] Quoting: Archon 1003003 The Bostons paying the excise-man or tarring & feathering [link to www.loc.gov] Tar and Feathers in Revolutionary America Benjamin H. Irvin Brandeis University [link to revolution.h-net.msu.edu] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [link to threerivershms.com] The nucleus of such radical mob action was the Sons of Liberty, groups first making their appearance in New England and New York, but soon springing up in virtually every colonial town. These organizations functioned as independent entities and in fact no one has demonstrated a clear and undisputed lineage between them and the...Committees of Correspondence....At the heart of radical demonstrations was the "mechanic," a catchall term covering both master employees and journeymen wage workers. The "mechanics" were the "radicals" and as such were indispensable ingredients in fueling the flame of political protests.(5) One of the favourite pastimes of the mob was to tar and feather "obnoxious Tories." The tar was usually heated before the victim was stripped naked. The hissing tar was poured over the victim's head, shoulder, chest and back and feathers were placed over the pine tar. The victim was then paraded about the streets in a cart for all the townspeople to see what happens to supporters of the British government. Another form of torture inflicted on some of the Tories was to force them to ride the rail. This involved placing the "unhappy victim" upon sharp rails with one leg on each side; each rail was carried upon the shoulders of two tall men, with a man on each side to keep the poor wretch straight and fixed in his seat. Seth Seeley, a Connecticut farmer, who later fled to New Brunswick was brought before a local committee in 1776 and, as punishment for signing a declaration to support the king's laws was put on a rail carried on men's shoulders through the streets, put into stocks and besmeared with eggs and was robbed of money for the entertainment of the Company.(6) Some of the other acts of extreme cruelty used on the Tories by the Patriots were hoisting enemies of liberty up a liberty pole with a dead animal on the pole; forcing a Tory to ride an unsaddled horse with his face to the tail of the horse and his coat turned inside out; sitting Tories on lumps of coal; whipping, cropping ears, placing the enemy in the pillory or stockade. The mob could at times be moved by extremely reactionary impulses and cruel acts. Some of the revolutionary leaders encouraged the sadistics acts of the mobs. In December 1776 the Provincial Congress of New York went so far as to order the Committee of Public Safety to purchase all the pitch and tar necessary for the public's use and safety. General George Washington seems to have approved mob persecution of the Tories. In 1776 General Israel Putnam, one of Washington's generals, met a procession of the Sons of Liberty parading a number of Tories on rails up and down the streets of New York and he attempted to halt this inhuman proceeding. On hearing this, Washington reprimanded General Putnam, stating that "to discourage such proceedings was to injure the cause of liberty in which they were engaged, and that nobody would attempt it but an enemy of his country." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the spring of 1766, John Gilchrist, a Norfolk merchant and ship-owner, came to believe that Captain William Smith had reported his smuggling activities to British authorities. In retribution, Gilchrist and several accomplices captured Smith and, as he reported, "dawbed my body and face all over with tar and afterwards threw feathers on me." Smith's assailants, which included the mayor of Norfolk, then carted him "through every street in town," and threw him into the sea. Fortunately, Smith was rescued by a passing boat just as he was "sinking, being able to swim no longer."(1) Tar and feathers was a very old form of punishment, but it does not appear to have ever been widely applied in England or in Europe.(2) Why Gilchrist and his allies chose to resurrect tar and feathers on this particular occasion historians can only surmise. Whatever their reasons, these Virginians inaugurated a new trend in colonial resistance, a trend that their New England neighbors would eagerly follow. Throughout New England, tar and feathers soon became the "popular Punishment for modern delinquents." By March, 1770, at least thirteen individuals had been feathered in the American colonies: eight in Massachusetts, two in New York, one in Virginia, one in Pennsylvania, and one in Connecticut. In all of these instances, the tar brush was reserved exclusively for customs inspectors and informers, those persons responsible for enforcing the Townshend duties on certain imported goods. Indeed, American patriots used tar and feathers to wage a war of intimidation against British tax collectors. During this period of economic resistance, the practice of tarring and feathering began to take shape as a kind of folk ritual. The participants in this ritual usually consisted of sailors, apprentices, and young boys---those members of society who could be readily mobilized by protesting merchants. In these early days the victim was sometimes fortunate enough to be "genteely" tarred and feathered, that is, over the outer garments. Within Whig ideology, these personal assaults were warranted only because the colonists had been denied all legal avenues of redress, and they were justified only to the extent necessary to deter enforcement of customs duties. This first tar and feathers campaign proved very successful. In conjunction with the nonimportation movement, tar and feather terrorism reduced Townshend duties' revenues below the costs of enforcement. In 1770, the British government recognized that the program was an abysmal failure, and it repealed the taxes on all imports but tea. As a result, the tarring and feathering of these loathed individuals came to a virtual halt. This is not to suggest, however, that the practice of tarring and feathering ceased entirely. To the contrary, tar and feathers had proven an effective deterrent, and patriot leaders quickly devised a new use for it. Before the repeal of the Townshend duties, when the colonists began to galvanize in their opposition to British taxes, Whig merchants coordinated a series of nonimportation agreements. To enforce these agreements, they then invoked the threat of tar and feathers. During this second phase of tarring and feathering, the practice changed significantly. Most notably, Boston mobs began to tar and feather an individual's property and effects rather than his body. Several persons' homes were tarred and feathered, as was at least one merchant's store. In Marlborough, a crowd went so far as to tar and feather the horse of merchant Henry Barnes. As the possibility of war grew imminent, however, Boston leaders began to feel that they could no longer control the violent impulses of the mob. In the wake of the incendiary Tea Party, tarring and feathering mobs nearly killed a crotchety old British official named John Malcom, and they also assaulted four men who had stolen hospital blankets. Meanwhile, back in England, King George III watched indignantly as impertinent colonists abused his agents and officials. In Parliament, where debates raged over how best to punish the Bostonians, one member argued that "Americans were a strange sett of people, and that it was in vain to expect any degree of reasoning from them; that instead of making their claim by argument, they always chose to decide the matter by tarring and feathering."(3) Recognizing that unrestrained violence could only bring the American cause into ill repute, Boston leaders called a halt to the practice of tarring and feathering. The town that contemporaries called a "seminar[y] in the art," and the "Focus of tarring & feathering," now laid the practice to rest.(4) In this resolve, however, Bostonians were alone. After 1773, mobs throughout the colonies continued to treat offenders to the "new-fashioned discipline." And, within this period, the meaning of tar and feathers continued to evolve. The punishment that had once been reserved for trade war culprits was increasingly applied to Tories and their sympathizers. In Georgia, New Jersey, and Connecticut, villagers were quick to feather any perceived "enemy to the rights of America." Tar and feathers were also put to use by the various local committees that formed throughout the colonies. In Charleston, the Secret Committee ordered the first South Carolina tarring and featherings for two men charged with disrespect towards the General Committee. Women also took part in this patriotic ritual. In the fall of 1777, for instance, the participants in a quilting bee seized a youth who dared to speak against the Continental Congress. For want of tar and feathers, these women applied molasses and "the downy tops of the flags that grew in the meadow."(5) As the focus of tar and feathers shifted from informers to loyalists, the practice became more violent. In 1775, a physician named Abner Beebe was blistered by the hot tar poured upon him. The mob then "carried [him] to an Hog Sty & rubbed [him] over with Hogs [sic] Dung. They threw the Hog's Dung in his Face, & rammed some of it down his Throat."(6) In 1776, a Charleston mob committed a even grizzlier execution. According to the local paper: John Roberts, a dissenting minister, was seized on suspicion of being an enemy to the rights of America, when he was tarred and feathered; after which, the populace, whose fury could not be appeased, erected a gibbet on which they hanged him, and afterwards made a bonfire, in which Roberts, together with the gibbet, was consumed to ashes.(7) Over time, the increasing violence of the colonial crowds gave rise to a great deal of ambivalence towards tarring and feathering among patriot organizers. Colonial leaders recognized the injustice of persecuting individuals who had committed no crime against the colonies. For this reason, many leaders began urging the American people to put aside the practice of tarring and feathering. Even Thomas Paine argued that tarring and feathering ought to be abandoned.(8) Yet others resisted Paine's proposal. As late as 1779, a Providence correspondent asked the American people to "[d]etermine whether the application of tar and feathers be not more absolutely necessary at this day, than at any time heretofore!"(9) Notwithstanding this debate, tarring and feathering continued throughout the war and even after it ended. "In the Jersies," wrote Peter Oliver, "they naturalize [returning loyalists] by tarring and feathering; and it costs them more in scrubbing and cleaning than an admission is worth, so that you know the fate of trading your natale solum."(10) Though the Revolution ended with the Treaty of Paris, Americans still felt the need to confirm themselves in their own patriotism and to subject those who had opposed them to a painful rite of reintegration. =============================================================================== Ahhh, the ‘Salad Days’, good times, good times… Have no idea who the weird muslim - [insert facetious Judy Tenuta tone] is but if you are trying to compare the early United States to the dirty muslims who SODOMIZED the US ambassador - you have some problems. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23836498  Morocco09/15/2012 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | absolute bullshit, this is haram, ghadafi says this is haram whilst he has a stick shoved up his arse. The only people I have known obsessed with sticking things up their arses have all called themselves christians |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7465905 United States09/15/2012 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22054163 United States09/15/2012 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It just a matter of opinion and we all have opinion. Suppressed or not opinion is in every non brain dead brain. [link to www.aina.org] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16800654 United States09/15/2012 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Muslims are dirty rotten bastards. "The U.S. ambassador to Libya was raped sexually before killing by gunmen who stormed the embassy building in Benghazi last night to protest against the film is offensive to the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)," The sources said that "Ambassador was killed and representation of his body in a manner similar to what happened with Gaddafi, such as murder. " |
PLEM  User ID: 1000169 United States09/18/2012 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As far as I understand it there is no evidence that Chris Stevens was raped, and that his death was likely due to smoke inhalation from the fires. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10363614 In his death picture his hair appears perfectly coiffed, his shirt was off, suggesting he took off his shirt to breathe through it hoping to filter out the smoke before his death, also his pants were not off and fully buckled in. Supposedly they dragged him out of the building and took him to a hospital and that he had no other injuries apparent. sorry, but his belt looks unbuckled to me. plem |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 237103 United States09/20/2012 12:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 237103 United States09/20/2012 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Zombietard User ID: 24118461  Argentina09/20/2012 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24153350 United States09/20/2012 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When will America stand up and declare war on these disgusting savages known as Muslims? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23166344 Until you visit the VA Hospital systems, please do not say anything about war. did you serve in this war or the Vietnam war? The Civil war in this country cost Americans 750,000 lives. Everyday a US solider kills himself because of the horror of war. We need to keep our distance and let those people figure it all out. They have been unreasonable for centuries. |
| Mwalk Low Earth Orbit User ID: 1067150 United States09/20/2012 10:31 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 579741 United States11/12/2012 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ALL YOU PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE UP FROM LALA LAND! THE US AMBASSADOR WAS SODOMIZED & KILLED 7 VIDEO TAPED! THE FOOTAGE WAS SENT TO THE US GOVENMENT TO KEEPP THEM QUIET ABOUT THE SHIT TYHERE ILLGALLY DOING. OBOMA IS VERY SECRETIVE & THE ONLY PRESIDENT WHO HAS EVER BEEN THAT WAY. AND TO THINK YOU AKLL VOTED FOR THIS ASSHOLE. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21438600 United States11/12/2012 01:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5271623 United States11/12/2012 01:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21438600 United States11/12/2012 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5271623 United States11/12/2012 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hello, Turkish bath houses? Lawrence of Arabia? Videos of Imams anally raping young boys? "Dancing boys" of Afghanistan? You motherfuckers need to wake up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5271623 Sounds like everyday crap going on in San Francisco. There's a reason why libtards love Muslims. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20193680 United States11/12/2012 01:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21438600 United States11/12/2012 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hello, Turkish bath houses? Lawrence of Arabia? Videos of Imams anally raping young boys? "Dancing boys" of Afghanistan? You motherfuckers need to wake up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5271623 Sounds like everyday crap going on in San Francisco. There's a reason why libtards love Muslims. Could it be programing from the jewish-homosexual-media-complex? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5271623 United States11/12/2012 01:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hello, Turkish bath houses? Lawrence of Arabia? Videos of Imams anally raping young boys? "Dancing boys" of Afghanistan? You motherfuckers need to wake up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5271623 Sounds like everyday crap going on in San Francisco. There's a reason why libtards love Muslims. Could it be programing from the jewish-homosexual-media-complex? You think? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 3696169 United States11/12/2012 01:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When will America stand up and declare war on these disgusting savages known as Muslims? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23166344 Until you visit the VA Hospital systems, please do not say anything about war. did you serve in this war or the Vietnam war? The Civil war in this country cost Americans 750,000 lives. Everyday a US solider kills himself because of the horror of war. We need to keep our distance and let those people figure it all out. They have been unreasonable for centuries. Who you fucking talking to? Stay out of it? Let them figure it out? Ya that's you and me you dumb fuck and not my brother and brother in-law who are in the ME. You pansy fuck types make me ill. STAY OUT OF IT you say? Who you defying? For that wishful thinking? You voted for OBama didn't you? Never compare our fuckin civil war to these radical camel fuckers and there war to secure 72 virgins you motherfucker. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69027989 United States06/16/2016 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We dont need no islam nation we dont need no thought control no dark sharia in the classroom false teacher leave them kids alone HEY SATAN LEAVE THEM KIDS ALONE ALL IN ALL YOUR JUST another brick in the wall We dont no islam nation we dont need no thought control No muslim teachings in the classroom False teachers leave those kids alone Hey Satan! Leave them kids alone! ALL IN ALL THEY''RE JUST ANOTHER ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL We dont need no muslim headscarves We dont need no sharia laws No crucifying of the Christians No breaking of Gods holy Laws Hey Satan!!! leave them saints alone! ALL IN ALL THEY'RE JUST ANOTHER ANOTHER BRICK INTHE WALL WE DONT NEED NO ROMAN PONTIF WE DONT NEED NO MAN OF SIN NO ANTICHRISTIAN ROMAN IDOLS WE STAND IN JESUS AND STAND TO WIN HEY SATAN !, LEAVE THEM SAINTS ALONE, ALL IN ALL YOUR JUST ANOTHER ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL We dont need no corporate empire Trading souls for papal gain NO BLOODY CUP OF THE HARLOT CITY STOP BLASPHEMING JESUS NAME HEY SATAN GODS WORD IS TRUTH ALONE! ALL IN ALL YOUR JUST A ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL We dont need no stoning women We don't need no islamic goal No subjigation of our nation Muslim leave our shores go home Hey Satan Leave our lands alone All in all your just a another brick in the wall We dont need no antisemites We dont need your book at all No throwing homos off a rooftop We need jesus we stand tall Hey satan Ya lies do not fool at all!! All in all they're the reason For us building THE WALL |
