Recent Jupiter Anomalies Correspond with J Edward Carper’s Pre-proposed Theory

Even under extraordinary circumstances it wouldn't light, or stay lit.

Let's say we hypothetically managed to raise the cores temperature to start stellar fusion.

What would happen next? IF you know please post, if you don't, still please post. I'm not judging you or anything like that either way.

Fusion creates enough heat to massively expand the planet. This happens in stars too, but eventually due to their mass, the forces of gravity are enough to keep it in equilibrium. Jupiter does not have sufficient mass for this to happen, so it would rapidly expand. As it does, it would cool, and fusion would be turned off, as the heat and density (core pressures) would not be sufficient to keep fusion going. Unless you are going to substantially ad to the Mass of Jupiter, you will not be able to make it fuse for any substantial length of time.

Balanced



:singinsun:

Nope again. Mythology is not created out of constellations. They incorporated constellations but they didn't worship the realms of the gods or their heavenly "houses" but the gods themselves. In order to teach you how you are setting the things upside down and worst , mixing myths from different civilizations, it would take me an eternity. Caiphas and Pontius Pilate or Tiberius Cesar or names mentioned by Peter have never been part of constellations or myths but Christ if ever and for reasons too long too explain. The same was done with other individuals which doesn't deny their existence. On the contrary it makes even more evident.

There's no real Virgo in heavens and I won't discuss with someone who even ignored the Bible never told about 3 kings. If people never read the Bible, haven't read books or ignore what was written in Greek or Hebrew it's like talking with a communist who has never read in his/her miserable life Karl Marx's Capital. A waste of time and energy so I won't comment in that subtopic unless the poster who originally wrote about the date 2 B.C. does.

So you got a big cast iron stove heating up. And you reach into the asteroid belt and grab some popcorn. You throw the kernels on the hot stove...

There WAS NO ASTEROID. You didn't read carefully. Astronomers had to say "asteroid" because they had no other explanation for "silica".

The Wesley mark was KEY EVIDENCE of a fusion reaction starting inside Jupiter.

So you got a big cast iron stove heating up. And you reach into the asteroid belt and grab some popcorn. You throw the kernels on the hot stove...

You have to show proof no asteroid impact occurred first.

That still does not negate the issue as to what would actually happen if you heated the core up to thermonuclear fusion temperatures.

I already told you exactly what would happen, which is opposite of your claim.

There WAS NO ASTEROID. You didn't read carefully. Astronomers had to say "asteroid" because they had no other explanation for "silica".

The Wesley mark was KEY EVIDENCE of a fusion reaction starting inside Jupiter.

Fusion can be consolidated to a small area at first. It TRIED to expand the planet, but under such conditions a WEAK POINT is found. This was Jupiter relieving the fusion pressure.

The current understanding of solar system dynamics, is not.