Glenn Beck: ‘Ron Paul people, I have had it up to here’ | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23984528 United States 09/18/2012 12:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
hugs1111 User ID: 10918646 United States 09/18/2012 12:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ron Paul peeps are NOT going to vote for romney, romney cheated us! Quoting: hugs1111 wtf are the corporate media shills thinking? lol i know, they are paid shills... everyone should watch the new documentary called "billionaires for tea party" I'll bet Ted Cruz's name is mentioned in this koch brothers started the tea party...look into it:) hugs for you:) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22925004 Mongolia 09/18/2012 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't miss the point people. Quoting: TS66 YES wake up and acknowledge the world and the truth around you. YES do what you can. YES accept what you can't change. YES live each day to it's fullest. And finally, YES you will die just like a billion people before you, don't sweat the small stuff, be good to others, and enjoy every minute of what you got. Just like a troubled marriage: What can YOU do? CHANGE it, (Can you change the NWO Oligarchy?) ACCEPT it, (Can you accept your enslavement?) or LEAVE it! (Can you escape the Matrix?) Which will be YOUR choice? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States 09/18/2012 12:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They'll figure it out after it happens. I hate being told what to do by people who can't see that they are two sides of the same coin. Romney will continue as Bush did and Obama will keep on going like Bush did. I don't see a damn bit of difference in Obama and Bush in policy, except Obama is not as amusing as Bush was. At least I got to laugh once in awhile while I was getting fucked when he was president. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22573986 United States 09/18/2012 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "But hey, if as a result of America losing its geo-strategic outposts oil costs 10 dollars a gallon once Iran, Russia and Co can freely extort the West " Geo-strategic outposts? PLEASE!! We have missiles that can be in any country in the world within 10 minutes and ready to glass their playground. What makes you think that having military outposts all over the damned place is in ANY way "geo-strategic?" They are outdated, old ancient relics of no good use and a blood sucking leech on the American people's money. Very good argument for relying on our own oil though isn't it? Can't do that though, because we've got Daryl Hannah fighting for "no drilling" in front of the White House, and we gotta pay attention to that shit, don't we? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States 09/18/2012 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23866201 United States 09/18/2012 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good! We will have someone to blame when Obozo is elected again and He locks up you people in detention and the NDAA. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4436859 Romney support NDAA! What the fuck is wrong with you???? I'm pretty sure he doesn't support ndaa anymore, or maybe he does, I can't keep up with him |
RTS REDUX User ID: 8620349 United States 09/18/2012 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | wasn't signed in Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8620349 That hand signal has been explained. Good God Almighty, some of you are pure idiots. Besides that, I's take the devil himself before I would vote for either in this controlled two party system! yes it has been explained..and you think your vote actually matters in this election? Pelosi: ‘Everybody Knows’ Mitt Romney Will Not Be the Next President [link to www.rawstory.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22573986 United States 09/18/2012 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "YES accept what you can't change." Ron Paul taught us a valuable lesson. Words with truth behind them make change. It may not be change fast enough for most, but it is real change in the long run. So yes, you can change things. You can change the way people think. And that, my friend, is bigger than anything the bought politicians will ever have. The politician may rule for a short term on misguided ideas, and doing whatever he can to get elected again and again, but the poet will rule for the long term on the sonnet of truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22110043 United States 09/18/2012 12:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1145382 United States 09/18/2012 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. I swore I'd write in Ron Paul if he didn't run. Then reality set in. The thought of looking at that commie rat bastard Obama's ugly face for the next four years makes me sick to my stomach. I'll hold my nose and vote for Romney, but I understand the feelings of anybody who wants to cast a protest vote. Honestly, all the "Libertarian" losers who claim they won't vote for Romney... are so spectacularly STUPID and HYPOCRITICAL, it would be so funny if it weren't so damned tragic. They will re-elect Obama. Whose 2nd term will, now that he no longer has to worry about running for office ever aga, as he told Russian President Medvedev in that live pic snafu... well, if you thought Obama was a Muslim-Marxist mole in his 1st term, get ready for what he, Valeri Jarred and Alinsky folk have cooked for you in the 2nd term. I wish Paul-tards woul for be HONEST with themselves and flat-out admit why they don't vote for GOP anymore: because they secretly, if only subconsciously WANT Obama to win. They want Obama to win for several reasons: 1. Obama win means America can begin dying. Many libertarians are self-loathing, envious, anti-social freaks who love to blame their problems on other. So America and the (Republican) rich hurting brings perverse pleasure to them -- ideology or logic or their alleged allegiance to Constitution they love to crow about so much be damned. 2. Romney means no drugs legalization, no food-stamps, no free rides in college to waste on partying, no government paid abortions and other unearned freebies. Despite their hollow rhetoric about "Constitution this and Liberty that".... many Paul-tards LOVE their drugs, they love their food-stamps, their unearned free rides, their abortions in college. But unlike most Liberals who are honest with their own lazyness & dependency on Big Government, Librtarian Poseurs want to have their cake and eat it too -- while hypocrically grandstanding in defense of American Way of Life, Constitution, etc. Beyond pathetic. 3. Libertarians make for best trolls. Deep down they know they follow empty, discredited "ideology", so what's left for them but to troll others? They can't troll Democrats because those Blacks, Hispanics and uneducated low-class Whites will KICK THEIR ASS in a real fight --- while the educated, wealthy Establishment Republicans who actually have something to lose, who fear God, would not touch them more often than not. So Paul-tards see that as weakness and pounce. This thread is but another example. The OP is fool and a vacuous troll. Nothing more. Yawn. Wow, I think you way over-analyze things. Here's why my husband will vote for a third party- he's a Republican who doesn't like Mitt Romney. He voted Libertarian last time because he couldn't stand Palin. That was his first time ever to not vote Republican. He has this thing about how he has to vote because people died for our right to vote or else he'd stay home and not vote at all. I haven't decided who to vote for or if to just skip voting. I voted for Obama last time because of that Palin woman. McCain was lame but I might have voted for him until he picked her for v.p. Romney doesn't seem that bad to me since he might be able to do something about the economy but I can't stand Ryan. I know the v.p. doesn't do much, but what if something happened to Romney and Ryan became president? I just don't think I can bring myself to vote for him. I'm sort of afraid to vote for a Democrat again but the Republican party has turned to crap. My other choice is to write in Ron Paul, who I like but who obviously won't win. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21549080 United States 09/18/2012 12:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Glenn, it IS important to vote for Gary Johnson. He needs 5% of the general vote to qualify the 2016 Libertarian candidate for matching funds. Quoting: RONPAULITICS 22162156 Matching Funds [link to en.wikipedia.org] Besides, who was the Libertarian presidential candidate in 1988 again? It's either vote Johnson or stay home. Obamney will not get our votes anyways. It is a myth that we will vote for red or blue, if Johnson was not in the race. I will be skiing instead of voting come November. Good point. However, I still think matching funds doesn't matter. It didn't matter in 2000 and it certainly won't matter in a post citizens united world. I will be voting Romney, but understand your rationale. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18937460 United States 09/18/2012 12:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. so your gonna put obama back in for revenge and your butt hurt? moran. we simply don't care which tool "wins" we find them both appalling so we'll let the masses with average iqs of 100 cast their votes then wonder why things just keep getting worse and laugh damn your dumb. your banking on the fact you think they are puppets and told what to do, which so do i. but theres always a chance they arent, and they will actually push this country in the direction they believe in. and your not gonna have any input in the push. Obama and Romney are in complete lockstep on every single issue I care about and they are both on the wrong side of it. Upholding the constitution is paramount and both have trampled all over it, so, no, won't be voting for either of them as they are the exact same, IMO. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22573986 United States 09/18/2012 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | he's saying this so you don't split the vote cuz it's an important election to him? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22110043 I was a Republican too before I started reading. He thinks he's awake, he isn't. He's never experienced life without a safety net. He has no idea. He thinks he's awake, but until you've experienced life on both sides of the fence, you CAN NOT be awake. He holds a typical rich asshole point of view. He doesn't even know it. He's useless and needs to hit rock bottom himself before he can speak for everyone. |
ohnonotagain User ID: 23745072 United States 09/18/2012 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15321093 Honestly, all the "Libertarian" losers who claim they won't vote for Romney... are so spectacularly STUPID and HYPOCRITICAL, it would be so funny if it weren't so damned tragic. They will re-elect Obama. Whose 2nd term will, now that he no longer has to worry about running for office ever aga, as he told Russian President Medvedev in that live pic snafu... well, if you thought Obama was a Muslim-Marxist mole in his 1st term, get ready for what he, Valeri Jarred and Alinsky folk have cooked for you in the 2nd term. I wish Paul-tards woul for be HONEST with themselves and flat-out admit why they don't vote for GOP anymore: because they secretly, if only subconsciously WANT Obama to win. They want Obama to win for several reasons: 1. Obama win means America can begin dying. Many libertarians are self-loathing, envious, anti-social freaks who love to blame their problems on other. So America and the (Republican) rich hurting brings perverse pleasure to them -- ideology or logic or their alleged allegiance to Constitution they love to crow about so much be damned. 2. Romney means no drugs legalization, no food-stamps, no free rides in college to waste on partying, no government paid abortions and other unearned freebies. Despite their hollow rhetoric about "Constitution this and Liberty that".... many Paul-tards LOVE their drugs, they love their food-stamps, their unearned free rides, their abortions in college. But unlike most Liberals who are honest with their own lazyness & dependency on Big Government, Librtarian Poseurs want to have their cake and eat it too -- while hypocrically grandstanding in defense of American Way of Life, Constitution, etc. Beyond pathetic. 3. Libertarians make for best trolls. Deep down they know they follow empty, discredited "ideology", so what's left for them but to troll others? They can't troll Democrats because those Blacks, Hispanics and uneducated low-class Whites will KICK THEIR ASS in a real fight --- while the educated, wealthy Establishment Republicans who actually have something to lose, who fear God, would not touch them more often than not. So Paul-tards see that as weakness and pounce. This thread is but another example. The OP is fool and a vacuous troll. Nothing more. Yawn. No, Romneytards make for the best trolls ever. You are a big bag of windy bs. Just like the fuckers that ruined this country. You deserve Romney. You just wait, if he wins and what you are going to get. Bush on fucking steroids, a war with Iran, kick off to WWIII, oh hell yes, I want my name on that. How about you, you vacuousness? If Obama or Romney wins, it's the fault of you and people like you that want to keep on playing the 2 party game. Some of us have had ENOUGH of their crap and YOUR crap. Oh yes another reason: Libertarians are huge pussies who, again, unlike Liberals who at least are honest with themselves, can never admit the pathetic truth about themselves. So of course, they are afraid of the INEVITABLE war with Iran -- the same Iran that is colluding with Bastions of Freedom & Hope like Putin's Russia or China.... in order to BANKRUPT the US by kicking the US out of strategic oil heart of the world and by getting rid of Dollar as world's reserve currency i.e. the 2 things that ensured American dominance since WW-2. You see, Libertarians being ideiologically bankrupt and cowardly as all hell... love to take advantage of all the GOOD things America had to offer to its citizens and the world in the last 70-100 years --- without having to risk their own neck when the BAD things such as Iran are about to happen. Talk about the ultimate hypocrisy. So folks, forget all that BULLSHIT about Ron Paul being snubbed at the Convention, or about that Gary Johnson nobody... This is the REAL reason why Libertarians hate Romney: because he stands in the way of Obama's 2nd term which will make Obama's 1st term look like Ronal Reagan reincarnated. That's right our cowardly, delusional, misanthropic OP couldn't care less about American Way of life or any other lofty things he keeps parroting. "Oh please, please Mr. Romney please don't attack poor widdle Iran that's never attacked anyone in 200 years. We don't want to have American empire anymore. Close all overseas military bases. Use money saved to pay for our drugs, abortions, food-stamps and Montana shacks. But hey, if as a result of America losing its geo-strategic outposts oil costs 10 dollars a gallon once Iran, Russia and Co can freely extort the West --- and the American economy is in 2nd Great Depression because we also can't print our own money anymore as a result of the Dollar not being world's reserve currency anymore... Mr. Romney we hold you accountable, why can't you wave your magical wand and fix things, Mommy mommy mommy why is Romney so mean to us lazy losers!!! It's all banksters fault, they are rich and we hate them, don't know why but we do WHAAAAAAA!!!" WOW....can you say brainwashed fool and uneducated idiot! "The Tree of Liberty is Thirsty and needs Watering" -Me |
RTS REDUX User ID: 8620349 United States 09/18/2012 12:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. I swore I'd write in Ron Paul if he didn't run. Then reality set in. The thought of looking at that commie rat bastard Obama's ugly face for the next four years makes me sick to my stomach. I'll hold my nose and vote for Romney, but I understand the feelings of anybody who wants to cast a protest vote. Honestly, all the "Libertarian" losers who claim they won't vote for Romney... are so spectacularly STUPID and HYPOCRITICAL, it would be so funny if it weren't so damned tragic. They will re-elect Obama. Whose 2nd term will, now that he no longer has to worry about running for office ever aga, as he told Russian President Medvedev in that live pic snafu... well, if you thought Obama was a Muslim-Marxist mole in his 1st term, get ready for what he, Valeri Jarred and Alinsky folk have cooked for you in the 2nd term. I wish Paul-tards woul for be HONEST with themselves and flat-out admit why they don't vote for GOP anymore: because they secretly, if only subconsciously WANT Obama to win. They want Obama to win for several reasons: 1. Obama win means America can begin dying. Many libertarians are self-loathing, envious, anti-social freaks who love to blame their problems on other. So America and the (Republican) rich hurting brings perverse pleasure to them -- ideology or logic or their alleged allegiance to Constitution they love to crow about so much be damned. 2. Romney means no drugs legalization, no food-stamps, no free rides in college to waste on partying, no government paid abortions and other unearned freebies. Despite their hollow rhetoric about "Constitution this and Liberty that".... many Paul-tards LOVE their drugs, they love their food-stamps, their unearned free rides, their abortions in college. But unlike most Liberals who are honest with their own lazyness & dependency on Big Government, Librtarian Poseurs want to have their cake and eat it too -- while hypocrically grandstanding in defense of American Way of Life, Constitution, etc. Beyond pathetic. 3. Libertarians make for best trolls. Deep down they know they follow empty, discredited "ideology", so what's left for them but to troll others? They can't troll Democrats because those Blacks, Hispanics and uneducated low-class Whites will KICK THEIR ASS in a real fight --- while the educated, wealthy Establishment Republicans who actually have something to lose, who fear God, would not touch them more often than not. So Paul-tards see that as weakness and pounce. This thread is but another example. The OP is fool and a vacuous troll. Nothing more. Yawn. Wow, I think you way over-analyze things. Here's why my husband will vote for a third party- he's a Republican who doesn't like Mitt Romney. He voted Libertarian last time because he couldn't stand Palin. That was his first time ever to not vote Republican. He has this thing about how he has to vote because people died for our right to vote or else he'd stay home and not vote at all. I haven't decided who to vote for or if to just skip voting. I voted for Obama last time because of that Palin woman. McCain was lame but I might have voted for him until he picked her for v.p. Romney doesn't seem that bad to me since he might be able to do something about the economy but I can't stand Ryan. I know the v.p. doesn't do much, but what if something happened to Romney and Ryan became president? I just don't think I can bring myself to vote for him. I'm sort of afraid to vote for a Democrat again but the Republican party has turned to crap. My other choice is to write in Ron Paul, who I like but who obviously won't win. McCain is a tool of the Jesuits (NWO) which is why he picked the idiot Palin who probably prefers the dark meat the Tea Party support of her idiocy which includes Glenn Beck btw.. was VERY disappointing to say the least |
jadksn User ID: 22267702 United States 09/18/2012 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13166822 United States 09/18/2012 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. so your gonna put obama back in for revenge and your butt hurt? moran. we simply don't care which tool "wins" we find them both appalling so we'll let the masses with average iqs of 100 cast their votes then wonder why things just keep getting worse and laugh This!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15321093 United States 09/18/2012 01:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "But hey, if as a result of America losing its geo-strategic outposts oil costs 10 dollars a gallon once Iran, Russia and Co can freely extort the West " Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22573986 Geo-strategic outposts? PLEASE!! We have missiles that can be in any country in the world within 10 minutes and ready to glass their playground. What makes you think that having military outposts all over the damned place is in ANY way "geo-strategic?" They are outdated, old ancient relics of no good use and a blood sucking leech on the American people's money. Very good argument for relying on our own oil though isn't it? Can't do that though, because we've got Daryl Hannah fighting for "no drilling" in front of the White House, and we gotta pay attention to that shit, don't we? LMAO, I love it when "Libertarian" poseurs huff and puff and try to sound smart and in-the-know.... while failing miserably. Really, you typed 2 short paragraphs and off-the top of my head I can point out a dozen falsehoods, logical fallacies and plain lazy thinking. Just the obvious: 1. Those "missiles" you refer to. How do you think they came about? Magical missile fairy? No, it's the dreaded, scapegoated Military-Industrial Complex that's been defeating Nazism, Communism, Maoism and generally guarding your ass. If it were up to you Paul-tard isolationist credins, you'd be crawling in front of Krauts, Ruskies, Chinamen, Muslims or some combination of all 4. It was the true extension of Capitalism & free market and yes Imperialism that America was so fricken powerful the last 70 years ago. But that my friend can be degraded faster than you think --- because it is ALWAYS much easier to ruin something than it is to painstakingly build it. Whether talking missiles, infrastructure, dimpomatic or corporate relationships. 2. My comment re: "geo-strategic" collapse does NOT just encompass military bases. It includes everything else. I don;t think you grasp the full extent of importance of AMerican presence in the Middle East, for instance. What do you think REALLY defeated the Evil Empire of Soviet Union? It was oil falling to 10 dollars a barrel. If Us didn't have control of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and others, do youn think it would have been able to have decades-long economic groth largely fueled by cheap oil and keeping Soviets and Chinese or hostile Iran post-79 out of the Gulf? LOL, no a chance. 3. Romney is FAR more liberal by nature than Bush ever was and he is only pretending to be a neo-con because he knows he wouldn't even won the Republican Primary. The war with Iran will probably happen REGARDLESS whether or not it's Obama or Mittens -- except Romney will play to win, while Obama will onlt do it half-assed way which, in war terms, actually means it's going to get worse for the US in the longer-term because the Apocalyptic Ayatollah regime will not be destroyed but merely wounded by secret-Muslim Obama. Make no mistake about it: you vote for 3rd party or write-in, you vote for Obama. I contend that that's what you poseur-pussies Paul tards have always secretly wanted. You love your handouts and drug-fueled lazyness. You hate and envy the rich. And, like most Isolationist charlatans who didn't even want to fight Hitler back in the day, you certainly don't know the first thing about (incredibly comlex world of) geo-politics. Everything else is just convenient excuse. At least Liberals and Marxists are HONEST about their true core and intentions. Libertarians want to have their cake and eat it, too, as usual while lying to both sides of political spectrum using both sides of their own mouth. Pathetic. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States 09/18/2012 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "But hey, if as a result of America losing its geo-strategic outposts oil costs 10 dollars a gallon once Iran, Russia and Co can freely extort the West " Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22573986 Geo-strategic outposts? PLEASE!! We have missiles that can be in any country in the world within 10 minutes and ready to glass their playground. What makes you think that having military outposts all over the damned place is in ANY way "geo-strategic?" They are outdated, old ancient relics of no good use and a blood sucking leech on the American people's money. Very good argument for relying on our own oil though isn't it? Can't do that though, because we've got Daryl Hannah fighting for "no drilling" in front of the White House, and we gotta pay attention to that shit, don't we? LMAO, I love it when "Libertarian" poseurs huff and puff and try to sound smart and in-the-know.... while failing miserably. Really, you typed 2 short paragraphs and off-the top of my head I can point out a dozen falsehoods, logical fallacies and plain lazy thinking. Just the obvious: 1. Those "missiles" you refer to. How do you think they came about? Magical missile fairy? No, it's the dreaded, scapegoated Military-Industrial Complex that's been defeating Nazism, Communism, Maoism and generally guarding your ass. If it were up to you Paul-tard isolationist credins, you'd be crawling in front of Krauts, Ruskies, Chinamen, Muslims or some combination of all 4. It was the true extension of Capitalism & free market and yes Imperialism that America was so fricken powerful the last 70 years ago. But that my friend can be degraded faster than you think --- because it is ALWAYS much easier to ruin something than it is to painstakingly build it. Whether talking missiles, infrastructure, dimpomatic or corporate relationships. 2. My comment re: "geo-strategic" collapse does NOT just encompass military bases. It includes everything else. I don;t think you grasp the full extent of importance of AMerican presence in the Middle East, for instance. What do you think REALLY defeated the Evil Empire of Soviet Union? It was oil falling to 10 dollars a barrel. If Us didn't have control of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and others, do youn think it would have been able to have decades-long economic groth largely fueled by cheap oil and keeping Soviets and Chinese or hostile Iran post-79 out of the Gulf? LOL, no a chance. 3. Romney is FAR more liberal by nature than Bush ever was and he is only pretending to be a neo-con because he knows he wouldn't even won the Republican Primary. The war with Iran will probably happen REGARDLESS whether or not it's Obama or Mittens -- except Romney will play to win, while Obama will onlt do it half-assed way which, in war terms, actually means it's going to get worse for the US in the longer-term because the Apocalyptic Ayatollah regime will not be destroyed but merely wounded by secret-Muslim Obama. Make no mistake about it: you vote for 3rd party or write-in, you vote for Obama. I contend that that's what you poseur-pussies Paul tards have always secretly wanted. You love your handouts and drug-fueled lazyness. You hate and envy the rich. And, like most Isolationist charlatans who didn't even want to fight Hitler back in the day, you certainly don't know the first thing about (incredibly comlex world of) geo-politics. Everything else is just convenient excuse. At least Liberals and Marxists are HONEST about their true core and intentions. Libertarians want to have their cake and eat it, too, as usual while lying to both sides of political spectrum using both sides of their own mouth. Pathetic. Walls and walls of text. Not interesting enough to read. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17851333 United States 09/18/2012 01:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. so your gonna put obama back in for revenge and your butt hurt? moran. we simply don't care which tool "wins" we find them both appalling so we'll let the masses with average iqs of 100 cast their votes then wonder why things just keep getting worse and laugh This!!!! Yep, but it is kind of sad because we are going to have to deal with it, too. |
Factual Error User ID: 19116606 United States 09/18/2012 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23681832 United States 09/18/2012 01:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.examiner.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23593671 Glenn went on to say, “You guys are so delusional you’re going to lead to the Arab Spring. What is wrong with you people? Ron Paul is not running. He’s not running.” “Please by all that is holy, don’t split that vote,” Pat said in reference to libertarians who want to vote for Gary Johnson. “If you think he can win God bless you then vote for him. If you’re trying to make some point you’re out of your mind,” Glenn added. nothing more fun than living in a swing state and being a conservative and refusing to vote for romney because of the way paul was treated it's hilarious watching reactions glenn's and pat's are awesome by all that is holy I'd like to shove those tonsils right down your throat. If you pieces of shit give us Obama again you will be responsible for the suffering, murder and death of thousands of Americans at the hands of his government. Laugh at that assholes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22074557 United States 09/18/2012 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Glenn Beck speaks just enough truth to be a very convincing liar when he needs to be. He consistently has lied about the forged birth certificate and attempted to marginalize and mock those who contest its authenticity or whether its been falsified. That's all you need to know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15321093 United States 09/18/2012 01:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. I swore I'd write in Ron Paul if he didn't run. Then reality set in. The thought of looking at that commie rat bastard Obama's ugly face for the next four years makes me sick to my stomach. I'll hold my nose and vote for Romney, but I understand the feelings of anybody who wants to cast a protest vote. Honestly, all the "Libertarian" losers who claim they won't vote for Romney... are so spectacularly STUPID and HYPOCRITICAL, it would be so funny if it weren't so damned tragic. They will re-elect Obama. Whose 2nd term will, now that he no longer has to worry about running for office ever aga, as he told Russian President Medvedev in that live pic snafu... well, if you thought Obama was a Muslim-Marxist mole in his 1st term, get ready for what he, Valeri Jarred and Alinsky folk have cooked for you in the 2nd term. I wish Paul-tards woul for be HONEST with themselves and flat-out admit why they don't vote for GOP anymore: because they secretly, if only subconsciously WANT Obama to win. They want Obama to win for several reasons: 1. Obama win means America can begin dying. Many libertarians are self-loathing, envious, anti-social freaks who love to blame their problems on other. So America and the (Republican) rich hurting brings perverse pleasure to them -- ideology or logic or their alleged allegiance to Constitution they love to crow about so much be damned. 2. Romney means no drugs legalization, no food-stamps, no free rides in college to waste on partying, no government paid abortions and other unearned freebies. Despite their hollow rhetoric about "Constitution this and Liberty that".... many Paul-tards LOVE their drugs, they love their food-stamps, their unearned free rides, their abortions in college. But unlike most Liberals who are honest with their own lazyness & dependency on Big Government, Librtarian Poseurs want to have their cake and eat it too -- while hypocrically grandstanding in defense of American Way of Life, Constitution, etc. Beyond pathetic. 3. Libertarians make for best trolls. Deep down they know they follow empty, discredited "ideology", so what's left for them but to troll others? They can't troll Democrats because those Blacks, Hispanics and uneducated low-class Whites will KICK THEIR ASS in a real fight --- while the educated, wealthy Establishment Republicans who actually have something to lose, who fear God, would not touch them more often than not. So Paul-tards see that as weakness and pounce. This thread is but another example. The OP is fool and a vacuous troll. Nothing more. Yawn. Wow, I think you way over-analyze things. Here's why my husband will vote for a third party- he's a Republican who doesn't like Mitt Romney. He voted Libertarian last time because he couldn't stand Palin. That was his first time ever to not vote Republican. He has this thing about how he has to vote because people died for our right to vote or else he'd stay home and not vote at all. I haven't decided who to vote for or if to just skip voting. I voted for Obama last time because of that Palin woman. McCain was lame but I might have voted for him until he picked her for v.p. Romney doesn't seem that bad to me since he might be able to do something about the economy but I can't stand Ryan. I know the v.p. doesn't do much, but what if something happened to Romney and Ryan became president? I just don't think I can bring myself to vote for him. I'm sort of afraid to vote for a Democrat again but the Republican party has turned to crap. My other choice is to write in Ron Paul, who I like but who obviously won't win. No offense, but your way of voting of "ooh, Obama is dreamy, not like that Paul Ryan [dork]" and then in one sentence say that you knonw VP is not that important and in another breathe admit that you disqualified McCain/Romney because of their running mates. What is this, Real Housewives of Albaquerque? Honestly, this irrational, silly sh!t right there this is why women had to fight 100s of years to get their right to vote. And yes, as long as you and especially your husband TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY for putting a Muslim-Marxist Mole who wants to slowly destroy America... in the White House both in 2008 and what's worse in 2012.... it's on your conscience, it's for you to live with yourself. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23681832 United States 09/18/2012 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Idiots like Glenn Beck don't seem to understand that the Republican party has permanently lost lots of voters who disagree with the neo-con agenda. Those voters are never coming back. Quoting: Factual Error That would be the God loving, Israel loving, anti-abortion, anti-big government, pro-small business Republican neo-con agenda that has ALWAYS been the Republican party platform??? I thought Republicans had lost voters because they moved to the center and tried to compromise with the immoral, Godless Democratic party that is predominantly run by FOREIGN money. |
Proskiracer User ID: 23988181 United States 09/18/2012 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. Me to. I would have called you out 8 months ago, but I will do the same. THINK ABOUT THIS! The universe created life to be observed, without an observer, it never existed. So it is a mathematical proof that the universe created life. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15321093 United States 09/18/2012 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "But hey, if as a result of America losing its geo-strategic outposts oil costs 10 dollars a gallon once Iran, Russia and Co can freely extort the West " Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22573986 Geo-strategic outposts? PLEASE!! We have missiles that can be in any country in the world within 10 minutes and ready to glass their playground. What makes you think that having military outposts all over the damned place is in ANY way "geo-strategic?" They are outdated, old ancient relics of no good use and a blood sucking leech on the American people's money. Very good argument for relying on our own oil though isn't it? Can't do that though, because we've got Daryl Hannah fighting for "no drilling" in front of the White House, and we gotta pay attention to that shit, don't we? LMAO, I love it when "Libertarian" poseurs huff and puff and try to sound smart and in-the-know.... while failing miserably. Really, you typed 2 short paragraphs and off-the top of my head I can point out a dozen falsehoods, logical fallacies and plain lazy thinking. Just the obvious: 1. Those "missiles" you refer to. How do you think they came about? Magical missile fairy? No, it's the dreaded, scapegoated Military-Industrial Complex that's been defeating Nazism, Communism, Maoism and generally guarding your ass. If it were up to you Paul-tard isolationist credins, you'd be crawling in front of Krauts, Ruskies, Chinamen, Muslims or some combination of all 4. It was the true extension of Capitalism & free market and yes Imperialism that America was so fricken powerful the last 70 years ago. But that my friend can be degraded faster than you think --- because it is ALWAYS much easier to ruin something than it is to painstakingly build it. Whether talking missiles, infrastructure, dimpomatic or corporate relationships. 2. My comment re: "geo-strategic" collapse does NOT just encompass military bases. It includes everything else. I don;t think you grasp the full extent of importance of AMerican presence in the Middle East, for instance. What do you think REALLY defeated the Evil Empire of Soviet Union? It was oil falling to 10 dollars a barrel. If Us didn't have control of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and others, do youn think it would have been able to have decades-long economic groth largely fueled by cheap oil and keeping Soviets and Chinese or hostile Iran post-79 out of the Gulf? LOL, no a chance. 3. Romney is FAR more liberal by nature than Bush ever was and he is only pretending to be a neo-con because he knows he wouldn't even won the Republican Primary. The war with Iran will probably happen REGARDLESS whether or not it's Obama or Mittens -- except Romney will play to win, while Obama will onlt do it half-assed way which, in war terms, actually means it's going to get worse for the US in the longer-term because the Apocalyptic Ayatollah regime will not be destroyed but merely wounded by secret-Muslim Obama. Make no mistake about it: you vote for 3rd party or write-in, you vote for Obama. I contend that that's what you poseur-pussies Paul tards have always secretly wanted. You love your handouts and drug-fueled lazyness. You hate and envy the rich. And, like most Isolationist charlatans who didn't even want to fight Hitler back in the day, you certainly don't know the first thing about (incredibly comlex world of) geo-politics. Everything else is just convenient excuse. At least Liberals and Marxists are HONEST about their true core and intentions. Libertarians want to have their cake and eat it, too, as usual while lying to both sides of political spectrum using both sides of their own mouth. Pathetic. Walls and walls of text. Not interesting enough to read. Nah, it's that you intellectually-feeble, ideologically BANKRUPT "Libertarian" poseurs hate to read -- probably because you can't. So you're just trying to save face. Nice try, LOL. Oh and Truth is not always "interesting". But it still needs to be mentioned to delusional bozos like you and the OP. You're welcome. |
anon User ID: 16752639 United States 09/18/2012 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think its funny. Since they wanted to cram mormon Romney down our throats as conservatives, and shun Ron Paul, im writing paul in. Quoting: Reelman I will not vote for the lesser of two evils, I wont vote for evil at all. Obama will win, the vote will be split. I am voting for Gary Johnson as he will be on the ballots of all 50 states. AFAIK, not all states allow write-ins, therein lies the crux of the problem. If you vote for Gary and he does get the plurality of all the votes, I can pretty much guarantee that he will ask Ron Paul to fill a high level position. Even Dennis Kucinich, another great truth teller, could end up in the Johnson administration too. So, I think the best thing is to vote for Gary Johnson. Obama and Romney are pure corporate/bankster/Wall-St. shills and have no place in American politics. WRT Obama winning, yeah, a good possibility since it's his select company in Spain that will count the votes for him. I don't understand why the Repugs aren't yelling and screaming about this arrangement. |
RTS REDUX User ID: 8620349 United States 09/18/2012 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Idiots like Glenn Beck don't seem to understand that the Republican party has permanently lost lots of voters who disagree with the neo-con agenda. Those voters are never coming back. Quoting: Factual Error Glenn Beck is hardly an IDIOT you pos! the only reason he prob. supported idiot Palin is because so many are so fucked up in the head. Was he not the person who EXPOSED Crime Inc.? Anita Dunn Van Jones Unless you actually know wtf you're talking bout homeskillit maybe it would behoove you to stfu? Thread: AGENDA 21..update: Al Gore Comes Unhinged During Climate Change Speech! |