Obama Changes Tune - Now labels Embassy Attack as Terrorist - led by Gitmo Detainee!

Laughable all the false flags.

The Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was in fact "a terrorist attack" and the U.S. government has indications that members of al Qaeda were directly involved, a top Obama administration official said Wednesday morning.

"I would say yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy," Matt Olsen, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said Wednesday at a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, in response to questioning from Chairman Joe Lieberman (I-CT) about the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

[link to thecable.foreignpolicy.com]

Gitmo trained eh ?

So, it's Obama's fau....... wait Bush's fault, once again.

2007 = bush......

eh?

Ex-Gitmo Detainee Blamed in Libyan Consulate Attack

The Obama Administration’s claims that last week’s attack on the Benghazi Consulate was spontaneous seems to be falling apart tonight, as officials are now openly calling it a terrorist attack.

Now the US also believes that a former Guantanamo Bay detainee may have been involved in the attack.

[link to news.antiwar.com]

Bush released a number of prisoners because of extreme pressure by the left and the msm.

After they have advanced MKUltra training only to be placed in strategic locations and activated when the need arises.

Optical Illusion of the Globalists: Al-Qaeda Attacking US Embassies Across the World

[link to counterpsyops.com]

A Fox News report didn't say how bin Qumu, a Libyan, may have been explicitly involved with the attack, although his fighting group — Ansar al-Shariah — is suspected in taking part.

Analysts at Guantanamo branded him in 2005 as “medium to high risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the U.S., its interests and allies,” the New York Times reported last year.

Bin Qumu was transferred from the detention camp to Libya in 2007, and was freed the next year in an amnesty for militants, according to The Times.

His Guantanamo file reportedly shows he has ties to 9/11 financiers.


Read more: [link to www.nydailynews.com]

White House dumps false cover story on embassy attacks?

For a week various Obama administration figures, including the White House press secretary, have insisted that the attacks on U..S. embassies in the Middle East were a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video. But that excuse has not held up to even superficial scrutiny.

The public certainly senses something is not right. Unlike the media, which is entirely obsessed with Mitt Romney’s remarks about the attacks, the public is troubled by President Obama’s handling or lack of handling of the crisis.

The pictures of dead Americans and burned embassies strike a cord with Americans.

So it is not surprising that Obama is down five points on handling of foreign policy and 12 points among independents, according to the latest Wall Street Journal-NBC poll.

It may get worse as the Obama administration’s story about the embassy attacks changes dramatically.

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

The U.S. ambassador and three other Americans killed last week in Libya died “in the course of a terrorist attack,” a senior U.S. intelligence official told lawmakers Wednesday.

Matthew Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, repeated earlier statements by the Obama administration that initial conclusions do not point to a planned assault. Instead, he said, “the facts that we have now indicate that this was an opportunistic attack,” in which heavily armed militants took advantage of an ongoing demonstration at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

WSJ/NBC Poll: Obama approval on foreign policy falls significantly on claims 'Benghazi Bungle' not terrorism; 11-point shift as approval falls and disapproval rises.

[link to blogs.wsj.com]

The Obama administration labeled Qumu an “ally of sorts,” according to the New York Times – that despite the fact that as of 2005, he was known as a “medium to high risk … likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests and allies.”

What made him an ally? According to the Times, that status change was due to the Obama administration’s “remarkable turnabout resulting from shifting American policies rather than any obvious change in Mr. Qumu.”

As a leader of the Libyan rebels, head of the Darnah Brigade, Qumu received support from NATO.

And unnamed Western observers, according to the Times, felt that Qumu wasn’t a real threat.

[link to www.breitbart.com]

Last Edited by DoorBert on 09/20/2012 06:45 AM

Much thanks for super pin!

Well, one can draw only two conclusions from this: either Obama knew the "spontaneous" story was a lie, or he was too incompetent and naive to see that it was incorrect. Neither possibility is flattering...

While the Obama administration finally begins to cop to the fact that the Libyan assault on our Benghazi consulate and the murder of our ambassador was in fact a terrorist attack, new details arise showing that they knew all along that such an attack could in fact take place.

Not only that – despite that knowledge, they left our ambassador virtually unguarded.

[link to www.breitbart.com]

As ye reap,so shall ye sow!

Thanks Doorbert for your continued great threads!

I agree, great post OP. What is your assessment of the election in November? Do you think anyone has a chance of beating Obama?

Listen, in my opinion they labeled this attack being led by an ex gitmo detainee is because of the court ruling just a few days ago stating indefinite detention was not allowed. Well then the White Houses' lawyers fought it and had it over-ruled. This is just to bolster why we 'need' gitmo and indefinite detention.

I thought the indefinite detention pertained to American citizens, not prisoners of war.

I thought it pertained to both. I could be wrong though.

Much thanks Rising Son!

IMHO Obama is ahead at this point but a lot can happen between now and the elections - if in fact they happen.

What do you think?

Last Edited by DoorBert on 09/20/2012 07:14 AM

Wasn't there an attack on Americans at the embassy in Mexico last month? I can see them covering that up during an election year. I think the US government and companies have poked the Islamic hornets nest too many times. This really seems like a systematic attacks on all the US embassies that we are either in a war with or near.

The Gitmo Detainee didn't make that happen.

I'm sad to say that it appears my hunch that it no longer even matters is accurate.

I fully beleive a huge UFO could land in times square and an hour later the sheep would be asking what else is on..

Notice how the MSM seem to have realized this. No need to cover anything up anymore, just keep throwing excuses until one sticks and makes its rounds on facebook...

Weeks later, as far as the masses are concerned, that has always been the official stance.



So lets all watch now, as we get giddy thinking
'This is it!' the masses will finally wake up as MSM starts to cover the lies.

Then we can all comfort each other when the opposite happens.

You wanna know how the masses are reacting to this? All you'd have to do is stand outside a walmart and ask the throngs passing by. I gurantee not a single fuck will be given.

This is the world we must endure, so is it any wonder so many of us want to watch it all burn?

With countries we are at war with rather. I really should log in.

I'm not completely sure either, but regardless, if the administration can justify indefinitely detaining an American citizen, then they would have no problem doing the same to a suspected terrorist or prisoner of war.