Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,276 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,288,245
Pageviews Today: 1,718,161Threads Today: 433Posts Today: 5,900
01:39 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24314358
Australia
09/23/2012 09:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.


Extract:

"...it must have been really pleasing when scientists, when in 1974, a more or less complete ancient human skeleton was found at a site in New South Wales, Australia, where once there had been a lake (now dried up).

The skeleton was undoubtably that of a homosapien and it was called Mungo Man.

Scientists were quick to proclaim that he was one of the most important human fossil to EVER have been found.

But it then turned out that Mungo Man was maybe not such a welcome edition to the meager homosapiens fossil hall afterall.

He posed problems.

Firstly, there was his age. Scientists at the Australian National University, as late as 1999, put the age of Mungo Man at around 60,000 years.

But that did not fit in with the Out of Africa, school of evolutionary thought...(continued)"
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 24314358
Australia
09/23/2012 09:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 24314358
Australia
09/23/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
Universities all around the world are being shills. They are feeding their sheep disinfo!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 24314358
Australia
09/23/2012 09:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24086162
United Kingdom
09/23/2012 09:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
weird.... but interesting... and of course there is the proximity of aus to antarctica.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24330153
Australia
09/24/2012 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12230704
United States
09/24/2012 08:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
His remains are one of the oldest anatomically modern human remains found in Australia.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1018225
United States
09/24/2012 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Out-of-Africa evolutionary theory is invalid. Here's why.
The biggest problem I see with the out of Africa theory is the concept that there was two migrations.
The first migration they claim was what evolved into neanderthal the second migration saw the mix of crow-mag-non with the neanderthal into the modern European. This does not make sense because we do not see much evolution in the divergent migrants after the combination of Neanderthal and crow-mag-non. We also do not see evolutionary changes taking place in people living in environments that were proposed to have caused the evolutionary changes in the first place.
It appears to me that the out of Africa theory has too many flaws to be valid, as do the creation myths that suggest all human life began with just two people.
The only thing that makes sense to me is that humans either evolved independently of each other in different regions or were created as small groups in different locations separately. Either way the evidence suggests that both religion and science are on the wrong track.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!