Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,852 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,224,899
Pageviews Today: 1,680,338Threads Today: 328Posts Today: 6,930
12:25 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Anunnaki, Nibiru created a stable genetic stock, eventually became so numerous some of us were expelled from the Annunaki city centers
Poster Handle Aikan
Post Content
One of the most basic things Sitchin says is the Anunnaki created man as a slave to mine gold. Man was created as a hybrid of Anunnaki DNA with the homo erectus being that was here on Earth.

One question that Sitchen fails to answer is what are the chances that two separate forms of life from different planets are so compatible enough that they can be successfully mated?
The Anunnaki were in human form in every way enough to be compatible with homo erectus?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1353946


If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
 Quoting: AwakenedDude


Sitchin debunkers are not is worried whether he misinterpreted things like location of Sumerian cities, dates of kingdoms or dynasties timelines. The concerning of Sitchin debunkers is conveniently to discredit everything he said about giant extraterrestrial aliens colonizing Earth half million years ago. If Sitchin had never mentioned the ANUNNAKI, nobody would be concerned in "debunk" him, therefore it's obviously a biased agenda to stop people reasoning on this subject.

If you Google for archeological excavations in the Middle East and Egypt you will find out that most of them were funded by the Rothschilds, so obviously the mainstream scholars follow the Zionist agenda to dumb-down the masses, and definitely Sitchin books don't fit in this agenda.
 Quoting: UndercoverAlien


Sitchin didn't invent the Anunnaki name. It was from the Sumerian tales.
What Sitchin did was spin a wild tale that has errors all along the way. And when confronted, he would get angry and defensive about it.
No one questions the Anunnaki from the Sumerian legends or even the ones who appear in HP Lovecrafts ' Necronomicon '.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1353946


1. I never said that Sitchin did invent the Anunnaki name. Bad start!!

2. The "ANUNNAKI" are depicted all over the Sumerian Genesis "ENUMA ELISH". It may be considered a "tale" by ignorant people who believe everything unusual depicted by ancient civilizations, didn't happen, because you were not there in Sumer, 6,000 years ago, to verify for yourself.

3. The Christian genesis is entirely cloned from the "ENUMA ELISH", nevertheless I don't see ANY scholars worried about debunking the "misinterpretations" made by the Council of Nicaea and kept by the Roman church for 2,000 years.

4. Sitchin was the first person to bring the ANUNNAKI into the realm of the pop culture, under a scientific scrutiny, not by a fictional approach.

5, You can find EXACTLY the same depictions of giant caucasian-like bearded "star gods" coming from the skies to teach civilization to men, in several ancient cultures that had NO mutual contact whatsoever, such as the Meso-Americans and Mesopotamians. Sitchin just bothered in wrap it all together, and that's what pisses off the haters and skeptics.
 Quoting: UndercoverAlien


Thread: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:



News