Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,787 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,793,553
Pageviews Today: 2,430,917Threads Today: 536Posts Today: 9,993
04:42 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8407446
United States
09/26/2012 11:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Guess the 188 day EQ cycle is true... 6 x in a row!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
09/26/2012 11:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
can you please post the date of all 6 that are 188 days apart please
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8407446
United States
09/26/2012 11:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Actually its more than 6 x in a row...Someone did a study going back decades and said it was true each time...

I think I read it here on GLP...Not sure...

But it sure seems to be panning out...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18427787
United States
09/26/2012 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
what 6 in a row, the last 188 day was the 24 th and there was no quake 7 or higher as discussed and none on the 25th or 26th
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
09/27/2012 12:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Actually its more than 6 x in a row...Someone did a study going back decades and said it was true each time...

I think I read it here on GLP...Not sure...

But it sure seems to be panning out...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8407446


If you have a look on USGS there is no pattern at all, I think there was 2 in a row, but thats about it.

The 188day falls apart when the start claiming quakes that are 190 or 180 daya apart, 188 is 188.

And is some cases of the ones that are 190+ days apart the 188 count seems to start from there not when the 188 should have happend.

Trust me when I say the 233 day cycle is more accurate
pray_Italy

User ID: 24496372
Italy
09/27/2012 12:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
2010 02 27 8.8 CHILE
2010 09 03 7.0 NZ
2011 03 11 9.0 JAPAN
2011 09 15 7.3 FIJI
2012 03 21 6.6 PAPUA NEW GUINES
2012 09 26 6.9 ALASKA
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23965031
United States
09/27/2012 12:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Bwahaha, 188Tards. Bending data to fit their so called theory of which they claim as fact..
pray_Italy

User ID: 24496372
Italy
09/27/2012 12:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Actually its more than 6 x in a row...Someone did a study going back decades and said it was true each time...

I think I read it here on GLP...Not sure...

But it sure seems to be panning out...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8407446


If you have a look on USGS there is no pattern at all, I think there was 2 in a row, but thats about it.

The 188day falls apart when the start claiming quakes that are 190 or 180 daya apart, 188 is 188.

And is some cases of the ones that are 190+ days apart the 188 count seems to start from there not when the 188 should have happend.

Trust me when I say the 233 day cycle is more accurate
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


IMO, the 188 day cycle SHOULD account for +/- 1 day variation as I have a feeling this might be due to some object orbiting "out there" somewhere in an ecliptic orbit....
So EVEN if this would mean that until it is figured out WHAT object this is and what EXACT orbit it has, account MAJOR quake (7.4+ IMO) at 186/190 days apart would still be more likely EVIDENCE to this cycle in order to PREDICT in what period of time NARROWED down to 2/4 days an EQ HITS... oppose to the actual "popular" science which just blatantly states that predicting EQs is IMPOSSIBLE... lulz

Just go read all the indepth information MATRIXLNIN11 has put out over the months/years in this respect.....
pray_Italy

User ID: 24496372
Italy
09/27/2012 12:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Bwahaha, 188Tards. Bending data to fit their so called theory of which they claim as fact..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23965031


SHILL... lulz... do the MATH yourself (it's not too hard) and you'll discover that there is NO BENDING involved.....

Simply start with one date, add 188 days and you'll get the next day then repeat.....
MatrixLNIN11

User ID: 24489474
United States
10/04/2012 07:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 6 x in a Row.....Guess there is something to that 188 day EQ Cycle !!!
Actually its more than 6 x in a row...Someone did a study going back decades and said it was true each time...

I think I read it here on GLP...Not sure...

But it sure seems to be panning out...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8407446



News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!