NASA lies: Apollo 16 Moon Hoax evidence (Conspiracy a proven fact)

Speaks for itself so check it out

Nice!

5 stars

AGREED 5*

100% Worth watching

100% pretty fuckin awesome! 5stars

If this is legit they screwed up another way. Look at the major slope they are on. It would not be that noticeable. They are not on a hill the background is flat which is the horizon. So it seems they have the size of the moon a little too small for there to be this much of a slant.

hilarious that people are still falling for SVector's hoax AFTER he admitted it. Truly a case of you seeing what you want to see.

Cheers!

I can't believe that people still think they landed on the moon.

Well, they probably went there, the hoaxed photos and footage is probably due to what they FOUND there.

clavius.org

aka, MoonShillCentral!

bump and 5 stars. Hard to argu with. Sad, but true.

Yup, isnt it the same people that are behind BadAstronomy.com ?

No one got more?

The thing here is that "svector" used an original footage from an angle that is DIFFERENT than the public and official material. Thus it means he IS a real insider with access to NASA material that others do not have access to. It seems that he was just being silenced , and forced to say it was a "hoax".

In other words, the footage is unreleased, and was never meant for the public - most likely because of the stage hand being visible.

Right. Those NASA morans would never thing of destroying the footage which would prove the whole thing to be a hoax, instead they tuck it safely away never to be seen again. Oooops.

So lemme get the OP straight; the landing is a hoax because a fake video which was released as a fake and described as a fake looks too good to be a fake?

I suppose there's really a rock band on the Moon, too!



Heh. Does the OP not even grasp that there was no film (outside of, of course, the DAC) and all the EVA material was caught on video? I'll admit, Svector omitted one of the usual gaffs and didn't put FILM artifacts on the video segment, but I'm pretty sure those are stock Adobe effects over the titles.

yup

soundtrack makes the video unwatchable

yes

The thing that convinces me is....

The stagehands SHADOW.....look at the green screen shot....there is NO shadow of the person....but you can clearly see shadow on the film...

Maybe you can't green screen a shadow...

Good point! That is an interesting observation! More credibility that it is a real hoax performed by NASA themselves! Why would anyone try to make a hoax of NASA hoaxing in the first place? Makes absolutely no sense. Specially not when the video used is one never before released, meaning a NASA insider must have created it in either case.

That's what AfterEffects is for. Shadows, dust, motion blur -- all the tools to fit a rendered or separately photographed object into the image in a convincing way.

I am pretty sure NASA got their own self-made software for such. Doubt they use AfterEffects when manipulating their stuff

NASA cant be trusted for anything, whatever they say cant be taken for granted and more probably just lies.