Syrian Chemical weapons on the move : CNN Now : Its 3:00 AM obummer what ya going to do!!

right after this commercial break, Barbra Star from the pentagon.

[link to www.swissinfo.ch]

Last Edited by boilerbengal on 09/28/2012 11:04 AM

news conference moments ago. Leon Penneta confirms intelligence Syria has moved some chemical weapons.


I imagine that the couple low stars are because you believe the downplay by the government media.

short term memory huh ??? i remind you.


State Department: No more questions on Benghazi atrocity.

[link to riehlworldview.com]

so believe what you will ..

Last Edited by boilerbengal on 09/28/2012 11:14 AM

Syrians moved some chemical weapons to improve security, main chemical weapons sites remain in place, US defense secretary says - @Reuters

last week CNN was saying from a reporter in Lebanon that Assad was dropping 500lb bombs on civilians...



ummmm.... Yeah ok

so what makes this story true.... oh I know, it's Zionism...

"There has been some intelligence that with regards to some of these sites that there has been some movement in order for the Syrians to better secure ... the chemicals," Panetta told a Pentagon news conference. "So while there's been some limited movement, again the major sites still remain in place, still remain secure."

[link to news.yahoo.com]

WAG
THE
DOG.....

Let the "Humanitarian" Bombing begiN!

i'm getting at thats its downplayed !! the red line changed again..

red line --- move chemical weapons

red line --- its ok if its for security purposes ,, HUH !!

there are no red lines. this administration has no BALLS to protect our national security before the elections. none.

I bet there could be Chinese troops attacking Seattle and they'd say they were on vacation from china

yes.. the state department and administration stated in the past. if the weapons had any chance to fall into radical hands, or they moved them action would be taken.

Sounds like our government just admitted some movement.

If Obama has balls, he have to act now!
Red Line was movement of chemical weapons not movement of ALL MAJOR chemical weapons, but it seems like they want to play it down so they dont have to act..


"limited movement" LOL

it's like saying "we dont attack iran because they just want to build a small nuke, not a big one!"

there are UN-confirmed reports of some maybe in rebel hands last week i believe.

They could blast one towards Israel in an attempt to implicate the Syrian govt

exactly.. they dont want to do shit till after the elections. these are serious issues that need attention now

this should get more attention guys
syria just crossed the red line!

Turkish foreign minister: Risk worth taking for Syria safe zones
[link to www.bbc.co.uk]

For "humanitarian" reasons of course!

Another nutty sick sad americqan thread yet again full of lies yet again who the fuck believes anything CNN SAYS for fucks sake believing cnn is like believing the BBC (british brainwashing corporation) do us all a favour and take your lies and FUCK OFF SAD SICK AMERICAN CUNT

Are you on your period? Your rant could have used a few.

FFS, CNN. This world has no chance.

your missing the point my English pacifist friend. its not just CNN reporting these movments also.

preemptive action does not mean all out bombardment. these weapons being moved means they are not secured. and its not fearmongering to suggest these weapons in the wrong hands ( Islamic extremists ) is a very bad thing.

Rebels extremists have no chance to get those chems.

i would love to hear why your so sure ,, and i hope your right.

First i 'll say that your argument in the previous post is a bit flawed. If NATO and CNN are worrying about rebels and islamist extremists getting the chems, then they should stop supporting them first, the hypocrisy on this subject is unreal.

Rebels have no chance against the Syrian army generally speaking, military capability of the Syrian army is greatly underestimated in GLP for some reason. They can't pull of an operation of getting the chems, some reports are saying that most of the chems are in the Russian base of Tartus anyway. The only chems that rebels will get is the ones that NATO will give them for the upcoming chem false flag.

Soooo is this new news which would equal DOOM, or is this old news? I have read over the past month Syria has been moving their chemical weapons to multiple locations all over Syria; spreading them out so they don't keep all their eggs in one basket. Is pannetta a few weeks late on that news, or is this a new development?

All I know is it took Pannetta weeks to say Libya was a terrorist act, when everyone else knew what was up the second it hit GLP....

Last Edited by DL on 09/28/2012 12:03 PM

I've read the same thing about moments but the press conference at the pentagon is new for admitting publicly.

hm yes i start to think that it's just a public statement about events in last weeks/months

its taking a long time to beat the rebels though. i know forian fighters are continually entering the battlefield though. i know we are supporting them. but they also were burning our flag just last week.

DoorBert just made a new thread about this, now i guess it IS doom!

big push of agenda on the MSM against the Syrian govt today.

even pushed the website were you and i with our credit cards can fund the rebels.

unbelievable.

if you told me 20 years ago that would be a reality i would have called ya NUTS....

i saw that.. doorbert is usually right on top of it.. today an hour late.. must have overslept today.. hehe

Of course it takes time, a new big fresh bunch just landed in Syria, but with no foreign support they are destined to extermination like the last ones and no MSM will report it as usual.

Well the old plan was take out Hezbollah and Syria before Iran. Perhaps that's back on the table!