Breaking - U.N. Taking up issue of "Redistribution of Wealth" - Considering a Global Tax on Rich Nations, targetting the U.S. as "too w

Come on guys, this is a big deal, the U.N. wants to enforce a new Global Tax on the United States because it is "too wealthy" while other, poorer countries, are apparently suffering because of it...

They want to take the wealth of the U.S. away from it, and "redistribute it" to those poorer countries!

The US is broke aren't we?

China is wealthier than us.

So, this doesn't make any sense.

Hey...U.N

Global government is right around the corner. The U.N has been poking their nose into sovereign nations affairs A LOT lately. Getting everyone mentally prepared.

fuck these cocksucking bastards using the goddamned usa as everybodys fuckin milking tit mammy.



Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 09/28/2012 02:25 PM

OP, have you read he actual UN Agenda 21 doctrine? It's all in there. If you want to see what's coming, read it. They're well on their way to implementing it (It was written in the early 90's).

There needs to be a bigger tax on billionaires.

No one should be allowed to be that rich in a world where toddlers die of starvation tied to poles in the blazing heat.

I don't think any person, entity or corporation should be allowed to make more than 5 to 10 million a year net, possibly less. Any overage should be given to (a hopefully reformed and trustworthy) government for savings and intelligent spending.

How many of us would be able to become well off in small business and other endeavors if we didn't have these global corporate conglomerates hogging up all the business?

How competitive would prices be if there were more real competition?

How many quality jobs would we generate if we had so many businesses independently fighting to hire us?

How many people could we pull out of poverty if the wealth were available to more people rather than the chosen few?

Will not happen. Keep dreaming

This has been the Radical Socialist wet dream FOR DECADES...

I watched an NPR round table back in the late 70's, with UN "World Hunger" Radical Socialist delegates calling for this very thing.

It never changes, does it?

I've always thought of the UN as a brilliant stage prop to make the poor countries of the world feel like they have some influence while we mercilessly fuck them up the ass.

Well damn It's about time !!!!!!! Woooohhoooo!!!!'

Many of the resources wealthy counties need come from poor countries. Fair is fair. We either learn to share or God will punish us.

OP,

You are correct this is a dangerous mindset of global entities demanding tax money for some fake goal much as the global warning crap championed by Al Gore designed to meet the Agenda 21 and the goal of generating money through carbon taxes.

The World Health Organization pet project Codex Alimentarius threatens our lives by controlling what we eat and drug to be decided by this dubious organization.

The World Health Organization announced that it was seeking to impose a cigarette tax upon the world.

Without out a doubt Australia is beginning to realize that, they have unleashed a growing taxation problem by embracing the carbon tax scheme.

It is time to make obsolete the UN, WHO and IMF for starters s they are nothing more than leeches upon all the countries that stupidly fund them.

Taxes Without Borders World Health Organization mulling global cigarette tax
[link to freebeacon.com]

Codex Alimentarius
[link to www.who.int]

Codex Alimentarius - The Sinister Truth Behind Operation Cure-All
[link to www.natural-health-information-centre.com]

Carbon tax 'octopus' hits economy: Abbott
[link to www.couriermail.com.au]

These communist UN assholes will F**k every free and prosperous country out of everything they possibly can.

LOL - 1% tax on billionaires ??
That should go over well.

1% does not sound like much but 1% of 1 billion is 10 million.

This is a good idea. There are 47% of the people not paying taxes and we could tax them to give to other countries that don't pay any tax to the U.N.

What is the problem with that?



Last Edited by TheToolMan on 09/28/2012 04:22 PM

It's the UN, it only makes sense if it empowers Communists and tyrants and weakens the USA.

OK, I have to agree with this.

Your grasp of theology is as developed as your knowlege of economics.

Become successufl, then you could donate ALL your money to whoever you want.

Exactly.

Since we, as a nation, have a negative net worth, will we be a recipient of benefits????

Last Edited by LJS on 09/28/2012 04:26 PM

sucesses? exsess? competion against what? a lot of small dicks and huge egos?

Omg 1 percent of the billionaires money omg how can they stand it won't someone please think of their poor mega mansions that need grounds keepers and butlers.

If the poster is soo eager to volunteer what I have worked for......they can go make some money and donate every cent....then I'll think about it.

"Too wealthy"????


How does being broke and in a state of HOPELESS debt equate to being "too wealthy"????


These putrid communist motherfuckers won't be happy until the USA looks like Ethiopia during their famine.

Yeah, I can't understand why everyone seems so shocked. We should have shut them down years ago instead of watching reality TV and shoving people in line to buy the latest iphone.
This country won't really wake up until it is to late.

What an awful idea. All that's going to happen is billionaires will relocate to Russia or China and use the Ruble or Yuan for transactions to avoid these taxes. Also, all these extra taxes for carbon emissions and mining will end up in added costs to consumers. If you think the price of your energy is high now, wait until after this gets passed. None of the money collected in tax revenues would be used to help those truly in need anyway. This extra tax money will just be squandered like it is everywhere else. Personally, I'm tired of turning on the television and hearing about how government used money to either A) drop bombs on people B) used money to host meetings in Hawaii or C) invested the money in one of their crony's companies like Solyndra.

I saw someone claim "no one should be allowed to make more than five million a year" in this thread. I fully understand the hatred for multinational corporations, businesses that got bailed out like Bank of America and people who did nothing to earn their wealth but merely inherited it. The fact is that most wealthy people actually did earn their money. Most business owners were "exploited" (worked for low wages because they had no skills whatsoever) themselves until they saved up enough money to start their own business. From there, these business owners risked their life savings and worked 16+ hour days for years. Successful business owners didn't just play it safe like their employees who didn't risk any of their savings, only show up for work between 9-5, take a leisure hour for lunch, and head home with a guaranteed paycheck. If someone becomes successful by hard work, dedication and sacrifice we should salute them, not tear them down because we are envious.

Sadly, you are living in a dream world. Money does not solve the word's poverty or crimes that occur. Just look at the U.S., even people who live here and make a decent living are subjected to crime, greed, etc. Probably 25% of the entire U.S. population completely lives off (& enjoys it as their lifestyle) of others -such as welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, subsizided heatining, free cell phones, all sorts of breaks. Money doesn't fix the heart or initiative in people - that comes from within.

That said, I think the solution should not be to tax the rich but to streamline the economy. Simplify the tax code so there are so many loopholes that only the rich can find and utilize. Simplify the rules for starting and running a business, so people can complete.

As for third world countries, they - like the U.S. and every other country should aim to become as independent of other nations as possible - a type of isolationism. Then local economies boom and people have jobs, hope and everyone benefits.

Your ideal of pulling people out of poverty by giving them money won't work, it just makes people more dependent -- look at all the young women in the U.S. who keep having baby after baby after baby with different baby daddies -- why? Because they are given money -- they are not made to take responsibility for themselves.

Fair trade - not free trade would benefit everyone.

Ya really can't explain the facts of life to an idiot like this, that thinks that trickle-up poverty, is better than trickle-down prosperity, because the rich fuggers on MSNBC told it so...