Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale

[link to www.youtube.com]

Part 1. Dr. David Berlinski sits down for a lucid and engaging interview; discussing some of the salient points of Darwinian theory and current attitudes in the scientific establishment.

David Berlinski was raised in New York City, educated at Columbia College and received his Ph.D in philosophy from Princeton University. He later became a Fellow of the Faculty in Mathematics and a Post Doctoral Fellow in molecular biology at Columbia University.

Part 2, these are great


[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Part 3

Try a post in your OWN words.

That might be worth responding to.

The Cambrian Explosion Problem - the missing links and the record of the rocks


[link to www.youtube.com]

Jerry Coyne, one of the current Priests of Darwinism, tells us why Evolution is True!



[link to www.youtube.com]


I urge people to watch this... THIS is the best evidence for Evolution. It is pathetic.

Complete speculation about fossils mixed with nonsense critiques about "Why would God do that??"

This is so sad. Darwinian Evolution is nothing more than a giant Public Relations campaign. They can out-publish anyone.

Oops, the above is a link to rebuttals by Jonathan Wells. (in video description)

This is Jerry Coyne's Comedy Hour I was referring to:


[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Hahaha

how to shut up pesky Darwinists... Human-Chimp claims.



[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

Good Summary of Evolutionism


[link to www.youtube.com]

Dissenting Scientists Against Darwinism


[link to www.youtube.com]

Black and red squirrel spotted yesterday, first of the species. UK. Evolution in action.

i think OP is beginning to evolve...

No original thoughts, eh?

Big surprise.

If I want to watch Creationist videos on YouTube....I'll just go to YouTube. They aren't exactly hard to find.

What would you like to discuss?

[link to www.uncommondescent.com]


Cool site, following recent biology research without the Darwinian blinders on.





Complex brains evolved much earlier than previously thought, 520-million-year-old fossilized arthropod confirms

[link to phys.org]

Complex brains already formed in the Cambrian. This is a good example of how Darwinian Evolution is largely unfalsifiable. When a discovery like this runs extremely counter to what Evolution predicts, instead of reassessing their claims, they just expound the "theory" around it.

sorry but a video doesn't mean a damned thing to me, except an indication of how weak the mind of the OP is.

Recent Developments in information npscience and genomics (last 10 years) have shown that an organism changes it's genetic code during its lifetime, from changes in the outside.

This is paralleled in the study of information as information systems "synchronizing" with the outside as the inner "resonates" with the macro outer, as all reality is self similar and based on the same core information.

If you then extrapolate to genomics, organisms and the greater ecological ecosystem are self similar and as such the inner of any organism, or DNA, being, "synchronizes" with the outer as it sees itself in the outer and the outer in it in resonance, and like an echo of mirroring you get "growth" from this synchronization process. You can think of pf nature as tuning forks growing in an ecological information ecosystem. The DNA then Mimcs or tried to reflect the outside and in that growth that in turn facets the environment which in turn grows beings. The increase of complexity is a natural process until you get synchronization with the source code and the universes wave function or rather, you become one with the universe. Time ends and you have the omega point. This is god consciousness. Complexi increase in linear time due to the perspective of a dualistic "order" and entropy

Both merging at the omega as entropy is higher order we don't understand.

So evolution is true in that organisms adapt to the environment but evacuee the enviroment and every rganism are the same source code or one, organisms adapt like an information system by synchronization throughout their lifetime. Rather than just billiard balls hitting around. And some getting "selected" by chance.

Is obviously more complicated .

Charles Darwin was right in his empirical observation, he never really went into what was going on underneath the observed process. He extrapolated to the philosophy of "survival of the fittest" but the actual more complex and nuanced workings he never really had access to.

I would not really call it "intelligent design" nature is intelligent or conscious. But it's definitely not the evolution Darwin wrote down in the origin of species. It's very much more like the concept of groking in a stranger in a strange land by Heinlein.

And there does seem to be a god. God would then jut be this beingness. Not n outside designer but the omega of all possibility and self actualization of awareness itself.

Interesting speculation. Reminds me of some earlier philosophies about all life being part of a "chain of being".

In any case, we can definitely rule out random mutations as an explanation.

Interesting, but if this were the case, strange that so many in the world would hold such spiritual awareness and faith in a personal intelligent creator God, like that of the Bible.

I like you, OP.