Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,433 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,250,449
Pageviews Today: 3,083,256Threads Today: 786Posts Today: 12,711
10:22 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale

 
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/04/2012 08:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Centre for Intelligent Design Lecture 2011 by Stephen Meyer


[link to www.youtube.com]
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
10/04/2012 09:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
But what is documented by this and other insect fossils coincides with what is documented in Scripture. The creation model holds that in the beginning, God created certain creatures to fly. Both the written and the fossil records agree that insect flight did not evolve, but suddenly appeared as a fully developed and completely functional ability.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


"Fish and Fowl" is the usual translation. This same translation is used to determine that Noah didn't have any insects on the Ark.

And day SIX is "land animals." Care to explain why this flying insect is exactly according to Genesis, but archeosaurs -- and even some synapsids -- were already well-instated in the PREVIOUS geological epoc?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
But what is documented by this and other insect fossils coincides with what is documented in Scripture. The creation model holds that in the beginning, God created certain creatures to fly. Both the written and the fossil records agree that insect flight did not evolve, but suddenly appeared as a fully developed and completely functional ability.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


"Fish and Fowl" is the usual translation. This same translation is used to determine that Noah didn't have any insects on the Ark.

And day SIX is "land animals." Care to explain why this flying insect is exactly according to Genesis, but archeosaurs -- and even some synapsids -- were already well-instated in the PREVIOUS geological epoc?
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


I don't know. But what the evidence certainly shows is that insects (or any organisms for that matter) did not "evolve" wings. Not only is there no evidence, such a concept is logically absurd. Mutations don't design complex aviation systems, obviously.

If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21041180
United Kingdom
10/05/2012 12:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Centre for Intelligent Design Lecture 2011 by Stephen Meyer


[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


[link to web.archive.org]

STATEMENT FROM THE COUNCIL OF THE BIOLOGICAL
SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON

The paper by Stephen C. Meyer, "The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories," in vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 213-239 of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, was published at the discretion of the former editor, Richard v. Sternberg. Contrary to typical editorial practices, the paper was published without review by any associate editor; Sternberg handled the entire review process. The Council, which includes officers, elected councilors, and past presidents, and the associate editors would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of the Proceedings because the subject matter represents such a significant departure from the nearly purely systematic content for which this journal has been known throughout its 122-year history.
Edge Rider

User ID: 1377922
United States
10/05/2012 12:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


we can also infer that god built an adapting and evolving system. something that doesnt require his daily supervision.
Row, row, row your boat...gently down the stream...merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily...life is but a dream...
[link to en.wikipedia.org] / [link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 12:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Centre for Intelligent Design Lecture 2011 by Stephen Meyer


[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


[link to web.archive.org]

STATEMENT FROM THE COUNCIL OF THE BIOLOGICAL
SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON

The paper by Stephen C. Meyer, "The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories," in vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 213-239 of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, was published at the discretion of the former editor, Richard v. Sternberg. Contrary to typical editorial practices, the paper was published without review by any associate editor; Sternberg handled the entire review process. The Council, which includes officers, elected councilors, and past presidents, and the associate editors would have deemed the paper inappropriate for the pages of the Proceedings because the subject matter represents such a significant departure from the nearly purely systematic content for which this journal has been known throughout its 122-year history.
 Quoting: SheldonCooper


Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Yes, anything that alludes to the rational premise of intelligent design is censored. That is the central theme of the presentation. Do you honestly think Academia is going to allow a divine foot in the door, regardless of data? Naturalism is the dominating philosophy and religion.

Like Meyers stated, the logical inferences he and others are using, are exactly the same inferring Darwin himself used to usher in the era of evolutionary thinking.

Another thing Meyers points out is the heuristic value of intelligent design. Whereas Evolutionists will commonly view the world of Genetics through the lens of randomness and purposelessness, an ID proponent will seek out function where it is not apparent.

That's why ID proponents were not surprised to learn recently of the major functionality reported in over 70% of the human genome that was once thought to be of little importance in the Evolutionist paradigm of unguided mutations.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


we can also infer that god built an adapting and evolving system. something that doesnt require his daily supervision.
 Quoting: Edge Rider


We certainly could, if there were evidence for such a thing.

Currently the historical and genetic data points away from common descent, and points towards a Creation event(s)

We simply are not seeing mutation events that would account for steadily increasing complexity.

Nor are we finding the fossil evidence of these gradual shifting of morphologies.

Not to mention, like it or not, the foundation of the evolutionary paradigm relies on some form of Abiogenesis, which modern molecular biology tells us is completely absurd. Nothing in natural science indicates that a living, functioning system will construct itself.
Edge Rider

User ID: 1377922
United States
10/05/2012 02:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
cellular automata...


Row, row, row your boat...gently down the stream...merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily...life is but a dream...
[link to en.wikipedia.org] / [link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9142675
United States
10/05/2012 02:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
how can you use 1 example as "proof" of creation, when you ignore 10,000 other examples that support evolution?

why do you say scientists are ridiculous, except when you come across the few instances their science supports your superstition?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22771242


There are NO examples which support evolution. Common design is supported, not common descent. Funny how you couldnt include just one of these thousands of examples.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9142675
United States
10/05/2012 02:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


we can also infer that god built an adapting and evolving system. something that doesnt require his daily supervision.
 Quoting: Edge Rider


We certainly could, if there were evidence for such a thing.

Currently the historical and genetic data points away from common descent, and points towards a Creation event(s)

We simply are not seeing mutation events that would account for steadily increasing complexity.

Nor are we finding the fossil evidence of these gradual shifting of morphologies.

Not to mention, like it or not, the foundation of the evolutionary paradigm relies on some form of Abiogenesis, which modern molecular biology tells us is completely absurd. Nothing in natural science indicates that a living, functioning system will construct itself.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519



The shills will be strong with this thread, OP. Keep up the honest work though, its appreciated.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9142675
United States
10/05/2012 02:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


we can also infer that god built an adapting and evolving system. something that doesnt require his daily supervision.
 Quoting: Edge Rider


Micro-evolution vs macro- evolution. This is the most common mostake made by evolutionists. Natural selection is not being debated here, sorry.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25021634
United States
10/05/2012 03:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Little Grand Canyon

[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 03:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
The shills will be strong with this thread, OP. Keep up the honest work though, its appreciated.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9142675


Thanks for the encouragement :)
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 04:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 07:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
bump
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
10/05/2012 07:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
But what is documented by this and other insect fossils coincides with what is documented in Scripture. The creation model holds that in the beginning, God created certain creatures to fly. Both the written and the fossil records agree that insect flight did not evolve, but suddenly appeared as a fully developed and completely functional ability.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


"Fish and Fowl" is the usual translation. This same translation is used to determine that Noah didn't have any insects on the Ark.

And day SIX is "land animals." Care to explain why this flying insect is exactly according to Genesis, but archeosaurs -- and even some synapsids -- were already well-instated in the PREVIOUS geological epoc?
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


I don't know. But what the evidence certainly shows is that insects (or any organisms for that matter) did not "evolve" wings. Not only is there no evidence, such a concept is logically absurd. Mutations don't design complex aviation systems, obviously.

If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


Run away, run away!

Are you going to stand by any argument, or are you just going to keep finding new horses?
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
10/05/2012 07:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
how can you use 1 example as "proof" of creation, when you ignore 10,000 other examples that support evolution?

why do you say scientists are ridiculous, except when you come across the few instances their science supports your superstition?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22771242


There are NO examples which support evolution. Common design is supported, not common descent. Funny how you couldnt include just one of these thousands of examples.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9142675


This would be the "common design" that came up with five different kinds of wing, and six different kinds of eye?

Come to think of it, that sounds like me. I'm always forgetting how I did something before, and re-inventing the wheel.
Edge Rider

User ID: 10607944
United States
10/05/2012 07:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale

Row, row, row your boat...gently down the stream...merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily...life is but a dream...
[link to en.wikipedia.org] / [link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
But what is documented by this and other insect fossils coincides with what is documented in Scripture. The creation model holds that in the beginning, God created certain creatures to fly. Both the written and the fossil records agree that insect flight did not evolve, but suddenly appeared as a fully developed and completely functional ability.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


"Fish and Fowl" is the usual translation. This same translation is used to determine that Noah didn't have any insects on the Ark.

And day SIX is "land animals." Care to explain why this flying insect is exactly according to Genesis, but archeosaurs -- and even some synapsids -- were already well-instated in the PREVIOUS geological epoc?
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


I don't know. But what the evidence certainly shows is that insects (or any organisms for that matter) did not "evolve" wings. Not only is there no evidence, such a concept is logically absurd. Mutations don't design complex aviation systems, obviously.

If we set aside your naturalism religion for a moment, we can rationally infer that they were intelligently designed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


Run away, run away!

Are you going to stand by any argument, or are you just going to keep finding new horses?
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


Yes, I stand by my argument that Evolution is a fairytale. I think I've been pretty consistent on that.

I never claimed to be able to explain every facet of the creation process.

Fortunately a "theory" like darwinian evolution can be demolished based on its own lack of merit. Supporting a replacement theory is not a prerequisite.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6732037
United States
10/05/2012 09:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
9 pages and no one posted anything about Kent Hovind, I suggest looking him up. He destroys every evolutionist he ever debates. He even debates entire universities on this subject and IMO wins every time.


[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
9 pages and no one posted anything about Kent Hovind, I suggest looking him up. He destroys every evolutionist he ever debates. He even debates entire universities on this subject and IMO wins every time.


[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6732037


Kent Hovind is great. He was the one who originally inspired me to question evolutionary dogma. Lo and behold, on further examination, there is not a shred of hard evidence to support Darwinian Evolution. They've been going off total assumption and speculation this entire time and passing it off to the public as irrefutable truth.

What we are truly faced with is a very rigid and blind faith in Naturalism. They can not let the evolutionary paradigm go because their whole world will fall apart.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 23223519
United States
10/05/2012 10:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale

[link to www.youtube.com]

I like this debate. Hovind vs. Shermer. You can see a lot of the poetry and philosophy an Evolutionist will employ to avoid dealing with facts.
jadksn
User ID: 24543892
United States
10/05/2012 10:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
The theory of evolution is a THEORY. Not 100% fact. It's a work in progress so to speak..

But it's still the best and most likely explanation for life around us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19726934
United States
10/06/2012 12:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Mehvolution :

[link to thesixthperspective.com]
Master X

User ID: 25055203
United Kingdom
10/06/2012 04:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
While not against some sort of creation theory (either by aliens of a higher entity god type thing) i don't agree with what I've read so far.

BIRDS. Well first of all, the dinosaurs into birds is easy. It started with those forest dinos which actually had feathers (as quite a lot now turn out to have) using the ability to GLIDE from tree to tree. All it takes is a shift in environment such as less trees with a farther distance between them to cause the dinos to start mating for with those with the best ability to glide/jump and so on and so on... Eventually one is strong enough to flap. Variety? Most birds are probably descended from just one dinosaur species like this, then the same thing happened to these birds; as they spread out they changed/adapted to their individual environments. Then those spread out, further changing and so on until you got the massive variety.

Haven't tests been done on eggs where they've got embryos in bird eggs to revert and grow tails...? I'm sure this was in New Scientist.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24924823
United States
10/06/2012 05:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Well, you get some primordial organic ooze, and strike it with lightning or some shit, and you get the music of Mozart. Duh!

Evolution for the win!!!
anonymousbraveman
User ID: 25055674
Puerto Rico
10/06/2012 05:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
The Cleaner Fish

Let's first start with the cleaner fish. This fish will swim into a shark's mouth and eat remnant food particles from the shark's teeth. The cleaner fish departs with a satisfied appetite, and the shark is happy because his teeth are cleaned in the process. The shark does not allow any other kinds of fish into its mouth without chomping down for a good lunch. Indeed, what other fish would dare attempt to swim into a shark's mouth! This type of relationship is called a symbiotic relationship. Creationists point out that these relationships clearly represent a design that could not have occurred by chance. Evolutionists have a very difficult time explaining how these types of relationships could evolve with time.

Nevertheless, an evolutionist will somehow have us believe that the cleaner fish eventually figured out he could go in the shark's mouth, and the shark eventually figured out that he should let him so as to maintain proper dental hygiene. The following illustrations portray the likely repercussions of this ill-advised bravery.

Nobel Prize winner and evolutionist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi acknowledged that time, chance, and random mutations could never produce the numerous symbiotic relationships we see all around us (He went on to postulate an impersonal creative force, an "innate drive in living matter" in an attempt to make peace with his faith in evolution)1.

Let's face it, symbiosis clearly points to a Designer. The lengths an evolutionist must go to explain away this one is beyond fairy tale!

"If it could be proved that any part of the structure of any one species had been formed for the exclusive good of another species, it would annihilate my theory, for such could not have been produced through natural selection." - Charles Darwin


[link to www.evolutionfairytale.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


actualy life does evolve spontaniously, there was a video of a priest (A PRIEST!) talking about these details

and that there have been periodic explosions of evolution in life

wat if a god exists and he uses evolution to create life? (you dimwit)

and even if evolution isnt true, does it prove theres a god? (especialy your spooky god yahweh?)

NOPE, it would only prove that life spontaniously spawns out of nowhere and that earth came outa nowhere 9000 years ago

that sir, would be very stupid
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11400595
United Kingdom
10/06/2012 05:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
The Cleaner Fish

Let's first start with the cleaner fish. This fish will swim into a shark's mouth and eat remnant food particles from the shark's teeth. The cleaner fish departs with a satisfied appetite, and the shark is happy because his teeth are cleaned in the process. The shark does not allow any other kinds of fish into its mouth without chomping down for a good lunch. Indeed, what other fish would dare attempt to swim into a shark's mouth! This type of relationship is called a symbiotic relationship. Creationists point out that these relationships clearly represent a design that could not have occurred by chance. Evolutionists have a very difficult time explaining how these types of relationships could evolve with time.

Nevertheless, an evolutionist will somehow have us believe that the cleaner fish eventually figured out he could go in the shark's mouth, and the shark eventually figured out that he should let him so as to maintain proper dental hygiene. The following illustrations portray the likely repercussions of this ill-advised bravery.

Nobel Prize winner and evolutionist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi acknowledged that time, chance, and random mutations could never produce the numerous symbiotic relationships we see all around us (He went on to postulate an impersonal creative force, an "innate drive in living matter" in an attempt to make peace with his faith in evolution)1.

Let's face it, symbiosis clearly points to a Designer. The lengths an evolutionist must go to explain away this one is beyond fairy tale!

"If it could be proved that any part of the structure of any one species had been formed for the exclusive good of another species, it would annihilate my theory, for such could not have been produced through natural selection." - Charles Darwin


[link to www.evolutionfairytale.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23223519


As opposed to a magical all powerfull man with a beard living in the clouds making people appear from thin air just from the snap of his fingers... Yeah... Evolution is really far fetched. skull_fing
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22089462
Netherlands
10/06/2012 08:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
The theory of evolution is a THEORY. Not 100% fact. It's a work in progress so to speak..

But it's still the best and most likely explanation for life around us.
 Quoting: jadksn 24543892


A theory by definition is the most rational and best fitting explanation we have for explaining facts.

Eg the theory of gravity will never become the "fact" or "law" of gravity (back when Newton was around the scientific method was not around, so he referred to his explanation as "laws of gravity", ironically later data showed him to be wrong (the orbit mercury did not fit his "law of gravity")).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14820909
United States
10/06/2012 09:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why Evolution is a ridiculous Fairytale
Romans 1: 20 is false.

Yes, false. "Creation" manifests a God that is bloodthirsty, cruel, twisted and vicious.

Every foolish Creationist quotes this text over and over to make a point about intelligent design and then ignores the utter lack of moral values in creation.

He created the guinea worm (extremely well designed!), alligators (with their backward pointing teeth to hold on to struggling victims), the Tyrannosaurus Rex (whose teeth marks have been identified on the fossils of other dinosaurs) and much more.

The utter lack of ethics in creation led Darwin to evolution and he talks about it in his writings.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!