Here is Islam for you.. (EXTREMELY GRAPHIC VIDEO)

You are so full of shit.

WTF did i just watch?? :O

Truth hurt?

Give evidence for why Muhammad never existed.

To begin with, contemporary non-Muslim sources of the 7th century do not corroborate the canonical story. For example, the Doctrina Jacobi (a document dating to 634-40 CE and probably written by a Christian living in Palestine; p. 20), an account of the Arab conquest of Jerusalem by Sophronius -- the patriarch who is said to have surrendered the city in 637 -- and a letter written in 647 by the patriarch of Seleucia make no reference to the Arab conquerors as Muslims, or show any awareness of a religion called Islam.

The earliest account that can reliably be taken to refer to Muhammad is a chronicle by the Armenian bishop Sebeos, dating either to the 660s or 670s but containing material that sharply diverges from the traditional Islamic accounts: thus he has Muhammad "insisting on the Jews' right to the Holy Land -- even if in the context of claiming that land for the Ishmaelites, acting in conjunction with the Jews" (p. 32).

Only by around 730 CE, nearly one hundred years after Muhammad's death in 632 CE according to the canonical story, do we see an account by John of Damascus make detailed reference to parts of the Qur'an, but even then he does not name the Qur'an or allude to the existence of a complete holy book for those he calls "Hagarians," "Ishmaelites" or "Saracens" (but not Muslims).

Instead, we have reference to Qur'anic chapter titles like "The Women" (this is the fourth Sura of the Qur'an today), implying that he was drawing on fragments of text that were later incorporated into the Qur'an.

Arabic epigraphic evidence from the 7th century similarly fails to validate the canonical account. An inscription attributed to the first Umayyad caliph -- Muawiya -- in 677 or 678 CE makes reference to belief in God but gives no indication of belief in Muhammad as his messenger or the Qur'an as revealed scripture.

On coins from this period, we do find the word "Muhammad" inscribed, but curiously the inscription comes under kingly figures bearing a cross, a symbol of Christianity that is totally antithetical to traditional Islam (pp. 43-4).

Bearing in mind that "Muhammad" can also mean "the chosen/praised one," the coins could well be conveying the idea that the ruler is praised or chosen in God's name (p. 45). Alternatively, they could be referring to Jesus -- at a time when the religion of the Arab conquerors was still a vague monotheism -- or a proto-Muhammad figure still very much unlike the man depicted in the traditional accounts of his life. Even the inscriptions on the Dome of the Rock -- completed in 691 CE and often thought to be the first elaborations on traditional Islamic theology -- could be referring to Jesus, explaining how he ("Muhammad") is a mere messenger and not divine as orthodox Christianity held (pp. 56-7).

IT IS ONLY TOWARDS the middle of the 8th century (735 CE onwards) that we begin to see very clear epigraphic evidence referring to Muhammad as we know him from the Ahadith (plural of hadith) and Sira (pp. 61-2).

more:
[link to spectator.org]

It doesn't matter how many times you repeat yourself, you can't have my country. Now go sit in the corner and play with your toys...

Honor Killings are ILLEGAL.

That smeller must be the feller.

islamics do unusual stuff with goats

But it's a lie the opposite of the truth.

I was smart enough to leave Islam 30 years ago.

And why's that?

mohammed was a fag. Now go burn some shit down you homo lovers

Not a very smart Christian... not even a Christian to boot.

this video is old as the hills....but your right it does show how civilized they are

50 wives and he's a fag.

Why did I leave Islam, or why am I smart enough?

Who? Muslims?

They both intersect numbnut.

Lets hear it.

Yeah, I think we already figured out which side of the gene pool you came from there, buddy. Oh, have you seen this one:

Thank God as a woman I wasn't born in their country.

The information is all there in one entire post.

Their god commands this. They are as dangerous as the barbarians were to rome. In perfect worlds, we would have destroyed them long ago. We have the power and technology. But be lack the will and balls. God speed western world!

YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN
YOU ARE NOT A CHRISTIAN

Lets get technical then, shall we? You are absolutely

correct! "Honor killing" is illegal, since it is really a

term identified by the UN. However, the Islamic law,

Sharia Law does in fact call for the death of any

individual that disrespects Prophet Mohamed or insults

Islam. So, in that case it is LEGAL to kill anyone that

breaks any of the Prophets laws. Now, how was that dance of

words???

Wasn't there a female murder in ozland?

I had the opportunity to move to a country where I was allowed to get really well educated without having a bunch of idiots running around to check up on my piety. I still called myself Muslim for the first 4 years after I stopped having anything to do with it, then I finally at the age of 29 stopped calling myself Muslim at all.