Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,332 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 70,231
Pageviews Today: 118,729Threads Today: 30Posts Today: 829
12:57 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow

 
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 07:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
Hey OP, can you explain why the cycle seem to return every 188 days? Cannot find that...

Also, if it's all about the 188 days, then why are you predicting more quakes in Oct, Nov & Dec?
 Quoting: Yddap


The 188 day cycle only happens 2 times a year...

but it was the 188 cycle that enabled the LEY LINES to be discovered and 188 has a deeper connection than just to quakes as I explained in PART 4.

THUS I've named these LEY LINES or ENERGY LINES that were BASED ON or FORMED by the SPECIAL QUAKES on the 188 day cycle.

You're confusing the 188 CYCLE with the 188 LEY LINES

which are technically SEPARATE but only connected as I explained.

So I have never posted quake warnings outside the 2 cycle timeframes and called them 188 days.

I do however post quake warnings that have nothing to do with the cycle.

hopefully that clears at least part of that up and you understand why others seem to be confused and erroneously use that false premise as a debunking tool and then they wonder why it doesn't debunk anything. lol

let me know if you have other questions I guess.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2095015
United States
09/30/2012 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
bump bump bump
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 07:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
Whether your theory is right or wrong, you shouldn't be "bragging" about it. The only thing you are saying is: The skeptics were wrong, i was right, i'm fucking smart.

Why can't you just respect it when someone else doesn't believe you theory? Damn, calm down dude.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22322054


THIS
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24705211


Thread: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow (Page 3)

THIS
Newbie Dreamer

User ID: 24507581
Lithuania
09/30/2012 07:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
hf
My mission here to create heaven in this world.
Search for thread: Merkaba chakras meditation by art. Balance yourself. Preparing body for multidimensional self.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24620294
Australia
09/30/2012 07:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
i think the main reason people dont like you is you have one of these threads at least twice a month on quakes... never take criticism at all, talk way to much in caps think you are always right everytime and are so quick to disregard the "shills" using the same exact tactics you are complaining about in the first place
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24417157
United States
09/30/2012 07:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
Yddap

User ID: 7925404
Netherlands
09/30/2012 07:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
You're confusing the 188 CYCLE with the 188 LEY LINES

which are technically SEPARATE but only connected as I explained.

 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Thanks, but you lost me here tomato
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 07:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
...


I've already DEBUNKED the "DRAWING ARBITRARY LINES ALL OVER A MAP" idiocy AD NASEUM in ALL 4 VIDEOS and at least hundreds of postings on the net including GLP which mindless trolls such as yourself are ALWAYS ABSENT FROM.

But then, if I were the skeptics at this point, I'd probably steer clear as well to avoid EMBARRASSMENT.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Holy shit, these threads have turned you into an arrogant prick.

I don;t even wan't to ask questions anymore incase you blow your top and kill everyone.

Good luck with your superiority OP.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


I find it so funny how you attack RESPONSES which are DEFENDING AGAINST ATTACKS and those who anyone with a brain can see above is DISRESPECTFUL CONDESCENDING and ANYTHING but intelligent discourse which you SAY NOTHING ABOUT.

And then you follow in LINE with these same ARROGANT ABUSIVE Trolls/Shills calling me names when no where have I said a WORD to you or criticized you at all.

This is exactly the type of disrespect and ABUSE I'm talking about showing you're among those incapable of intelligent discourse due to YOUR ego, ignorance, arrogance and BIAS.

SHOW ME ONE SINGLE POST THAT I NAMED CALLED OR ATTACKED ANYONE USING FIRST.

the fact is you CAN'T since I've only defended the information and myself against these vile attacks that GO FAR BEYOND MERE QUESTIONING.

Since you're incapable of being OBJECTIVE or NEUTRAL, and don't know the difference between an attack and defending against attacks, PLEASE STAY OUT OF ALL MY THREADS.

Thanks.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


I have tried asking you questions in many of your threads and you respond VERY HOSTILE towards any objections.

I hope one day you will answer the many questions I have asked.

Like:
The 188 day thing is the only thing I don't understand myself.

If its 4 days since 188 then its not 188 that would be 192.
and if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

For it to be a cycle of 188 one would think it would have to be 188 no more no less.

Also why are the points you draw the quake so inaccurate, ie: the Chrischruch quake you have a circle 700km away from the epicenter, is ther a reason for this?? or is it just so it creates a straight line??
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus

 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/30/2012 08:00 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24417157
United States
09/30/2012 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
You're confusing the 188 CYCLE with the 188 LEY LINES

which are technically SEPARATE but only connected as I explained.

 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Thanks, but you lost me here tomato
 Quoting: Yddap


he lost himself a long time ago. OP is mentally ill and there's no "188 day cycle". The whole thing is a huge cherry-picking croc of shit. There's TONS of 7+ earthquakes every year. Seriously, an absolute fuckton. Look at the video I posted above, it shows how full of shit this "theory" is.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
09/30/2012 08:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
...


Holy shit, these threads have turned you into an arrogant prick.

I don;t even wan't to ask questions anymore incase you blow your top and kill everyone.

Good luck with your superiority OP.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


I find it so funny how you attack RESPONSES which are DEFENDING AGAINST ATTACKS and those who anyone with a brain can see above is DISRESPECTFUL CONDESCENDING and ANYTHING but intelligent discourse which you SAY NOTHING ABOUT.

And then you follow in LINE with these same ARROGANT ABUSIVE Trolls/Shills calling me names when no where have I said a WORD to you or criticized you at all.

This is exactly the type of disrespect and ABUSE I'm talking about showing you're among those incapable of intelligent discourse due to YOUR ego, ignorance, arrogance and BIAS.

SHOW ME ONE SINGLE POST THAT I NAMED CALLED OR ATTACKED ANYONE USING FIRST.

the fact is you CAN'T since I've only defended the information and myself against these vile attacks that GO FAR BEYOND MERE QUESTIONING.

Since you're incapable of being OBJECTIVE or NEUTRAL, and don't know the difference between an attack and defending against attacks, PLEASE STAY OUT OF ALL MY THREADS.

Thanks.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


I have tried asking you questions in many of your threads and you respond VERY HOSTILE towards any objections.

I hope one day you will answer the many questions I have asked.

Like:
The 188 day thing is the only thing I don't understand myself.

If its 4 days since 188 then its not 188 that would be 192.
and if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

For it to be a cycle of 188 one would think it would have to be 188 no more no less.

Also why are the points you draw the quake so inaccurate, ie: the Chrischruch quake you have a circle 700km away from the epicenter, is ther a reason for this?? or is it just so it creates a straight line??
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus

 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Sorry I don't know what a Facebook is?

But could you please answer these, You did not above.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

With greatest respect.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24705211
09/30/2012 08:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
...


I find it so funny how you attack RESPONSES which are DEFENDING AGAINST ATTACKS and those who anyone with a brain can see above is DISRESPECTFUL CONDESCENDING and ANYTHING but intelligent discourse which you SAY NOTHING ABOUT.

And then you follow in LINE with these same ARROGANT ABUSIVE Trolls/Shills calling me names when no where have I said a WORD to you or criticized you at all.

This is exactly the type of disrespect and ABUSE I'm talking about showing you're among those incapable of intelligent discourse due to YOUR ego, ignorance, arrogance and BIAS.

SHOW ME ONE SINGLE POST THAT I NAMED CALLED OR ATTACKED ANYONE USING FIRST.

the fact is you CAN'T since I've only defended the information and myself against these vile attacks that GO FAR BEYOND MERE QUESTIONING.

Since you're incapable of being OBJECTIVE or NEUTRAL, and don't know the difference between an attack and defending against attacks, PLEASE STAY OUT OF ALL MY THREADS.

Thanks.
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


I have tried asking you questions in many of your threads and you respond VERY HOSTILE towards any objections.

I hope one day you will answer the many questions I have asked.

Like:
The 188 day thing is the only thing I don't understand myself.

If its 4 days since 188 then its not 188 that would be 192.
and if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

For it to be a cycle of 188 one would think it would have to be 188 no more no less.

Also why are the points you draw the quake so inaccurate, ie: the Chrischruch quake you have a circle 700km away from the epicenter, is ther a reason for this?? or is it just so it creates a straight line??
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus

 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Sorry I don't know what a Facebook is?

But could you please answer these, You did not above.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

With greatest respect.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Means he can manipulate the data to fit his "predictions" and many dumbasses will fall for the illusion.
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 08:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
You're confusing the 188 CYCLE with the 188 LEY LINES

which are technically SEPARATE but only connected as I explained.

 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Thanks, but you lost me here tomato
 Quoting: Yddap


he lost himself a long time ago. OP is mentally ill and there's no "188 day cycle". The whole thing is a huge cherry-picking croc of shit. There's TONS of 7+ earthquakes every year. Seriously, an absolute fuckton. Look at the video I posted above, it shows how full of shit this "theory" is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24417157


Except the FACTS and EVIDENCE I've presented which anyone with a BRAIN thats actually taken the time to EDUCATE themselves on, PROVES OTHERWISE.

Those like you have NEVER ONCE BEEN ABLE TO REFUTE any of the evidence I've presented in 4 videos and thousands of postings on the net and this forum.

All you do is post AD HOMS, ABUSE, PERSONAL ATTACKS and EVERYTHING but INTELLIGENT ARGUMENTS showing exactly how and where what you CLAIM is true and what I've presented is all just "CHERRY-PICKING, and a CROC OF SHIT"

You're such a brain-dead ignorant fool you even keep posting a video I've repeatedly DEBUNKED over and over and challenged YOU and all those posting that video to show exactly where it debunks ANYTHING I've presented in ALL MY VIDEO'S!

you can't do it because you don't even understand the material i've presented or even what your poor excuse for a debunking video is even about or saying as well.

WHY?

because you're at best a SHILL, probably a TROLL, and at the very least a TOTAL MORON in DENIAL.

(note to all those who question my use of the word MORON... NOTICE its a RESPONSE that MIRRORS the same DISRESPECT and ABUSE being posted by this MORON first) ;))
OnTheFence

User ID: 24715409
United States
09/30/2012 08:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
I think Doommicus is saying that you placed the Christchurch epicenter circle on the wrong spot on the map and thus that may skew your data ???????

Regardless, NOTHING is an EXACT science.
There will always be a margin/window of error or wiggle room. I learned that in high school and college science classes, as we always had to calculate the +/- wiggle room in our experiments.

So, it doesn't matter if the major EQ happened 4 days later or if the epicenter is a few hundred km off the ley-line, it is the fact that Matrix, by using his theory, has predicted major EQs in/around specific dates. Period.

If people would use this theory and prep during "watch" times ... there might be more lives saved than not.

Keep up the good work, Matrix.
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 08:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
...


I have tried asking you questions in many of your threads and you respond VERY HOSTILE towards any objections.

I hope one day you will answer the many questions I have asked.

Like:
...

 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Sorry I don't know what a Facebook is?

But could you please answer these, You did not above.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

With greatest respect.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Means he can manipulate the data to fit his "predictions" and many dumbasses will fall for the illusion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24705211


but unfortunately, AS USUAL, you have ZERO EVIDENCE to support that CLAIM not to mention have failed miserably to show exactly how and where all I've presented to SUPPORT what I claim, is wrong and "manipulating data to fit".

But thanks again for your OPINION SHILLBOT which as usual is worthless and proves or disproves NOTHING

oh well
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
09/30/2012 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
...


DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Sorry I don't know what a Facebook is?

But could you please answer these, You did not above.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

With greatest respect.
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Means he can manipulate the data to fit his "predictions" and many dumbasses will fall for the illusion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24705211


but unfortunately, AS USUAL, you have ZERO EVIDENCE to support that CLAIM not to mention have failed miserably to show exactly how and where all I've presented to SUPPORT what I claim, is wrong and "manipulating data to fit".

But thanks again for your OPINION SHILLBOT which as usual is worthless and proves or disproves NOTHING

oh well
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Have you sent your thesis to any scientific communities yet, Since your 100% correct thier help could save lives
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22459462
Portugal
09/30/2012 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
ok so lets assume one quake hits 4 days before the 188, and the next one hits 4 days after the 188.. thats 192 days. Would you accept it as being inside the cycle range? And the other way, with a quake hitting 4 days after and the next 4 days before, it would be 180 days

So in fact you are talking about a cycle with a 12 days window! Lots of days for a significant quake to hit
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 08:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
You're confusing the 188 CYCLE with the 188 LEY LINES

which are technically SEPARATE but only connected as I explained.

 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Thanks, but you lost me here tomato
 Quoting: Yddap


not sure what you don't understand.

Thread: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow (Page 4)

perhaps you should read over my response and/or clarify your question.

thats how the intelligent discourse or PROCESS WORKS.

question / answer etc

you asked why i post predictions outside of the 188 cycle...

WHY NOT?

is there a rule that one can only post quake warning dates 2 times a year? lol

please focus and articulate your question better if you want a better answer.
Messenger
User ID: 24214267
09/30/2012 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
********************

Hi OP.

Thank YOU for all your time and hard work. Mnay of us do appreciate what you are doing. Now, here is something important.

Do you see a 7.5 ANY WHERE in California within the next 3 months??????


bump



*******************
yahwehs princess
User ID: 23672607
United States
09/30/2012 08:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
FUCK THE QUAKE HATERS OP! WHEN IS THE NEST ONE COMIN! THIS IS RELIABLE DOOM GIVE OR TAKE A FEW DAYS! YOU HAVE WISDOM FROM YAHWEH HIMSELF OR YOUR AN INSIDER FOR HARRP! EITHER WAY YOUR THE BEST FALSE PROPHET IVE SEEN ON GLP IN 2 YEARS! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!SmileyWink
Amy_A

User ID: 16982804
United States
09/30/2012 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
OP,

Where did this 188 day chart come from. Is it your theory alone or have others recognized this pattern? If it is your theory then it is a good one. I feel you would gather more supporters if you had a plus/minus built in. When I design parts, I always leave a bit of play in the finished piece. You have connected many locations that seem to draw a grid. How many other points needs to be connected for the finished grid pattern.

Peace
Amy
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 08:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
i think the main reason people dont like you is you have one of these threads at least twice a month on quakes...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24620294


AND YOUR POINT IS??

SO WHAT?

LOL

are you actually saying you think major quakes don't happen every month?

or its not useful to know dates or timeframe when major quakes are most likely to occur?

the only reason "people" don't like me is because of THEIR EGO'S and fact that what I'm doing and presenting challenges their concept of reality and truths they've been taught to believe since birth may be all WRONG. They don't like me because I don't allow them to post LIES or I challenge them to PROVE WHAT THEY CLAIM IS TRUE OR FALSE! And you can STOP right there saying PEOPLE in general as if EVERYONE doesn't like, understand or have any interest in what I'm doing which is a LIE as well.

never take criticism at all,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24620294


NOW YOU'RE LYING AGAIN..

or just IGNORANT of what you're criticizing. Which is it? Because I can show many examples where I had no problem with criticism that was RESPECTFUL!

talk way to much in caps
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24620294


thats a PERSONAL BIAS and has NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER THE INFORMATION IS TRUE OR NOT.

So you're telling me because i have a certain syntax or writing style, that the EVIDENCE and information is therefore FALSE and meaningless because of peoples PERSONAL FEELINGS?

SINCE WHEN DOES ONES "FEELINGS" or OPINIONS, have ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE MERIT OF THE MATERIAL AND INFORMATION?

answer: IT DOESN'T.

For anyone to DISREGARD and DENY facts and evidence because of PERSONAL BIASES or FEELINGS, is ABSURD.

think you are always right everytime and are so quick to disregard the "shills" using the same exact tactics you are complaining about in the first place
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24620294


WRONG. This has absolutely NOTHING to do with me THINKING I'm "right".

UNLIKE YOU AND THOSE WHO THINK I'M WRONG, I've posted FACTS, compelling EVIDENCE and intelligent arguments to SUPPORT and BACK UP WHAT I CLAIM or say is RIGHT.

If I'm not right or what I've presented is wrong, then why is it that NONE of these so-called skeptics can show exactly how and where I'm wrong.
Why is it that MOST OF THESE "SKEPTICS" who are mostly shills or trolls using that GUISE, can ONLY POST AD HOMS, EMPTY CLAIMS and ABUSE with CONDESCENDING TONES and SARCASM?

The fact is you can't find a SINGLE post I ignored that was sincere and made attempts to engage in intelligent discourse.

So you're entire argument is based on ZERO knowledge of the issue or facts you're trying to criticize.

I rest my case

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/30/2012 08:50 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24417157
United States
09/30/2012 08:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
You're confusing the 188 CYCLE with the 188 LEY LINES

which are technically SEPARATE but only connected as I explained.

 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


Thanks, but you lost me here tomato
 Quoting: Yddap


he lost himself a long time ago. OP is mentally ill and there's no "188 day cycle". The whole thing is a huge cherry-picking croc of shit. There's TONS of 7+ earthquakes every year. Seriously, an absolute fuckton. Look at the video I posted above, it shows how full of shit this "theory" is.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24417157


Except the FACTS and EVIDENCE I've presented which anyone with a BRAIN thats actually taken the time to EDUCATE themselves on, PROVES OTHERWISE.

Those like you have NEVER ONCE BEEN ABLE TO REFUTE any of the evidence I've presented in 4 videos and thousands of postings on the net and this forum.

All you do is post AD HOMS, ABUSE, PERSONAL ATTACKS and EVERYTHING but INTELLIGENT ARGUMENTS showing exactly how and where what you CLAIM is true and what I've presented is all just "CHERRY-PICKING, and a CROC OF SHIT"

You're such a brain-dead ignorant fool you even keep posting a video I've repeatedly DEBUNKED over and over and challenged YOU and all those posting that video to show exactly where it debunks ANYTHING I've presented in ALL MY VIDEO'S!

you can't do it because you don't even understand the material i've presented or even what your poor excuse for a debunking video is even about or saying as well.

WHY?

because you're at best a SHILL, probably a TROLL, and at the very least a TOTAL MORON in DENIAL.

(note to all those who question my use of the word MORON... NOTICE its a RESPONSE that MIRRORS the same DISRESPECT and ABUSE being posted by this MORON first) ;))
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11




Every post you've ever made debunked in 1 short video.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13967411
United States
09/30/2012 08:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
What do you know about the Nile in Egypt? We, that Nile, and Orion is connected.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13967411


not sure what your point is exactly...

did you see the portion in the video I explained about the NILE?
 Quoting: MatrixLNIN11


No, It appears I missed it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1310035
New Zealand
09/30/2012 09:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

4. Can you please post the 6 quakes that are EXACTLY 188 days apart, Please

With greatest respect.
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 09:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
ok so lets assume one quake hits 4 days before the 188, and the next one hits 4 days after the 188.. thats 192 days. Would you accept it as being inside the cycle range? And the other way, with a quake hitting 4 days after and the next 4 days before, it would be 180 days

So in fact you are talking about a cycle with a 12 days window! Lots of days for a significant quake to hit
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22459462


You're still missing the first point....

your 4-day window premise s irrelevant due to 6 major quakes IN A ROW that have validated this current cycle which evidence proves goes far beyond the type of coincidence most skeptics try to argue.

so there is NO 12 day window that the cycle uses or is based upon.

the CONSISTENCY of the cycle/pattern has only certain types of quakes associated with it that CONSISTENTLY REPEATS with a CONSISTENT TIMEFRAME or WINDOW in the majority of cases. THATS CALLED a PATTERN... and the quakes associated DO NOT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME. So what you're suggesting has no bearing on this cycle or the merit of it.

And your premise about "lots of days for a significant quake to hit" is totally out of context. the term SIGNIFICANT IS VAGUE, and you offer no specific stats or evidence to support it nor does anything your'e saying address any of the specifics or evidence I've been presenting in the past 4 video's that shows why your point is irrelevant. But then, contrary to your inference, being within 4 days for a MAJOR QUAKE to hit, is VERY ACCURATE!
Chas

User ID: 1376646
United States
09/30/2012 09:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
well done as always OP...
Chas
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 09:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
I think Doommicus is saying that you placed the Christchurch epicenter circle on the wrong spot on the map and thus that may skew your data ???????
 Quoting: OnTheFence


LOL

no I didn't... he just doesn't understand anything about what I've explained regarding the 188 GRID etc and is unable to ask the right question because he hasn't done enough research into what he's criticizing or thinks is wrong.

He's getting closer in understanding about his comment I'll be addressing about "straight lines", but is way too assuming its wrong without clarifying what he doesn't understand about that.

do you understand it? or what exactly don't you understand?

Regardless, NOTHING is an EXACT science.
There will always be a margin/window of error or wiggle room. I learned that in high school and college science classes, as we always had to calculate the +/- wiggle room in our experiments.
 Quoting: OnTheFence


EXACTLY... but wiggle room is the wrong term... as to 100% precision in measuring such things as quakes etc, yes there's always a margin of error and humans do not posses the knowledge or technology yet.

but then, to understand your point better, you have to apply specifics to this case or each case.

So, it doesn't matter if the major EQ happened 4 days later or if the epicenter is a few hundred km off the ley-line, it is the fact that Matrix, by using his theory, has predicted major EQs in/around specific dates. Period.
 Quoting: OnTheFence


for the most part... BINGO.

If people would use this theory and prep during "watch" times ... there might be more lives saved than not.
 Quoting: OnTheFence


JACKPOT!

now your'e hitting the nail on the head grasshoppa as ONE of the aspects that can be applied and or be USEFUL!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15530582
United States
09/30/2012 09:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
Dear OP .... Please ignore all the many many shills here!!
You are doing a fantastic job to try to educate the sheep!
Just want to say ... GREAT JOB ! !!!
MatrixLNIN11 (OP)

User ID: 24489474
United States
09/30/2012 09:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
Have you sent your thesis to any scientific communities yet, Since your 100% correct thier help could save lives
 Quoting: Doommincus Maximus


Not yet... but in time, that may occur if and when the time is right and I can compile all the data into a proper format for "conventional science" to study and understand or accept...and so far there is ample evidence, information and data that has established a PATTERN that could be a good starting point IF someone in the science communities were to analyze.

but then, how would you expect a concept based on a far more advanced science, to be presented to a primitive science that refuses to accept or even consider it unless it conforms to ONLY what conventional science deems credible?

you imply that because this discovery/theory hasn't been presented or accepted yet, it therefore means it not credible.

Did you watch the first 3 minutes of part 4?

because it addresses part of your question quite well
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15530582
United States
09/30/2012 09:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow
Dear OP .... Please ignore all the many many shills here!!
You are doing a fantastic job to try to educate the sheep!
Just want to say ... GREAT JOB ! !!!

News