...
I've already DEBUNKED the "DRAWING ARBITRARY LINES ALL OVER A MAP" idiocy AD NASEUM in ALL 4 VIDEOS and at least hundreds of postings on the net including GLP which mindless trolls such as yourself are ALWAYS ABSENT FROM.
But then, if I were the skeptics at this point, I'd probably steer clear as well to avoid EMBARRASSMENT.
Quoting: MatrixLNIN11 Holy shit, these threads have turned you into an arrogant prick.
I don;t even wan't to ask questions anymore incase you blow your top and kill everyone.
Good luck with your superiority OP.
I find it so funny how you attack RESPONSES which are DEFENDING AGAINST ATTACKS and those who anyone with a brain can see above is DISRESPECTFUL CONDESCENDING and ANYTHING but intelligent discourse which you SAY NOTHING ABOUT.
And then you follow in LINE with these same ARROGANT ABUSIVE Trolls/Shills calling me names when no where have I said a WORD to you or criticized you at all.
This is exactly the type of disrespect and ABUSE I'm talking about showing you're among those incapable of intelligent discourse due to YOUR ego, ignorance, arrogance and BIAS.
SHOW ME ONE SINGLE POST THAT I NAMED CALLED OR ATTACKED ANYONE USING FIRST.
the fact is you CAN'T since I've only defended the information and myself against these vile attacks that GO FAR BEYOND MERE QUESTIONING.
Since you're incapable of being OBJECTIVE or NEUTRAL, and don't know the difference between an attack and defending against attacks, PLEASE STAY OUT OF ALL MY THREADS.
Thanks.
I have tried asking you questions in many of your threads and you respond VERY HOSTILE towards any objections.
I hope one day you will answer the many questions I have asked.
Like:
The 188 day thing is the only thing I don't understand myself.
If its 4 days since 188 then its not 188 that would be 192.
and if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.
For it to be a cycle of 188 one would think it would have to be 188 no more no less.
Also why are the points you draw the quake so inaccurate, ie: the Chrischruch quake you have a circle 700km away from the epicenter, is ther a reason for this?? or is it just so it creates a straight line??
Quoting: Doommincus Maximus DUDE...
show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.
I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!
As to the questions above....
1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!
2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!
3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!
4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!
