...


DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!