7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow

i think the main reason people dont like you is you have one of these threads at least twice a month on quakes... never take criticism at all, talk way to much in caps think you are always right everytime and are so quick to disregard the "shills" using the same exact tactics you are complaining about in the first place

Thanks, but you lost me here

DUDE...

show me 1 post I didn't answer of yours that you asked something respectfully.

I've ALWAYS answered respectful posts etc unless i didn't see it or didn't get to it yet!

As to the questions above....

1) the "4" day THING is the FLUCTUATION of the C Y C L E ... its called a CYCLE for a reason and I HAVE explained it in detail before... If you didn't see it, its because you didn't ask or didn't look for what I've said or CARED until now evidently because I've always explained this to those who ASK or have sincere questions and need clarifying! In fact, I explained it AGAIN in DETAIL on my 188 facebook page the other day!

2) the FLUCTUATION hasn't even been relevant or necessary for me to use in validating the cycle since 6 quakes IN A ROW now have correlated to the EXACT DATE within +- 1 day!

3) how is your argument or question valid or logical when your PREMISE is flawed in that you're implying the cycle isn't valid if there's a FLUCTUATION and unless it hits ON the DATES of the CYCLE, then its not valid either???
THE PAST 6 QUAKES IN A ROW HAVE HIT ON THE CYCLE DATES! LOL
However, the fluctuation I've explained compliments it or is PART OF IT!

4) what do you mean the christchurch circle etc is inaccurate??? What 700km circle away from the epicenter have I drawn that you're talking about?
Your question is VAGUE and doesn't make sense probably because you're taking information out of context and haven't watched the video's which is the entire basis for the theory and explains most of your questions. So you criticize this which is fine, but at the same time you don't seem to have had any desire to educate yourself on that which you're criticizing!

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/30/2012 08:00 PM

he lost himself a long time ago. OP is mentally ill and there's no "188 day cycle". The whole thing is a huge cherry-picking croc of shit. There's TONS of 7+ earthquakes every year. Seriously, an absolute fuckton. Look at the video I posted above, it shows how full of shit this "theory" is.

Sorry I don't know what a Facebook is?

But could you please answer these, You did not above.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

With greatest respect.

Means he can manipulate the data to fit his "predictions" and many dumbasses will fall for the illusion.

Except the FACTS and EVIDENCE I've presented which anyone with a BRAIN thats actually taken the time to EDUCATE themselves on, PROVES OTHERWISE.

Those like you have NEVER ONCE BEEN ABLE TO REFUTE any of the evidence I've presented in 4 videos and thousands of postings on the net and this forum.

All you do is post AD HOMS, ABUSE, PERSONAL ATTACKS and EVERYTHING but INTELLIGENT ARGUMENTS showing exactly how and where what you CLAIM is true and what I've presented is all just "CHERRY-PICKING, and a CROC OF SHIT"

You're such a brain-dead ignorant fool you even keep posting a video I've repeatedly DEBUNKED over and over and challenged YOU and all those posting that video to show exactly where it debunks ANYTHING I've presented in ALL MY VIDEO'S!

you can't do it because you don't even understand the material i've presented or even what your poor excuse for a debunking video is even about or saying as well.

WHY?

because you're at best a SHILL, probably a TROLL, and at the very least a TOTAL MORON in DENIAL.

(note to all those who question my use of the word MORON... NOTICE its a RESPONSE that MIRRORS the same DISRESPECT and ABUSE being posted by this MORON first) ;))

I think Doommicus is saying that you placed the Christchurch epicenter circle on the wrong spot on the map and thus that may skew your data ???????

Regardless, NOTHING is an EXACT science.
There will always be a margin/window of error or wiggle room. I learned that in high school and college science classes, as we always had to calculate the +/- wiggle room in our experiments.

So, it doesn't matter if the major EQ happened 4 days later or if the epicenter is a few hundred km off the ley-line, it is the fact that Matrix, by using his theory, has predicted major EQs in/around specific dates. Period.

If people would use this theory and prep during "watch" times ... there might be more lives saved than not.

Keep up the good work, Matrix.

but unfortunately, AS USUAL, you have ZERO EVIDENCE to support that CLAIM not to mention have failed miserably to show exactly how and where all I've presented to SUPPORT what I claim, is wrong and "manipulating data to fit".

But thanks again for your OPINION SHILLBOT which as usual is worthless and proves or disproves NOTHING

oh well

Have you sent your thesis to any scientific communities yet, Since your 100% correct thier help could save lives

ok so lets assume one quake hits 4 days before the 188, and the next one hits 4 days after the 188.. thats 192 days. Would you accept it as being inside the cycle range? And the other way, with a quake hitting 4 days after and the next 4 days before, it would be 180 days

So in fact you are talking about a cycle with a 12 days window! Lots of days for a significant quake to hit

not sure what you don't understand.

Thread: 7.3 HITS LEY-LINES OF 188 WITHIN 4 DAYS OF 188 CYCLE & 1 DAY OFF FROM 10/2 QUAKE WARNING OF A MAJOR 7+!!! Wow (Page 4)

perhaps you should read over my response and/or clarify your question.

thats how the intelligent discourse or PROCESS WORKS.

question / answer etc

you asked why i post predictions outside of the 188 cycle...

WHY NOT?

is there a rule that one can only post quake warning dates 2 times a year? lol

please focus and articulate your question better if you want a better answer.

********************

Hi OP.

Thank YOU for all your time and hard work. Mnay of us do appreciate what you are doing. Now, here is something important.

Do you see a 7.5 ANY WHERE in California within the next 3 months??????






*******************

FUCK THE QUAKE HATERS OP! WHEN IS THE NEST ONE COMIN! THIS IS RELIABLE DOOM GIVE OR TAKE A FEW DAYS! YOU HAVE WISDOM FROM YAHWEH HIMSELF OR YOUR AN INSIDER FOR HARRP! EITHER WAY YOUR THE BEST FALSE PROPHET IVE SEEN ON GLP IN 2 YEARS! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

OP,

Where did this 188 day chart come from. Is it your theory alone or have others recognized this pattern? If it is your theory then it is a good one. I feel you would gather more supporters if you had a plus/minus built in. When I design parts, I always leave a bit of play in the finished piece. You have connected many locations that seem to draw a grid. How many other points needs to be connected for the finished grid pattern.

Peace

AND YOUR POINT IS??

SO WHAT?

LOL

are you actually saying you think major quakes don't happen every month?

or its not useful to know dates or timeframe when major quakes are most likely to occur?

the only reason "people" don't like me is because of THEIR EGO'S and fact that what I'm doing and presenting challenges their concept of reality and truths they've been taught to believe since birth may be all WRONG. They don't like me because I don't allow them to post LIES or I challenge them to PROVE WHAT THEY CLAIM IS TRUE OR FALSE! And you can STOP right there saying PEOPLE in general as if EVERYONE doesn't like, understand or have any interest in what I'm doing which is a LIE as well.



NOW YOU'RE LYING AGAIN..

or just IGNORANT of what you're criticizing. Which is it? Because I can show many examples where I had no problem with criticism that was RESPECTFUL!



thats a PERSONAL BIAS and has NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER THE INFORMATION IS TRUE OR NOT.

So you're telling me because i have a certain syntax or writing style, that the EVIDENCE and information is therefore FALSE and meaningless because of peoples PERSONAL FEELINGS?

SINCE WHEN DOES ONES "FEELINGS" or OPINIONS, have ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE MERIT OF THE MATERIAL AND INFORMATION?

answer: IT DOESN'T.

For anyone to DISREGARD and DENY facts and evidence because of PERSONAL BIASES or FEELINGS, is ABSURD.



WRONG. This has absolutely NOTHING to do with me THINKING I'm "right".

UNLIKE YOU AND THOSE WHO THINK I'M WRONG, I've posted FACTS, compelling EVIDENCE and intelligent arguments to SUPPORT and BACK UP WHAT I CLAIM or say is RIGHT.

If I'm not right or what I've presented is wrong, then why is it that NONE of these so-called skeptics can show exactly how and where I'm wrong.
Why is it that MOST OF THESE "SKEPTICS" who are mostly shills or trolls using that GUISE, can ONLY POST AD HOMS, EMPTY CLAIMS and ABUSE with CONDESCENDING TONES and SARCASM?

The fact is you can't find a SINGLE post I ignored that was sincere and made attempts to engage in intelligent discourse.

So you're entire argument is based on ZERO knowledge of the issue or facts you're trying to criticize.

I rest my case

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/30/2012 08:50 PM

Every post you've ever made debunked in 1 short video.

No, It appears I missed it.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

4. Can you please post the 6 quakes that are EXACTLY 188 days apart, Please

With greatest respect.

You're still missing the first point....

your 4-day window premise s irrelevant due to 6 major quakes IN A ROW that have validated this current cycle which evidence proves goes far beyond the type of coincidence most skeptics try to argue.

so there is NO 12 day window that the cycle uses or is based upon.

the CONSISTENCY of the cycle/pattern has only certain types of quakes associated with it that CONSISTENTLY REPEATS with a CONSISTENT TIMEFRAME or WINDOW in the majority of cases. THATS CALLED a PATTERN... and the quakes associated DO NOT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME. So what you're suggesting has no bearing on this cycle or the merit of it.

And your premise about "lots of days for a significant quake to hit" is totally out of context. the term SIGNIFICANT IS VAGUE, and you offer no specific stats or evidence to support it nor does anything your'e saying address any of the specifics or evidence I've been presenting in the past 4 video's that shows why your point is irrelevant. But then, contrary to your inference, being within 4 days for a MAJOR QUAKE to hit, is VERY ACCURATE!

well done as always OP...

LOL

no I didn't... he just doesn't understand anything about what I've explained regarding the 188 GRID etc and is unable to ask the right question because he hasn't done enough research into what he's criticizing or thinks is wrong.

He's getting closer in understanding about his comment I'll be addressing about "straight lines", but is way too assuming its wrong without clarifying what he doesn't understand about that.

do you understand it? or what exactly don't you understand?



EXACTLY... but wiggle room is the wrong term... as to 100% precision in measuring such things as quakes etc, yes there's always a margin of error and humans do not posses the knowledge or technology yet.

but then, to understand your point better, you have to apply specifics to this case or each case.



for the most part... BINGO.



JACKPOT!

now your'e hitting the nail on the head grasshoppa as ONE of the aspects that can be applied and or be USEFUL!

Dear OP .... Please ignore all the many many shills here!!
You are doing a fantastic job to try to educate the sheep!
Just want to say ... GREAT JOB ! !!!

Not yet... but in time, that may occur if and when the time is right and I can compile all the data into a proper format for "conventional science" to study and understand or accept...and so far there is ample evidence, information and data that has established a PATTERN that could be a good starting point IF someone in the science communities were to analyze.

but then, how would you expect a concept based on a far more advanced science, to be presented to a primitive science that refuses to accept or even consider it unless it conforms to ONLY what conventional science deems credible?

you imply that because this discovery/theory hasn't been presented or accepted yet, it therefore means it not credible.

Did you watch the first 3 minutes of part 4?

because it addresses part of your question quite well

Dear OP .... Please ignore all the many many shills here!!
You are doing a fantastic job to try to educate the sheep!
Just want to say ... GREAT JOB ! !!!

ALL I WAS ASKING IS WHY ON ALL YOUR DIAGRAMS THE CHRISTCHURCH EQ EPICENTER IS MARKED IN WELLINGTON NZ, OVER 700KM FROM CHRISTCHURCH

How is that asking the wrong question?

I have watched you vids, and read your threads what else am I supposed to reseach in regards YOUR theroy??????

These are the questions I asked, If you can't answer them thats fine, but don't blame me for asking questions.

1. if there is a +- amount of days where does the next 188 start from, 188 days from when the chosen EQ happened or 188 from when the 188 EQ was supposed to happen.

2. All the diagrams in your videos have a circle around Wellinton NZ for the quake, not Christchurch. Do you use acuall Long.Lat values or is it just to create straight lines.

3. What do you mean by "Exact date +- days", Exact is Exact not almost

4. Can you please post the 6 quakes that are EXACTLY 188 days apart, Please

If the 4 day is irrelevant you cant count this quake. Period. If its relevant all the remaining calculations are relevant

Adding this to the fact that a 7+ quake happened every 20 days (average) since 1990 ( [link to www.infoplease.com] You are working with something that can be adjusted to a 12 day window on something that can happen every 20 day. To tight to be considered statistically meaningful.

And by significant i mean 7+. because yes, vague indeed is the word for all of this