Is Obama Introducing National Socialism to the United States? | |
Phennommennonn (OP) Forum Administrator 10/02/2012 11:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is nothing close to socialism. Big business and banks run this country. In socialism, they're owned by the people. We have the opposite of socialism - fascism. Quoting: jcab2002 what the fuck are you reading from? Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy,and a political philosophy advocating such a system. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, direct public ownership or autonomous state enterprises.There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them.They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Where the hell do you see the social ownership of the means of productions and co-operative management of the economy? What I see is a few people with most of the money running everything for their benefit and to the detriment of everyone else. start reading fact101. then get back to us. political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9870801 United States 10/02/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shogu666 User ID: 1217094 Poland 10/02/2012 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is nothing close to socialism. Big business and banks run this country. In socialism, they're owned by the people. We have the opposite of socialism - fascism. Quoting: jcab2002 get your head out of the clouds. the people will never own shit. but they can be controlled and their actions dictated by the government..and that is what socialism is in practice. Every form of government ends up being the same in practice - statism. State derives from inequality since someone must protect haves against have-nots. State can only be abolished is a system apart from market. |
Shogu666 User ID: 1217094 Poland 10/02/2012 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where the hell do you see the social ownership of the means of productions and co-operative management of the economy? Quoting: Phennommennonn What I see is a few people with most of the money running everything for their benefit and to the detriment of everyone else. start reading fact101. then get back to us. Ok so you wont tell us where is social ownership of the means of productions and co-operative management of the economy ?? Becuase i would really like to see it, i am always in favor of learning something new. |
jcab2002 User ID: 24453126 United States 10/02/2012 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is nothing close to socialism. Big business and banks run this country. In socialism, they're owned by the people. We have the opposite of socialism - fascism. Quoting: jcab2002 what the fuck are you reading from? Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy,and a political philosophy advocating such a system. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, direct public ownership or autonomous state enterprises.There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them.They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Where the hell do you see the social ownership of the means of productions and co-operative management of the economy? What I see is a few people with most of the money running everything for their benefit and to the detriment of everyone else. start reading fact101. then get back to us. I have no idea what that is. But still, where do you see anyone other than a few rich powerful people running everything for their benefit? The crumbs handed out to the slaves or zoo animals are nothing more than a means to continue the raping by preventing revolution. “We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms." “We’ll therefore speed up the question of reform (of tarrifs within) the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on the question of protection …(for) the Republican Party." “By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves, on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever." - United State Bankers magazine, 1892. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21102346 United States 10/02/2012 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Governor User ID: 24809655 United States 10/02/2012 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | in talking with some local libs - check out the reasons they want him to remain in office Quoting: Phennommennonn they took our jobs, the govt should support us its not a black thing. its a people thing. he understands our people. blacks have been shit on since before lincoln. you all cant handle black supremacy now that we have a black president. we need him because he is finally getting us black folk the respect we deserve. the govt has been handing it out for decades, and you white ppl been bitchin bout it - now that its your turn you white folk dont want it? you white people dont understand what obamas trying to do for america. any president who empathizes with a mother and father (ref trayvon/zimmerman case) like he did has my vote. socialism? so what. :dannyOMG: |
jcab2002 User ID: 24453126 United States 10/02/2012 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | in talking with some local libs - check out the reasons they want him to remain in office Quoting: Phennommennonn they took our jobs, the govt should support us its not a black thing. its a people thing. he understands our people. blacks have been shit on since before lincoln. you all cant handle black supremacy now that we have a black president. we need him because he is finally getting us black folk the respect we deserve. the govt has been handing it out for decades, and you white ppl been bitchin bout it - now that its your turn you white folk dont want it? you white people dont understand what obamas trying to do for america. any president who empathizes with a mother and father (ref trayvon/zimmerman case) like he did has my vote. socialism? so what. :dannyOMG: You aren't seeing the big picture. There are 3 groups of people in politics and society. There are not just 2 sides. You have the super elite, the richest of the rich, the people who decide everything including who the president will be and what they must do for them. Then you have the slaves. And finally the zoo animals. The super elite continue to get the slaves and the zoo animals to fight each other so they never direct their anger at them. Even if you got your way - where you could starve the zoo animals, the super elite will continue to take trillions and trillions of dollars, destroying the economy forever. It's time that the slaves and zoo animals stop fighting with each other and instead look at who has caused things to get how they are. “We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms." “We’ll therefore speed up the question of reform (of tarrifs within) the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on the question of protection …(for) the Republican Party." “By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves, on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever." - United State Bankers magazine, 1892. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942369 United States 10/02/2012 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shogu666 User ID: 1217094 Poland 10/02/2012 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You aren't seeing the big picture. There are 3 groups of people in politics and society. There are not just 2 sides. You have the super elite, the richest of the rich, the people who decide everything including who the president will be and what they must do for them. Then you have the slaves. And finally the zoo animals. The super elite continue to get the slaves and the zoo animals to fight each other so they never direct their anger at them. Quoting: jcab2002 Even if you got your way - where you could starve the zoo animals, the super elite will continue to take trillions and trillions of dollars, destroying the economy forever. It's time that the slaves and zoo animals stop fighting with each other and instead look at who has caused things to get how they are. The problem with the slaves is that a lot of them is content just from the fact they are above zoo animals. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 942369 United States 10/02/2012 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You aren't seeing the big picture. There are 3 groups of people in politics and society. There are not just 2 sides. You have the super elite, the richest of the rich, the people who decide everything including who the president will be and what they must do for them. Then you have the slaves. And finally the zoo animals. The super elite continue to get the slaves and the zoo animals to fight each other so they never direct their anger at them. Quoting: jcab2002 Even if you got your way - where you could starve the zoo animals, the super elite will continue to take trillions and trillions of dollars, destroying the economy forever. It's time that the slaves and zoo animals stop fighting with each other and instead look at who has caused things to get how they are. The problem with the slaves is that a lot of them is content just from the fact they are above zoo animals. Some of them lately do not rank up to zoo level. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10128444 Portugal 10/02/2012 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jcab2002 User ID: 24453126 United States 10/02/2012 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You aren't seeing the big picture. There are 3 groups of people in politics and society. There are not just 2 sides. You have the super elite, the richest of the rich, the people who decide everything including who the president will be and what they must do for them. Then you have the slaves. And finally the zoo animals. The super elite continue to get the slaves and the zoo animals to fight each other so they never direct their anger at them. Quoting: jcab2002 Even if you got your way - where you could starve the zoo animals, the super elite will continue to take trillions and trillions of dollars, destroying the economy forever. It's time that the slaves and zoo animals stop fighting with each other and instead look at who has caused things to get how they are. The problem with the slaves is that a lot of them is content just from the fact they are above zoo animals. The real problem is that neither the slaves nor the zoo animals have realized that they are not and never will be free until the super elite are no longer running the world. All it takes is for everyone to stop believing in them. There is no way they have the power they have unless it is given to them unknowingly or willingly. If slaves desire to no longer be slaves and zoo animals desire to be out of their cages, then we can all be equal and free. “We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms." “We’ll therefore speed up the question of reform (of tarrifs within) the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on the question of protection …(for) the Republican Party." “By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves, on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever." - United State Bankers magazine, 1892. |
Shogu666 User ID: 1217094 Poland 10/02/2012 12:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The real problem is that neither the slaves nor the zoo animals have realized that they are not and never will be free until the super elite are no longer running the world. Quoting: jcab2002 All it takes is for everyone to stop believing in them. There is no way they have the power they have unless it is given to them unknowingly or willingly. If slaves desire to no longer be slaves and zoo animals desire to be out of their cages, then we can all be equal and free. You do not get it. What i mean is those slaves will not rise against the elite if that means zoo animals being freed from their cages. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23425569 United States 10/02/2012 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Socialism? Crap...that was 20 years ago...this is plain out and out communism and people STILL will not believe it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9870801 I always wondered what people would do if they were on the Titanic when it was sinking. We're seeing it first hand!! Right. what he has done for his handlers is bring marxist socialsim in its concentrated form called communism to America it is INTERNATIONALISM or NWO it is the opposits of NATIONAL SOCIALISM WW2 was fought to try to stop communism, marxist socialsim, from entering into the heart of Europe Those who fought to total destruction by the forces of the INTERNATIONAL BANKERS or communist ELITE were the National Socialists The wrong side won WW2 so now marxist socialsim , communism has taken over Europe and are putting the last few nails in the box in which it has encased America. do some RESEARCh on marxist communist socialism and its opposite National Socialsim. mas has a campaign to confuse the masses that they are one and the same as the msm owners are terrified of National Socialsim, as they should be. Every thing is owned by the people and no CENTRAL BANKS ALLOWED. YES! ` |
seethelight User ID: 21130561 Ireland 10/02/2012 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is a big topic on which much can be said. The U.S. has dabbled in National Socialism before; elements of Roosevelt’s New Deal emulated Mussolini’s policies, and were implemented by men who made no secret of their admiration for Il Duce. But it has been a long time since anyone has seriously tried to turn the United States in a National Socialist direction. Quoting: Phennommennonn Which is what Barack Obama seems to be doing. Consider his 983 executive orders, compared with George W. Bush’s 63. Or his extra-constitutional czars; or his illegal cramdown of bondholders in auto bankruptcies; or the explosion in warrantless wiretaps and the even greater explosion in federal regulations; or his “green energy” scams to distort the economy and enrich political cronies; or the recent revelation that the Obama family costs U.S. taxpayers something like twenty times what the British Royal Family costs its subjects. Or, more important, consider Obamacare, a classic top-down National Socialist program. finish it here [link to www.powerlineblog.com] Here, I'll save you all the trouble. the answer is simply: No. |
seethelight User ID: 21130561 Ireland 10/02/2012 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jcab2002 User ID: 24453126 United States 10/02/2012 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The real problem is that neither the slaves nor the zoo animals have realized that they are not and never will be free until the super elite are no longer running the world. Quoting: jcab2002 All it takes is for everyone to stop believing in them. There is no way they have the power they have unless it is given to them unknowingly or willingly. If slaves desire to no longer be slaves and zoo animals desire to be out of their cages, then we can all be equal and free. You do not get it. What i mean is those slaves will not rise against the elite if that means zoo animals being freed from their cages. Neither side will rise against the elite until they realize that the elite is causing everyone's misery. Nothing will ever change until the elite are dealt with. It's meaningless to argue over anything else. “We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms." “We’ll therefore speed up the question of reform (of tarrifs within) the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on the question of protection …(for) the Republican Party." “By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves, on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever." - United State Bankers magazine, 1892. |
Anonymous User ID: 24819111 United States 10/02/2012 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20413827 United States 10/02/2012 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Phenomenon.. National Socialism is also known as Naziism.. I am pretty sure Obama is not the white fuhrer... and even if it was a National Socialism based on current America, it would not be about its race.. These are the predominant races Whites are Europeans whom came from hungry immigrants not that long ago when Europe was shit Mexicans(mestizos) are a mixture of natives and rapist Spaniards, came to southern U.S bringing marijuana, and in the last decade spread throughout the entire country Blacks were slaves from the whites, forced to be here, they never chose to come here Now none of these can speak about race and state... this state is a war machine, and regardless of how you want to say it.... the u.s is the main capitalist engine of the world... it might no longer have a model as extreme as Chile, but it sure is about capitalism.. |
Phennommennonn (OP) Forum Administrator 10/02/2012 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | eat a bag of dicks mick - you gotta problem with the article take it up with the author. truth hurts doesnt it fukko? political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
niphtrique User ID: 14748444 Netherlands 10/02/2012 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After Adolf Hitler rose to power, Germany issued debt free government money based on human labour. Within two years unemployment had disappeared and the country was back on its feet. Germany had a stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. The national restoration programme of Nazi-Germany started with public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities and later also for the military. One billion bills of exchange, called Labour Treasury Certificates were issued to cover the cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. The workers then spent the certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people. Economist Henry C.K. Liu wrote the following about Germany's remarkable transformation: "The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began." Germany rose from depression to the strongest economy in the world in five years time. The success was based on balancing the rewards for labour and capital and economic stimulus. Germany managed to restore foreign trade although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. The lack of foreign credit and the boycott meant that the effects of the economic stimulus remained within the borders of the country because Germany could not buy foreign goods and services on credit. Nazi-Germany demonstrated that it is possible to rebuild an economy on the national level while being cut off from international finance and trade. [link to www.naturalmoney.org] It does not look like Obamanomics to me. But you know now that the depression can be gone in two years. Last Edited by niphtrique on 10/02/2012 12:16 PM |
The Governor User ID: 24809655 United States 10/02/2012 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SaveUSa User ID: 21010731 United States 10/02/2012 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is a big topic on which much can be said. The U.S. has dabbled in National Socialism before; elements of Roosevelt’s New Deal emulated Mussolini’s policies, and were implemented by men who made no secret of their admiration for Il Duce. But it has been a long time since anyone has seriously tried to turn the United States in a National Socialist direction. Quoting: Phennommennonn Which is what Barack Obama seems to be doing. Consider his 983 executive orders, compared with George W. Bush’s 63. Or his extra-constitutional czars; or his illegal cramdown of bondholders in auto bankruptcies; or the explosion in warrantless wiretaps and the even greater explosion in federal regulations; or his “green energy” scams to distort the economy and enrich political cronies; or the recent revelation that the Obama family costs U.S. taxpayers something like twenty times what the British Royal Family costs its subjects. Or, more important, consider Obamacare, a classic top-down National Socialist program. finish it here [link to www.powerlineblog.com] Anyone that has not figured that out by now needs serious counseling. Anyone that supports it should be deported. Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
The Governor User ID: 24809655 United States 10/02/2012 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After Adolf Hitler rose to power, Germany issued debt free government money based on human labour. Within two years unemployment had disappeared and the country was back on its feet. Germany had a stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. The national restoration programme of Nazi-Germany started with public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities and later also for the military. Quoting: niphtrique One billion bills of exchange, called Labour Treasury Certificates were issued to cover the cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. The workers then spent the certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people. Economist Henry C.K. Liu wrote the following about Germany's remarkable transformation: The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began. Germany rose from depression to the strongest economy in the world in five years time. The success was based on balancing the rewards for labour and capital and economic stimulus. Germany managed to restore foreign trade although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. The lack of foreign credit and the boycott meant that the effects of the economic stimulus remained within the borders of the country because Germany could not buy foreign goods and services on credit. Nazi-Germany demonstrated that it is possible to rebuild an economy on the national level while being cut off from international finance and trade. [link to www.naturalmoney.org] It does not look like Obamanomics to me. Fair enough. But Hitler's goal was to use fascist techniques to strengthen his country. Obama is using fascist techniques to destroy ours. Last Edited by The Governor on 10/02/2012 12:17 PM |
jcab2002 User ID: 24453126 United States 10/02/2012 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After Adolf Hitler rose to power, Germany issued debt free government money based on human labour. Within two years unemployment had disappeared and the country was back on its feet. Germany had a stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. The national restoration programme of Nazi-Germany started with public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities and later also for the military. Quoting: niphtrique One billion bills of exchange, called Labour Treasury Certificates were issued to cover the cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. The workers then spent the certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people. Economist Henry C.K. Liu wrote the following about Germany's remarkable transformation: "The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began." Germany rose from depression to the strongest economy in the world in five years time. The success was based on balancing the rewards for labour and capital and economic stimulus. Germany managed to restore foreign trade although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. The lack of foreign credit and the boycott meant that the effects of the economic stimulus remained within the borders of the country because Germany could not buy foreign goods and services on credit. Nazi-Germany demonstrated that it is possible to rebuild an economy on the national level while being cut off from international finance and trade. [link to www.naturalmoney.org] It does not look like Obamanomics to me. But you know now that the depression can be gone in two years. That's exactly the key to what needs to be done worldwide - take the banks out of the money business and issue money not based on debt. Debt-based money is the chains that bind us all. The end result will always be slavery. “We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms." “We’ll therefore speed up the question of reform (of tarrifs within) the Democratic Party; and we’ll put the spotlight on the question of protection …(for) the Republican Party." “By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves, on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever." - United State Bankers magazine, 1892. |
niphtrique User ID: 14748444 Netherlands 10/02/2012 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fair enough. Quoting: The Governor But Hitler's goal was to use fascist techniques to strengthen his country. Obama is using fascist techniques to destroy ours. Within the current economic model you can choose between deficit spending/austerity or socialism/capitalism. Both will end in disaster. The real cause of the problems lies in the nature of our money system in which interest on money is charged. Interest causes wealth to concentrate as the poor pay interest to the rich. Interest can therefore be seen as a tax on poverty to the benefit of the rich. Money in the bank is backed by debt, so interest is a fraud that forces the poor into debt if the rich do not take the money out of their accounts and spend it. The following example demonstrates this and also that interest on money is unsustainable and leads to crisis: "If someone brought a 1/10 oz gold coin to the bank in the year 1 AD, and the money remained there until the year 2000 AD, collecting a yearly interest of 4%, the amount of gold in the account would have been 3.6 * 10^31 kilogramme of gold weighing 6,000,000 times the complete mass of the Earth." When interest is charged on a limited scale or over a short timeframe then those problems do not surface. Interest is an insidious process. Over time it is inescapable that it reduces large numbers of people to a state of servitude to the money lenders. This is a long term development that transcends the life span of a human. Interest is the main reason why a number of civilisations have failed and why Western civilisation is about to fail. Therefore all interest is usury and the current financial system is a usury financial system. Interest is also the cause of inflation as more and more money has to be created to keep the economy going. Any analysis that does not identify interest as the core problem will not bring a solution. |
krinkfan User ID: 1527832 United States 10/02/2012 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the problem is that his supporters are socialists themselves. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1379065 2nd Civil War draws near. +100% "and that's the fact, jack." all the pink-o commie's from the 60's and 70's are running the asylum now. its the only explanation and anyone that doesn't see it.....well, nuff said. Last Edited by Krinkfan on 10/02/2012 12:27 PM "the thin veneer of civilization that we all take for granted every day is starting to rapidly disappear." |
Phennommennonn (OP) Forum Administrator 10/02/2012 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Phenomenon.. National Socialism is also known as Naziism.. I Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20413827 Blacks were slaves from the whites, forced to be here, they never chose to come here cluepon...blacks were originally sold by their own. you failed high school history didntcha? political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10128444 Portugal 10/02/2012 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After Adolf Hitler rose to power, Germany issued debt free government money based on human labour. Within two years unemployment had disappeared and the country was back on its feet. Germany had a stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. The national restoration programme of Nazi-Germany started with public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities and later also for the military. Quoting: niphtrique One billion bills of exchange, called Labour Treasury Certificates were issued to cover the cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. The workers then spent the certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people. Economist Henry C.K. Liu wrote the following about Germany's remarkable transformation: The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began. Germany rose from depression to the strongest economy in the world in five years time. The success was based on balancing the rewards for labour and capital and economic stimulus. Germany managed to restore foreign trade although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. The lack of foreign credit and the boycott meant that the effects of the economic stimulus remained within the borders of the country because Germany could not buy foreign goods and services on credit. Nazi-Germany demonstrated that it is possible to rebuild an economy on the national level while being cut off from international finance and trade. [link to www.naturalmoney.org] It does not look like Obamanomics to me. Fair enough. But Hitler's goal was to use fascist techniques to strengthen his country. Obama is using fascist techniques to destroy ours. Sorry but National Socialism is not fascism. It got inspired by Italian Fascism, mussolini and such. They used militarism too. Also, it is a nationalist ideology. This is what fascism means. It was proven already that Socialism can only work if it is National, for your own folk and nation. Obama is not a nationalist. He keeps giving out money to Israel and other countries to promote the zionist american imperialism. Obama is a globalism puppet. A puppet of the world finance. If you don't understand that Hitler lost in WW2 and the allies (USA block and Soviet block) took over with their policies I don't know what else can I tell you... Open your eyes. |