Pole Shift, Crustal displacement evidence is here! Vast Plate movement sequence proved between Indonesia, Alaska and Americas

great post, great analysis, been following this from the original thread and it's all been spot on.

I'd be interested to see a little more analysis around the swarm going on along the mediterranean/african plate boundary, but I realise this isn't your day job !!

Have you seen this OP and what are your thoughts?

[link to earthsky.org]

Bottom line: German and Norwegian scientists have incorporated hotspots in Earth’s mantle into a computer model being used to study true polar wander. They say their work established a stable reference frame for this study that lets them conclude Earth is undergoing true polar wander today.

i love it when young fresh minds do research!

:awesomee:

Hi bendinglight,

something to think about:

the Earth is not flat like in your maps, it's a globe - not 2D but 3D.

The map you use is a cylindrical projection (Mercator-Projection). If you use another projection like the Mollweide Projection your straight lines will be distorted.

E.g.:
Using the Mollweide Projection your line "Buoy event" -> "6.6 Indonesia" would end up somewhere in Peru, not California.
Using the Peters Projection your line "Buoy event" -> "6.6 Indonesia" would end up somewhere in Ecuador.

It is quite complicated to project a straight line on a globe to a flat map. In your case your straight lines transferred back to a globe would be severe curved lines.


This is a major flaw in your calculation.
And sorry to say: If there is only one flaw in a theory, the whole theory is loused up.


.

Good research. Good information.

Bizarre bouy action happening now.

[link to www.ndbc.noaa.gov]

How can this thread NOT be pinned? C'mon, GLP! Get it together!

SHIN THIS PIT!!!

wow hard work

That image is not apart of the original post, it's just some data.
I try to find all sorts of connections and yes I know the Earth isn't flat lol but following longitude and latitude are better for working with.

Like for example,

Notice Alaska, well recently this happened:

Thread: ALASKA EARTHQUAKE 6.9

Check the longitude of the Alaskan quake and the recent quake by Antarctica.

Alaska 178.293°W [link to earthquake.usgs.gov]
Antarctica 177.926°E [link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

In other words you can basically draw a straight line between the two.

For me is all about connection the dots.

MSM likes us to think earthquakes are just localized events... but many signs are now pointing otherwise.

I have older screenshots of USGS large quakes during two different events, notice how similar globally?





There is much going on that's odd but can be connected in many ways, that's my goal with this thread and hope I've made it clear.

What's bizarre with it?

[link to www.ndbc.noaa.gov]

Just usual tides - in the Indian Ocean 0.40 cm to 0.50 cm.


.

Sure it's not a part of the original post - but it's also your post.
And it contains a flaw. Thus it discredits also your initial post.



That's honest - but if I collect a vast amount of data I could even find a connection between earthquakes and the birth rate in India.



May be MSM do, but scientists don't.
As far as I remember there are shockwave simulations that indicate a possible connection between the 2004 Sumatra quake and a quake in Chile shortly afterwards.



Almost opposite points - like Sumatra <-> Chile (How about research in this direction?)



I find nothing unusual in the data.
If you have stress relieve (EQ) at a plate boundary you will get also stress relieve at other points of this plate.
Thus repeating patterns are not unusual.


.

Hydra is a known shill. Don't bother with him. Everything is always absolutely as it should be, accordingly to him, Astromut and Marketselloff, who work as a team on such threads.

The opposite is true, as you have exampled here.

I can't even find the motivation to respond when somebody has already made up their mind no matter what the information is.

"Thus it discredits also your initial post."

A post of a screenshot of earthquakes with a line showing their position discredits this thread?
The initial post is all documented information and data, it's not even about me.
Data is data.

OP, does the break up of the Indo-Australian tectonic plate (see the information provided below) also factor into the "triangular" plate tectonic theory that you have put forward?

Newly published findings shed light on the relationship between two large (8.6 and 8.2 magnitude) quakes in the Indian Ocean that happened this past April 11th and the ongoing break up of the Indo-Australian plate.

These research findings have just been published in the most recent (Sept 26th) issue of Nature (the International Journal of Science), which is a VERY well recognized scientific journal.

The title of the research article published in Nature is:

Unusual Indian Ocean earthquakes hint at tectonic breakup

The article is subtitled:

April 2012 quakes occurred away from plate edges, suggesting formation of a new boundary.

Here are excerpts of the research article:

A pair of massive earthquakes that rocked the Indian Ocean on 11 April 2012 may signal the latest step in the formation of a new plate boundary within Earth’s surface.

Geological stresses rending the Indo-Australian plate apart are likely to have caused the magnitude-8.6 and magnitude-8.2 quakes, which broke along numerous faults and unleashed aftershocks for 6 days afterwards, according to three papers published online today in Nature.

Seismologists have suspected since the 1980s that the Indo-Australian plate may be breaking up. But the 11 April earthquakes represent “the most spectacular example” of that process in action, says Matthias Delescluse, a geophysicist at the Ecole Normale Supérieure in Paris and lead author of the first paper1. Worldwide, “it’s the clearest example of newly formed plate boundaries,” he says.

...the Australian portion [of the Indo-Australian plate forged ahead, creating twisting tensions that are splitting the plate apart in the Indian Ocean.

...the magnitude-9.1 tremor in 2004 that unleashed a massive tsunami across the Indian Ocean, and another quake in 2005 — probably triggered the 2012 event by adding to pent-up stresses in the plate’s middle region.

However, the first 11 April event defied expectations as the largest strike-slip earthquake on record, and one of the strongest to occur away from any conventional plate boundaries.

...accumulated stresses spread over the plate’s interior broke free in the first 11 April event, resulting in one of the most complex fault patterns ever observed. Unlike most earthquakes that shake along a single fault, this one ruptured along four faults, one of which slipped as much as 20–30 metres.

...scientists found that for six days following the event, earthquakes of magnitude 5.5 and greater occurred at almost five times their normal rate all around the world.

[link to www.nature.com]

OK, let's turn our attention to your initial thread:

All your sea level adjustments refer to station 53046.
Of course you watched also the data of the stations 56001 and 56003? They should (only about 300 miles away) also show a significant drop in water column height.
Why don't you post this data to verify your claims?

Oh yes, forgot:
Most of the 16 buoys, handed over to Indonesia in 2011, are destroyed beyond repair. The remaining buoys submit largely corrupt data.
The reason why the "Gitews" don't rely any more on the buoys for tsunami warnings, instead on GPS and seismometer data.


And everybody with a little brain would expect, that a sea level adjustment of 110 m or 270 m should trigger a major tsunami. Did it? No.


Thus buoy error.
Second flaw in your calculations.



.

Last Edited by Hydra on 10/03/2012 04:06 PM

Excellent info, thanks OP *****

I'm great going back to the initial thread.
Buoy errors eh?

- MSM admit "vast Indo-Australian plate is being torn in two" right after latest buoy event by Java.
- Detailed buoy events that have lead to volcanic eruptions 3 times in a row.
- Detailed information showing a pattern 3 times in a row leading up to 7+ quakes starting with buoy events.
- With that pattern being use to predict the 7+ within the exact region and time frame days before it happened.

This is not speculation but rather documented information!

I would also like to point out that that the seafloor adjustments didn't happen at once but rather over a period of a couple days such as this example:


Being this was a slow displacement the water disperses evenly being there isn't one single mega jolt that would thrust the force necessary for a tsunami.


Well to further my point, by following this data have I been able to predict mega quakes.. yes I have:

Back on 8/31 I posted this image:



Stated this:
"There are two possible things which are possible.
The western Pacific still has more pressure to release, resulting in more earthquakes in the short term.

OR.. the sequence shall continue just like last time.
As the Pacific further compresses.. the pressure point has now moved to the other side of the Pacific, the Americas.
I showed the area of concern in the image above, anywhere within that box.
Specially I'd be most concerned anywhere from California down to the bottom of Central America.
For swarms and/or at least one 7+ earthquake.. in which would release the pressure.

One of those two will happen in the short term.
Short term as in less than two weeks but honestly could be much sooner, perhaps within a couple days.
I personally feel that the Americas are now in for it based upon all this vast data but could be either."

Source: Thread: Plate movement watch underway! Java buoy going wild.. again! (Page 8)

The outcome..
Turned out instead of one option happening, both happened fairly shortly:

"The western Pacific still has more pressure to release, resulting in more earthquakes in the short term":

I said more pressure needed to be released.. which happened in the EXACT same location as the Seafloor rise buoy event!
Notice the location of the seafloor rise next to the location of the earthquake swarm:




To further show what I mean notice the longitude of the buoy and one of the earthquakes.. both are 113 degrees east.
Buoy details: [link to www.ndbc.noaa.gov]
6.4 quake details: [link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

and then this happened, the 7+ quake within the area and time frame I warned :


Recall this image I posted on 8/31..




and most recently:
Thread: Columbia 7.4
Colombia was right within that box as well.

Hmmmm another connection!

If these were "buoy errors" then how come there is a pattern of:
1: Java buoy event showing large displacement, volcanic eruptions Indonesia.
2: Followed by buoy events around Alaska's Aleutian Islands.
3: Followed by 7+ quake in the lower Americas.

These "errors" sure are telling a story by this sequence happening 3 times in a row.. especially being it's increasing!

-The first event started with a 40 meter seafloor adjustment by Java leading up to the El Salvador quake.
-The second event was a 110 meter seafloor adjustment by Java leading up to the Costa Rica Quake.
-The latest event was a 270 meter seafloor adjustment by Java which made step 2 in the sequence more severe by Alaska with a 6.4 quake along with the buoy movements there leading up to the Columbia quake.

Being this sequence is soo clear I've also documented a time I predicted the 7+ quake within an area and time frame accurately.


If all this was false inaccurate buoy data then there wouldn't be this pattern three times in a row, then I wouldn't have been able to predict a 7+ quake.

CASE CLOSED!

The simply fact is all you can say is these are "buoy errors" without acknowledging the documented pattern sequence that has occurred 3 times in a row now.
Why? Because acknowledging that documented sequence pattern blows right out the water the theory that these are "buoy errors".

I've worked too hard to be dealing with this ignorance.

Perhaps maybe..

It's possible.

Then again how much trust can we have with the MSM reports?

I do believe the simple fact they are putting out some info regardless of how accurate it might be is a sign more activity is likely to come.

BL, whats you thought on the 4 mid-atlantic quakes (3 5.5's and a 4.8) late Thursday night and into Friday?

Bump for further updates from op.

Well it's been fairly quiet as of late.
From what I see it's been about a week since a 6+ earthquake anywhere and zero buoy events as well.

The sequence I described was three times in a row.
I believe activity will now be in those regions mainly.
It's the prime target zone, other area have been very quiet lately.
The last adjustment sequence was very significant, so much so that MSM came out admitting the Indo-Australian plate is "breaking" followed by large quake off of Alaska and Colombia completing the event.
My guess would be that now pressure is building again in which will lead to buoy events by Indonesia and/or 7+ quake/s by Indonesia/Philippines, when you see that take place you know time will is short until the 7+ quakes in the lower Americas.

However I would like to point out that the adjustments have gotten more severe each time during the previous three sequences.
So this time around when the pressure gets released in the lower Americas to allow more movement it will most likely be more severe than the previous times.
Which is specially for lower Central America and upper North America.



I'm not totally sure but I can take a stab at it.



As you can see under "3" the top of the box goes over the Caribbean plate with a red circle in the top right corner representing a pressure point.
Again this whole area is on the MOVE but is determinant on adjustments around Indonesia first which allows the movement to take place.
As the area within the box moves west, specially by the recent 7+ quakes in that region.. it PULLS the area in the upper right on the other side.

I can give an example, here is a screen shot of buoy events at the time of the Costa Rica quake:



Notice the events on the other side of the Caribbean plate, that's because this area is being PULLED by the movement that takes place.

Bare that in mind when you see this:



Now take a look at the location of one of the Atlantic quakes in comparison to the plate map above:
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

What you'll notice is the earthquake swarm occurred right where the Caribbean plate meets the African plate.

So I would guess and say that this was repercussion pressure that was now released from a pulling affect due to the previous completion sequence.

Again this is just a guess.
Being the last sequence was most severe it could indeed have lead to this pressure.
It's really too early to tell however.. if a expanded pattern sequence develops then this very well might be the start.
As the plate movement sequence continues to intensify it should expand pressure to more regions as well.
It's all too early to tell beyond what's already been documented.

Last Edited by Bending Light on 10/07/2012 02:47 PM

OK, let's turn our attention to your initial thread:

All your sea level adjustments refer to station 53046.
Of course you watched also the data of the stations 56001 and 56003? They should (only about 300 miles away) also show a significant drop in water column height.
Why don't you post this data to verify your claims?

Oh yes, forgot:
Most of the 16 buoys, handed over to Indonesia in 2011, are destroyed beyond repair. The remaining buoys submit largely corrupt data.
The reason why the "Gitews" don't rely any more on the buoys for tsunami warnings, instead on GPS and seismometer data.
And everybody with a little brain would expect, that a sea level adjustment of 110 m or 270 m should trigger a major tsunami. Did it? No.


Thus buoy error.
Second flaw in your calculations.


I see what you are saying and respect your info. BUT I also see where OP has predictions of EQ's happening in particular areas,following same patterns using the 'broken buoys' when calculating this info, and OP has been accurate EVERY TIME. And everybody with a little brain would expect that after OP's multiple predictions being 100% correct, the reality of this information is priceless.
Thanks,
Little Brain PS: Being a little brained moron, I must tell you that your comments are crap and I have no respect. Have a good evening

:wearetoast:
:shakenbake:

From El Q's earthquake thread

Thanks for the logical sharing.



Call these errors if you wish however these "errors" have lead to a step by step pattern ending in 7+ quakes by Central/South America.

I would like to also point out:
End of August to end of September within this sequence.. three 7+ quakes.
Last 7+ quake in Central/South America was back in March.

Dang those buoy errors eh? lol

There was no intelligent answer of the documented data showing a sequential pattern, just oh well BUOY ERRORS!
It's amazing how people dismiss reality at times!

I worked very hard on this thread showing clear steps 1,2,3 and took screen shots etc.
We learned about counting and patterns back in kindergarten, thankfully most people here can still count.
There will always be ridiculous ignorant tards that dismiss clear data no matter what.

Yup, it was very tiny though.
Could have been nothing or perhaps some rumbling as pressure is increasing.

Note the event happen 20 minutes before a 4.9 quake in Indonesia as well.

Too early and too small to tell if anything.
This might be a sign things will increase soon however.

Two buoys in event mode now. It's getting lively out there!