With an attitude like that, things like this will only accelerate.

I couldn't expect someone who thinks that he reads within the "99 percentile," as you eloquently stated last week, to understand that though.

By the way...for those trying to understand this post. Brief here bragged that he reads within the 99 percentile. What he was TRYING to say was that he reads in the upper 1% bracket, which couldn't be true, otherwise he wouldn't have made such a ridiculous error. Only those who have NO IDEA what they're talking about would brag about being within the 99%. In other words, that puts his reading level with those who can't read, mentally challenged people, average to mediocre readers, and the limited percentage of Good readers who didn't make the 1% cut.

This is the reason when employers or educators ask you about your academic history, you always say that you excelled within the upper 1% or 10% of your class, or whatever level you achieved.

Further explanation:...if you are in the upper 1%, you read better than 99% of everyone else who has gone through the same schooling. If you are in the upper 10%, you achieved scores that are above 90% of those who participated.

But Brief here tells me that he was in the 99 percentile. So...if this is the case, he ain't too bright.

I sure am glad I got it straight from the horse's mouth.