Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,695 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,492,420
Pageviews Today: 2,159,368Threads Today: 595Posts Today: 11,815
05:29 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Bill introduced in Ohio would effectively ban concealed carry without repealing it.
Poster Handle s. d. butler
Post Content
This is how they want to circumvent CCW without repealing CCW. This tactic will be coming to your state soon, be aware!

You would not even be allowed to have a gun in your own apartment or rented home without permission.



Article; Two Ohio Democrat State Representatives, Bill Patmon and Ted Celeste, are co-sponsoring a bill "to generally prohibit a person from having a firearm on privately owned land or premises unless the person owns, controls, or resides on or in the land or premises, has permission of the owner or person who controls the land or premises and, if the land or premises is rental property, of the tenant when required, or is the tenant with respect to those premises." The bill specifies that it "applies to any person, including a concealed handgun licensee."

HB595 would essentially reverse current law, which allows concealed carry on private property unless a sign is posted requesting that law-abiding CHL-holders stay out, and replace it with a requirement that CHLs would need to obtain permission to carry almost anywhere they go. That permission could come in the form of a sign specifically granting permission to CHL-holders, or by the CHL-holder obtaining permission either orally or in writing. The bill would even require non-tenants on rented or leased property to obtain permission to bring a firearm on the property. Short of obtaining that permission, the gun owner or concealed handgun licensee would not be allowed to go on the property, visit a place of business, or even to keep a gun in their friend's apartment or place of business (if they lease).


[link to www.buckeyefirearms.org]
 Quoting: Chrit


Jurors have the Constitutional right to nullify illegal and unfair laws. One juror has the right to stop the prosecution of a person charged with breaking any law he deems unfair.

A juror on the bench has more power than the President or the Supreme Court.

People need to know this because it's the most basic principle of checks and balances included in the Constitution by the framers of our Republic.

A juror does not have to follow the instructions of the judge. One man can stop an unfair law.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24844915


TPTB don't want you to know about jury nullification. Jurors have the right to judge not only the facts of the case but the law itself and exercise their own conscience as to the rightness or wrongness of the law itself.

Also be aware there have been cases where juries have found someone not guilty of the main charges and guilty of lesser charges.

And because the judge disagreed with the verdict gave a heavy punitive sentence for the lesser charge.

It is an end run around the intent of a jury.
 Quoting: s. d. butler
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP