Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,621 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,767,264
Pageviews Today: 2,868,182Threads Today: 1,086Posts Today: 19,610
11:17 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!
Poster Handle Waterbug
Post Content
...


Bedrock, not Mudstone!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


We doing this dance again..?
 Quoting: Waterbug


Up to you!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom



In order to build the plant - originally only Unit 1 - the upper sedimentary layers were excavated. These are Quaternary alluvial deposits composed of clay and sand which are friable or semi-hard (green and brown in the cross-section). Thus the plant was built on "mudrock" type sedimentary rock (yellow in the cross-section), which is a muddy rock composed of clay and silt (very fine sand). But the term "muddy" does not mean that the rock is soft. It simply means that it is a rock whose matrix is clay; it is also called "argillite".


Source: [link to fukushima.over-blog.fr]

[link to a34.idata.over-blog.com]
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


This report is much better... chuckle

Lying by omission is still lying.. in case you are keeping track.
I am...



The Geology of Fukushima
[link to fukushima.over-blog.fr]

[snip]

The first paper brings together two cross-sections of the ground at the site of the future plant: one east-west, another north-south. Based on this document, backed by a photo of the site before construction (1966), we realize that the coast was originally rocky and that the sedimentary plateau has been excavated in order to achieve the earthwork for the construction of the nuclear plant. As anticipated in the cross-section (marked by the dotted red line), the excavation lowers the ground to 10 meters above the sea and the digging of the basement is below sea level.

In several of these cross-sections, an ancient fault, predating the later Miocene, is clearly visible under the nuclear site. Whereas the geological survey conducted prior to the construction of the plant does not reveal this fault (drilling did not go beyond a depth of 200 meters at the time), it is clear from the documents dated 2009 and 2010 that Tepco and the NSC have known about it for several years.

One dissenting Japanese geologist, for example, - who wishes to remain anonymous - has been noted for his views expressed on a U.S. forum, "Physics Forum": according to him, the bedrock of the region is made of coarse, very permeable sandstones, and contains vast amounts of water from the neighboring Abukuma mountain. This groundwater, he claims, is flowing under the plain towards the sea at a very low speed of about 50 cm / day (3).

And finally, there is the problem of the type of rock on which the plant was built being rather "soft", meaning that an earthquake can only destabilize the buildings.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting: