The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane

Perhaps, but isn't it funny how you guys whine for it?

After all this time since I first turned you into a blubbering idiot by hammering the final nail into your FR failed theory argument, this is the best you can still come up with...just to say "Well I'm still right"? Lame-O

I don't know why IP is showing up in Australia since I'm still in Korea. Totally bizarre.

It's Astro's tactic to muddy the waters when he's lost, just like you, the psycho babble guy, has lost!

I think this is the reason I'm showing up in Oz:

39.117.23.1** Neighborhood
LAN
: get my LAN address »
Host : ?
Country : Korea, Republic Of

OrgName: Asia Pacific Network Information CentreOrgId: APNICAddress: PO Box 3646City: South BrisbaneStateProv: QLDPostalCode: 4101Country: AU

We all know you will never admit you were wrong.
Doesn't change the fact that you have never been right.

Time for the list again?


Another thing you're wrong about.
Nobody effing cares.

You must be low on the totem pole to keep insisting I'm IDW, and be the first dummass to put it in stone on this thread. But your posts have already proven that, so no big surprise!

If you're talking about the list that Agent 4 keeps, that doesn't surprise me that you'd reference it.

Truth cares, something though you would know nothing about, nor can.

Lessee...

Most inflated ego on the internet.
Rabid anti-semite.
Is always wrong.
Never admits he's wrong.
Throws a hysterical hissy fit when people show him wrong.

Yep, it's you.


Oh, and paranoid of course.


Funny coming from a known liar.

Nothing wrong with an ego when that Ego has the right Mind of the Creator and is inspired to see and know things little peons like you can never even dream of.

I just admitted my missteps on his thread, due to my being lit the other day/night/as you please. Just shows I'm human. It's you shills, rather, who can never admit you're wrong. In fact if we go back a few weeks I myself made this point to you, and you just admitted you could only do this in a hypothetical logical way, so you side-step ever so nicely that you could ever substantially be wrong. So maybe YOU are IDW??? (that's my being facetious, in case you didn't catch it, like other concepts in our Universe).

The only Liars here are the Shills, and you're included in that Base category, in case you also didn't know.

You and the mods all know I'm not IDW/AA. And it's funny that you continue in that direction. It won't last for long though. You've been warned, the truth will come out, I guarantee you.

Usually I'm just giggling when I read your stuff, but that made me laugh out loud.

Thank you.

You've been worn-ed (warned). It's so evident. But I won't be satisfied until I can gloat over your spiritually-defunct carcass til its last dying breath.

Look at this folks!

These people (and I use the term loosely) think the author of this thread:

Thread: 3 conspiracy forum members die after ingesting copious amounts of sheep dung in an apparent act of self-deprecation

is the same as the author of this thread:

Thread: WARNING: SOLAR DATA PAGE COMPLETELY CENSORED,DATA ON OTHER SOURCES BEING FABRICATED!

Are they insane?

And then Can't Lie Forever supports...and doesn't come here, no surprise again. Pussies.

The moon is gravitationally locked to the Earth. It isn't crooked. If it were the entire field of independent astronomers would discuss nothing else. Why the need to continually barrage the people with nonsense? Causing a stir where one doesn't exist is an act of cruelty - and nothing less. Are you so masochistic that you and others resort to fear-mongering for you mental orgasm? What about true events happening all around us? Those are the focus of a fruitful mind.

Here are your errors:

First, your use of gravity in 'gravitationally locked". Tell us what is this Gravity anyway? You can't. So don't use words that try and make you look intelligent, when you don't know what they even mean, which just makes you look stupid.

Next, "barrage". This implies that people get 'barraged' even when they don't want to. No one gets subjected to anything, including you, who don't first volitionally come to this thread in the first place. Capiche?

"nonsense" So far this describes perfectly what you've posted. let's see the rest.

Cruelty? What about hiding the truth? That's indicative of the malicious spirit, which seems to be yours.

You must be new to the internet, and to life, decidedly to this thread and others on this forum. No one is fear mongering. just truth-letting. You know like as in blood-letting. I'm sure you can figure out my meaning eventually.

I'm sure you're reading your post and re-reading and getting your kicks off how devilishly smart you are. Boy, are you dumb.

Yes, let's pay attention to ALL things around us that are amiss.

Care to spout more? I'll be ever so patient in waiting.

ARE YOU STILL HERE?!?!

I thought this thread died a death already! Albeit a slow, painful and completely undignified death but come on seriously!!

Wow,thanks for taking all that effort to whip up such a reply I can't know how to withstand the sheer intelligence and substance of it!

You know as well as I do both the sun and moon by just simply looking at them are obvious ominous important portents of things soon to come.


[link to www.youtube.com]

The Human Sack of Shit

Nailed it!

And again they've deleted one of my posts here when I exposed E-mentally challenged. Wow.

I proved I was right, the video shows field rotation of an orbiting object, you have yet to offer a substantive rebuttal for why this would not be true of the moon as well.

[link to www.youtube.com]

Still no substantive rebuttal. I have turned you into nothing more than a "blubbering idiot" since you cannot offer anything substantive.

You toy with me, why can't I have some fun and toy with you also?

You offer nothing substantive, why can't I do the same?

It's only fair, you know, Dr. Foe (Faux).

(The space station doesn't have the same orbittal pattern as the moon. I've already stated this. Don't make me lose my whimsical facetious spirit with you, it'll just make you lose again, you know.)

Yes, I did.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
You have chosen to offer nothing substantive in reply.

I actually do have my PhD. Of course all you have to offer are cheap insults, which is why you fail.

Irrelevant. ISS's orbital pattern is even more non-sidereal than the moon, thus it is generous to your claim that the moon should not show field rotation like the stars do because it is orbiting. I showed that your excuse doesn't work, orbiting objects DO show field rotation, even in extreme examples where the object orbits at a highly non-sidereal rate. That was generous to your claim since ISS doesn't move "like the stars" at all (whereas the moon very nearly does).

You could state it till you were blue in the face and it still wouldn't matter, it's a meaningless reply. Not only does it not matter that ISS has a low earth orbit as opposed to the moon's high earth orbit, but ISS is far less close sidereal in its motion than the moon thus it is generous to your claim to use it as an example of how orbiting objects DO show field rotation. There is only one specific type of orbit which does not, geostationary, for the simple reason that the altitude and azimuth of such an object never changes. The moon's orbit is far from a geostationary orbit.

You have failed to offer a substantive reply, thus I was not the one who lost. You claimed the moon shouldn't show field rotation because it orbits earth. I showed that orbiting objects do show field rotation. You failed to give a substantive reason why the moon would not show field rotation when other orbiting objects do, thus you lose. I win.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 01/06/2013 11:13 PM

Ah, so you've checked with your handlers in the time that has elapsed since I first checkmated you? Well, why didn't you post this from the very get-go?! It sure sounds very intelligent, and worthy of the time that has gone by since then for your formulated reply since I turned you into a blubbering idiot, which I remind you is on record. Should I go through the trouble and show it post for post here on this thread, or should I spare you the public humiliation again?

You still don't have a fundamental grasp of the orbital pattern of the moon, as obvious from your post here, but you can't understand it, because you're just getting fed reply data from your superiors. So I don't know that I'll even bother with you, who certainly has no PHD, except a Preliminary adHoc Dilemma.

You were the one that stopped offering substantive replies last time as well; you never checkmated me, you're projecting, I checkmated you.

Yes, let's look at that record shall we? You never substantively responded to this post:
Thread: U - moon ("laid back" crescent) shows that position of Sun Earth and Moon has changed- update 2012: PROOF!!!! on page 6, new info on page11 (Page 9)
I won.

More insults, nothing of substance. You claimed the moon shouldn't show field rotation because it orbits earth. I showed that orbiting objects do show field rotation. You failed to give a substantive reason why the moon would not show field rotation when other orbiting objects do, thus you lose. I win.

Yes, let the reader keep reading onto the next page, and your utterly pathetic attempt to again pin the thread in a last-ditch effort to save yourself, which backfired on you since it just showed everyone how abysmally you lost. Glad you still remember. But then the psyche remembers moments of extreme pain, no?

You just keep doing what you did then, lob insults and offer nothing of substance. That's why I won then, that's why I won now. Your behavior never changes.

Why can't you get it through your thick skull Astro that I like you, even though you're my avowed enemy, so I do all that I might to save you from public humiliation again? you're just a peon low on the totem pole certainly, lower of course than HD, but that makes your like-ability factor all the higher in my book. I'm the owner who looks upon his ant farm as a thing to be amused by, not to condemn because they don't know things.

More insults, nothing of substance. You claimed the moon shouldn't show field rotation because it orbits earth. I showed that orbiting objects do show field rotation. You failed to give a substantive reason why the moon would not show field rotation when other orbiting objects do, thus you lose. I win.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 01/06/2013 11:41 PM