The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane | |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 05:35 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 31516487 01/08/2013 05:42 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Oh my god, you are such an idiot. The phases of the moon are not caused by the "shadow of the earth on the moon." They're caused by the day/night cycle of the moon itself! You previously claimed that field rotation did not apply to the moon, only libration, and this is how the moon should look to an observer on earth over the course of a month: ... Hey, we'll see how well YOU do after a couple of late--I mean real late drinks! Still, two different things lol You have a truly fucked up notion of how the moon moves. No, the shadow is not tilted aberrantly relative to the surface features. I have a photo from about 70-80 years ago of the moon showing the same shadow angles in the craters of the first quarter moon that you still see even today. bullshit. oh wait, probably in winter. Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. ![]() |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 05:45 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31757050 Hey, we'll see how well YOU do after a couple of late--I mean real late drinks! Still, two different things lol You have a truly fucked up notion of how the moon moves. No, the shadow is not tilted aberrantly relative to the surface features. I have a photo from about 70-80 years ago of the moon showing the same shadow angles in the craters of the first quarter moon that you still see even today. bullshit. oh wait, probably in winter. Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. Ummm.. that proves nothing. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 31516487 01/08/2013 05:45 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31757050 Hey, we'll see how well YOU do after a couple of late--I mean real late drinks! Still, two different things lol You have a truly fucked up notion of how the moon moves. No, the shadow is not tilted aberrantly relative to the surface features. I have a photo from about 70-80 years ago of the moon showing the same shadow angles in the craters of the first quarter moon that you still see even today. bullshit. oh wait, probably in winter. Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. ![]() |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 31516487 01/08/2013 05:45 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro You have a truly fucked up notion of how the moon moves. No, the shadow is not tilted aberrantly relative to the surface features. I have a photo from about 70-80 years ago of the moon showing the same shadow angles in the craters of the first quarter moon that you still see even today. bullshit. oh wait, probably in winter. Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. ![]() ![]() |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 05:47 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro You have a truly fucked up notion of how the moon moves. No, the shadow is not tilted aberrantly relative to the surface features. I have a photo from about 70-80 years ago of the moon showing the same shadow angles in the craters of the first quarter moon that you still see even today. bullshit. oh wait, probably in winter. Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. I don't even think you know what you're trying to prove. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 05:48 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. ![]() Only YOU give you credit, you know. Pretty sad... Funny, but sad. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 31516487 01/08/2013 05:49 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. I don't even think you know what you're trying to prove. "One has to do with the shadow of the earth on the moon" -You LOL, it's hilarious just how dead wrong you are, and how completely I just disproved you. If you disagree, then feel free to come into voice chat and explain it to me. I'm going to make a VC room about your thread right now. ![]() |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 31516487 01/08/2013 05:50 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. ![]() Only YOU give you credit, you know. Pretty sad... Funny, but sad. Bro, you really should stop posting. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22826717 Astro has answered your questions, and you've made yourself look like a complete and utter fool. It's embarassing to see. ![]() |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 05:51 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Wrong. [link to i319.photobucket.com] October 26, 1937 [link to i319.photobucket.com] Comparison with a modern image taken December 31st, 2007. A little bit of a libration and phase difference, but the sun's angle with respect to the lunar surface is the same as seen by the angles of the shadows relative to the craters. And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. I don't even think you know what you're trying to prove. "One has to do with the shadow of the earth on the moon" -You LOL, it's hilarious just how dead wrong you are, and how completely I just disproved you. If you disagree, then feel free to come into voice chat and explain it to me. I'm going to make a VC room about your thread right now. Sure let's go. I'm still lit, so don't expect too much. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Dr. Astro Not to be confused with Phil Plait User ID: 31516487 01/08/2013 05:55 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro And another comparison, this time with an image taken December 19th, 2008: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Less of a phase difference, a bit of a libration difference in longitude this time but not latitude like last time. Clearly the shadow angles are the same. Season doesn't matter. I don't even think you know what you're trying to prove. "One has to do with the shadow of the earth on the moon" -You LOL, it's hilarious just how dead wrong you are, and how completely I just disproved you. If you disagree, then feel free to come into voice chat and explain it to me. I'm going to make a VC room about your thread right now. Sure let's go. I'm still lit, so don't expect too much. Ok, I'm waiting for you in VC. ![]() |
| Hydra User ID: 31724507 01/08/2013 06:28 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- The moon orbits the earth being held in said orbit not because of gravity but because of the EM forces, forces that are directly powered by the sun. Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- While my initial opening post like my thread title drew attention to one certain mechanism in play that brings on our viewable tilt of the moon (being subjected to the high concentrations of energy found in the center plane of our galaxy) which is a direct influence... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- Still we mustn't also forget the indirect, secondary cause (if that's an accurate way to describe it, maybe, maybe not) also that brings about a tilting of the moon and that is: Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 "The almost highly erratic variable magnetic shifting of the Earth" Thread: 2 Simple reasons why the moon is off Because even though the moon doesn't have the same iron core as the Earth to be subjected the same way to the galactic plane's extreme amounts of magnetic energy, it's still locked in place to the magnetic field of Earth, so when the Earth's magnetic poles are moving so fast historically nowadays, the moon gets pulled a little more this way and than that way, compared to what it's used to doing. And no one would notice unless, like me, they are used to gazing at the moon and have the experience to know what the usual face of the moon looks like. Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- And something else that I've mentioned before, worth mentioning again with an additional clarification, is that we also see annular eclipses of the moon in front of the sun which no longer give us a complete solar eclipse, which is something new for us in recent geological terms, ... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- . If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen? ![]() Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 06:35 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- The moon orbits the earth being held in said orbit not because of gravity but because of the EM forces, forces that are directly powered by the sun. Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- While my initial opening post like my thread title drew attention to one certain mechanism in play that brings on our viewable tilt of the moon (being subjected to the high concentrations of energy found in the center plane of our galaxy) which is a direct influence... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- Still we mustn't also forget the indirect, secondary cause (if that's an accurate way to describe it, maybe, maybe not) also that brings about a tilting of the moon and that is: Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 "The almost highly erratic variable magnetic shifting of the Earth" Thread: 2 Simple reasons why the moon is off Because even though the moon doesn't have the same iron core as the Earth to be subjected the same way to the galactic plane's extreme amounts of magnetic energy, it's still locked in place to the magnetic field of Earth, so when the Earth's magnetic poles are moving so fast historically nowadays, the moon gets pulled a little more this way and than that way, compared to what it's used to doing. And no one would notice unless, like me, they are used to gazing at the moon and have the experience to know what the usual face of the moon looks like. Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- And something else that I've mentioned before, worth mentioning again with an additional clarification, is that we also see annular eclipses of the moon in front of the sun which no longer give us a complete solar eclipse, which is something new for us in recent geological terms, ... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- . come to vc Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 06:43 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "One has to do with the shadow of the earth on the moon" -You LOL, it's hilarious just how dead wrong you are, and how completely I just disproved you. If you disagree, then feel free to come into voice chat and explain it to me. I'm going to make a VC room about your thread right now. Sure let's go. I'm still lit, so don't expect too much. Ok, I'm waiting for you in VC. When your bitches in heat silence me, then have at if fuckers. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Hydra User ID: 31724507 01/08/2013 06:50 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- The moon orbits the earth being held in said orbit not because of gravity but because of the EM forces, forces that are directly powered by the sun. Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- While my initial opening post like my thread title drew attention to one certain mechanism in play that brings on our viewable tilt of the moon (being subjected to the high concentrations of energy found in the center plane of our galaxy) which is a direct influence... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- Still we mustn't also forget the indirect, secondary cause (if that's an accurate way to describe it, maybe, maybe not) also that brings about a tilting of the moon and that is: Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 "The almost highly erratic variable magnetic shifting of the Earth" Thread: 2 Simple reasons why the moon is off Because even though the moon doesn't have the same iron core as the Earth to be subjected the same way to the galactic plane's extreme amounts of magnetic energy, it's still locked in place to the magnetic field of Earth, so when the Earth's magnetic poles are moving so fast historically nowadays, the moon gets pulled a little more this way and than that way, compared to what it's used to doing. And no one would notice unless, like me, they are used to gazing at the moon and have the experience to know what the usual face of the moon looks like. Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- And something else that I've mentioned before, worth mentioning again with an additional clarification, is that we also see annular eclipses of the moon in front of the sun which no longer give us a complete solar eclipse, which is something new for us in recent geological terms, ... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: come to vc I prefere to have the answer in writing. . If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen? ![]() Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 07:02 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- The moon orbits the earth being held in said orbit not because of gravity but because of the EM forces, forces that are directly powered by the sun. Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- While my initial opening post like my thread title drew attention to one certain mechanism in play that brings on our viewable tilt of the moon (being subjected to the high concentrations of energy found in the center plane of our galaxy) which is a direct influence... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- Still we mustn't also forget the indirect, secondary cause (if that's an accurate way to describe it, maybe, maybe not) also that brings about a tilting of the moon and that is: Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 "The almost highly erratic variable magnetic shifting of the Earth" Thread: 2 Simple reasons why the moon is off Because even though the moon doesn't have the same iron core as the Earth to be subjected the same way to the galactic plane's extreme amounts of magnetic energy, it's still locked in place to the magnetic field of Earth, so when the Earth's magnetic poles are moving so fast historically nowadays, the moon gets pulled a little more this way and than that way, compared to what it's used to doing. And no one would notice unless, like me, they are used to gazing at the moon and have the experience to know what the usual face of the moon looks like. Prove it or to say it with your own words: --------------------------------- And something else that I've mentioned before, worth mentioning again with an additional clarification, is that we also see annular eclipses of the moon in front of the sun which no longer give us a complete solar eclipse, which is something new for us in recent geological terms, ... Quoting: Korea Coward 31757050 Prove it or to say it with your own words: come to vc I prefere to have the answer in writing. . How about this: youre an asshole. Does that suffice? Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Hydra User ID: 31724507 01/08/2013 07:15 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hydra Prove it or to say it with your own words: Your claim. Your burden of proof. --------------------------------- ... Prove it or to say it with your own words: Your claim. Your burden of proof. --------------------------------- ... Prove it or to say it with your own words: Your claim. Your burden of proof. --------------------------------- ... Prove it or to say it with your own words: Your claim. Your burden of proof. --------------------------------- ... Prove it or to say it with your own words: Your claim. Your burden of proof. come to vc I prefere to have the answer in writing. How about this: youre an asshole. Does that suffice? Is this your answer to my questions below? Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Then it's simple: I win - you are the loser. . If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen? ![]() Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 29820852 01/08/2013 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In our EU, the usual nearer and stronger EM forces of the sun keep us oriented--usually. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22569292 However as we approach galactic center, the forces there are so strong that we tilt even moreso sometimes (given whatever conditions we pass through at any given time), giving that mushroom smoking Cat like grin to the moon we witness, sometimes, even out of season. Not to mention the polar disarray the sun is also going through not only with its own solar cycles (of which are bad enough), but--again--approaching galactic center. These are signs of our impending pole shift. When did Korea join the EU? |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 07:38 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is this your answer to my questions below? Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Then it's simple: I win - you are the loser. . Keep your shut up, just like day one H. Look in the mirror, there's an L forming on your forehead, take a guess what the significance of that is? You don't even know your own significance (that of the Hydra) so good luck and good fucking off. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 07:38 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In our EU, the usual nearer and stronger EM forces of the sun keep us oriented--usually. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22569292 However as we approach galactic center, the forces there are so strong that we tilt even moreso sometimes (given whatever conditions we pass through at any given time), giving that mushroom smoking Cat like grin to the moon we witness, sometimes, even out of season. Not to mention the polar disarray the sun is also going through not only with its own solar cycles (of which are bad enough), but--again--approaching galactic center. These are signs of our impending pole shift. When did Korea join the EU? Good question. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Hydra User ID: 31724507 01/08/2013 08:04 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is this your answer to my questions below? Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Then it's simple: I win - you are the loser. . Keep your shut up, just like day one H. Look in the mirror, there's an L forming on your forehead, take a guess what the significance of that is? You don't even know your own significance (that of the Hydra) so good luck and good fucking off. Ah, just the usual babble of someone suffering from the Napoleon complex. The only thing you are superior in is insulting and ad hominem. Still waiting for your proof: Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. . If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen? ![]() Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31757050 01/08/2013 08:07 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is this your answer to my questions below? Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Then it's simple: I win - you are the loser. . Keep your shut up, just like day one H. Look in the mirror, there's an L forming on your forehead, take a guess what the significance of that is? You don't even know your own significance (that of the Hydra) so good luck and good fucking off. Ah, just the usual babble of someone suffering from the Napoleon complex. The only thing you are superior in is insulting and ad hominem. Still waiting for your proof: Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. . Someone who is better than you, well they don't need to offer any explanation. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Hydra User ID: 31724507 01/08/2013 08:27 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hydra Is this your answer to my questions below? Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Then it's simple: I win - you are the loser. Keep your shut up, just like day one H. Look in the mirror, there's an L forming on your forehead, take a guess what the significance of that is? You don't even know your own significance (that of the Hydra) so good luck and good fucking off. Ah, just the usual babble of someone suffering from the Napoleon complex. The only thing you are superior in is insulting and ad hominem. Still waiting for your proof: Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. Someone who is better than you, well they don't need to offer any explanation. Your same old lame tactic: You just have to bolster yourself as better than everybody else playing the game. Even when you don't know the answer to something. Just respond emotionally and full of confidence, and it really doesn't matter. Quoting: MoonMonstrosity Still waiting for your proof: Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. . If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen? ![]() Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India |
| AllGunsBlazing User ID: 30888674 01/09/2013 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for your proof: Quoting: Hydra Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. . I'm still waiting for that video of him eating his hat. |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31879422 01/10/2013 02:19 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: MoonMonstrosity Keep your shut up, just like day one H. Look in the mirror, there's an L forming on your forehead, take a guess what the significance of that is? You don't even know your own significance (that of the Hydra) so good luck and good fucking off. Ah, just the usual babble of someone suffering from the Napoleon complex. The only thing you are superior in is insulting and ad hominem. Still waiting for your proof: Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. Someone who is better than you, well they don't need to offer any explanation. Your same old lame tactic: You just have to bolster yourself as better than everybody else playing the game. Even when you don't know the answer to something. Just respond emotionally and full of confidence, and it really doesn't matter. Quoting: MoonMonstrosity Still waiting for your proof: Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. . Read the thread for your answer, non-catastrophism tard. I'm happy to answer questions again that I've already answered before to others to perhaps spare them from sifting through all pages of this thread, but to you who lost at the very get-go? Nah. Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31879422 01/10/2013 02:21 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for your proof: Quoting: Hydra Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. . I'm still waiting for that video of him eating his hat. It's more amusing to me to watch you all guys keep whining for it! Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Hydra User ID: 31862581 01/10/2013 01:08 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for your proof: Quoting: Hydra Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. Read the thread for your answer, non-catastrophism tard. I'm happy to answer questions again that I've already answered before to others to perhaps spare them from sifting through all pages of this thread, but to you who lost at the very get-go? Nah. You answered the questions before? Lets again say it with your own words: And Mr MM Superior, it seems your "superiority" has got some scratches. Giving red karma with the comment "From your worst enemy, you'll see -MM" really doesn't testify to superiority. (At least you had the guts to sign your red.) You are my worst enemy? At the best you fall victim to me, you'll see. May be one day I'll give you some red back - when you are drunk and lose your face again. Double win - BabbleMonster double lose. . If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen? ![]() Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India |
| AllGunsBlazing User ID: 30888674 01/10/2013 03:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for your proof: Quoting: Hydra Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. . I'm still waiting for that video of him eating his hat. It's more amusing to me to watch you all guys keep whining for it! No whining here. Just excitement. |
| MoonMonstrosity User ID: 31950678 01/11/2013 02:51 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for your proof: Quoting: Hydra Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. Read the thread for your answer, non-catastrophism tard. I'm happy to answer questions again that I've already answered before to others to perhaps spare them from sifting through all pages of this thread, but to you who lost at the very get-go? Nah. You answered the questions before? Lets again say it with your own words: And Mr MM Superior, it seems your "superiority" has got some scratches. Giving red karma with the comment "From your worst enemy, you'll see -MM" really doesn't testify to superiority. (At least you had the guts to sign your red.) You are my worst enemy? At the best you fall victim to me, you'll see. May be one day I'll give you some red back - when you are drunk and lose your face again. Double win - BabbleMonster double lose. . Haha, if I didn't know your blah personality better there, I'd say you might have a sense of humor. You probably already gave me one of the reds I've already so quickly gotten, but didn't have the guts to back it up with your sig (hydra-proxy-acid or hydra-eubonics-pro, take your pick). You pushed my buttons before, so looks like it was easy enough to push yours, and who knows, maybe I'll act like a complete fool again tonight. I hope not, but it is Friday evening here after all. This is pretty much my song with that cute creative ozzie chick: [link to www.youtube.com] In regards to what I said about the burden of proof, I'm pretty sure that's what I said to Dr'ing the Tardis, I mean Truth, Astronutmegmutt. He like the rest of you guys like to put out FR at every one of these kinds of threads, but yet to prove a thing with it, just says: It's FR Try to disprove it's not. Well, no, that's your alls' claim, so your burden of proof. And see how nice I really am? You failed in the beginning, but I'm willing to give you a second chance. To fuc* it up again, k? Wile E Coyote Genius Extraordinaire |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 31951672 01/11/2013 03:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still waiting for your proof: Quoting: Hydra Thread: The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane (Page 32) Your claims. Your burden of proof. No answer: I win - you lose. . I'm still waiting for that video of him eating his hat. It's more amusing to me to watch you all guys keep whining for it! No whining here. Just excitement. [link to www.youtube.com] |
| 1 | Full Moon aligns with Galactic Center | 06/17/08 |
| 2 | Could The Moon Mission For "water" Cause Galactic Interference !! | 10/05/09 |
| Related Topics: Space (Science) - Astronomy (Science) | ||