REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
The moon's crookedness is caused by our going toward the center of the galactic plane
Quoting: Menow 18943200 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412 Quoting: Menow 18943200
... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412
First, FR is a non-issue to the crux of this thread.
Second, the Moon has no Rotational pole to speak of.
Say what? Are you one of these "the moon does not rotate" people? That wouldn't surprise me.
It doesn't even have a magnetic north pole. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412
Irrelevant. That wasn't the question.
The most that can be said is that it has a Directional North, so that really renders the applicability of your point mute or irrelevant. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412
First, it's "moot", not "mute" and it does no such thing. In fact, the idea of a directional north will serve just fine. I'll elaborate shortly.
Besides, no one is saying that FR doesn't exist anyway for things like the stars in our sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412
Things LIKE the stars? What is LIKE the stars, in your mind? The planets? The milky way? The sun? The galaxies? The celestial sphere in general? The entire SKY and EVERYTHING IN IT? Of course it applies to all those things. How could it not?
Thems three strikes, so I believe you're OUT! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412
Nice imagination. Do you always just invent whatever reality suits your mood?
To be continued.
It doesn't surprise me that you are of the traditional (read: brain-warshed people) academia who teaches us of Dark Matter or Quantum Physics or Gravity or the Big Ban or Relativity or Evolution (macro) or well you get the picture (maybe).
When I spell something I spell it the way I WANT,
Really? So you WANTED to say "brain-warshed" and "Big Ban"?
I digress. Let's move on to the point, if you are capable of grasping it.
because it does also MUTE your point! Language is a tool, that we can use it how ever we see fit, we are NOT slaves to it, but that point escapes you, like everything else no doubt. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27374412
When two people are looking at the Moon, one from the Northern Hemisphere and one from the Southern, that's when the viewpoint changes of the Moon substantially. Libration was traditionally the only view of the Moon that changed, not because of Field rotation. Still, you're making this about FR which again is NOT, at least Kathy had the wherewithall to address the fundamental aspect of my thread with her crescent weak analysis. And Failed. But you know of her failure, so you're back with the only thing you have left, FR. And it simply does not suffice. Sorry.
YOU are making it about field rotation by claiming that phenomenon didn't exist until recently. That claim of yours is absurd.
So... you admit that the moon has a "north". Do you also admit that Earth has a "north" and that both of those "norths" point "north" toward the object we call the "north star"- Polaris?
I meant waRshed. I slipped up on Big Ban(g), but I find that was also fitting. Why keep drawing attention to certain minuscule points? Ahh
I only make a point of FR because that is the argument from the simpletons, yourself included. Why can't you grasp this easy-enough concept?
This is Not about Polaris, at least not yet, until the Big BanG hits. Can you understand?
To you: care to explain to everyone how we even have a magnetosphere? Let's put your 'knowledge' to an Easy test.
Please verify you're human:
Reason for reporting: