Why Chemtrailing Is NOT A Hoax Or A Ridculous Conspiracy Theory On The Net | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry, this isn't evidence that the trails we see are anything more than contrails. Sure, people may be experimenting with weather manipulation...or even performing cloud seeding. But, that doesn't change the FACT that no one has been able to prove that trails shown in chemtard videos or images are anything more than contrails. Sorry... Spraying chemicals into the air is NOT a hoax.... It does happen...no one who thinks "chemtrails" are a hoax denies this in ANY way. What we deny is that the visible trails are anything more than contrails. And chemtards have failed to prove they are. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25141269 United States 10/11/2012 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25060386 Australia 10/11/2012 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: LID BLOWN OFF BY STANFORD PRESENTATION "Solar Geoengineering To Manage Climate" Quoting: Veranidae Precisely how much evidence do skeptics really need? The only thing that indemnifies the government is their ability to avoid addressing it (what ELSE is new?) |
Juliebean User ID: 17454207 United States 10/11/2012 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Agent Tray User ID: 17522961 Canada 10/11/2012 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25127309 United States 10/11/2012 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25296689 United States 10/11/2012 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25127309 United States 10/11/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. Yes...they are different, and no shill is going to convince me otherwise. And you are never going to convince me that you understand aviation, atmospheric science and basic science. And you'll never convince me that you are anything more than an ignorant paranoid loser. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6718538 United States 10/11/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they have been putting them in movies and TV for a while now. Even world of warcraft had them in that one Burning crusade land in the sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25127309 The particulates are in the fuel supply. Not sprayed. They are metallic and come out the exhaust relatively undamaged. This is why planes can draw a line for as long as the plane is in the air. I see planes on many days... one drawing a line, the other not. A large area of high pressure sits over the whole state and the surrounding 4. Both planes are clearly below the height of the jet stream. There is no difference in their relative humidity and temp in such conditions especially when the planes are within 3 miles of one another. No debunkers ever answer that question. They resort to 'the conditions at altitude aren't the same as on the ground.' As I said. I've observed this in conditions of stationary high pressure with both planes below the jet stream. Please explain concerning THOSE factors. |
Agent Tray User ID: 17522961 Canada 10/11/2012 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. yeah, I'll bet you did... ooooooooooookay. How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they have been putting them in movies and TV for a while now. Even world of warcraft had them in that one Burning crusade land in the sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25127309 Yup, persistent contrails have been in movies for a long time... Spartacus Patton Spaghetti westerns Always been a problem for directors during period shots. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. yeah, I'll bet you did... ooooooooooookay. Yeah, morons always think what they don't understand is "weird"... You're so eloquent! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6718538 United States 10/11/2012 03:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Agent Tray agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. yeah, I'll bet you did... ooooooooooookay. Yeah, morons always think what they don't understand is "weird"... You're so eloquent! They're just shilling. There's an obvious level of emotion for them to persist with such determination. Probably pride. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they have been putting them in movies and TV for a while now. Even world of warcraft had them in that one Burning crusade land in the sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25127309 The particulates are in the fuel supply. Not sprayed. They are metallic and come out the exhaust relatively undamaged. This is why planes can draw a line for as long as the plane is in the air. I see planes on many days... one drawing a line, the other not. A large area of high pressure sits over the whole state and the surrounding 4. Both planes are clearly below the height of the jet stream. There is no difference in their relative humidity and temp in such conditions especially when the planes are within 3 miles of one another. No debunkers ever answer that question. They resort to 'the conditions at altitude aren't the same as on the ground.' As I said. I've observed this in conditions of stationary high pressure with both planes below the jet stream. Please explain concerning THOSE factors. You are making statements of fact...and then failing to provide evidence to support them.. Typical chemtard. You are WRONG about the relative humidity...or why that's important. You are FAILING to apply all the other variables...moron. Engine type, power setting, engine size, engine efficiency.. But, keep making shit up and accepting your own ignorant notions as truth...it's hilarious! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, morons always think what they don't understand is "weird"... You're so eloquent! They're just shilling. There's an obvious level of emotion for them to persist with such determination. Probably pride. Yeah, I agree..they are shilling for other paranoid idiots like Michael Murphy and Clifford Carnicom... Just other idiots who have never stupid aviation or atmospheric science. Quite sad. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they have been putting them in movies and TV for a while now. Even world of warcraft had them in that one Burning crusade land in the sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25127309 The particulates are in the fuel supply. Not sprayed. They are metallic and come out the exhaust relatively undamaged. This is why planes can draw a line for as long as the plane is in the air. I see planes on many days... one drawing a line, the other not. A large area of high pressure sits over the whole state and the surrounding 4. Both planes are clearly below the height of the jet stream. There is no difference in their relative humidity and temp in such conditions especially when the planes are within 3 miles of one another. No debunkers ever answer that question. They resort to 'the conditions at altitude aren't the same as on the ground.' As I said. I've observed this in conditions of stationary high pressure with both planes below the jet stream. Please explain concerning THOSE factors. By the way, I have yet to see a single chemtard PROVE the conditions are the same where two planes are flying, where only one is leaving a trail. You CLAIM it to be the case...then FAIL to prove it. Sorry, there are too many variables. You have FAILED to prove that at ANY time, where all things are equal, one plane leaves a trail...and another doesn't. FAIL FAIL FAIL |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/11/2012 03:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, morons always think what they don't understand is "weird"... You're so eloquent! They're just shilling. There's an obvious level of emotion for them to persist with such determination. Probably pride. Yeah, I agree..they are shilling for other paranoid idiots like Michael Murphy and Clifford Carnicom... Just other idiots who have never stupid aviation or atmospheric science. Quite sad. Oops...that should have been "studied"...not stupid. Damn muscle memory! |
Daniel of the Rose User ID: 15114131 United States 10/11/2012 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. Yes...they are different, and no shill is going to convince me otherwise. And you are never going to convince me that you understand aviation, atmospheric science and basic science. And you'll never convince me that you are anything more than an ignorant paranoid loser. see this is why we know you that you have no idea of what you are talking about.......... it's real.......and come to think of it ...now .... i think trolls are real too.HAH!!....you troll...you should ashamed.....VIPER |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2562242 United States 10/11/2012 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. Yes...they are different, and no shill is going to convince me otherwise. And you are never going to convince me that "I" understand aviation, atmospheric science and basic science. And you'll never convince me that "I" anything more than an ignorant paranoid loser. Fixed it for ya shit brain |
Daniel of the Rose User ID: 15114131 United States 10/11/2012 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they have been putting them in movies and TV for a while now. Even world of warcraft had them in that one Burning crusade land in the sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25127309 The particulates are in the fuel supply. Not sprayed. They are metallic and come out the exhaust relatively undamaged. This is why planes can draw a line for as long as the plane is in the air. I see planes on many days... one drawing a line, the other not. A large area of high pressure sits over the whole state and the surrounding 4. Both planes are clearly below the height of the jet stream. There is no difference in their relative humidity and temp in such conditions especially when the planes are within 3 miles of one another. No debunkers ever answer that question. They resort to 'the conditions at altitude aren't the same as on the ground.' As I said. I've observed this in conditions of stationary high pressure with both planes below the jet stream. Please explain concerning THOSE factors. You are making statements of fact...and then failing to provide evidence to support them.. Typical chemtard. You are WRONG about the relative humidity...or why that's important. You are FAILING to apply all the other variables...moron. Engine type, power setting, engine size, engine efficiency.. But, keep making shit up and accepting your own ignorant notions as truth...it's hilarious! the evidence is being lived through ...you silly techno linker.........get out more often other than at night...........understand the process for yourself...........you want us to reasearch..DONe... now it's time to do one of your own ...lazy you duplicate |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2562242 United States 10/11/2012 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean Liar.. What you losers call "chemtrails" look just like the persistent contrail I have seen for the last 40 fucking years. Is this last 40 years you pretended to be a pilot or be an aviation / weather specialist? How can you see the sky from your parents basement? You are so full of yourself shithead and no one cares what you have to say. Get back to flipping those taco shells at the Bell loser. |
Juliebean User ID: 17553212 United States 10/11/2012 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. Thanks for the reply. I'm ignoring the shill- arguing wastes my time and energy. People don't need a degree in atmospheric engineering (pun intended) to see the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail. Time for me to get back to work... |
Chemtrail Documents User ID: 10774911 United States 10/11/2012 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chemtrail Documents A government biowarfare jet spraying program to cause the genocide of the general public. FREE DOCUMENTS DOWNLOADS!!! [link to www.scribd.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/12/2012 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chemtrail Documents Quoting: Chemtrail Documents 10774911 A government biowarfare jet spraying program to cause the genocide of the general public. FREE DOCUMENTS DOWNLOADS!!! [link to www.scribd.com] And you accept it as fact...why?! Oh, because you're an idiot... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1211465 United States 10/12/2012 08:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I remember what real contrails look like. Chemtrails are real and look totally different... Quoting: Juliebean agreed. in fact i remember the first time i saw a chemtrail and i thought it was so weird. Thanks for the reply. I'm ignoring the shill- arguing wastes my time and energy. People don't need a degree in atmospheric engineering (pun intended) to see the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail. Time for me to get back to work... Apparently YOU do...because what you call "chemtrails" ARE contrails...every single one of them. Fucking idiot! |
Noble User ID: 1211465 United States 10/12/2012 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they have been putting them in movies and TV for a while now. Even world of warcraft had them in that one Burning crusade land in the sky. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25127309 The particulates are in the fuel supply. Not sprayed. They are metallic and come out the exhaust relatively undamaged. This is why planes can draw a line for as long as the plane is in the air. I see planes on many days... one drawing a line, the other not. A large area of high pressure sits over the whole state and the surrounding 4. Both planes are clearly below the height of the jet stream. There is no difference in their relative humidity and temp in such conditions especially when the planes are within 3 miles of one another. No debunkers ever answer that question. They resort to 'the conditions at altitude aren't the same as on the ground.' As I said. I've observed this in conditions of stationary high pressure with both planes below the jet stream. Please explain concerning THOSE factors. You are making statements of fact...and then failing to provide evidence to support them.. Typical chemtard. You are WRONG about the relative humidity...or why that's important. You are FAILING to apply all the other variables...moron. Engine type, power setting, engine size, engine efficiency.. But, keep making shit up and accepting your own ignorant notions as truth...it's hilarious! the evidence is being lived through ...you silly techno linker.........get out more often other than at night...........understand the process for yourself...........you want us to reasearch..DONe... now it's time to do one of your own ...lazy you duplicate Accepting everything you read from OTHER paranoid losers as truth isn't "research" you fucking moron! You need to learn the facts about aviation and the atmosphere from someone QUALIFIED to teach others about such things. There is NO WAY you have done any such thing. You ignorant chemtard. I HAVE done my own...40 fucking years of it! All you've done is read retarded conspiracy sites and accepted information... That's NOT research, stupid! Last Edited by Noble on 10/12/2012 08:11 AM Favorite Karma: 12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?" No, I can't. Because that would be a lie. Can you admit that you are a gullible loser? |