Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,224 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 635,761
Pageviews Today: 788,881Threads Today: 122Posts Today: 2,487
05:55 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Question: If Sitchin is wrong...

 
AwakenedDude
"CAN'T" Never Did Anything

User ID: 6598408
United States
10/11/2012 12:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
"The paradigm of science is that creation is all, and the creator is nothing. Religion says the creator is all, and the creation is nothing. These two extremes are the bars of a prison cell. They prevent observation of all phenomenon as an interactive whole." -- Airl
TOMMY B

User ID: 25361765
United States
10/11/2012 12:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
Good question! bump
Eimaj

User ID: 10601066
United States
10/11/2012 12:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
Bump
This time I feel lost in a world so cold and lonely. This time I feel broke and if I left no one would even know me ...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8621371
United States
10/11/2012 12:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
there is no other translation.
everyone is so quick to holler "wrong!! wrong!!"
but no one else has come forward with any sort of alterior translation or explanation.
Mordier L'eft

User ID: 25333446
Canada
10/11/2012 12:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
The Lost Book was a story built on a scaffold of ancient historical writings.

some of the ancient writings quoted what may have been the lost tablets

no one can provide an alternative to it because no one who claims it to be wrong has any resource to draw upon to provide said alternative. they simply listen to their professors who say "sitchin is wrong because he's wrong"

that's the best argument that they have

"sitchin is wrong because he's wrong".

no one ever claims to have the info "right", so fuck' 'em. fuck 'em in the ear. people like michael heiser are nothing but fucking shills.

the best argument to be made against nibiru are made from a current astronomical stand-point, but those are all based on Nancy Leider's "calculations" (I.E.: "mad ravings"). if sitchin is to be considered, then he claimed that nibiru would likely be hundreds of years away, perhaps over a thousand years away. if it was thousands of years away its influence would still not affect our system in any appreciable way.

any astronomer who claims to know everything in the sky can be counted on to be nothing more than an amateur, since professional astronomers are the first to admit that they have only found a very small amount of what there is to find in our sky, and that there are many many things still left to be discovered, even in our own close system. shills, however, will claim that a backyard scope shows them our entire system and everything it can do (they know who they are, if they're reading this)

Last Edited by Mordier L'eft on 10/11/2012 01:02 PM
--"In this era of great big brains anything that can happen will. So hunker down." -- Kurt Vonnegut, JR. -- Galapagos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8621371
United States
10/11/2012 12:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
sichin was legit.
I dont care who says otherwise the man made it his career to expose this lost knowledge risking his career and reputation to do so.
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 3539589
United States
10/12/2012 12:39 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
My only exposure to this issue has been from GLP threads, mixed with a bit of outside digging, however, since it is all based on actual relics from our past history, I am inclined to believe that Sitchin's work is important.

It seems much MORE than romanticized fiction.

So, I continue to listen and learn.

thanks.
SpookyWatcher
User ID: 15535895
United States
10/12/2012 12:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
 Quoting: AwakenedDude


GREAT question!

I hear crickets coming from sitchin detractors.

SpookyWatcher
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1353946
United States
10/12/2012 02:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
I believe Sitchin isn't on the up and up.
A while before he passed away, he appeared on Coast to Coast with no name. Noory was all excited to have him as a guest. But throughout the interview, when George asked him specific questions on his theories, Sitchin would avoid them by saying you have to read his books.
The same went when the callers asked questions. " Yu have to read my books "

Towards the end of the program, Noory point blank told Sitchin that his appearance on the show was " .....just an infomercial on your part to sell your books, right? "

Sitchin giggled at that and Noory was very frustrated.

I think Sitchins version of the Sumerian legends are by and large B.S.
He comes up with tales that don't appear in the tablets.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6739256
United States
10/12/2012 02:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
is he wrong?


ahahah


Sitchin isnt Wrong,


Sitchin is a Liar,




Planet XX = is Saturn
Aikan

User ID: 25415254
Thailand
10/12/2012 03:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
Thread: Anunnaki, Nibiru created a stable genetic stock, eventually became so numerous some of us were expelled from the Annunaki city centers (Page 4)
Aikan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1353946
United States
10/12/2012 03:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
One of the most basic things Sitchin says is the Anunnaki created man as a slave to mine gold. Man was created as a hybrid of Anunnaki DNA with the homo erectus being that was here on Earth.

One question that Sitchen fails to answer is what are the chances that two separate forms of life from different planets are so compatible enough that they can be successfully mated?
The Anunnaki were in human form in every way enough to be compatible with homo erectus?
UndercoverAlien

User ID: 25327273
Brazil
10/12/2012 03:37 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
 Quoting: AwakenedDude


Sitchin debunkers are not is worried whether he misinterpreted things like location of Sumerian cities, dates of kingdoms or dynasties timelines. The concerning of Sitchin debunkers is conveniently to discredit everything he said about giant extraterrestrial aliens colonizing Earth half million years ago. If Sitchin had never mentioned the ANUNNAKI, nobody would be concerned in "debunk" him, therefore it's obviously a biased agenda to stop people reasoning on this subject.

If you Google for archeological excavations in the Middle East and Egypt you will find out that most of them were funded by the Rothschilds, so obviously the mainstream scholars follow the Zionist agenda to dumb-down the masses, and definitely Sitchin books don't fit in this agenda.
"Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda)
Funney

User ID: 11648979
Czech Republic
10/12/2012 03:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
in his time..variant! he was spot on, BUT NOW?! no way

we are on a different line now, it is like sci-fi novel..
it made its work with the reader, but reality shifts according to choices and possibilities of many,

where the summ of energy leads the vector into future

..our line is secure now..

afro
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1353946
United States
10/12/2012 03:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
 Quoting: AwakenedDude


Sitchin debunkers are not is worried whether he misinterpreted things like location of Sumerian cities, dates of kingdoms or dynasties timelines. The concerning of Sitchin debunkers is conveniently to discredit everything he said about giant extraterrestrial aliens colonizing Earth half million years ago. If Sitchin had never mentioned the ANUNNAKI, nobody would be concerned in "debunk" him, therefore it's obviously a biased agenda to stop people reasoning on this subject.

If you Google for archeological excavations in the Middle East and Egypt you will find out that most of them were funded by the Rothschilds, so obviously the mainstream scholars follow the Zionist agenda to dumb-down the masses, and definitely Sitchin books don't fit in this agenda.
 Quoting: UndercoverAlien


Sitchin didn't invent the Anunnaki name. It was from the Sumerian tales.
What Sitchin did was spin a wild tale that has errors all along the way. And when confronted, he would get angry and defensive about it.
No one questions the Anunnaki from the Sumerian legends or even the ones who appear in HP Lovecrafts ' Necronomicon '.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20569884
United States
10/12/2012 03:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
[link to www.sitchiniswrong.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24089933
United States
10/12/2012 03:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
 Quoting: AwakenedDude


Sitchin's books are great. Read them all.

Immanuel Velikovsky's books are GREAT. READ THEM ALL.

After reading these 12 or so books by these brilliant scholars, then read the Bible with "new eyes" and you will be ASTOUNDED at what you have been told and did not have eyes to see.

Luke 21:25
And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25416621
Australia
10/12/2012 03:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
he made up his version for profit and like von daniken, bought his own private islands to live on with book revenue.


it's not a matter of debunking, they made book profits also.

if your interested, look at the tablets and do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

thet real story, in my opinion , is harder to sell books aboit as it it dull, depressing and repetitive.

three major cultures spanning nearly eight thousand years have elite groups within them that represent the 'divine' . they live off the slaves they indoctrinate. the method is so successfull even breakaway states of former slaves adopt it. they are of course the sumerians, egyptians and todays roman/western/abraamic

it is called religion or monotheism these days and while only a ever shrinking number of humans participate in the charade, your book will be far more successful if alien gods and weird planets that appear in super long orbits are in it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24089933
United States
10/12/2012 03:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
is he wrong?


ahahah


Sitchin isnt Wrong,


Sitchin is a Liar,




Planet XX = is Saturn
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6739256


Oh, bullshit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21656968
United States
10/12/2012 04:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
There is much room for play between "right" OR "wrong". What if Sitchin had it Right but mankind translates his expression wrong? What if he was recieving his translation from a spiritual source and thus his right only depends upon the spiritual realm? Sitchin was right and wrong depending upon your perspective of translation of his works.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 25358447
Netherlands
10/12/2012 04:02 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
The Online Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL)
[link to etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk]
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1353946
United States
10/12/2012 04:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
There is much room for play between "right" OR "wrong". What if Sitchin had it Right but mankind translates his expression wrong? What if he was recieving his translation from a spiritual source and thus his right only depends upon the spiritual realm? Sitchin was right and wrong depending upon your perspective of translation of his works.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21656968


Well if he was right then he wouldn't have been defensive and difficult everytime he was questioned about it, right?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24089933
United States
10/12/2012 04:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
he made up his version for profit and like von daniken, bought his own private islands to live on with book revenue.


it's not a matter of debunking, they made book profits also.

if your interested, look at the tablets and do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

thet real story, in my opinion , is harder to sell books aboit as it it dull, depressing and repetitive.

three major cultures spanning nearly eight thousand years have elite groups within them that represent the 'divine' . they live off the slaves they indoctrinate. the method is so successfull even breakaway states of former slaves adopt it. they are of course the sumerians, egyptians and todays roman/western/abraamic

it is called religion or monotheism these days and while only a ever shrinking number of humans participate in the charade, your book will be far more successful if alien gods and weird planets that appear in super long orbits are in it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25416621



You're full of bullshit.

There's a history of 3650 year destruction in the archeological records consistent with the return of the planet of the crossing.

WE ARE AT THE CROSSING, bozo. Here's a clue:

[link to www.pcmag.com]

[link to www.livescience.com]



[link to www.youtube.com]
weasel keeper

User ID: 15395274
United States
10/12/2012 04:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
Zecharia sitchin is a demented lying resident of the deepest depths of hell, his college degree is in economics, he NEVER learned to read sumerian, his life achievement is deceiving people into believing in ancient aliens on earth, another satanic cult designed to drag more ignorant people into hell.
Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21656968
United States
10/12/2012 04:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
There is much room for play between "right" OR "wrong". What if Sitchin had it Right but mankind translates his expression wrong? What if he was recieving his translation from a spiritual source and thus his right only depends upon the spiritual realm? Sitchin was right and wrong depending upon your perspective of translation of his works.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21656968


Well if he was right then he wouldn't have been defensive and difficult everytime he was questioned about it, right?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1353946


No. There is a knowing you're right but not understanding how. Very much like Prophecy. There have been a number of Prophets, or seers, that knew things, in context within their consciousness limits, and outside their personal perspectives, that delived "visions" or what ever, that were corrrect over time, but couldn't be expressed in modern day understandings between the person the prophet was and the people of his day.

Does that make sense?
weasel keeper

User ID: 15395274
United States
10/12/2012 04:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
I believe Sitchin isn't on the up and up.
A while before he passed away, he appeared on Coast to Coast with no name. Noory was all excited to have him as a guest. But throughout the interview, when George asked him specific questions on his theories, Sitchin would avoid them by saying you have to read his books.
The same went when the callers asked questions. " Yu have to read my books "

Towards the end of the program, Noory point blank told Sitchin that his appearance on the show was " .....just an infomercial on your part to sell your books, right? "

Sitchin giggled at that and Noory was very frustrated.

I think Sitchins version of the Sumerian legends are by and large B.S.
He comes up with tales that don't appear in the tablets.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1353946


sherlock
Wild Weasels? You've got to be shitting me!
PHX57

User ID: 23446935
United States
10/12/2012 04:10 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...

If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
[/quot
Wow!! On coast 2 coast tonight ...they are discussing this same topic....check out the replay.....sounds convincing to me.
Chick out. LOL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1353946
United States
10/12/2012 04:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
There is much room for play between "right" OR "wrong". What if Sitchin had it Right but mankind translates his expression wrong? What if he was recieving his translation from a spiritual source and thus his right only depends upon the spiritual realm? Sitchin was right and wrong depending upon your perspective of translation of his works.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21656968


Well if he was right then he wouldn't have been defensive and difficult everytime he was questioned about it, right?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1353946


No. There is a knowing you're right but not understanding how. Very much like Prophecy. There have been a number of Prophets, or seers, that knew things, in context within their consciousness limits, and outside their personal perspectives, that delived "visions" or what ever, that were corrrect over time, but couldn't be expressed in modern day understandings between the person the prophet was and the people of his day.

Does that make sense?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21656968


Then please explain to me the chances of two separate species from two different planets which are so close that DNA infusion can be compatible enough to create a hybrid race?
After all, the Anunnaki created man from their DNA infused into the existing homo erectus being on Earth.
How?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25074887
United States
10/12/2012 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
Zecharia sitchin is a demented lying resident of the deepest depths of hell, his college degree is in economics, he NEVER learned to read sumerian, his life achievement is deceiving people into believing in ancient aliens on earth, another satanic cult designed to drag more ignorant people into hell.
 Quoting: weasel keeper


coo-coo for coco puffs, I see.

Thorazine is what you need, son.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25371718
Belgium
10/12/2012 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...
is he wrong?


ahahah


Sitchin isnt Wrong,


Sitchin is a Liar,




Planet XX = is Saturn
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6739256


ahahhahahahaahahhahahahahhahahahahahha
hhahahahahaahha
hahahhahahahaahha
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1353946
United States
10/12/2012 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Question: If Sitchin is wrong...

If Zecharia Sitchin is wrong, or perhaps simply misinterpreted the "Book of Enki" tablets, can someone point me in the direction of the corrected version?

I see a lot of information on the web that goes to great lengths to debunk his work, arguing about the meaning of this symbol or that symbol and whatnot. However, these same people haven't provided the "alternate/correct/updated" version of this book.

Not looking for a fight or debate, although I'm sure one will break out (this is GLP after all).

What gives?

Can anyone shed light on this? If no updated version exists, what can be made of that? If a correct translation does exist, shouldn't we all be at least open to that possibility?

Dude out.
[/quot
Wow!! On coast 2 coast tonight ...they are discussing this same topic....check out the replay.....sounds convincing to me.
Chick out. LOL
 Quoting: AwakenedDude


The guy on Coast to Coast is a laughable as Sitchin.

News