| Users Online Now: 1,313 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 242,512 | |
| Pageviews Today: 408,021 | Threads Today: 178 | Posts Today: 3,019 |
| 04:56 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,313 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 242,512 | |
| Pageviews Today: 408,021 | Threads Today: 178 | Posts Today: 3,019 |
| 04:56 AM | ||
Jewish Lobby in Germany gets circumcision ban overturned | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 976158  Germany10/11/2012 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The absolutely clueless idiots who think circumcision of newborns should be outlawed need to be studied. Stupidity of that degree must surely show on a PET scan or have some identifiable serum marker. It obviously would have a negative survival benefit, and perhaps sterilization to prevent harm to society would be indicated. Quoting: MuzzleBreak im sure you find plenty of jew doctors that will conduct such a study to your satisfaction wtf hapend to the quote? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1473574  United States10/11/2012 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For 7,000 years, the cutting of the foreskin of a baby on the eighth day of life has been commanded by the Lord. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14127627 Jewish people and many others do it. It has nothing to do with mutilation, or torture. It is not done on an adult or older child. It is commnanded NOT to be done at birth . . . how strange that the clotting factors for the newborn's blood are at their optimal effectiveness on the eighth day. of course it took science about 6,900 years to catch up to that. They hate it because it came from God and is recorded in the Torah and the Old Testament. They hate it for no other reason. People tattoo themselves, cut themselves, do all kinds of bizarre acts that DO constitute mutilation. But nobody legislates against those practices because they did not come from the God of the Old Testament, but rather from some multicultural voodoo. Most people who get tattoos + scarification are doing it willingly with their own freewill. So that example is shitty. If an adult want to get a circumcision, fine let him, but don't mutilate the innocent. Babies don't choose to get their foreskin cut off. Nor do they get to choose to have their birth defects repaired, nor their appendicitis operated upon, nor their ear-drums punctured with tubes to prevent recurrent infections. Many adults get circumcised to get rid of the above mentioned problems, and they all wish they had had the procedure done when they were infants. The absolutely clueless idiots who think circumcision of newborns should be outlawed need to be studied. Stupidity of that degree must surely show on a PET scan or have some identifiable serum marker. It obviously would have a negative survival benefit, and perhaps sterilization to prevent harm to society would be indicated. Yeah, because foreskin is a "birth defect". Outside of the uncommon extreme medical problem with foreskin, if you teach your child proper hygiene practices and use a bit of logic, you can avoid many of the negative problems associated with foreskin. Yet again you discredit yourself, tool. You're just trying to justify your fucked wacko cultish up practices. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25388275 United States10/11/2012 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
