******Syrian intervention******* MODS PLZ LOOK!!!!

what if there's no polish moderators on GLP?

Then I'm not interested, my poll must be polished or nothing.

Seriously, can it be done or do I need an account?

First of I'm in no way supportive of anybody stepping in for either side, Assad or the FSA.

Sorry, let me try again. Could a passing mod, or paying member please create a poll, in this thread or another, asking the members of GLP to vote yes or no on wheather the wast should directly intervine in the Syrian civil war. Simply trying to gauge opinion. Comprendes?

Polish this

I happen to have a specially designed tool to do this.

Yes, even if theyre gonna do it for Oil/Natural gas/Killing Iran's ally/Imperialistic expansion or another step for TPTB to world domination or all the above, I would still vote for intervention.

its ironic that they refused the ONE time western military intervention is actually needed for the sake of humanity.

The US has already intervened. We have our own "Fast and Furious" jihad style going on over there. The US, among others, has supplied 20,000 weapons, to Al Qaeda. Meanwhile, the artillery coming from Syria, into Turkey at very high velocities, and exploding, seem to have the NATO signature on them.

The objective is to destabilize Syria, and to create the conditions for a set of proxy wars, with Iran being the Fiesta Resistànce, per General Wesley Clark. He claims that Iran is the final, of 7 countries identified as targets, in a memo that was circulated "eyes only" around September 17, 2001. (Hmmm)

What is happening between Syria and Turkey, is a footnote to the script that was written quite a while ago, that has to do with hegemony of Petroleum, and an agreement between factions within the Pentagon, several US administrations, The "Chosenites", the Saudi Royals, and CIA assets within leadership positions in the Middle East and North Africa.

Done

Thread: Should the West directly intervine in the Syrian civil war?