| Users Online Now: 1,376 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 386,251 | |
| Pageviews Today: 586,464 | Threads Today: 200 | Posts Today: 3,485 |
| 05:56 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,376 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 386,251 | |
| Pageviews Today: 586,464 | Threads Today: 200 | Posts Today: 3,485 |
| 05:56 AM | ||
Hot new image MARS | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25429979  United States10/12/2012 01:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24394728  Austria10/12/2012 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 628775  Canada10/12/2012 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Cave Johnson Commander and Beef  User ID: 17090286 United States10/12/2012 01:41 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24011285  United Kingdom10/12/2012 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1647441 United States10/12/2012 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This image was taken by Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) onboard NASA's Mars rover Curiosity on Sol 65 (2012-10-12 00:21:35 UTC) . Quoting: zooky [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Take a good look and tell me what you think. It's got to be a piece off the rover itself. Notice how it's got no Mars dust on it. Must have came off the rover or any other parts that were involved in the rover's landing. IMHO. [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Ok, I downloaded a couple of images of Sol 65 and whatever that is, NASA is pretty much interested on it because they spent 2 FUCKING DAYS taking pictures of it. Did you guys notice that?? I don't think it's organic! It totally looks like some industrial polymer to me! Yep could be a piece of some component of the landing apparatus, but I don't think it is, because I don't think NASA would spent two days taking photos of rover's scraps. But that piece of plastic is not the cherry of the cake. The cherry is what is on it: [link to imageupper.com] In 24 hrs the object suffered ZERO modifications on its shape or position, suggesting that it was untouched by the rover and weather influence. Therefore, the black spot seen on its edge in one of the images, but not seen in others, is not a spec of dust put there by the wind. IMO that black spot is an INSECT, what proves either that there IS complex life in Mars or the rover is NOT in Mars. In any cases NASA is lying as usual. this^ |
| Ladydoom Mainly Crazy User ID: 24197134 United Kingdom10/12/2012 01:51 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| FatalW1shes User ID: 18009481 United States10/12/2012 01:59 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1379065 United States10/12/2012 02:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This image was taken by Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) onboard NASA's Mars rover Curiosity on Sol 65 (2012-10-12 00:21:35 UTC) . Quoting: zooky [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Take a good look and tell me what you think. plastic sheathing fell off rover |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23900468 United States10/12/2012 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23755636 United Kingdom10/12/2012 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Zombietard its a used penis I wish if people were going to try and be funny & contribute nothing that at least it could be funny & not something an irritating uneducated 12 years old glue sniffer would say. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23755636 United Kingdom10/12/2012 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Zombietard its a used penis I wish if people were going to try and be funny & contribute nothing that at least it could be funny & not something an irritating uneducated 12 years old glue sniffer would say. |
| Cave Johnson Commander and Beef User ID: 17090286 United States10/12/2012 02:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20129820 United Kingdom10/12/2012 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25076958  Mexico10/12/2012 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| UndercoverAlien User ID: 25420655  Brazil10/12/2012 02:10 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The black speck is a sand flea Look it the first picture (22:43:40) and you will notice the black speck is on the sand just below and slightly to the right of the unknown object. In the second picture (00:21:35)it jumped onto the unknown object. Yeah, totally! However, the interval between one pic and another suggests it is NOT a flying bug or a jumping bug, because it took almost 2 hrs to reach that distance until the edge of the object. Anyway, I'm 110% convinced that it IS an insect, regardless its species. We can even see its legs! NASA epic fail!!!!  "Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1285189  Netherlands10/12/2012 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This image was taken by Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) onboard NASA's Mars rover Curiosity on Sol 65 (2012-10-12 00:21:35 UTC) . Quoting: zooky [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Take a good look and tell me what you think. It's got to be a piece off the rover itself. Notice how it's got no Mars dust on it. Must have came off the rover or any other parts that were involved in the rover's landing. IMHO. [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Ok, I downloaded a couple of images of Sol 65 and whatever that is, NASA is pretty much interested on it because they spent 2 FUCKING DAYS taking pictures of it. Did you guys notice that?? I don't think it's organic! It totally looks like some industrial polymer to me! Yep could be a piece of some component of the landing apparatus, but I don't think it is, because I don't think NASA would spent two days taking photos of rover's scraps. But that piece of plastic is not the cherry of the cake. The cherry is what is on it: [link to imageupper.com] In 24 hrs the object suffered ZERO modifications on its shape or position, suggesting that it was untouched by the rover and weather influence. Therefore, the black spot seen on its edge in one of the images, but not seen in others, is not a spec of dust put there by the wind. IMO that black spot is an INSECT, what proves either that there IS complex life in Mars or the rover is NOT in Mars. In any cases NASA is lying as usual. this^ there is no black dot in the original photo. only in the one at the link you posted lol |
| UndercoverAlien User ID: 25420655 Brazil10/12/2012 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20737157 I wish if people were going to try and be funny & contribute nothing that at least it could be funny & not something an irritating uneducated 12 years old glue sniffer would say.  "Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda) |
~Jay~ Forum Moderator User ID: 25305720 United States10/12/2012 02:13 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: El Quisqueyano It's got to be a piece off the rover itself. Notice how it's got no Mars dust on it. Must have came off the rover or any other parts that were involved in the rover's landing. IMHO. [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Ok, I downloaded a couple of images of Sol 65 and whatever that is, NASA is pretty much interested on it because they spent 2 FUCKING DAYS taking pictures of it. Did you guys notice that?? I don't think it's organic! It totally looks like some industrial polymer to me! Yep could be a piece of some component of the landing apparatus, but I don't think it is, because I don't think NASA would spent two days taking photos of rover's scraps. But that piece of plastic is not the cherry of the cake. The cherry is what is on it: [link to imageupper.com] In 24 hrs the object suffered ZERO modifications on its shape or position, suggesting that it was untouched by the rover and weather influence. Therefore, the black spot seen on its edge in one of the images, but not seen in others, is not a spec of dust put there by the wind. IMO that black spot is an INSECT, what proves either that there IS complex life in Mars or the rover is NOT in Mars. In any cases NASA is lying as usual. this^ there is no black dot in the original photo. only in the one at the link you posted lol there are multiple photos on nasa of this object, not just the one you seen. [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] ^This is the one with the black spot Last Edited by ~Jay~ on 10/12/2012 02:14 PM The Raw Feed Live [link to members.therawfeedlive.com] Like us on Facebook [link to www.facebook.com] VISIT THE GLP STORE [link to www.cafepress.com]  Find me on Facebook @ [link to www.facebook.com (secure)] |
| UndercoverAlien User ID: 25420655 Brazil10/12/2012 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: El Quisqueyano It's got to be a piece off the rover itself. Notice how it's got no Mars dust on it. Must have came off the rover or any other parts that were involved in the rover's landing. IMHO. [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Ok, I downloaded a couple of images of Sol 65 and whatever that is, NASA is pretty much interested on it because they spent 2 FUCKING DAYS taking pictures of it. Did you guys notice that?? I don't think it's organic! It totally looks like some industrial polymer to me! Yep could be a piece of some component of the landing apparatus, but I don't think it is, because I don't think NASA would spent two days taking photos of rover's scraps. But that piece of plastic is not the cherry of the cake. The cherry is what is on it: [link to imageupper.com] In 24 hrs the object suffered ZERO modifications on its shape or position, suggesting that it was untouched by the rover and weather influence. Therefore, the black spot seen on its edge in one of the images, but not seen in others, is not a spec of dust put there by the wind. IMO that black spot is an INSECT, what proves either that there IS complex life in Mars or the rover is NOT in Mars. In any cases NASA is lying as usual. this^ there is no black dot in the original photo. only in the one at the link you posted lol [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov]  "Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1273864 Netherlands10/12/2012 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20737157 I wish if people were going to try and be funny & contribute nothing that at least it could be funny & not something an irritating uneducated 12 years old glue sniffer would say. a shill's gotta do what a shill's gotta do. |
| NervousAndJerky User ID: 13967233 United States10/12/2012 02:16 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Keep in mind. There were a lot of things going on during decent of the lander. A heat sheild drop. 2 chute deployments. A RCS activation (rocket control system). A chute detachment, A RCS system detachment. All achieved by pyrotechnics. ie. exploisive bolts, and fittings. All this is achived before landing. Than all the science equipment on board the lander deployed. There is pleanty of opertunity for the creation of small debris. Last Edited by NervousAndJerky on 10/12/2012 02:17 PM Perspective is everything AKA. 1.NervousNJerky B.ThKpDrgnMeBk and UndisclosedScource |
| Conspiracy Witch User ID: 23165747 United States10/12/2012 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25440805  Portugal10/12/2012 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Another image of the same object: [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] "The rover team's assessment is that the bright object is something from the rover, not Martian material. It appears to be a shred of plastic material, likely benign, but it has not been definitively identified...." Read all of it here: [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] |
| UndercoverAlien User ID: 25420655 Brazil10/12/2012 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Keep in mind. There were a lot of things going on during decent of the lander. A heat sheild drop. 2 chute deployments. A RCS activation (rocket control system). A chute detachment, A RCS system detachment. All achieved by pyrotechnics. ie. exploisive bolts, and fittings. All this is achived before landing. Quoting: NervousAndJerky Than all the science equipment on board the lander deployed. There is pleanty of opertunity for the creation of small debris. Ok, but the $ 1 million question is: Do NASA scientists have nothing better to do, than taking several pictures of a small piece of trash, during 2 days??? And the $ 2 million question is: What's that black spot that moves from the ground to the edge of the plastic object, in 2 hrs??? "Do or do not. There is no try." (Yoda) |
| closing eyes User ID: 24721119 United States10/12/2012 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the HELL is that???? Looks like it could be organic. Take a look at the full resolution image.... Quoting: Travis Bickle I mean, it could be a sheath from some wiring or something like that, which fell off the rover, but I doubt it. Maybe it's a remnant from a Mars creature shedding it's skin  LOL Thats what i thought, like a snake shedding its skin. If you woke up breathing, you have another chance! |
| closing eyes User ID: 24721119 United States10/12/2012 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the HELL is that???? Looks like it could be organic. Take a look at the full resolution image.... Quoting: Travis Bickle I mean, it could be a sheath from some wiring or something like that, which fell off the rover, but I doubt it. Maybe it's a remnant from a Mars creature shedding it's skin LOL Thats what i thought, like a snake shedding its skin. If you woke up breathing, you have another chance! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1565709  France10/12/2012 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Parameters show... A 25 milimeter working distance, and a resolution of 13.9 micro meters per pixel? Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) will acquire color close-up images of rocks and surface materials at the MSL landing site at a range of spatial scales with resolution as high as 13.9 micrometers per pixel. [link to msl-scicorner.jpl.nasa.gov] Image Resolution. The MAHLI design permits imaging over a range of spatial scales between about 13.9 microns/pixel and infinity. Malin Space Science Systems follows a strict definition for resolution of in-focus images wherein the optical blur circle is equal to or less than one pixel across. Acquiring images with 13.9 micron per pixel under actual operational conditions on Mars will likely be challenged by as-yet unmeasured uncertainties in the ability to place the camera using the robotic arm. Get RAW with Mars... [link to mars.jpl.nasa.gov] Morans Only.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25130922 United States10/12/2012 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180457 United States10/12/2012 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
