Nordic race is dying - Blonde-haired, blue-eyed people getting extinct

Before the textbooks, and reference works, were rewritten to conform to the commie party line, people all over the world recognized that the 3 species of man could be determined by the appearance of their hair. In the 19th century, when microscopes were in common use, the study of the anatomy of the hair commenced. Much of the material presented here comes from the 11th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, that is, before the jew buy out in the 1920s. Today's editions of this once great reference work are little more than sophomoric, politically correct exercises in disinformation and evasion.

The yellow man -- hair is uniformly circular with easily identifiable medulla (pith). Both the pith and cortex contain pigment and air cells. The pigment in both regions is always black. In addition, the pith contains fat cells. This renders the hair opaque, straight, lank, and coarse.

The white man -- the medulla shaft is apparent but contains no pith. The cortex contains pigment and air cells. The shape is oval which renders it smooth, wavy and silken. The light pigments, usually appearing as yellow to light brown, plus the absence of pith renders the hair translucent. This is why, when backlighted, the hair of white people show its familiar shine and glow.

The black man -- in stark contrast to the other species, the black man's hair has no medulla. The cortex contains a black pigment with air cells. The cross section shape is "kidney bean", sometimes approximating an ellipse. The absence of the medulla renders the hair closer to wool than true hair. The shape causes the hair to be crisp, coarse and kinky. The "peppercorn" arrangement of the hair is a function of the attributes of the skin which differs in measurable degrees far beyond a mere description of melanin content. The pigment of the black skin is deep in the fourth layer (stratum mucosum) and has nothing in common with the upper layers of white skin where "tanning" occurs.

The reason that skin color is so widely used as a race indentifier is due to its large area. When one gets closer, the visual area occupied by the hair further "tunes one in". Up close, an intensive examination of the various colored flecks in the iris leaves no doubt as to what you are looking at. (My grandfather, when seen at a distance, looked like someone from Bombay, his skin color was that brown from years of toiling in the sun. There was only one occasion where I saw more of my grandfather's skin than the head, neck and hands. That was the time he decided to jump into one of the ponds we had on the property. All of the kids laughed since his chest, back and legs were as white as the driven snow. The contrast was indeed very funny.)

Race mixing has occurred throughout all times wherever races come into contact. Europeans, once uniformly blue-eyed with light hair, have become increasingly darker due to this process. World-wide race mixing will eventually submerge all of those recessive characteristics we associate with white people. If the white race disappears, what will be left except a world over-stuffed with varities of Chinese?

Incidentally, white people also have a translucent skin which, particularly in the wrist area, allows the blood to be seen. This is the origin of the term "blue blood" -- to show blood in the skin -- the old mark of nobility. (My wife never forgot that on our first date, I took her hand and examined her wrist. I was never frivolous concerning the females I chose to associate with. I was in the market for a mother for my future children.) There are mongrel varieties of so-called white people who have light skin but the blue blood cannot be seen. If you look close, you'll find other revealing characteristics also. The ever-increasing mongrel populations obviously show mixed characteristics even when it comes to the anatomy of the hair. There are 3 basic "races" and 3 basic hair structures. If you don't belong to one of these, then you are some mongrel mixture. The differences are stark and far from trivial.

Open your eyes and think. "Education" is all about placing faith in the words of others.

Nice to see other parts of the world are just as racist and hate-filled as America.

In case ya missed it-

If diversity isn’t forced, why is there affirmative action & racial employment quotas?

If diversity isn’t forced, why aren’t White People allowed to vote to stop mass non-White immigration into ALL & ONLY White countries?

If diversity isn’t forced, why is assimilation of non-Whites into ALL & ONLY White communities forced?

If diversity isn’t forced, then you describe the diversity we are forced to accept?

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

Last Edited by Elzop on 10/15/2012 03:13 PM

Oh, because you say so? I'm sorry to hurt your narrow little worldview, but I'm actually a Conservative who has no problem with women. As for degenerate, so are you. After all, all human races have their distinctive features due to inbreeding. Maybe I'm driven by some instinct to find some new DNA.

Well said.

That's funny. You mad bro? Do tigers mate with lions to get 'new' DNA?
Hey if you liked the last vid you'll love this ya degenerate race-traitor. Heh. Watch them black bucks drop like flies!




An example of anti-white cunning:

“[W]e want to convey the sense that the bigots are isolated, embittered individuals, rather than permit them to contact and coordinate with one another.” — Professor Jeremy Waldron, NYU Law, “The Harm in Hate Speech”, Harvard University Press, 2012

They say they are anti-racist, what they really are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Making you feel like you are alone, is a form of psychological warfare. Yes anti-whites really are that evil.

Just remember, no one ever asked for this, no one was allowed to vote on it, or discuss it, when it was done to all white countries and only white countries and we still aren't allowed to discuss it.

Everyone knows the consequences, if we raise this issue in public. This is not a free system we live in. The White Genocide system, is every bit as oppressive as the old Soviet Union.

Last Edited by Elzop on 10/15/2012 03:34 PM

Thanks but the credit goes to: [link to faem.com]

Nope, not mad, more pitying. I don't care what traits or agendas you attempt to project onto me. I know who I am and what I think, and everyone else reading this thread can see it, too. I reject racism because I have met and worked with people of all races, and I know we can all get along if we share the same culture (military, in my case). As travel becomes easier, more people will see this, and people who believe as you do will become extinct, a cast-off relic of a more ignorant age.


Last Edited by The Guy on 10/15/2012 03:45 PM

If you need scientific facts in order to evaluate the various races, then your 5 senses are obviously malfunctioning. Then again, you just might have Alzheimer's or tertiary syphilis.

Now who's mad? I have the evidence of my senses. Of course people differ, but a person's race is no guarantee that he will or won't have a certain trait.

Funny how the always say blond hair blue eyes is recessive... My mom is Swedish and has two siblings... All of whom are sisters... All three sisters married dark Italians or dark Russians.... There are 9 grand children all of which are blond blue eyed lol!

You are obviously quoting something you read that was written by someone who had no idea what he was thinking.

Animal breeders know full well that mutations are very hard to set. And furthermore, most mutations are usually defects and the individual dies. If it lives, it is likely shunned, driven from the herd or tribe or possibly killed, and does not get a chance to mate. To set the mutated trait it is necessary that the individual mate with its offspring that would be carrying the defective gene, and a lot of inbreeding from thereon.

No, white people are not mutations of black people.

You might want to ask yourself if the ancient Africans were really black. There is nothing in those old bones that indicates skin color you know. They might have been white and adapted to their environment by developing more melanin.

You just keep digging yourself in deeper and deeper. It appears the only thing you use your limited mental faculties for is rationalizing your immoral miscegenation.
[link to heretical.com]

Keep trying, this is fun! And yes, I do like big butts.

Elzop says:"Slight changes in genetic structure often make a great difference in outward appearance. These changes obviously can come from the mixing which occurs during fertilization. Another factor is mutation which is not as rare as we might suppose. It's very often that we hear of some virus mutating rapidly so as to produce another variety. Fruit flies have also been known to have such alterations beyond heredity. I cannot now remember the substance we used in high school biology to produce gene alteration in peanuts thus producing, at times, very strange results"

Elzie, we humans are not viruses nor peanuts.
There has never been any evidence that mutations in animals perpetuates itself. See my post above.
And educate yourself on the mutation subject by associating with animal breeders, not by reading stuff by scientists who fill in the gaps in their information with fantasy.

Who cares humans are to.

Well you cannot argue preferences. I just wonder how you do it, I mean, black women are repulsively ugly ape-like creatures unless they have significant white admixture. But hey, some people will screw anything.
[link to www.komonews.com]

Telegony is the name given to the hypothesis that offspring can inherit characteristics from a previous mate of the mother. Breeders call this "throwing back" and physiologists call it "infection of the germ". The idea here is that the entire female's ovum apparatus is affected by the sperm, and hormones, which are injected by the male. There is an absorption factor here and absorption of many substances through ostensible membrane barriers is common knowledge. Otherwise the market for Ben Gay, beauty pastes, cellulite creams, and nicotine patches would simply be non existent.

I have mentioned earlier that Africans over the centuries have noted that when a wildebeest bull (genus Connochaetes) mates with a domestic cow (genus Bos), the cow is rendered sterile and is subsequently killed by the herders.

I have observed one example relative to a White colleague who married a White woman with mulatto children, where his children had a negro taint to their looks and behavior. Coincidence or what, I do not know, but years ago while still earning a living as a machinist, I was familiar with another case where George P.'s kids, from a similar situation, also appeared somewhat negro.

It has been often recorded that mares (Equus caballus, horse) who had previously mated with zebras (Equus grevyi), and subsequently mated with their own kind, often had foals with stripes on their legs. This was noted by people such as Charles Darwin, L. Agassiz, W.B. Carpenter and G.J. Romanes. Quite naturally, other reasons were given for those observations and many people on the experimental end claim they cannot find any evidence in their results, for telegony.

The doctrine of "infection" is ancient and widespread, and one might wonder if observation did not reinforce, or affirm, then why the tenacity of such a belief over the centuries? It would certainly be to any breeder's benefit to believe the contrary -- that their mares are not contaminated by previous mating. Whatever the views of stock owners in the past, it is clearly evident that all of the English and Continental breeders of the period 1700-1920, were fully satisfied that it was truth, and acted accordingly. The veterinarian which tended to my grandfather's live stock held similar views and grandfather once related that a stray scrub bull once 'ruined' his prize Holstein, Mary Lou. It remains difficult for me to believe that telegony is made from the same fabric as groundless gossip.

Dog breeders, especially, are generally quite firm in their belief in telegony and this is in evidence even as I write.

Telegony -- true or false? As with all schools of thought, there are opposing views and the dispute arises since science, contrary to popular opinion, does not know everything. This clearly is demonstrated in the changing view of the atom and in nearly all aspects of nutrition. Once vitamin C was isolated, the belief was that it could be given in tablet form to produce the same effects as eating natural foods containing it. This view, now archaic, has been proved false and only persists due to the profits engendered by the promotion of such a view. We are now back to natural foods which is another enduring belief of the past many centuries. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing and one only has to study the views concerning the "harmless" radiation of the first atomic explosions. (See the video Atomic Cafe.) At that time, the "experts knew the truth" and they certainly let we gullible cattle know that they did. The years proved them wrong to the sorrow of thousands. If the Army had believed that the radiation was extremely dangerous, then I am sure the whole atomic explosion business would have taken an entirely different path. What other sacred cows will be demolished in the future? The number will certainly be quite large.

Telegony -- truth or fiction? Many of the practical people who do work with livestock and breeding, generally accept it as fact. The myopic microscope users, and technocrats who love to nit-pick over trivia, say there is no evidence to support such a belief. It always makes more sense to err on the side of caution. If telegony is only a spurious vapor then it remains a vacuous proposition when applied, for it will produce no ill effects. However, if there is substance to telegony, than one invites disaster if he believes it to be false. If I assume incorrectly that the salt-looking substance in the shaker is potassium cyanide, and I toss it out, then what did I lose if it really were table salt?

I bring to your attention that all dispute over telegony deals entirely with the offspring and not one thing is mentioned of any possible effect upon the female. I find it very hard to believe that a White female's delicate sexual apparatus, complete with glands, ova, and other vitals, could remain unaffected by continual bombardment of the biological discharges of Black men which, incidentally, are chemically distinct from those of a White man. There is a whole lot more to the differences of blood, and semen, than mere DNA. We need no DNA to tell one blood from another, or one ejaculate from another.

I am writing briefly on this topic due to the number of email questions I have received. I am sure that those asking were less interested in what happens to Herefords or Spaniels, than they do about women who practice race-mixing. I, like Eric, have yet to meet one Black woman who provides sex appeal. Physically, each and every attribute I seek in a female is absent in the Black woman. A statue, or porno photo, while resembling female, simply holds no appeal either. I find nothing in Black people that would invite my friendship, and attraction between these two species seems preposterous to me. But then again, I never understood John Cromwell who was frequently spied mounting Mr. Betzhold's heifers, or Dr. Wade's daughter who was observed more than once playing bitch to her Collie..

Very few people seek truth. What they seek is affirmation of their held views -- as if they weren't sure of them. You cannot ever prove anything to anyone unless they are willing to accept your argument. That is a rare occurrence. Even if you ask a person what it will take to prove something to them, most deceive themselves by offering something such as, "If it's signed by Herr Professor Doctor Heinz Gerstenberg." If you happen to obtain such a document and show it to your antagonist, I'll bet that he will find some way to reject it, for that is the way of bone-headed people. They want to argue, not learn. The argument is a mere contest to see who "wins". Debates are always ego trips.

We White men often like to show the downside of race-mixing, of which evidence abounds. Let's assume that there are no "side effects" and that Matilda views sex is a neutral thing whether the object is Aids Johnson or Bush's pet goat. The question is then: Why do it? Have all the White males vanished? Or is there some dark reason like a hatred for your own kind? Whatever the reason, all life strives to reproduce its own kind. Black people and White people are not the same kind, for "kind" means kin, and kin are of the same blood, that is, they have a common ancestor. Pray tell, who is the common ancestor of Robert Mugabe and George Washington?

Since I have no personal interest in filling any available orifice, I do not concern myself with telegony, AIDS, or syphilis, one way or the other. As I intend to rob no banks, I have no interest in what penalty the law provides.

Believe what you will.

I know that many who read this will endeavor to research the matter further. Be advised that since the judeo-communist military victory of 1945, "history" is being rewritten to fit the goals of World ZOG. I personally take with 6 grains of salt, any so-called reference which was printed after 1930. The Encyclopedia Britannica is a good example. Once a standard of reference, the purchase by jewish interests in the 1920s, has resulted is a downgrading, and revision, of previous topics. I again repeat that one should apply his own god-given powers of observation and logic, in preference to something written by others, including myself. Train to be of independent thought. That's a good way to reduce your number of friends. You'll be better for it.

Just because it is new, doesn't mean it is correct. Just because it is old, doesn't mean it should be dismissed.

Except the ones that aren't.

Then this is sure to turn you on...enjoy!

Why yes, yes it does.

Last Edited by The Guy on 10/15/2012 05:04 PM

Here are some real women, as opposed to female primates...

Hotness comes in assorted colors.

Notice how the non-white 'hotties' have White characteristics.

Black females are the least preferred of all races, but cheaper than a mail-order bride. Say's something about your manhood because you cannot attract an equal mate.

Not really, no. Then again, I'm not seeing the world through a filter of white supremacy. My wife is quite attractive, and could kick your ass in Jeopardy, knife-fighting, swimming, and rifle marksmanship. So much for stereotypes.

Sounds like she's more of a man than you are.

She's got me on swimming and knife-fighting, but I beat her at Jeopardy and marksmanship.

No we're not.
Apart from a brief sojourn in the Middle East where some of us got tangled up in the barbaric Bronze Age death cults and then got the fuck out our connection to that area is peripheral.
You're fellow Irish-tell me, where in the ancient Brehon law or history is there any similarity to the demented crap of the Old Testicles?
There's none.
We're much older than that Mediterranean rubbish-check out the age of Stonehenge,the standing stones of Ireland and the temple complex of the Orkneys.
That's us... not the other stuff.
And for sure there are very old connections to our Scandinavian cousins.
Can you say "suppressed history"?

Back to the subject...