Sitchin Ancient Alien work is Illuminati Psy-Op tied to Rothschild

You got everything right except one thing.


The Ancient Aliens are known as the Fallen.


It should make sense to you now why the Illuminati believe in them.

you didn't have to read on this thread.
so why did you ???

I could not prove it
hence why it was left out

Word up Op!

There's been anunnaki propaganda for thousands of years imo...

I think they exist, but I think there is a long-time programmed script which is being played out - so that we assume they have always been our over-lords.

Now you can take either side of the scenario, this is a terrestrial based NWO plot or an extra-terrestrial NWO plot.

I'm of the persuasion of this being an ET plot, with a line of command leading from earth, to the moon, to mars, saturn, jupiter, uranus, then respectively to orion and sirius - all of this within the "sirian empire"...

The thing is, this then leads us into gnosticism, we're in a samsara karmic wheel reincarnation situation - where the reality is attempting to make us in its image, so that we are only compatible with this contained reality and its 8 spiritual propaganda domains, this is the "samsara matrix" - and for thousands of years, we have been "hoped" to assume these "anunnaki" are our overlords in the local food chain.

These forces have never left, they've always been present enough to harness our emotional energies, treating us like the workhorse slaves they've attempted to convince us we are...

So really this becomes about getting out of the physical illusion, and seeing all the traps laden around us - as the illusion revealing its structure and ploys to keep us "worshiping" - narrow-minded - attached to the physical incompatible with any other existence.

Oh yes, this is a hardcore assimilation, a slow-burn thousands of years long ET takeover with spiritual repercussions imo...

How many will fall for it when push comes to shove? You must give credit where its due - but it is also very desperate and falls apart when the script is heavily dissected and logically broken down - reveals itself like an open book.

So let me ask you this: Do ancient astronaut theories sound any more deluded than yahweh creating heaven and earth in 6 days and then resting on the seventh?

Science is as much a religion as the looniest of cargo cults. The problem is that you have drawn the strings around your neck a little too tight. You leave no room for theories that run against the mainstream.

Just remember how Edison is lauded and Tesla is basically unknown. Edison invented many things; however, it was his business acumen that made him the rich "Prince of Light"; while Tesla, a man many times more intelligent and innovative than Edison, a man whose AC electricity powers modern civilization to this day, died a pauper spending what little money he had on bird food for the pigeons he would feed in his old age while sitting on bench in Bryant Park.

You could as easily say that Sitchin was part of a jewish conspiracy to confuse gentiles and waste their time, but then you would begin to see how this could all go south in a hurry. Your original thesis that Sitchin was a paid shill is not proved at all. You have used a pretty large brush to color him a Soros/Rothschild stooge, but I'll bet if you confronted him with this he would say something like, "I wish Soros or Rothschild would have funded my work, then I would not have had it so hard in my life." If you really want to look into a paid shill, you should investigate Christopher Bollyn - now there's is no mean wood from which to construct a shill.

in the beginning of one of Sitchins books "12th planet" i believe... he claims he predicted the color of neptune from the sumerian tablets BEFORE HUMANS actually discovered it and finally saw its color... GREEN. he basically proved that the sumerians had knowledge of the planets well beyond what we understand.

is there anyone that has debunked that?

kudos: very well stated

there is a flaw in your logic.
you have narrowed down creation
to only 2 possibilities.

Right you are.

And nobody can explain why the Dogon tribe knows so much about Sirius.

But OP is just worried that we are being misled by paid shills, he is not interested in the truths that are contained in the fantastic theories that people like Sitchin propose.

If Bill Coope called him a fraud the he's a fraud.

that's why

I have not narrowed anything down. I am just confronting you with the loony shit that passes for accepted dogma in this society.

The Cosmic accretion theory that I believe you are headed for has been disproved by scientisits already. Don't go there. How about the idea that we evolved as a result of primates eating stropharia cubensis. I think that is a marvelous concept. Some would say that it was also put out by shills, shills like Gordon Wasson - one of the foremost anthropologists of his time who got the magic mushroom kick started in the mid 20th century.

I love theories :)
it's when people start posting theories
as proven facts that I have a problem with.

Bill Cooper
Pot/Kettle/Black

John Lear can fill you in on Cooper's bullshit.

Superbly said...TY!!!

OP, you are under the relentless attacks of an army of mocking birds!..
Guess why?!!

Ironic that you speak of scientists
to wit Sitchin was NOT one.
He was a Journalist and got his
degree from a place loyal to
Rothschild.

How do you "debunk" the actual PHYSICAL EVIDENCE all over the planet? Regardless of who you believe is in charge of the financing, how can you ignore all the PHYSICAL EVIDENCE numerous ancient civilizations around the world have made to document their own history in stone, clay, buildings, pyramids, etc.? It's there! They all revolve around a similar story, that beings from the sky helped jumpstart mankind.

truth

One of the mistakes Sitchin made is that life on earth has multiple star system origins as opposed to just some lost planet on the outer fringes of our own solar system.

He also made root lingual mistranslations according to the root language teaching rat associated with the cactus of the four winds.

P.S. Occupy the House of Rothshcild

12DnA
[link to uenc2012.blogspot.com]

And this IS logical???

First you use a ad hominem and now you set up a strawman!

But if this is all a big bad scheme/bad idea from the Rothschild's, as you claim it is, then riddle me this.

If the Rothschild (and their ideas (which they arent)) are so dangerous, as you say then why are you still using their tools that gives them this power? You still give them your consent by using their tools that give them that power of what you say, they do?

You/we still use their money, buy their products, use their economic system (profit, interest and the need for continuous growth)? Any ideas countering this system of Rothschild, will be attacked and ridiculed. Calling it socialism, communism or whatever.

Do you even know that the whole idea of gold being valuable in the first place, has the SAME origin as what Sitchin is talking about. I.E. Sumerian writings about their history/mythology about elohim, anunaki, aliens, gods, wanting gold for shielding for their home planet.

Here's an idea, maybe the Rothschild's and ilk continued this economic system where gold is the basis to get all the gold so they can give it to the aliens when they come back. And that there never has been any chance between then and now. That it has always been true, and only now they allow the truth coming out. In steps ofcourse to prevent a total breakdown. Because the overlords are on their way back. i mean, who the fuck knows.

I rather look at the evidence, and till now the intervention theory has the most evidence to support human origin. There is a lot more then Sitchin alone, but one has to have the time and the will to look into it all.

Well said!

tis the only way to reach the sleeping ones
within the Matrix.

Why is it that you have taken efforts to investigate Sitchen, Von Donaken, and the likes but you have made no efforts to research the background of individual who created the 'Ancient Aliens Debunked' video? When you agree with the 'message' you don't investigate any further to look for ulterior motives, right? Very telling.

P.S. this 'Bluebeam' shit is never happening.....

Much better worded then i ever could, excellent post...

yep, that's how it works!

Some even grow serious to claim such things as Jisus WAS from Sirius :chucle:

Rather than that He is the Son Of God Almighty.

The theory that sitchin came up with falls into a realm that science reserves for anthropologists, historians, and philologists et al. not really for hard scientists. Sitchin's brother was involved in astrophysics I believe. If you think establishment researchers are going to think outside the box, then you are dead wrong. The establishment has too much at risk to deal with the shock of the new.

Instead of attacking sitchin for being a journalist, how about refuting his ideas and leaving it at that. Educational institutions are very happy to accept money from rich patrons. If you think every school that takes Soros or rothschild money makes shills of all of its graduates, then how can I begin to have a dialogue with you.

If you had something like a letter or an eyewitness account backing up your claim, then I would give it more credence. To quote a famous scientist, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof!"

May be correct. What OP believes could be entirely true. And, so, Sitchin could speak the complete truth and be debunked (not to be confused with proof/disproof) by the conspiracy types. Then the conspiratorial minority is made all comfortable by their armchair research, and the majority are drooling sheeple remain of no account. THEN you all find out the hard way that Sitchin was just telling the truth, after all.

What does it matter to you? If the Annunaki don't exist, what does it matter what other conspiratists believe? And if the Annunaki really o exist, it's not like there is anything you could do about it, anyway.

Or is it that you just want others to believe what you want them to believe - hmmm, sounds no different than what the conspirasists, themselves, complain about.

when somebody tells you the sky is blue
and your own common sense tells you also
that the sky is blue

why is there a need to research the
individual ??? physical confirmation
and personal experience shall suffice.

the sky is blue