Video of aftermath from bunker explosion at Camp Minden

Great OP!

I thought they said that no one got hurt? What about the train driver???

PIN PLEASE!

Very good point!

I have a feeling we are being lied to about some of the details. However if no one was hurt in reality than the train driver must of had his seatbelt on /sarcasm.

From the video you can definitely see the explosion came from underground. I keep watching it over to see if I can't pick up anything weird about the area.

Any other thoughts?

I bet you also believe muslims did 9/11. When did this site turn into a nwo propaganda loudspeaker???

On another thread someone had proof that this was from
2006

What kind of cops do they have if they didn't see that last night?

Push me, shove you?

[link to www.youtube.com]
Covert retaliation for a covert attack?

Last Edited by Billy_Sastard on 10/16/2012 11:50 PM

I got a 404 error for your link, can you post it again?

Mind sharing that proof? Info gets buried in long threads quickly, especially with the shills pouring in.

EXACT SAME THING IN 2006

C'mon..what are you going to believe.

Just google it
link to google search:
[link to www.google.com]

Explain how you came to this most idiotic conclusion.


No I don't believe in the official story bro. It's obvious you didn't read my other comments I posted. As I mentioned we get lied to. Trains don't have seatbelts Moran. It's more than possible that the conductor of the train was injured to some extent. Reading comprehension could do you some good.

and in 2011.

Check out the video again. It mentions 2006, it also mentions explosions there and a fire from 2011.

They clearly say this isn't the first time this has happened at Camp Minden.

I want to believe the news story from the local station that had the balls to flyover a military base the day an event as such has occurred.

But even that is just hard to believe. But it's nice to have this as evidence to support either side of the story. Cause if you can produce aerial photos of the aftermath in 2006 and from 2011. Not just 2006, because like I said this has happen as recent as last year.

Compare pics and do some google earth of the area and act like you got brain enough to figure the shit out. Not just read someone else's B.S. on what they think it is.

trust me I've been following this from the start...

Fox News were the ones who used information from the 2006 explosion to describe the events that took place over the past 24 hours...

So...

There was an explosion last night..The one and only...

And we still don't how that happened, correct?

Another interesting thing is that the plume from this went 7000 ft high were it was picked up on radar. If you look at the video you don't see that the damage shown looks like it could have done that. Cause it only looks like two different slits that were blown from the ground. The news reporters said that they bunker design was so that blast would go upward and not outward to reduce shockwave impact. If so why isn't the ground level seem to be blown away differently and with more damage?

Or maybe what we see is because of such a grand bunker design. I still don't see how it could generate enough force to have a plume with a sphere of some kind inside which I saw on another video of a 3d rendering of the data from the plume.

Lots of questions as to be honest not all the data seems to line up.

[link to www.youtube.com]

Go to 2:11 if you don't want to listen to the guys ranting intro...

Correct!

I am just hoping this does not really tie in with the New Madrid precursors. I rather believe that the train passing by rattled some munitions which blew when they hit the ground(1st explosion) than that ignited a much bigger event (2nd explosion). That's just wishful thinking however.

Kind of looks like something hit and slid.

Yup when I saw that last week I was thinking of how odd that was. Now this month America and Russia have had major munitions explosions from underground dump facilities.

Or, it's something else!

I wanna believe too but it's damn near impossible when they say it was a bunker that DID WHAT IT WAS CREATED TO DO. Really? You put a train track over a bunker that had a probability of exploding upwards? How does this make sense? And if it did fling those trains upwards where was the resulting shake when they finally came down? Where was the resulting fire from the trees? How did it get put out on it's own? If we are to believe that it was meant to go upwards instead of out in the event it did go off accidentally then who put out the fire and why weren't the fire marshals there to make sure it was put out? I mean look at that woodland. It was dry out...shouldn't the 7,000 high blast have done more damage caused by a massive fire? Cause it sure as heck couldn't have been contained the way it was meant to if it derailed those trains like they say.

^THIS!^

I kinda feel sorry for that news crew - having to film with such low quality cameras...

^^THIS!^^

this

I have a feeling the next few days maybe weeks will get very interesting. But I do agree with your statements. As I myself have pondered the same questions as I continue to rewatch the video.

One post on here said it looks like something hit than slid. If you look at the video a few times, that is exactly what it looks like. Like it slid, hit the train and skipped away a little further where we don't have any video.

Who knows for sure unless we can get more evidence. What is certain is that a lot of ppl were rattled to hell last night by this event.

Shouldn't there be a huge hole in the ground?

That is what I was thinking. I don't see any kind of hole, maybe some kind of slits in the ground. It really does look like something fell out of the sky and traveled while it was burning hot and it might of exploded right before impact.

Who knows though. Would like to get discussion going about everyone's thoughts on what they think of this. Maybe we could get a better picture of what really went on by our own observations and out of the box thinking. I

This is from my first observation where I see the slits, which also could be trail marks now that I look at it again.

I am not sure that the video is convincing me of the official story the more I look at it.