The Official Consolidation Thread for Lousiana Sinkhole and Other Related Happenings

OP

Regarding the initial video

My only question is......what about the things that have been built by the Feds in the area that according to the video is going to be either blown away.....or under water?

Didn't they build some type of underground refuge in Missouri that would be in the path of destruction?

And what about the FEMA camps built in the path of destruction?

Not sure why they would put money and effort into these things......if they were just going to be destroyed.

Certainly Yellowstone going off.....would probably affect the whole world for a long time.....so I am not sure that the elites would want to mess with that.

Other than that......the video was quite interesting.

look......... [link to www.haarp.alaska.edu]

new aerials

[link to www.youtube.com]

True or not, I thought this was interesting:

Well, you raise legit questions, I wonder that, too, and perhaps others can jump in and offer their insight on this?

As for any underground refuge/bunker, aren't they sealed and impenetrable from water? I would think that would be taken into account when they're building them. I don't mean to sound naive about that, but it makes sense, I think.

The alleged FEMA camps, of which there are I believe around 800, are listed online and yes, many are located within what's considered the NM zone, so I cannot argue this point - I too, wonder why they would be located there if the gov had some intentions toward or knew about impending disaster in the NMSZ. As it's considered an extremely unstable area, it would seem more logical to place them far outside that perimeter. On the other hand, though . . . perhaps the "reasoning" is to have them in place in the event of other types of "events" that might require implementing martial law, etc. and that if NM went off and some camps were lost, no big deal . . . you know, the gov cares little about collateral damage and money is like candy, right?

Sorry I can't provide more than the above sort of logic, but let's see if some other posters will chime in and offer their opinions.

Thanks for posting.

We can't take everything out of the earth without upsetting the balance of nature. Earth will shake her back and dislodge the fleas.

Makes perfect sense that they be built where shit is going to blow up/shake down, or just in general go to hell. The NWO goal is population reduction on a massive scale in an inhumanely short amount of time.

Possibly related...

Thread: Likely meteor seen, heard in Bay Area

A while back I made a post on the Assumption thread about what my Father had to say about all this. He worked in the oil and gas industry for over 40 years. He was an engineer and worked in Canada and the Middle East. He was a trouble shooter. He was always sent out to the Trouble stuff. The oil patch is full of gossips. They are like a female sewing circle. They tell each other everything. HERE GOES. They have always known that the Gulf was an unstable place to be doing any drilling. The pressure onshore and off shore in that area and surrounding area's has always been historically higher and harder to control. They really don't have the technology in place for it. Hence the BP Disaster and addmissions of altering the Shut Off Control Valve's. To make this easy for everybody he explained it like this. Take a can of tomato soup. Drive a nail into it with a hammer. Stick a straw in the whole. Place can in a fire. YOU GET THE PICTURE. As more pressure builds the straw can't accomodate all the material being forced out of it and ruptures. Other area's start to rupture because of the HUGE VOLUME of material in the feilds. From the gossip flying around it appears that the whole area is under growing pressure from the Earths interior. The pressure has been increasing dramatically. The pressure is causing seismic activity. The seafloor has been fractured in a few places. There is oil seeping out of the cracks. As the pressure builds, more cracks and more seismic activity will occur. The area around the sinkhole is MUSH, excuse the expression so material can travel up and out of that area more easily. Just like water it will take the path of least resistance. Long story short. The area is failing. Its going under. The pandoras box has been opened. He suggested that a safe distance from the region of no less than 200 miles would be in order. He said he wouldn't live within a 500 mile radius from the original BP disaster. Get out a protractor and make a circle. YOU GET THE PICTURE.

From another thread here . . . interesting explanation:

Could you interpret, please?

My thoughts exactly. When people post a link to a site that has updated since they posted, opening the link is a waste of time. I wish people would write a sentence saying what they see, at the very least. And yes, a very brief explanation of what they see would be nice.

damn, everyone of them cross the madrid.

Sentinal, I'm going to go ahead and embed that vid here, and hope everyone will watch it:

This info may already be well known, but it's soo ridiculously pertinent to the ongoings, if it's real, that I'm going to fawking post it a million times if I have to, at least until I think everyone has seen it, lol. [link to www.zengardner.com] < Think of all the activity around the NMF, from the recent storms to strange missile/meteors near the LA sinkhole.

thank you for the video uptake, just got on to GLP tonight....I hope people are paying attention...this is very sinister. I'll add my thread below this on INDUCED SEISMICITY.. very real technology and very real experiments. I lovethis thread....