BUMP
We'll see what happens =)
Quoting: amywood71605 for someone to name specific set of dates in a 30 day period for a major 7+ quake to hit even 1 of the windows/dates and be within 3 days, goes against stats and huge odds. For 2 major quakes to hit within the same parameters is astronomical and far beyond what science says is possible. And as I've said, to have 3 quakes occur with the minimum magnitude and parameters I've explained is, well, pretty much unheard of which even I say extremely difficult and unlikely. If a GREAT QUAKE or closer to a 7.9+ hits in any window, that increases the odds and level of difficulty exponentially. And adding the LEY LINE/location parameter to any event/quake correlating as well, puts another level of difficulty thats far less likely of any chance for even 1 quake to occur in which all parameters are met.
If nothing happens and there's no quakes over 6.7 in any of these windows, I have no problem admitting this quake warning failed. Would it invalidate the consistency of my accuracy over the past year? Not at all since 90% means there's a 10% margin of error and I'm well within that margin and could have a few misses since I no of no one with even close to an 80% accuracy meeting these parameters and for sure NO human has ever had a 100% accuracy especially when you're talking about natural events.
But the real question is... will skeptics be able to do the same if any hit ;))
should be an interesting game to watch over the next 13 days.
Lets hope though, if any do occur, there's no major damage or loss of life and this just adds more validation for the Ley Lines and "theory" which will help raise awareness to far more serious events coming.
cheers