Nibiru - Possible Proof At Neumayer Station...And a Recent Visit From The M.I.B | |
jonas773 User ID: 3512842 United States 10/25/2012 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This Essay on Nibiru and The Anunnaki was delivered recently to all the major governments of the world and was translated into more than 20 languages. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 842645 Thoughts? [link to www.scribd.com] I've read that, besides the little history at the beginning of the document, it describes exactly what is happening. Sweet post. Last Edited by jonas773 on 10/25/2012 01:44 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26248899 United States 10/25/2012 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's an artifact of the stellarium rendering software - light pollution, fog, atmosphere, whatever. I don't think stellarium is going to be showing a planet that no one else in the world knows about. I'm pretty sure the folks who created that program used data that your various astronomers have access to, you know? |
balthuuu User ID: 14434601 Finland 10/25/2012 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Could it be... THE MOON? Love is not the game, life is. - When we wake up in this "reality" every morning, we are actually falling asleep, because only in our dreams we are truly awake. - We are not our body, nor our mind. We are not the voice in our body, nor our head. We are the the here and now, experiencing without any input from either of the mentioned above. - It's not about others forgiving you, but whether you can forgive yourself. - It doesn't take much energy to make the wrong decision. But to make the right one, you have to put every fiber of your being to it. - I know i have a lot to work on. But knowing that there's no hairy ass man in the clouds to judge me when I have little bit of fun on the expense of someone elses ignorance, makes life a whole lot easier. |
jonas773 User ID: 3512842 United States 10/25/2012 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jonas773 User ID: 3512842 United States 10/25/2012 01:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's an artifact of the stellarium rendering software - light pollution, fog, atmosphere, whatever. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26248899 I don't think stellarium is going to be showing a planet that no one else in the world knows about. I'm pretty sure the folks who created that program used data that your various astronomers have access to, you know? Yeah, probably... they went through the trouble to write software that depicts fake objects to feed doom porn. Artifact in the rendering??? Last Edited by jonas773 on 10/25/2012 02:02 AM |
ET*Dude (OP) User ID: 25793339 Australia 10/25/2012 01:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Published on Oct 24, 2012 by tree0fmight This is a follow up to my previous video with Stellarium included showing that although the faint glow may be from our sun, the hard direct light source is coming from an independent source higher in the sky as the sun could not light up the sky as shown at the times shown from Neumayer As our sun is rising another bright star is setting giving the illusion that our sun is giving the glow. [link to www.youtube.com] Video Comments: Good follow up to my concern about a sun setting in the west might cause the glow. You disproved that. Your observation on the shadow is concerns me. First it should not be there. Second its is very defined as if the source is large and bright. Finally it is moving in the wrong direction. OK so what are we to conclude? This is pretty daming to NASA, govt, trolls. MrMexBiker 1 hour ago I thank you for that statement, I always check time and dates with stellarium for Neumayer and when I and using Helioviewer, It slipped my mind to include stellarium in the first video as I was just excited at what I was finding. There has to be a star very close to illuminate the sky bright blue as they show, that shadow should have been stationary even though our suns dim orange glare was moving, it was not bright enough to show that shadow from under the horizon. tree0fmight in reply to MrMexBiker 1 hour ago You are correct I checked your data and the sun is below the horizon in the sequence there could not be a bright blue sky as shown unless there is another light source from higher in the sky. The sky should be a grimy orange color at 14:50 utc through the sequence you show. good research !!!! DarkSkyWatcher74 2 hours ago Any thoughts? They Come...Destination>Earth...Arrival>>Imminent |
jonas773 User ID: 3512842 United States 10/25/2012 02:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | YouTube uploader claims possible proof of Nibiru/Planet X Quoting: ET*Dude Published on Oct 24, 2012 by tree0fmight This is a follow up to my previous video with Stellarium included showing that although the faint glow may be from our sun, the hard direct light source is coming from an independent source higher in the sky as the sun could not light up the sky as shown at the times shown from Neumayer As our sun is rising another bright star is setting giving the illusion that our sun is giving the glow. [link to www.youtube.com] Video Comments: Good follow up to my concern about a sun setting in the west might cause the glow. You disproved that. Your observation on the shadow is concerns me. First it should not be there. Second its is very defined as if the source is large and bright. Finally it is moving in the wrong direction. OK so what are we to conclude? This is pretty daming to NASA, govt, trolls. MrMexBiker 1 hour ago I thank you for that statement, I always check time and dates with stellarium for Neumayer and when I and using Helioviewer, It slipped my mind to include stellarium in the first video as I was just excited at what I was finding. There has to be a star very close to illuminate the sky bright blue as they show, that shadow should have been stationary even though our suns dim orange glare was moving, it was not bright enough to show that shadow from under the horizon. tree0fmight in reply to MrMexBiker 1 hour ago You are correct I checked your data and the sun is below the horizon in the sequence there could not be a bright blue sky as shown unless there is another light source from higher in the sky. The sky should be a grimy orange color at 14:50 utc through the sequence you show. good research !!!! DarkSkyWatcher74 2 hours ago Any thoughts? Guy is doing his homework. Def more proof, his video comments backed him up after his retort. Nice. |
ET*Dude (OP) User ID: 25793339 Australia 10/25/2012 02:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's an artifact of the stellarium rendering software - light pollution, fog, atmosphere, whatever. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26248899 I don't think stellarium is going to be showing a planet that no one else in the world knows about. I'm pretty sure the folks who created that program used data that your various astronomers have access to, you know? He never claimed that stellarium was showing anything to do with what you are saying. He was only using stellarium to track the path of the sun and where it rises and sets in regards to Neumayer Station in Antarctica. It was the North facing cam at Neumayer Station that showed the second light source. This one - [link to www.awi.de] The south facing cam (Where the other light source is coming from) is conveniently out of service - [link to www.awi.de] They Come...Destination>Earth...Arrival>>Imminent |
Children of the Atom User ID: 20257839 United States 10/25/2012 02:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26238392 Australia 10/25/2012 02:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26259396 Germany 10/25/2012 02:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
stormer User ID: 26209727 South Africa 10/25/2012 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality420 User ID: 23400173 United States 10/25/2012 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | YouTube uploader claims possible proof of Nibiru/Planet X Quoting: ET*Dude Published on Oct 24, 2012 by tree0fmight This is a follow up to my previous video with Stellarium included showing that although the faint glow may be from our sun, the hard direct light source is coming from an independent source higher in the sky as the sun could not light up the sky as shown at the times shown from Neumayer As our sun is rising another bright star is setting giving the illusion that our sun is giving the glow. [link to www.youtube.com] Video Comments: Good follow up to my concern about a sun setting in the west might cause the glow. You disproved that. Your observation on the shadow is concerns me. First it should not be there. Second its is very defined as if the source is large and bright. Finally it is moving in the wrong direction. OK so what are we to conclude? This is pretty daming to NASA, govt, trolls. MrMexBiker 1 hour ago I thank you for that statement, I always check time and dates with stellarium for Neumayer and when I and using Helioviewer, It slipped my mind to include stellarium in the first video as I was just excited at what I was finding. There has to be a star very close to illuminate the sky bright blue as they show, that shadow should have been stationary even though our suns dim orange glare was moving, it was not bright enough to show that shadow from under the horizon. tree0fmight in reply to MrMexBiker 1 hour ago You are correct I checked your data and the sun is below the horizon in the sequence there could not be a bright blue sky as shown unless there is another light source from higher in the sky. The sky should be a grimy orange color at 14:50 utc through the sequence you show. good research !!!! DarkSkyWatcher74 2 hours ago Any thoughts? My thoughts - I think the uploader, tree0fmight, is very confused and doesn't know how to use his software. Where he is seeing the radome shadow and complaining that it shouldn't be there because the sun has set (according to how he is using Stellarium), is actually showing exactly what should be seen as the sun hasn't set at 15:50-16:00 on 24-Oct. It is about 22° above the horizon directly behind the camera on the radome. He doesn't know how to use Stellarium. Stellarium defaults to use your system clock. His Stellarium is displaying the time as if NeumayerIII were in his time zone. From viewing his Rubetube vid it looks like he is in Mountain Daylight Time or maybe Pacific Daylight. If he's in MDT, he needs to add 6 hours to the time Stellarium is displaying to get UT which is what the images from NeumayerIII are logged as. If he's in PDT, he needs to add 7 hours to Stellarium's time to get UT. These will change to 7 and 8 hours on 4 November. So, when NeumayerIII images are showing the shadow at ~16:00 UT he needs to set Stellarium to 10:00 if he's MDT or 09:00 if he PDT. Then he can look to see if the sun is above the horizon - which it is. He needn't feel badly. This isn't the 1st time a PXtard didn't know how to use their software or make local to UT time corrections. Ninny Lieder has been having that problem for 16 years. What is amazing is that incompetent tyros such as this think they are qualified to "discover" a new, giant planet in the solar system. It's like a 5 year-old telling you they can drive an LMP car and win at Le Mans. BTW - I do know of what I speak re: NeumayerIII: Thread: Neumayer Station III - Moon appearances Aug & Sept. R. Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. — Thomas Jefferson Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action. — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13974494 United States 10/25/2012 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daersoulkeeper User ID: 4665114 United States 10/25/2012 02:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HOPE the real reason most people on this planet are the most ignorant gullible people that have ever lived is a little thing called the TELL-LIE-VISION television when you watch it, you put the I(you) in television and you get tel(i)evision tell lie vision |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14910449 Australia 10/25/2012 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality420 User ID: 23400173 United States 10/25/2012 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it always some rehtard on YouTube who thinks they "uncovered" undeniable proof of something important... Scientists totally missed it, right? And because you spent 15 minutes trolling webcams, you have somehow made a huge discovery. Then, for some unknown reason you have trouble getting more that a couple hundred views... Coincidence? Nope, you're a rehtard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16293101 Wise words for the Rubetube University set. These things are made by 8 year-olds for all you know. Retarded 8 year-olds. R. Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. — Thomas Jefferson Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action. — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26126220 Thailand 10/25/2012 03:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25549261 Sweden 10/25/2012 03:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If there was a second sun/nibiru out there we all would see it. We don't. So it doesn't exist. How stupid must you be to actually believe that a big object like that in the sky can be hidden from us? Be fucking rational. Nibiru is a hoax. End of discussion already. Oh, some scientists and astronomers have died in the past 30 fucking years? I thought they were immortal! Seriously, people die, some are scientists. Stupid fucks. |
Children of the Atom User ID: 20257839 United States 10/25/2012 03:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Children of the Atom User ID: 20257839 United States 10/25/2012 03:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | YouTube uploader claims possible proof of Nibiru/Planet X Quoting: ET*Dude Published on Oct 24, 2012 by tree0fmight This is a follow up to my previous video with Stellarium included showing that although the faint glow may be from our sun, the hard direct light source is coming from an independent source higher in the sky as the sun could not light up the sky as shown at the times shown from Neumayer As our sun is rising another bright star is setting giving the illusion that our sun is giving the glow. [link to www.youtube.com] Video Comments: Good follow up to my concern about a sun setting in the west might cause the glow. You disproved that. Your observation on the shadow is concerns me. First it should not be there. Second its is very defined as if the source is large and bright. Finally it is moving in the wrong direction. OK so what are we to conclude? This is pretty daming to NASA, govt, trolls. MrMexBiker 1 hour ago I thank you for that statement, I always check time and dates with stellarium for Neumayer and when I and using Helioviewer, It slipped my mind to include stellarium in the first video as I was just excited at what I was finding. There has to be a star very close to illuminate the sky bright blue as they show, that shadow should have been stationary even though our suns dim orange glare was moving, it was not bright enough to show that shadow from under the horizon. tree0fmight in reply to MrMexBiker 1 hour ago You are correct I checked your data and the sun is below the horizon in the sequence there could not be a bright blue sky as shown unless there is another light source from higher in the sky. The sky should be a grimy orange color at 14:50 utc through the sequence you show. good research !!!! DarkSkyWatcher74 2 hours ago Any thoughts? My thoughts - I think the uploader, tree0fmight, is very confused and doesn't know how to use his software. Where he is seeing the radome shadow and complaining that it shouldn't be there because the sun has set (according to how he is using Stellarium), is actually showing exactly what should be seen as the sun hasn't set at 15:50-16:00 on 24-Oct. It is about 22° above the horizon directly behind the camera on the radome. He doesn't know how to use Stellarium. Stellarium defaults to use your system clock. His Stellarium is displaying the time as if NeumayerIII were in his time zone. From viewing his Rubetube vid it looks like he is in Mountain Daylight Time or maybe Pacific Daylight. If he's in MDT, he needs to add 6 hours to the time Stellarium is displaying to get UT which is what the images from NeumayerIII are logged as. If he's in PDT, he needs to add 7 hours to Stellarium's time to get UT. These will change to 7 and 8 hours on 4 November. So, when NeumayerIII images are showing the shadow at ~16:00 UT he needs to set Stellarium to 10:00 if he's MDT or 09:00 if he PDT. Then he can look to see if the sun is above the horizon - which it is. He needn't feel badly. This isn't the 1st time a PXtard didn't know how to use their software or make local to UT time corrections. Ninny Lieder has been having that problem for 16 years. What is amazing is that incompetent tyros such as this think they are qualified to "discover" a new, giant planet in the solar system. It's like a 5 year-old telling you they can drive an LMP car and win at Le Mans. BTW - I do know of what I speak re: NeumayerIII: Thread: Neumayer Station III - Moon appearances Aug & Sept. R. |
ET*Dude (OP) User ID: 25793339 Australia 10/25/2012 03:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am awaiting the up-loaders response in regards to Reality420's post. Last Edited by ET*Dude on 10/25/2012 03:30 AM They Come...Destination>Earth...Arrival>>Imminent |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21102572 United States 10/25/2012 03:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6285015 United States 10/25/2012 03:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seven weeks until doomsday. Yet look up at the Sun, do you see Nibiru near it? do you see Nibiru anywhere in the heavens? Surely with only seven weeks to go you would see some kind of object. Seven weeks until all this bs can be put behind us. I can't wait to see where the goalposts are moved to in December. |
Electric wizard User ID: 26264464 United Kingdom 10/25/2012 03:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No proof IMO . I can't see how using computer generated graphics in stellarium proves anything, ever. Also why would nibiru be in stellarium in the first place. As for the shadows i think that's complete conjecture and the videos publisher dosnt understand what he is seeing. Also you can take away the background in stellarium so you could see what that glow is. Took me a while to figure out 'neo mare' perhaps that's a thread in itself. Doom busted |
ET*Dude (OP) User ID: 25793339 Australia 10/25/2012 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1011606 France 10/25/2012 03:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25901896 United States 10/25/2012 03:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26224878 Canada 10/25/2012 03:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality420 User ID: 23400173 United States 10/25/2012 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well - considering he's made this moronic error, I'm betting he'll deny that his Stellarium is set to use his local time. It is Teh Way of teh kOOk. For those interested, use this applet: [link to aa.usno.navy.mil] Enter NeumayerIII location as: Longitude: 08º 16´ W Latitude: 70º 41´S Time Zone: 0 hours Make sure bullets/data are marked for: Object: Sun Year: 2012 Month: October Day: 24 Tab Interval: 10 minutes Then click Compute Table. Notice Sun position at the time: 15:50UT - Alt = 23.0º, Azimuth = 301.7º The US Navy says the sun was up by 23º at 15:50UT. He obviously has the time offset messed up with Stellarium. He'll deny it, but I'm sure the USNO didn't change their web-applet just to agree with me and make him wrong and hide NibbleU. If so, they didn't call me to find out what story I was using to debunk an 8 year-old on Rubetube. <snicker> Maybe he'll surprise me and admit his error... R. Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. — Thomas Jefferson Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action. — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |