Ancient astronaut theory... ask me a question.

Do you have awesomely big hair?

No thats a coon hat.

agreed to all now move along

Big Foot ?

Why do you think the megalith stones were placed at the site in Lebanon? Do you think they are part of a retaining wall or are part of a space port for ancient aliens?

The balbek megalithic stones or however you spell it was the area described in the "Lost book of Enki" as an "airport" if you will.

The "prehuman" fossil record are infact "pre-bigfoots"

Once this is realized.. it means human beings do not have a physical place in the natrual scheme of life on earth.

I recomend Lloyd Pye's book Everything You Know is Wrong.

or his most recent E-book The Intervention Theory Essentials.

Oh you're being serious! Okay do you believe the face on Mars was shaped by the Annunaki and buried Alalu there or is it just a rock per NASA? I have the book of Enki too and love it.

Also would you please recommend some books? I've read garden of eden, a bunch of sitchen books, who built the moon, a couple von daniken books, and I have forbidden archaeology but I'm not sure if beasting through that thing is worth it. Thanks!

double post sorry!

The "face of mars" unfortonaly was proven to be a coincidence of shadows. There are infact features on mars that are most perplexing.

90 degree surfaces and hat looks to be a pharroh statue among other things.

Mars is said to have been Earth like till the species made an artificial "Maharac" vortex. To which they killed their planet, and came to Earth to found Atlantis.

Everything You Know is Wrong by Lloyd Pye.

or his most recent and updated E-book.. "Intervention Theory Essentials"

The Lost Technologies of Ancient Egypt, by Chistopher Dunn.

The Giza Powerplant by chistopher Dunn..

The ancient alien question by Filip Coppens.

and many more. But start with Pye.

Hm that's interesting because I immediately thought of the "face on Mars" when they were describing the burial and carving the face on the rock. Bummer!

Yup I've read that Mars was earth-like too. No idea what a Maharac vortex is I will have to look that up thanks!

Thanks I will look into them soon!

Interesting, and stonehenge, do you know its purpose, Thanking you. Have a great day!

See... Sitchin never knew the aftermath of his books..

while Pye never knew the genesis of his books.

Their work fused to make the ultimate book. Everything You Know if Wrong.

Last Edited by Heretic_333 on 10/28/2012 11:25 PM

Awesome I'm ordering it off Amazon right now. :)

Zecharia Sitchin claimed there are Sumerian texts which tell the story that 50 Anunnaki, inhabitants of a planet named Nibiru, came to Earth approximately 400,000 years ago with the intent of mining raw materials, especially gold, for transport back to Nibiru.

Question:

Why would these ancient astronauts create man for harvesting gold in Africa when California had so much gold it could be gather just at the surface? If they needed gold so bad to repair their atmosphere then why leave such large amounts in California?

Once and for all:

The Book of Enki is a work of fiction BASED on Sitchin's Non-Fiction books of Speculation and Linguistics.

The Book of Enki is not to be quoted or referred to when discussing Ancient Astronaut Theory. It automatically invalidates the cause/point/argument.

Sitchin's biggest mistake, this Book of Enki.

Arg.

Anyone who says Zecharia Sitchin is a fraud or mistaken in his translations of Sumerian texts, or anything in that vein, is busily grinding a heavily worn axe. They base all of their complaints on the fact that in certain key areas of the Sumerian writings, he deviates markedly from the "classical" translations, the vast majority of which were completed before 1947, before the terms "UFO" or "alien" came into common usage.

When the early translators came upon passages that could have been and should have been interpreted the way Sitchin interpreted them, they had no conceivable frame of reference for such terminology. Thus, they shoehorned it to fit into their own restricted world views, and because this nonsense was created by "experts" of that time, modern experts have inevitably been brainwashed by their education process to believe that no other translation is needed, much less preferable.

This intellectual claptrap has become established as the "preferred" and "accepted" translations that critics claim Stichin should have respected and stuck with in the way they are obligated to do. Sitchin rightly jettisoned the nonsense and translated the texts more like they were actually written, calling an alien an alien, so to speak, and this gross offense to modern academic sensibilities is what classic scholars considera sacrilege to their mindset.

I have no doubt that, in the fullness of time, historians will consider Zecharia Sitchin vastly more correct than any mainstream pundit in alive at this moment. Why? Because modern scholars endure years of intense training to consider the work of prior scholars sancrosanct, which turns out a virtual army of close-minded sycophants who, ultimately, will be dismissed as the laughable fools they are.

Lloyd Pyes defense of Sitchin.

The man studied Sumerian for 20+ years.

So you're saying all translators of ancient languages are to be considered as speculators???

Yes it does say that on the back cover I believe. He should have specified the truth from fiction. Then again who knows if anything Sitchen wrote about was true. There's strong evidence that the planet "Nibiru" in that famous Sumerian tablet is actually Saturn and its moons.

Uh-huh.

AWESOME QUESTION!!!

Would it not be auspicious were one of the key players, an eyewitness and one who could
distinguish between Fate and Destiny, to record for posterity the How and Where and When and
Why of it all-the First Things and perhaps the Last Things'
But that is precisely what some of them did do; and foremost among them was the very leader
who had commanded the first group of astronauts!
Scholars and theologians alike now recognize that the biblical tales of Creation, of Adam and
Eve, the Garden of Eden, the Deluge, the Tower of Babel, were based on texts written down
millennia earlier in Mesopotamia, especially by the Sumerians. And they, in turn, clearly stated
that they obtained their knowledge of past events-many from a time before civilizations began,
even before Mankind came to be-from the writings of the Anunnaki ("Those Who from Heaven
to Earth Came")-the "gods" of antiquity.
As a result of a century and a half of archaeological discoveries in the ruins of the ancient
civilizations, especially in the Near East, a great number of such early texts have been found;
the finds have also revealed the extent of missing texts-so-called lost books-which are either
mentioned in discovered texts or are inferred from such texts, or that are known to have
existed because they were cataloged in royal or temple libraries.
1

[link to www.mycuriousbrain.com] -lost book of Enki introduction.

What do you guys make of these?

Im sorry my keyboard doesnt not have the correct accented letter A to spell the word Balbek.

no

You silly sod, I love and adore Sitchin. I refer only to the Book of Enki, which is fiction, and should not be confused with the rest of his work.

What I really want to know is why have all the "gods" abandoned us.

The gold in California throughout time has not come close to the gold in the Abzu and the Eden.

Wasn't "worth it"

They wanted to wipe us out, under the radar, clean up their mess.

But some didnt agree, some were pro life, and seen the capacity of the Adamu.

We will become smarter then them in the future, and we will be what they were not.

All they did was put their brains into a bigfoot about 200K years ago.