Ancient astronaut theory... ask me a question.

They wanted to wipe us out, under the radar, clean up their mess.

But some didnt agree, some were pro life, and seen the capacity of the Adamu.

We will become smarter then them in the future, and we will be what they were not.

All they did was put their brains into a bigfoot about 200K years ago.

How much did you have to pay the narrator of the show? The emphasis on the phrase Ancient Astronaut Theorist

He had to say that hundreds of times. Opera singers get combat pay for stuff like this.

It's ancient "assonauts," actually.

Anyone who says Zecharia Sitchin is a fraud or mistaken in his translations of Sumerian texts, or anything in that vein, is busily grinding a heavily worn axe. They base all of their complaints on the fact that in certain key areas of the Sumerian writings, he deviates markedly from the "classical" translations, the vast majority of which were completed before 1947, before the terms "UFO" or "alien" came into common usage.

When the early translators came upon passages that could have been and should have been interpreted the way Sitchin interpreted them, they had no conceivable frame of reference for such terminology. Thus, they shoehorned it to fit into their own restricted world views, and because this nonsense was created by "experts" of that time, modern experts have inevitably been brainwashed by their education process to believe that no other translation is needed, much less preferable.

This intellectual claptrap has become established as the "preferred" and "accepted" translations that critics claim Stichin should have respected and stuck with in the way they are obligated to do. Sitchin rightly jettisoned the nonsense and translated the texts more like they were actually written, calling an alien an alien, so to speak, and this gross offense to modern academic sensibilities is what classic scholars considera sacrilege to their mindset.

I have no doubt that, in the fullness of time, historians will consider Zecharia Sitchin vastly more correct than any mainstream pundit in alive at this moment. Why? Because modern scholars endure years of intense training to consider the work of prior scholars sancrosanct, which turns out a virtual army of close-minded sycophants who, ultimately, will be dismissed as the laughable fools they are.

Lloyd Pyes defense of Sitchin.

The man studied Sumerian for 20+ years.

So you're saying all translators of ancient languages are to be considered as speculators???

No arguments if stood corrected.

I am a self proclaimed expert in the subject.

Everything You Know is Wrong by Lloyd Pye.

or his most recent and updated E-book.. "Intervention Theory Essentials"

The Lost Technologies of Ancient Egypt, by Chistopher Dunn.

The Giza Powerplant by chistopher Dunn..

The ancient alien question by Filip Coppens.

and many more. But start with Pye.

The Ancient Astronaut Theory i believe is dis info.

Those structure we built many many thousands of years ago by man. A different kind of race a peaceful race who had a different energy source from fossil fuel.

Check out Hanan Pacha stone work, the original builders.

Do you have awesomely big hair?